TRUSTDICE: up to $25 FREE BONUS [NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED] Forum EXCLUSIVE!

[steampunkz]

Nice to see your project promoting using a signature campaign which is  popular to this forum site to promote any project, good luck team hoping your success in the future also bring your players a good games, I know you can do it.

There campaign rules and style is thesame with stakes signature rules, i hope they can recruit good and active members to promote this site.

[Coinbox1]

Can you please, specify about the program Bonus Deposit? Do you suggest a lowering of the wagering amount(x91)?
Thanks a lot for feedback!

Deposit bonus in dice game is not really popular in this bitcoin gambling industry. It reminds me of DuckDice, their wagering requirement was 110x IIRC. Stated as 55x, but for deposit + bonus amount = 110x.
How about yours? Lets say I deposit 0.1btc then get 0.1 bonus, how much I need to wager? 9.1btc or 18.2btc?

when I see a deposit bonus on a cryptocasino , I close the site straight away
if you deposit 0.1 btc and get 0.1 btc bonus you should wager it 91x times so it should be 9.1 btc total
duckdice got  a lot of flak for their deposit bonus , it costed some red trust rating in the end

Yes, we heard a story about Duckdice. It was a lot of talk and drama about their deposit bonus.
Our deposit bonus is finished and users who joined during this time, got good gains. So generally we are agree with you. Games have to be super carefully with this btc deposit promotions. And think twice if games can take this risks.

[Coinbox1]

Nice to see your project promoting using a signature campaign which is  popular to this forum site to promote any project, good luck team hoping your success in the future also bring your players a good games, I know you can do it.

Thank a lot! We also think from Users side, the more BTC dice games appearing the more benefits users will have. Because the competition between these BTC gambling games increases, and it is always beneficial for the end user.

[r1a2y3m4]

How does your faucet works? Is faucet limited to 10 faucets per day? And if your account has at least 1 satoshi can you do faucet?

TrustDice is different than other Gambling games with faucets. You can claim coins from Faucet every 6 hours. Nevermind whether you have BTC on the balance or not. The min. bet is 10 satoshi, so you can easily get Free Spins by claiming BTC from faucet!

Okay, thank you for the reply. I'll try your site using faucet.

I saw that you are now conducting a signature campaign right now but why does it looks like stake and the rules are like the same? Did you ask for steve's permission to this?

[panjul07]

How does your faucet works? Is faucet limited to 10 faucets per day? And if your account has at least 1 satoshi can you do faucet?

TrustDice is different than other Gambling games with faucets. You can claim coins from Faucet every 6 hours. Nevermind whether you have BTC on the balance or not. The min. bet is 10 satoshi, so you can easily get Free Spins by claiming BTC from faucet!

Okay, thank you for the reply. I'll try your site using faucet.

I saw that you are now conducting a signature campaign right now but why does it looks like stake and the rules are like the same? Did you ask for steve's permission to this?

Signature campaign rules are mostly similar one to another, I think there is no need to ask permission. Just look at other available campaigns especially campaigns of gambling site. Most of the rules are similar, the difference is about the payment rate. As long as coinbox is not copying the whole thread then I think it is OK.

[stomachgrowls]

How does your faucet works? Is faucet limited to 10 faucets per day? And if your account has at least 1 satoshi can you do faucet?

TrustDice is different than other Gambling games with faucets. You can claim coins from Faucet every 6 hours. Nevermind whether you have BTC on the balance or not. The min. bet is 10 satoshi, so you can easily get Free Spins by claiming BTC from faucet!

Okay, thank you for the reply. I'll try your site using faucet.

I saw that you are now conducting a signature campaign right now but why does it looks like stake and the rules are like the same? Did you ask for steve's permission to this?

Signature campaign rules are mostly similar one to another, I think there is no need to ask permission. Just look at other available campaigns especially campaigns of gambling site. Most of the rules are similar, the difference is about the payment rate. As long as coinbox is not copying the whole thread then I think it is OK.

True, I've tried to check between Trustdice thread and with Stake, they are really similar but they arent copying the entire thread or template so there no wrong with it and as
said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.
Dividend system on Eos platforms are way too small thats why i lost interest on playing.I'll just stick to the old or basic ones.

[BUK2016]

Nice to see your project promoting using a signature campaign which is  popular to this forum site to promote any project, good luck team hoping your success in the future also bring your players a good games, I know you can do it.

There campaign rules and style is thesame with stakes signature rules, i hope they can recruit good and active members to promote this site.

Personally, don't have any problem with their rules colliding with that of Stake.com. My greatest concern is for them to; be able to employ good promoters for their signature campaign in order to get the message across to the public about their gambling platform. Just checked their platform and find more interesting games on their platform. Wish you and your team success.

[Coinbox1]

Actually, I feel so bad about, but I've translated it with little mistake. This is not Wagering Contest. It's BTC Deposit Bonus promotion. The difference is:
in wagering contest: you deposit money(no bonus and play, wager more than others - you win.
in BTC deposit bonus: you deposit, you get bonus and play, if you met requirement x91 - you take all your money from the balance. If couldn't you can withdraw your deposit(if you didn't spend it). So at the end in this case player don't risk and spend money.

Okay if this is not a wagering contest then it may not increase your traffic because as I know most site will offer this kind of promotion to attract more people here. But you guys made a deposit bonus with of course really huge of wagering requirement so I do not think this will get to the players as well. Other casinos will offer lower than 91x of your deposit. May be you should adjust it to get players first

Are you comparing the wagering requirement with non-dice sites deposit bonus which has around 35-50x wagering requirement but players will only able to wager it on slot games? If no, mind to give me an example of a dice site that offering deposit bonus with lower wagering requirement than this site as I cant even find other dice sites offering deposit bonus (at least most popular dice sites does not offer deposit bonus).

Im actually having the same thing on my mind that there are no current dice sites that do offer deposit bonus exclude into those typical slot games having some 30-50x wager.
Maybe he do mean about those slots thats why saying up 91x is a ridiculous wagering requirement but actually its pretty decent and achievable with dice.

Hey milewilda, I'm late with response I think it depends on player, for some of them wager x91 is a joke. They will do this in a few hours with small amount. We had a few very experienced gamblers who won like this during promotion. And there are some users who think x91 is too big amount and hard to achieve.
All users are right. So we are considering to lower this amount next time.

[Coinbox1]

How does your faucet works? Is faucet limited to 10 faucets per day? And if your account has at least 1 satoshi can you do faucet?

TrustDice is different than other Gambling games with faucets. You can claim coins from Faucet every 6 hours. Nevermind whether you have BTC on the balance or not. The min. bet is 10 satoshi, so you can easily get Free Spins by claiming BTC from faucet!

Okay, thank you for the reply. I'll try your site using faucet.

I saw that you are now conducting a signature campaign right now but why does it looks like stake and the rules are like the same? Did you ask for steve's permission to this?

Signature campaign rules are mostly similar one to another, I think there is no need to ask permission. Just look at other available campaigns especially campaigns of gambling site. Most of the rules are similar, the difference is about the payment rate. As long as coinbox is not copying the whole thread then I think it is OK.

True, I've tried to check between Trustdice thread and with Stake, they are really similar but they arent copying the entire thread or template so there no wrong with it and as
said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.
Dividend system on Eos platforms are way too small thats why i lost interest on playing.I'll just stick to the old or basic ones.

I wonder do some BTC dice games have Dividend system? So far didn't meet one.

[Coinbox1]

Nice to see your project promoting using a signature campaign which is  popular to this forum site to promote any project, good luck team hoping your success in the future also bring your players a good games, I know you can do it.

There campaign rules and style is thesame with stakes signature rules, i hope they can recruit good and active members to promote this site.

Hahah, yeah. It looks similar. When I was writing it, I've checked many signature campaigns and realized Steve's one has quite good and simple explanation.
@SteveStake, if you're reading this, thank you so much. You did great job by writing it. I hope you're fine that I was looking to your campaign as a nice example of how signature campaign can be written

[veleten]

Can you please, specify about the program Bonus Deposit? Do you suggest a lowering of the wagering amount(x91)?
Thanks a lot for feedback!

Deposit bonus in dice game is not really popular in this bitcoin gambling industry. It reminds me of DuckDice, their wagering requirement was 110x IIRC. Stated as 55x, but for deposit + bonus amount = 110x.
How about yours? Lets say I deposit 0.1btc then get 0.1 bonus, how much I need to wager? 9.1btc or 18.2btc?

when I see a deposit bonus on a cryptocasino , I close the site straight away
if you deposit 0.1 btc and get 0.1 btc bonus you should wager it 91x times so it should be 9.1 btc total
duckdice got  a lot of flak for their deposit bonus , it costed some red trust rating in the end

Yes, we heard a story about Duckdice. It was a lot of talk and drama about their deposit bonus.
Our deposit bonus is finished and users who joined during this time, got good gains. So generally we are agree with you. Games have to be super carefully with this btc deposit promotions. And think twice if games can take this risks.

I don't think many cryptocasinos offer wagering bonus nowadays
it is becaus eif the game is provably fair , it will be pretty easy to wager 30-40x the deposit and withdraw
and if the game is rigged the deposit bonus won't help ya and you will lose in the end no matter what
it is very easy to wager on dice , 40x should cost you less than half of the deposit  if you play it right

[veleten]

said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.

Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.

there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of  some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that

[Coinbox1]

said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.

Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.

there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of  some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that

We actually run signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129362.0.
I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.
By the way, what is the usage of Signature campaign on bitcointalk for projects?

[veleten]

said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.

Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.

there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of  some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that

We actually run signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129362.0.
I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.
By the way, what is the usage of Signature campaign on bitcointalk for projects?

as I have mentioned above- it is some kind of a quality mark and branding
to advertise at one of the most popular cryptoforums of the world means alot ( and costs alot too )
gambling sites use signature campaigns to get exposure and gamblers and to show that their brand is financially solid
some have been running such a campaign for years , for example the one I'm wearing
but huge sites and established brands  like Bitsler or Stake can afford it and it is working for them
while the new sites should not expect miracles to happen once they run a signature campaign themselves
it can  be good , it can be not so cost effective or it can also fail dramatically since if the site is not meeting the player's expectations -no adverting would be able to correct this

[Coinbox1]

said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.

Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.

there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of  some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that

We actually run signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129362.0.
I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.
By the way, what is the usage of Signature campaign on bitcointalk for projects?

as I have mentioned above- it is some kind of a quality mark and branding
to advertise at one of the most popular cryptoforums of the world means alot ( and costs alot too )
gambling sites use signature campaigns to get exposure and gamblers and to show that their brand is financially solid
some have been running such a campaign for years , for example the one I'm wearing
but huge sites and established brands  like Bitsler or Stake can afford it and it is working for them
while the new sites should not expect miracles to happen once they run a signature campaign themselves
it can  be good , it can be not so cost effective or it can also fail dramatically since if the site is not meeting the player's expectations -no adverting would be able to correct this

This is very good to know. I also want to believe that it(campaign) brings quality users in the long run. Otherwise, I highly doubt that it's only for branding and quality mark.

[thd26bct]

Well, you should officially state that the Trust Dice campaign already escrowed its funds dedicated for Trust Dice's Signature campaign.

Coinbox1 has asked me to escrow the funds for the campaign. The escrow address is: 3D1ceTrHVrnx1oiN2sr25iq2hEvC54GVAy (Balance: )

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The escrow address for TrustDice's signature campaign is 3D1ceTrHVrnx1oiN2sr25iq2hEvC54GVAy
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
HH+ZdI+JcDqh90sAVnXL/c95HbwWq0oUPt+yhz8xmZnqLjAQqoFqTCOFaPcOGsYXdmKf786HNaHAA8tOSX4UFyA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Note that I am only escrowing the funds (and not managing the campaign).

We actually run signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129362.0.

Most of campaigns do the same. They open campaigns that have first wave lasted for 4 weeks or longer, but after the first wave, they will stop to collect data, and analyse cost-benefit from the campaigns' first waves before deciding to expand the campaign longer to finally stop.
Signature campaigns, in general, will help projects (especially young ones) to catch attention of potential investors or gamblers/ gamers to invest or use sites for gambling/ gaming. If you visit the topic, you can see some campaigns that has continuously run for years.
Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 07-April-2019]

I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.
By the way, what is the usage of Signature campaign on bitcointalk for projects?

[winotwin]

Hi, what is the minimum betting amount in your platform ?

[panjul07]

Hi, what is he minimum betting amount in your platform ?

10 satoshi as per OP post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126117.msg50542180#msg50542180

This is very good to know. I also want to believe that it(campaign) brings quality users in the long run. Otherwise, I highly doubt that it's only for branding and quality mark.

veleten gives you a good point already. Another addition is that you should not rely on signature campaign only as it wont be effective for you.
Signature campaign may brings quality users as well as it may bring you nothing.
As I read, you are doing a test campaign for one week only. To be honest, a one week campaign is not enough to see the result or the effectiveness of a campaign especially if you have no other offers on the site.

[cizatext]

Tristdice is really an interesting gaming site with they latest features such as faucet where you can earn little amount to use in gambling and also they odd is also high.

[winotwin]

Hi, what is he minimum betting amount in your platform ?

10 satoshi as per OP post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126117.msg50542180#msg50542180

This is very good to know. I also want to believe that it(campaign) brings quality users in the long run. Otherwise, I highly doubt that it's only for branding and quality mark.

veleten gives you a good point already. Another addition is that you should not rely on signature campaign only as it wont be effective for you.
Signature campaign may brings quality users as well as it may bring you nothing.
As I read, you are doing a test campaign for one week only. To be honest, a one week campaign is not enough to see the result or the effectiveness of a campaign especially if you have no other offers on the site.

Thank you so much for response !:)