Buy the DIP, and HODL!

[Justbillywitt]

As a newbie or someone that is new to bitcoin investment, your attention should be more focused on accumulating bitcoin with the DCA strategy because it will help you to accumulate bitcoin consistently at any given price and also help to control your emotions since you are not yet used to the volatile part of bitcoin. Since bitcoin is a long-term investment, both investors who are using a lump sum, buying the dip, and the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin need to do that with their discretionary income so that they will comfortably sort out their daily expenses, which will allow them to hold their bitcoin investment for a long term since they didn't use the money that is allocated to solve their daily expenses to invest in bitcoin.

It needs to be underlined that regular purchases are important, with dca or others but can we do it consistently. Many of them fail for many reasons, they no longer have money so they stop accumulating bitcoins.

HOLD requires a method.
Does buying bitcoin require a method, Yes it is very much needed in other words a strategy, but here I prefer DCA so DCA is the best.

This is a long-term investment, so I have highlighted these things the most, or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.

Hope you know that that Emergency fund(s) is not a method of buying bitcoin? Rather it is just a fund you keep aside to help you successfully hold your bitcoin for the desirable number of years.

If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

The emergency funds is not meant for meeting your needs as an investor. The emergency funds are strictly there for any emergency purposes (unforeseen circumstances that may arise in the future). Mind you not everything that are classified under emergency.Your unique needs as you may call it such as feeding, shelter and clothings are not part of emergencies, therefore you don't classify them as emergency. And since they ain't part of emergencies, you don't use your emergency funds to solve them. As an investor you don't depend on your emergency funds to solve your unique needs, because your unique or basic needs doesn't fall under emergency situation.

Severe accidents, the roof of your house falling off by winds or part of your house being damaged by earthquake, fire burning down your house, chronic health challenge, floods etc. These and many for more are what are classified under emergencies. Things you don't have control over, but it happens. When things of this nature happens, only then can you make use of your emergency funds.

[Fara Chan]

Inasmuch as most investors that are financially capable may likely be nterested in buying Bitcoin at once than buying by parts I still believe there is still need to know the best strategies that will be more favourable because if one is equip with the right information it gives more confident and determination to make more significant investment.
DCA strategies is more leverage to accumulate Bitcoin and I think most investor will consider it more preferable.

Buying Bitcoin all at once in large or large amounts is also not a problem for investors or companies who have a lot of money and I have also seen this in several investment companies that are very brave to do this, for example, like Blackrock and Microstrategy today where they very often buy Bitcoin in large quantities and the DCA they do is also in larger amounts rather than in smaller accumulations like investors who only have limited capital. However, what you need to understand here is that a strategy like DCA is not bad at all even though the amount of Bitcoin purchases can still vary greatly for each person because it is also always adjusted to our respective abilities.

[JayJuanGee]

Inasmuch as most investors that are financially capable may likely be nterested in buying Bitcoin at once than buying by parts I still believe there is still need to know the best strategies that will be more favourable because if one is equip with the right information it gives more confident and determination to make more significant investment.
DCA strategies is more leverage to accumulate Bitcoin and I think most investor will consider it more preferable.

Buying Bitcoin all at once in large or large amounts is also not a problem for investors or companies who have a lot of money and I have also seen this in several investment companies that are very brave to do this, for example, like Blackrock and Microstrategy today where they very often buy Bitcoin in large quantities and the DCA they do is also in larger amounts rather than in smaller accumulations like investors who only have limited capital. However, what you need to understand here is that a strategy like DCA is not bad at all even though the amount of Bitcoin purchases can still vary greatly for each person because it is also always adjusted to our respective abilities.

Blackrock buys bitcoin on behalf of clients who had purchased Spot BTC ETFs. 

Sure, blackrock owns the keys, but they have legal obligations to clients.

MSTR structures its financial products in ways that they BTC are not encumbered, even though they tend to promise (repeatedly) that they are never selling.. ]

There are similarities yet differences, and surely if we are talking about individual strategies then we have to consider cashflows and perhaps other investments that they might have and I suppose your mentioning of companies is because you are wanting to show examples in which lump sum might be used rather than DCA, which is fair enough, and surely anyone who has lump sum available may well choose to lump sum rather than DCA, yet even if they have a lump sum they still might spread their entry over a few weeks rather than buying everything at once, even if they might get into their target allocation position in a relatively front-loading kind of a manner.

[SuperBitMan]

[edited out]

You are very wrong here, using lump sum to accumulate a huge amount of Bitcoin at once is not a bad strategy and will not affect your financial status except you don't have the financial strength to use the amount you used in accumulating it, there are some set of people they see DCA strategy as stress to them because of there busy schedule so they just buy at once and hold and I see nothing wrong with that, for example someone decides to use $2millon to $5million or even more to accumulate at once using the lump sum strategy and then hold it for 10 to 20 years, do you think he won't be successful in that his Bitcoin investment.
Some set of people in this thread only believe the best strategy for Bitcoin investment is DCA strategy forgetting that humans are different and that is how there financial strength, time and the rest is different what may go down well with you may not with someone else.
@sotelorene saying in his write up that buying Bitcoin at once may affect your financial status without proper explanation is missing leading, yes DCA strategy is good so also lump sum strategy, what matters is if such strategy will be comfortable for you.

Can you try to be more realistic with your examples?

Do you think that most normal people have $2 to 4 million sitting around to invest?

Try to share more realistic examples, and yeah sure there are some folks that have lump sum amounts available.. either they have the amount that comes to them suddenly, or they can draw the lump sum amounts from other locations (investments that they have).

I would suggest that even someone who might have investments into other things, they are frequently not going to want to cash out of their other investment and put that into bitcoin, even though surely there could be some cases in which they will make that kind of a choice.

Giving more realistic examples will be helpful, even though your overall point about lump sum investing into bitcoin surely is not a bad one, since DCA and lump sum might not even be very different from one another, since many times folks will DCA into bitcoin with as much extra money that they have available.. so they are not necessarily purposefully slowing down their investment into bitcoin, so if a person has a lump sum amount that either comes available or that they can make come available, it may be reasonable for them to buy bitcoin right way with that amount rather than delaying with DCA or even with buying on dip, even though surely someone who has a lump sum come available to them will tend to have more options than a person who is completely relying upon any extra cashflow that they might get from their regular income to buy bitcoin.

I used that example in other to make it more understandable, it may not be a realistic example for you but there are people accumulating with even more than that amount I mentioned and yeah normal people may not have such amount to buy at once and I don't remember mentioning normal people in my example we all know that a normal person can't invest with such amount because he or she won't have it, I'm talking about rich people who has such amount of money and wants to use it to invest in Bitcoin.

Yeah you are right some people may find it hard to cash out from there other investment to invest in Bitcoin and the reason may be because that invest is there source of income so using DCA strategy will be more better for them, because if you cash out from your other investment and then use it to buy Bitcoin at once knowing fully well that's your source of income, you will one day deep has into your Bitcoin investment to settle bills, the money you should use for a lump sum is money that won't affect your financial status if been removed, it may be easier to cash out from your investment when you have many investment and may decide to do so with 1.

I never realized that I over pointed on lump sum strategy, however you are very correct sir JJG when you said DCA and lump sum might not even be very different from one another, one is buying bit by bit and the other is buying at once there two are now holding is really not very different but there's a little different.

[Jewan420]

or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.
If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

You are misinterpreting emergency fund. Any type of fund is not an investment strategy. You can call emergency fund or other funds together as backup fund. Backup fund is the protection of long-term investments. Just as every asset needs protection, investment needs protection. Emergency fund is a strategy for protecting investments. It is essential to have emergency fund or necessary backup funds ready to succeed in long-term investment.

Even in the use of emergency fund, you are ignorant or wrongly defined. Emergency fund is only for emergency moments. Emergency moments are like: 1) Unexpected accident of you or any member of your family or accident of someone for whom you have responsibility or duty. 2) You or someone in your charge getting sick (arrange medical treatment). Especially these two situations are considered as emergency moments. You can consider some other necessary moments along with emergencies like: getting fired from your job suddenly, helping your close friend in distress, buying something that you need urgently. However, you can consider these along with the reserve fund. If you are not able to meet these needs with the reserve fund, then you can consider meeting these needs with the emergency fund. You should keep various backup funds ready as per the need and use the funds according to the plan. Using the emergency fund only to meet the needs will not be the right thing to do.

[Mayor of ogba]

As a newbie or someone that is new to bitcoin investment, your attention should be more focused on accumulating bitcoin with the DCA strategy because it will help you to accumulate bitcoin consistently at any given price and also help to control your emotions since you are not yet used to the volatile part of bitcoin. Since bitcoin is a long-term investment, both investors who are using a lump sum, buying the dip, and the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin need to do that with their discretionary income so that they will comfortably sort out their daily expenses, which will allow them to hold their bitcoin investment for a long term since they didn't use the money that is allocated to solve their daily expenses to invest in bitcoin.

It needs to be underlined that regular purchases are important, with dca or others but can we do it consistently. Many of them fail for many reasons, they no longer have money so they stop accumulating bitcoins.

HOLD requires a method.
Does buying bitcoin require a method, Yes it is very much needed in other words a strategy, but here I prefer DCA so DCA is the best.

Those who will hold Bitcoin in the DCA method will definitely be able to invest in Bitcoin with the remaining money left over after excluding the family or its basic expenses. That is why I say that the most important thing to focus on in long-term Bitcoin holding is to meet the needs of money.
This is a long-term investment, so I have highlighted these things the most, or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.
If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

You are getting the concept of the DCA strategy and emergency fund wrong. An emergency fund is not a strategy for accumulating bitcoin; it is the money you set aside when you are investing in bitcoin that will help you to solve your unforeseen problems anytime they arise. For instance, if you are investing in bitcoin and suddenly your car broke down, you will use your emergency fund to fix or repair your car since it is an unexpected problem and it's part of your daily expenses. You are wrong. If you are using the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin, you can only fail in your investment if you use all your money to invest in bitcoin or if you use the money that is meant to solve your daily expenses and invest in bitcoin, and your daily expenses arise, you have no choice but to depend on your bitcoin investment to survive.

[tiCeR]

Inasmuch as most investors that are financially capable may likely be nterested in buying Bitcoin at once than buying by parts I still believe there is still need to know the best strategies that will be more favourable because if one is equip with the right information it gives more confident and determination to make more significant investment.
DCA strategies is more leverage to accumulate Bitcoin and I think most investor will consider it more preferable.

Buying Bitcoin all at once in large or large amounts is also not a problem for investors or companies who have a lot of money and I have also seen this in several investment companies that are very brave to do this, for example, like Blackrock and Microstrategy today where they very often buy Bitcoin in large quantities and the DCA they do is also in larger amounts rather than in smaller accumulations like investors who only have limited capital. However, what you need to understand here is that a strategy like DCA is not bad at all even though the amount of Bitcoin purchases can still vary greatly for each person because it is also always adjusted to our respective abilities.

Blackrock buys bitcoin on behalf of clients who had purchased Spot BTC ETFs. 

Sure, blackrock owns the keys, but they have legal obligations to clients.

MSTR structures its financial products in ways that they BTC are not encumbered, even though they tend to promise (repeatedly) that they are never selling.. ]

There are similarities yet differences, and surely if we are talking about individual strategies then we have to consider cashflows and perhaps other investments that they might have and I suppose your mentioning of companies is because you are wanting to show examples in which lump sum might be used rather than DCA, which is fair enough, and surely anyone who has lump sum available may well choose to lump sum rather than DCA, yet even if they have a lump sum they still might spread their entry over a few weeks rather than buying everything at once, even if they might get into their target allocation position in a relatively front-loading kind of a manner.

Which to a certain degree is good for bitcoin because as far as I understand, Blackrock is obliged to have 100% of their sold derivatives covered, which means there is no thin air gap in what they sell to their clients and what they have to have under their control. At some point I thought that these companies have some scope, which allows them to only hold like 50% or something and that could have led to systemic problems and potential fire sales. Then again Blackrock is unlikely to get into trouble if bitcoin doesn't perform well even if these gaps/leverage were allowed. But as I said, I think it isn't.

MSTR is an interesting case that is difficult to assess if you don't take the time to have a closer look at their balance sheet and how they have structured all the financials. It is complicated because they have set up a huge toolbox, but so far Saylor has been using it in a way that makes sure the balance is kept. While I can't verify this at first glance, here is a quote from someone that I think could be about right:

“But if you really study his balance sheet, he has long, long-term debt, and he has rolling long-term debt. You’d have to have a systemic collapse in Bitcoin, and you’d have it to last six or seven years to flash him out.”

The various tools with varying durations, convertibles etc. gives enough runway to survive for a long time even if bitcoin goes through prolonged bad times. Now there is still some concern as to why MSTR is trading at market cap 3x its BTC holdings. But I think this has mostly to do with the vision that Saylor presented (first global bitcoin bank) and the fact that the current holdings give MSTR a huge competitive advantage for future endeavors. In order to a bitcoin bank, a certain amount of BTC is necessary and if any other company would like to compete with MSTR, they would first have to acquire a lot of BTC, which MSTR has already done. Competitors would make MSTR stronger while they try to become more competitive themselves as there are only so many bitcoin.

Here it is well explained how MSTR trading at a premium in relation to its BTC holdings plays out.

"Think about it like this: if MicroStrategy holds ~$30 billion in bitcoin and the company’s worth ~$100 billion, by issuing $1 billion in convertible debt (or equity) to buy bitcoin, its bitcoin holdings increase by ~3% while equity is only diluted by ~1%. Buying pressure sends the price of bitcoin higher, MicroStrategy’s stock continues to increase as bitcoin grows more valuable, and the cycle repeats."

[GIF-JOBS]

As a newbie or someone that is new to bitcoin investment, your attention should be more focused on accumulating bitcoin with the DCA strategy because it will help you to accumulate bitcoin consistently at any given price and also help to control your emotions since you are not yet used to the volatile part of bitcoin. Since bitcoin is a long-term investment, both investors who are using a lump sum, buying the dip, and the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin need to do that with their discretionary income so that they will comfortably sort out their daily expenses, which will allow them to hold their bitcoin investment for a long term since they didn't use the money that is allocated to solve their daily expenses to invest in bitcoin.

It needs to be underlined that regular purchases are important, with dca or others but can we do it consistently. Many of them fail for many reasons, they no longer have money so they stop accumulating bitcoins.

HOLD requires a method.
Does buying bitcoin require a method, Yes it is very much needed in other words a strategy, but here I prefer DCA so DCA is the best.

Those who will hold Bitcoin in the DCA method will definitely be able to invest in Bitcoin with the remaining money left over after excluding the family or its basic expenses. That is why I say that the most important thing to focus on in long-term Bitcoin holding is to meet the needs of money.
This is a long-term investment, so I have highlighted these things the most, or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.
If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

You are getting the concept of the DCA strategy and emergency funds wrong. An emergency fund is not a strategy for accumulating bitcoin; it is the money you set aside when you are investing in bitcoin that will help you to solve your unforeseen problems anytime they arise. For instance, if you are investing in bitcoin and suddenly your car broke down, you will use your emergency fund to fix or repair your car since it is an unexpected problem and it's part of your daily expenses. You are wrong. If you are using the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin, you can only fail in your investment if you use all your money to invest in bitcoin or if you use the money that is meant to solve your daily expenses and invest in bitcoin, and your daily expenses arise, you have no choice but to depend on your bitcoin investment to survive.

Yes, the funds that need to be kept ready when running a DCA should not be confused, An emergency fund is primarily set aside to deal with unexpected financial problems, you cannot use this fund to buy Bitcoin DIP. If an investor really wants to buy Bitcoin DIP, he can keep a reserve fund in addition to the emergency fund, with which he can buy DIP, but the emergency fund should be used only for unexpected things, such as car or house repairs, or emergency health expenses, or to deal with any family problems.

And it should be remembered that DCA should be invested using excess money, not from money that is needed for daily expenses or emergency funds. And to achieve success from DCA, an investor should continue to invest in DCA continuously for 8 to 10 years, because Bitcoin is a long-term potential currency, short-term profits can never be expected from Bitcoin. This is why you should run a DCA with your extra income in a disciplined manner, and use your emergency fund for unexpected expenses, and for buying DIPs keep a reserve fund ready.

[Futurexxx]

As a newbie or someone that is new to bitcoin investment, your attention should be more focused on accumulating bitcoin with the DCA strategy because it will help you to accumulate bitcoin consistently at any given price and also help to control your emotions since you are not yet used to the volatile part of bitcoin. Since bitcoin is a long-term investment, both investors who are using a lump sum, buying the dip, and the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin need to do that with their discretionary income so that they will comfortably sort out their daily expenses, which will allow them to hold their bitcoin investment for a long term since they didn't use the money that is allocated to solve their daily expenses to invest in bitcoin.

It needs to be underlined that regular purchases are important, with dca or others but can we do it consistently. Many of them fail for many reasons, they no longer have money so they stop accumulating bitcoins.

HOLD requires a method.
Does buying bitcoin require a method, Yes it is very much needed in other words a strategy, but here I prefer DCA so DCA is the best.

This is a long-term investment, so I have highlighted these things the most, or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.
If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

Most of what you wrote down here are very confusing and difficult to understand, but I just want to talk about this your last statement here, you aren't saying it right, but I know what you are trying to say, anyone that fails to buy Bitcoin when necessary is either procrastinating or they don't have the resources to do so, not being lazy as you claimed.
And the most important thing you really need to understand about this whole Bitcoin investment of a thing is that, in all you do, having an emergency funds and a discretionary income is very much key, because that's what will prevent you from tempering with your holdings in the future.
Though your mean of accumulation will determine how huge your stash of Bitcoin will be but holding and not tempering with it is the most important thing after buying, but the survival of your Bitcoin investment depends on you having an emergency funds and a decretionary income in place .

[Samlucky O]

You are very correct. It's a wise decision for a person that have a lump sum amount to accumulate Bitcoin as much as possible without delay because Bitcoin is very volatile and while delaying and still contemplating on DCA or waiting for the price to dip before buying the price may skyrocket beyond the person budget.

Surely I agree with you that if a person has money to lump sum once at go, he should invest it fast as possible without hesitation but that does not mean that Bitcoin will outgrown the impossibility of buying according to your Budget. Of course that is a misinformation, Bitcoin nature permit any one to buy according to their budget. For example if 1 Bitcoin today is $100k and you have $100k to buy 1 Bitcoin but due to procrastinatination you somehow waited for Bitcoin to increase to $120k surely you will not be able to buy 1 Bitcoin $100k, you will be able to afford 0.833BTC with $100k and not 1 or 0.99BTC. So surely Bitcoin is affordable with any amount you have but not less than $5.

[PremiumcryptoHub]

Buying Bitcoin all at once in large or large amounts is also not a problem for investors or companies who have a lot of money and I have also seen this in several investment companies that are very brave to do this, for example, like Blackrock and Microstrategy today where they very often buy Bitcoin in large quantities and the DCA they do is also in larger amounts rather than in smaller accumulations like investors who only have limited capital. However, what you need to understand here is that a strategy like DCA is not bad at all even though the amount of Bitcoin purchases can still vary greatly for each person because it is also always adjusted to our respective abilities.

These two companies mentioned by you have huge amount of money but they are adopting DCA in investment. Maybe this company has a lot of money with which they buy a lot of bitcoins at once but they are constantly buying Bitcoin. They sometimes buy more bitcoins and sometimes they buy less bitcoins. MicroStrategy recently announced that they will raise another two billion in capital to purchase Bitcoin. They are currently buying small amounts of bitcoins but their goal is to buy bitcoins regularly.

Every investor should buy Bitcoin regularly and hold their investment for a long time, just as these companies regularly buy Bitcoin. If someone has the money to buy more bitcoins then he will buy more bitcoins and if someone has the money to buy less bitcoins then he will buy less bitcoins. Still he should buy bitcoins regularly.

[Obim34]

You are very correct. It's a wise decision for a person that have a lump sum amount to accumulate Bitcoin as much as possible without delay because Bitcoin is very volatile and while delaying and still contemplating on DCA or waiting for the price to dip before buying the price may skyrocket beyond the person budget.

Surely I agree with you that if a person has money to lump sum once at go, he should invest it fast as possible without hesitation but that does not mean that Bitcoin will outgrown the impossibility of buying according to your Budget. Of course that is a misinformation, Bitcoin nature permit any one to buy according to their budget. For example if 1 Bitcoin today is $100k and you have $100k to buy 1 Bitcoin but due to procrastinatination you somehow waited for Bitcoin to increase to $120k surely you will not be able to buy 1 Bitcoin $100k, you will be able to afford 0.833BTC with $100k and not 1 or 0.99BTC. So surely Bitcoin is affordable with any amount you have but not less than $5.

Yes, Bitcoin volatility rate is high with no exception to how the price might increase, still we should have in mind that same way the price have the possibility of increasing while holding funds to lump sum, the price of Bitcoin might also decide to fall below giving the investor an opportunity to invest and hold more portions of Bitcoin using that same amount. Delays with funds can positively or negative affect the impact of our portfolio, purchasing at a high price or even lower.
1 Bitcoin = $100K (At when due)

0.83 Bitcoin = $100K  (When the price of Bitcoin increase)

1.2 Bitcoin = $100K (By time the price of Bitcoin reduces)

For those who do not want to make use of the DCA approach and love to implement the lump sum method should consider proper timing, not procrastination or delay understanding the market and knowing when to buy with the consciousness of holding for a long term.

[Uhwuchukwu53]

Buying Bitcoin all at once in large or large amounts is also not a problem for investors or companies who have a lot of money and I have also seen this in several investment companies that are very brave to do this, for example, like Blackrock and Microstrategy today where they very often buy Bitcoin in large quantities and the DCA they do is also in larger amounts rather than in smaller accumulations like investors who only have limited capital. However, what you need to understand here is that a strategy like DCA is not bad at all even though the amount of Bitcoin purchases can still vary greatly for each person because it is also always adjusted to our respective abilities.

These two companies mentioned by you have huge amount of money but they are adopting DCA in investment. Maybe this company has a lot of money with which they buy a lot of bitcoins at once but they are constantly buying Bitcoin. They sometimes buy more bitcoins and sometimes they buy less bitcoins. MicroStrategy recently announced that they will raise another two billion in capital to purchase Bitcoin. They are currently buying small amounts of bitcoins but their goal is to buy bitcoins regularly.

Every investor should buy Bitcoin regularly and hold their investment for a long time, just as these companies regularly buy Bitcoin. If someone has the money to buy more bitcoins then he will buy more bitcoins and if someone has the money to buy less bitcoins then he will buy less bitcoins. Still he should buy bitcoins regularly.

There is no much to puzzle on this, right from time to time the direction to accumulate Bitcoin has always accord on this buying gradually if you can't afford lumps sum that most people felt it's those that have money that invest in Bitcoin, the DCA strategy which has given room to all kind of investor  even the so called lumps some required investor to to keep accumulating while holding for long time in order to get a good profit at the appreciate time because this regular buying or accumulating for me can covers some lapse most the one investor buys when there is ATH because the investor keeps buying regularly he can also buy at a period of ATL when the dip is experience and both situation can be merge to attain the required profit when the actual holding period is put in place.

[adultcrypto]

These two companies mentioned by you have huge amount of money but they are adopting DCA in investment. Maybe this company has a lot of money with which they buy a lot of bitcoins at once but they are constantly buying Bitcoin. They sometimes buy more bitcoins and sometimes they buy less bitcoins. MicroStrategy recently announced that they will raise another two billion in capital to purchase Bitcoin. They are currently buying small amounts of bitcoins but their goal is to buy bitcoins regularly.

Every investor should buy Bitcoin regularly and hold their investment for a long time, just as these companies regularly buy Bitcoin. If someone has the money to buy more bitcoins then he will buy more bitcoins and if someone has the money to buy less bitcoins then he will buy less bitcoins. Still he should buy bitcoins regularly.

The
There is no much to puzzle on this, right from time to time the direction to accumulate Bitcoin has always accord on this buying gradually if you can't afford lumps sum that most people felt it's those that have money that invest in Bitcoin, the DCA strategy which has given room to all kind of investor  even the so called lumps some required investor to to keep accumulating while holding for long time in order to get a good profit at the appreciate time because this regular buying or accumulating for me can covers some lapse most the one investor buys when there is ATH because the investor keeps buying regularly he can also buy at a period of ATL when the dip is experience and both situation can be merge to attain the required profit when the actual holding period is put in place.

First and foremost,  there is no method of buying bitcoin that is reserved for the poor or the rich, anyone can use any method to buy. It is very wrong when we make it look as if the DCA method is for the poor while lump sum buy is for the rich, such notion is wrong and misleading. The method of buying is just an individual thing which depends on what the individual is comfortable with and if we put forward this idea of DCA for the poor and lump sum for the rich, there could be people who have small discretionary income and who would prefer just putting them into bitcoin but might be discouraged thinking the money is too small. This will cost them the opportunity of getting started since they don't know that even lump sum can be made with small amount of money.

DCA method is no doubt a great method of going about Bitcoin investment but other methods can still be used to achieve similar results as the DCA method and even a combined method of DCA and lump sum can even be better depending on the market condition.

[Sim_card]

These two companies mentioned by you have huge amount of money but they are adopting DCA in investment. Maybe this company has a lot of money with which they buy a lot of bitcoins at once but they are constantly buying Bitcoin. They sometimes buy more bitcoins and sometimes they buy less bitcoins. MicroStrategy recently announced that they will raise another two billion in capital to purchase Bitcoin. They are currently buying small amounts of bitcoins but their goal is to buy bitcoins regularly.

Every investor should buy Bitcoin regularly and hold their investment for a long time, just as these companies regularly buy Bitcoin. If someone has the money to buy more bitcoins then he will buy more bitcoins and if someone has the money to buy less bitcoins then he will buy less bitcoins. Still he should buy bitcoins regularly.

The
There is no much to puzzle on this, right from time to time the direction to accumulate Bitcoin has always accord on this buying gradually if you can't afford lumps sum that most people felt it's those that have money that invest in Bitcoin, the DCA strategy which has given room to all kind of investor  even the so called lumps some required investor to to keep accumulating while holding for long time in order to get a good profit at the appreciate time because this regular buying or accumulating for me can covers some lapse most the one investor buys when there is ATH because the investor keeps buying regularly he can also buy at a period of ATL when the dip is experience and both situation can be merge to attain the required profit when the actual holding period is put in place.

First and foremost,  there is no method of buying bitcoin that is reserved for the poor or the rich, anyone can use any method to buy. It is very wrong when we make it look as if the DCA method is for the poor while lump sum buy is for the rich, such notion is wrong and misleading. The method of buying is just an individual thing which depends on what the individual is comfortable with and if we put forward this idea of DCA for the poor and lump sum for the rich, there could be people who have small discretionary income and who would prefer just putting them into bitcoin but might be discouraged thinking the money is too small. This will cost them the opportunity of getting started since they don't know that even lump sum can be made with small amount of money.

DCA method is no doubt a great method of going about Bitcoin investment but other methods can still be used to achieve similar results as the DCA method and even a combined method of DCA and lump sum can even be better depending on the market condition.

Of course, lump sum doesn't really mean a big amount of money its just buying all in one strategy, which a poor bitcoin investor can also do if he has extra cash from work or as bonus since he doesn't have any plan for the money. It's just that it is good that brand new investor keep his bitcoin investment ongoing overtime so that he can be building and growing his portfolio bit by bit and that's where the DCA strategy comes to play because it's flexible enough for anyone to accumulate easily and it disciplines the investor on how to manage his finances properly.

No method is not helpful or bad but it depends on the strength of your cash inflow, the level of your bitcoin portfolio and how long you have being accumulating bitcoin. However, using all three strategies is good but you need to know prepare for it and know the right to use them to avoid miscalculation that will lead to reducing the size of your bitcoin portfolio. Because that's the most important thing when building your bitcoin portfolio only to keep adding without reduction

[qurbanshah02]

There are example of different people that you have said that some people have so much money because there are some people who have put some money to add to their everyday money.   These are example of people and there are some people who have multiple investments and get money from other places, these are examples of such people.

Many times if someone is brand new to bitcoin and they have a lump sum that is of a considerable size (perhaps anything greater than $20k), they likely are already going to have had some practice with other investments, since it is not very common that folks are going to want keep very much money in cash, even though surely there could be some cash equivalent products that they might invest into, even bonds or interest bearing cash-like instruments.

And surely the kinds of an investments a person has and their investment experiences could affect whether and how they might get into bitcoin, and sometimes they still might want to be careful regarding how they might get out of some other investments (unless the investments are cash-like), and it is difficult to know in advance how they might want to ease out of one investment and into bitcoin, if that is how they choose to proceed.

I have seen many people who want to invest in Bitcoin but they are afraid of how they will compensate if they go into loss. Although this is a silly question and it should be because it is new people who are afraid to invest in Bitcoin. These are people who don't have money they will tell everything and those who have will mention their household expenses when they are not seen. Usury and these other things are forbidden and it is better to manage the expenses of the house by doing hard work.

Yes, if his investment is high and his variety is also high, then he must invest in bitcoin because if he spends money in it once, he has many investment varieties 10 bitcoin profit will be given. He can earn money with peace of mind and will not care about other tasks. Such people run after little money, they have no intelligence, because of which they do not have the courage to do any great work, that is why they live a middle life in the world.

These are the people who have no idea about the value of Bitcoin. 

Even if they are new to bitcoin, we might not want to presume that they don't know anything about bitcoin, to the extent that their knowledge of bitcoin as compared to their knowledge of other places that they might have (or they might consider putting their value) might affect whether and if so how to get into bitcoin

If we want to understand Bitcoin anew it is our duty to understand them. If they know about Bitcoin they want to know how to trade in it then it is also our duty to explain it to them properly. Because this will give us a commission gain but the next loss will be 100k$ which is the current price of Bitcoin. So for that they start with small coin first which won't make any difference if they lose.

[bitzizzix]

As a newbie or someone that is new to bitcoin investment, your attention should be more focused on accumulating bitcoin with the DCA strategy because it will help you to accumulate bitcoin consistently at any given price and also help to control your emotions since you are not yet used to the volatile part of bitcoin. Since bitcoin is a long-term investment, both investors who are using a lump sum, buying the dip, and the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin need to do that with their discretionary income so that they will comfortably sort out their daily expenses, which will allow them to hold their bitcoin investment for a long term since they didn't use the money that is allocated to solve their daily expenses to invest in bitcoin.

It needs to be underlined that regular purchases are important, with dca or others but can we do it consistently. Many of them fail for many reasons, they no longer have money so they stop accumulating bitcoins.

HOLD requires a method.
Does buying bitcoin require a method, Yes it is very much needed in other words a strategy, but here I prefer DCA so DCA is the best.

Those who will hold Bitcoin in the DCA method will definitely be able to invest in Bitcoin with the remaining money left over after excluding the family or its basic expenses. That is why I say that the most important thing to focus on in long-term Bitcoin holding is to meet the needs of money.
This is a long-term investment, so I have highlighted these things the most, or you can follow another method, which is an emergency fund.
If you have an emergency fund, you can meet your unique needs in the future, then you don't have to worry about investing in Bitcoin. Some people fail in the Bitcoin DC method only because they are lazy in using their strategies.

You are getting the concept of the DCA strategy and emergency fund wrong. An emergency fund is not a strategy for accumulating bitcoin; it is the money you set aside when you are investing in bitcoin that will help you to solve your unforeseen problems anytime they arise. For instance, if you are investing in bitcoin and suddenly your car broke down, you will use your emergency fund to fix or repair your car since it is an unexpected problem and it's part of your daily expenses. You are wrong. If you are using the DCA strategy to accumulate bitcoin, you can only fail in your investment if you use all your money to invest in bitcoin or if you use the money that is meant to solve your daily expenses and invest in bitcoin, and your daily expenses arise, you have no choice but to depend on your bitcoin investment to survive.

It is clear that emergency funds are important and serve to deal with unexpected events and use emergency funds to overcome them without having to change or use the DCA investment that you make periodically, therefore it is very important for us to set aside money for both interests without having to interfere with each other. And all of that must also be adjusted to your abilities and income, and if that is not enough and you have serious intentions for your life journey and also your future, you should try or find additional income so that you can run everything well including your important needs because if that is not done, most likely in the middle of the road both will be neglected even very reluctantly you have to use your Bitcoin which should not happen because we will never know what will happen in our life journey, therefore emergency funds are very important and investment is also more important and both must run well.

[Uhwuchukwu53]

These two companies mentioned by you have huge amount of money but they are adopting DCA in investment. Maybe this company has a lot of money with which they buy a lot of bitcoins at once but they are constantly buying Bitcoin. They sometimes buy more bitcoins and sometimes they buy less bitcoins. MicroStrategy recently announced that they will raise another two billion in capital to purchase Bitcoin. They are currently buying small amounts of bitcoins but their goal is to buy bitcoins regularly.

Every investor should buy Bitcoin regularly and hold their investment for a long time, just as these companies regularly buy Bitcoin. If someone has the money to buy more bitcoins then he will buy more bitcoins and if someone has the money to buy less bitcoins then he will buy less bitcoins. Still he should buy bitcoins regularly.

The
There is no much to puzzle on this, right from time to time the direction to accumulate Bitcoin has always accord on this buying gradually if you can't afford lumps sum that most people felt it's those that have money that invest in Bitcoin, the DCA strategy which has given room to all kind of investor  even the so called lumps some required investor to to keep accumulating while holding for long time in order to get a good profit at the appreciate time because this regular buying or accumulating for me can covers some lapse most the one investor buys when there is ATH because the investor keeps buying regularly he can also buy at a period of ATL when the dip is experience and both situation can be merge to attain the required profit when the actual holding period is put in place.

First and foremost,  there is no method of buying bitcoin that is reserved for the poor or the rich, anyone can use any method to buy. It is very wrong when we make it look as if the DCA method is for the poor while lump sum buy is for the rich, such notion is wrong and misleading. The method of buying is just an individual thing which depends on what the individual is comfortable with and if we put forward this idea of DCA for the poor and lump sum for the rich, there could be people who have small discretionary income and who would prefer just putting them into bitcoin but might be discouraged thinking the money is too small. This will cost them the opportunity of getting started since they don't know that even lump sum can be made with small amount of money.

DCA method is no doubt a great method of going about Bitcoin investment but other methods can still be used to achieve similar results as the DCA method and even a combined method of DCA and lump sum can even be better depending on the market condition.

Of course, lump sum doesn't really mean a big amount of money its just buying all in one strategy, which a poor bitcoin investor can also do if he has extra cash from work or as bonus since he doesn't have any plan for the money. It's just that it is good that brand new investor keep his bitcoin investment ongoing overtime so that he can be building and growing his portfolio bit by bit and that's where the DCA strategy comes to play because it's flexible enough for anyone to accumulate easily and it disciplines the investor on how to manage his finances properly.

No method is not helpful or bad but it depends on the strength of your cash inflow, the level of your bitcoin portfolio and how long you have being accumulating bitcoin. However, using all three strategies is good but you need to know prepare for it and know the right to use them to avoid miscalculation that will lead to reducing the size of your bitcoin portfolio. Because that's the most important thing when building your bitcoin portfolio only to keep adding without reduction

Well I stand to be corrected but view your understanding over my post as misconception on discribing the lumps sum, there smaller investor who can't buy at once because they consider the lumps sum as huge investment in trying to buy once but using the DCA where one can buy gradually even with smaller amount depending on the individual ability make it more easier, I am not ignorant that others strategies is good based on choice of individual or investor but emphasize most on one that can accommodate all kind of investor without putting phobia before the investor. For instance using our domestic market to explain to a layman if I want to buy something like smart phone which I can't afford the money at once or even if I will if my source to avoid it is not enough it will make me to have a rethink of buying it no matter the value  but where I have an option of paying installmentally, I will be eager to rush in buying it this are the perspective I see lumps sum to DCA as this DCA serve to be more easier and reduce phobia to whoever that may not lumps sum due to how it's financial credibility could be.

[promise444c5]

These are the people who have no idea about the value of Bitcoin. 

Even if they are new to bitcoin, we might not want to presume that they don't know anything about bitcoin, to the extent that their knowledge of bitcoin as compared to their knowledge of other places that they might have (or they might consider putting their value) might affect whether and if so how to get into bitcoin

If we want to understand Bitcoin anew it is our duty to understand them. If they know about Bitcoin they want to know how to trade in it then it is also our duty to explain it to them properly. Because this will give us a commission gain but the next loss will be 100k$ which is the current price of Bitcoin. So for that they start with small coin first which won't make any difference if they lose.

What exactly are you trying to point out qurbanshah02 … and how did you come about mentioning the word “trade” maybe you mean it another term but if you meant trading exactly, you should know that we don’t do that here…
Hence, I find your statement to be vague maybe you can clear us on what you meant throughout, but emphasizing the sentence “ understanding bitcoin as a newbie” we can say a newbie who’s willing to invest just need to know just some basics to setup his/her investment account, Basic interm of how to acquire Bitcoin, setup a bitcoin wallet , secured type /how to secure your bitcoin wallet ,receiving of bitcoin on your wallet ,privacy and AFAIK all this can be cover in a week although some might be a little bit deeper than it might appear but they still have their basics that can be easily covered, all needed is a proper guidance . This, all other learning can go on while they grow their investment in Bitcoin.
There’s nothing like starting with small coin(bitcoin does not work as big or small), you invest according to your plan though you can start little to understand how it’s being done and there’s a strategy that works fine with it (DCA ) as you can always increase your plan for the int.. whenever you want .

[reefsea]

If we want to understand Bitcoin anew it is our duty to understand them. If they know about Bitcoin they want to know how to trade in it then it is also our duty to explain it to them properly. Because this will give us a commission gain but the next loss will be 100k$ which is the current price of Bitcoin. So for that they start with small coin first which won't make any difference if they lose.

You need to adjust to what you are saying.
You prefer to be a trader for the rest of your life if I look closely at your post, that's a big mistake my friend, trading won't make you a millionaire if you can't Hold.

Here we prefer to hold rather than trade, buy aggressively and also learn properly so that bitcoin investment can be run every week with DCA.
You need a good approach to holding bitcoin for your old age.