Is IEO better than ICO?

[imstillthebest]

As you said there is not much difference in IEO and ICO i am completely agree with that, ICO just evolve in IEO and making this a bit easy, i also think spammer just make the word ICO very bad so it is good to evolve into IEO

There's no much difference, but when you conduct IEO in a reputable exchange it means there are legit, especially in Binance as they are really doing their best for them to run IEO with those legit only and no scam, but in ICO, you cannot determine who are scam and not because scammers are also clever enough.

i think if ico will also be conducted by famous people  , it cant be also turn into scam because these famous personalities are going to get affected if they scam the investors  .  that is the same as putting an ieo on binance because binance are also afraid to get a complain whenever the ieo turns bad  . if that would be the basis , both ieo and ico are equal  but if that isnt the condition  , we should have choose properly and grade them depending on thier performance

[1714746520]

1714746520

[1714746520]

1714746520

[Meowth05]

With the introduction of IEO everything began to happen through the exchanges. This limited the scams happening through ICO, and people began to move towards IEO. At any instance we can't say one is better than the other, because now the scammers have begun to use IEO as a way to scam creating new exchanges that was never been into usage earlier.

Well, I think we can somehow avoid that. If we saw an IEO that is partnered with a new and suspicious exchange then I guess we shouldn't participate from it that is why before taking any move we should make a research about the project we are going to engage. Personally, I think IEO was somehow much better in ICOs simply because of the fact that it is already been partnered with exchanges so you won't need to wait for too long just to enlist the tokens you've got. The only thing I can think of why IEO does not become mainstream as ICOs have is because investors having a doubt that they will encounter the same thing what they had experience in ICO back in the day.

[calandra78]

As you said there is not much difference in IEO and ICO i am completely agree with that, ICO just evolve in IEO and making this a bit easy, i also think spammer just make the word ICO very bad so it is good to evolve into IEO

There's no much difference, but when you conduct IEO in a reputable exchange it means there are legit, especially in Binance as they are really doing their best for them to run IEO with those legit only and no scam, but in ICO, you cannot determine who are scam and not because scammers are also clever enough.

i think if ico will also be conducted by famous people  , it cant be also turn into scam because these famous personalities are going to get affected if they scam the investors  .  that is the same as putting an ieo on binance because binance are also afraid to get a complain whenever the ieo turns bad  . if that would be the basis , both ieo and ico are equal  but if that isnt the condition  , we should have choose properly and grade them depending on thier performance

binance has good regulations for projects that want to be listed in their IEO. and until now it has managed to maintain the trust of traders and investors who are in the exchange. ICO is not bad, only those who do ICO must be able to convince the best way that can be done.