Is IEO better than ICO?

[richminded]

For me I think they are still the same we still need to wait till their product starts operating.
We couldn't know if it is worth it or not, if it is legit or scam we still need to wait so they are just the same for me.

That’s true actually IEO are more risky because the possible dump are high since you are just trading without any real product and it can turn into a scam. I’m still not investing on a new product because i know its hard for the to grow so i’d rather to focus on the top coins now that they’ve started to pump. If you don’t want to be fooled go for the safe coins.

[1714733481]

1714733481

[1714733481]

1714733481

[1714733481]

1714733481

[1714733481]

1714733481

[1714733481]

1714733481

[2tang]

I don't think that this is all about the IEO and ICO because both have the same potential to succeed and are equally risky to fail and even scam
both are just as good so don't forget the most important points, the important thing is that the project is not whether it is the IEO or ICO because if the project is good and gets support from investors, then the project will be a successful and profitable project

[Chrystora123]

I personally do not really like the IEO, I have lost several times because I joined the IEO, indeed the appeal of the IEO is very convincing because we are affected by being able to directly use the IEO coins in the exchange but in reality the exchange is like not alive.  I did not say that overall all IEOs are bad, but if asked which is the best whether IEO or ICO then I personally prefer ICO.

[Nitori_m]

IEOs boost the trust level of investors, this alone makes a big difference.

[naira]

of course IEO is better than ICO, ICO has been very bad in the eyes of investors and has no profit at all for them with the existence of the IEO, investors will again trust the new crypto project

[gaj ahmada]

Both have their respective advantages, namely IEO with projects that have been running while ICO with a variety of very flexible concepts
The IEO may be more credible because the project is a project that is already running and that means that the risk of scam is lower but unfortunately the IEO has no other concepts and there seems to be no innovation that can be obtained from the IEO so ICO is actually good for crypto continuity and blockchain because there many concepts that adopt and integrate the blockchain and I think that is innovation, therefore it is actually not fair to have to compare the two because both have their own advantages

[aylabadia05]

On the other hand, IEO is a very if not entirely, different model. While both ICO and IEO share the similar rationales of Initial Public Offering (IPO). In an IEO an exchange is an administrator. As the excitement around ICO’s has cooled off, it looks like IEO could gain prominence as they provide a new fundraising method for blockchain projects and an extra layer of trust and security. As Exchanges themselves screen every project and select the high-quality ones to launch IEOs their chances of failure or scamming reduces significantly.

[Youghoor]

I don't really see  IEO as that better than ICO. I just see IEO as rebranding of ICO to help bring more investors into the crypto space to help support new crypto projects. IEO is as good as ICO since both are just crowdfunding venture but the only difference is that with IEO, the total number of tokens or coins are made available to the exchange platform running the IEO.

[H1N1]

To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.

Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.

Yes it is better than ICO of course. You can get a listing guarantee after the IEO over in that exchange.
Many ICO were unable to list their token even after some months from token sale.
And, the IEO will have no chance to be a scam IEO, because it will destroying the exchange reputation.

[cryptonx]

IEO just another way to collecting money from investors,, so, basicly ICO and IEO have the same purpose,
IEO use an exchange as crowdfunding platform, and thats the main benefits from IEO, because after the IEO finish, the token or coin will automatically tradeable on the exchange, but ICO must wait to be listed in any exchange for some period time

[starblocks]

IEOs are fast gaining in popularity mainly due to the lack of trust in ICOs and if they are hosted by exchanges that have good reputations this can take some of the risks out of investing into these types of offerings, however, if you do choose to commit capital to these newer crowdsales always ensure you do your own research to determine whether or not a startup has a quality product and marketing strategy and a sustainable ecosystem

[canman]

IEO just another way to collecting money from investors,, so, basicly ICO and IEO have the same purpose,
IEO use an exchange as crowdfunding platform, and thats the main benefits from IEO, because after the IEO finish, the token or coin will automatically tradeable on the exchange, but ICO must wait to be listed in any exchange for some period time

In general, IEO is still much better than ICO and this investment trend is still well known in the last 3 months. I think the risk investment has changed and only those who catch the new trend the fastest have the opportunity to earn better profits. I will personally choose to invest  IEO because these are projects that exchange proposals for investors and it makes the participants more secure in liquidity.

[inanilujimi]

I think the IEO and ICO are the same as the difference between the initial funding method.
if I have to choose, I prefer the IEO which is run on a large exchange like binance because until today there is no IEO that fails in binance, as for the profits and losses it all depends on how the project runs on the market.

[Little Mouse]

I think the IEO and ICO are the same as the difference between the initial funding method.
if I have to choose, I prefer the IEO which is run on a large exchange like binance because until today there is no IEO that fails in binance, as for the profits and losses it all depends on how the project runs on the market.

The difference is people can't trust ICO anymore, but they trust IEO just because of the launchpad of renowned exchange. I think soon IEO also face the same of ICO, because at the end of the, product matters.

[soulripper]

IEOs boost the trust level of investors, this alone makes a big difference.

Not only that.. IEOs are good cause we no more worry about exchanges list for that projects and with ICOs sometime even they get a good amount of money from ICOs their projects are never get list on a good exchanges a the market are dying so fast even peoples did not realise their projects are exist.. I already dump a lots of token cause their project are lack on getting liquidity where no body want to buy their tokens as thing are going to slow or nothing promise has full fill make investors run away.so for me IEOs is a good thing where we can choose where that IEOs are has being promoted. I only pick a good exchanges as i know it will be more succeed.

[rachman mahesa]

Not only that.. IEOs are good cause we no more worry about exchanges list for that projects and with ICOs sometime even they get a good amount of money from ICOs their projects are never get list on a good exchanges a the market are dying so fast even peoples did not realise their projects are exist.. I already dump a lots of token cause their project are lack on getting liquidity where no body want to buy their tokens as thing are going to slow or nothing promise has full fill make investors run away.so for me IEOs is a good thing where we can choose where that IEOs are has being promoted. I only pick a good exchanges as i know it will be more succeed.

If you choose IEO, of course it's the right choice. But ICO is actually still good for investing. If you really find a good ICO. As you said above, the reality is like that. However, if I really want to invest in ICO, of course I would be happy that people still believe in the ICO. And one more thing, if you invest in IEO, of course popular exchanges are better for IEO.

[bgaf]

To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.

Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.

I like on IEO is the fact that the exchange itself handle the scrutinization of the project whether they are real and legit team working on something and that make it easier for the participants and save time to search whether the project isnt scam and just a cash grab project on which ICO doesnt get us the guaranteed about this matter. But in terms of project output it is our responsibility as a investor to look into it. The exchange just helping us out in terms of convenient and legality but still the future of the project still depends on us to see if the project can still be alive after so many years.

[rijaljun]

IEOs boost the trust level of investors, this alone makes a big difference.

You are right, but investors must be more careful of what he is believing. By the increasing number of IEO and its hype, there will be more scammers to take this opportunity to scam investors. Also, IEO is just ensure listing and not ensure that the project will be developed well.

[freedomgo]

IEOs boost the trust level of investors, this alone makes a big difference.

You are right, but investors must be more careful of what he is believing. By the increasing number of IEO and its hype, there will be more scammers to take this opportunity to scam investors. Also, IEO is just ensure listing and not ensure that the project will be developed well.

What you said is right, there are still scammers who will take advantage and therefore the risk is still here.
However, if you will compare to ICO, IEO is less risky and proven that it could raise investments and can give to investors since they have the volume in trading sites like Binance.

Unfortunately, I haven't heard a coin that is successful coming from IEO, except those coins from Binance.

[rdewilde]

IEO is much more better than ICO. Before now, any team can come up create a website and start ICO which most of time ends up scamming investors. But with the advent of IEO, every team now goes through exchanges which will verify and confirm them before accepting the project, that is to say to a certain level fraudulent teams will be rejected.
Also, exchanges wouldn't want to risk their reputation for any IEO if they fail to do the needful so as to protect investors. But in all, one thing truly matters; that is the exchange should be a good one capable of protecting investors.