Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!

[Rikafip]

Requesting flag support against AddmoreMining

Flag type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1393

Addmore used fake team member photo, and plagiarized content from 2 sources. Here is the thread from scam accusation board with more info:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227258.0

[ChiBitCTy]

NVM

[Lauda]

Please support flag against Bitcoin Gold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1408.

[Lauda]

Evidence of connection given. Support needed:

Flag on hacker1001101001: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412.
Flag on poochpocket (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413.
If you want to contest the alt claim, I am ready to talk about it.

hacker1001101001", is your alt account / have you ever used the account (in any way or form) under the name: "poochpocket"?

Yes, the account is in control of me. I would also like to mention I have never used it for any scamming purpose hence none, me or the other account deserves a tag or an flag.

Quoted for reference.

[Timelord2067]

Support needed:

Flag on hacker1001101001: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412.
Flag on poochpocket (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413.

More fake flags by the guy with the highest percentage of fake flags.

[Lauda]

Support needed:

Flag on hacker1001101001: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412.
Flag on poochpocket (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413.

More fake flags by the guy with the highest percentage of fake flags.

If you continue posting lies like that, you are going to create enough references for yourself to be flagged. Those flags are on-point and based on evidence, zero speculation. Some people..

[Timelord2067]

If you continue posting lies like that, you are going to create enough references for yourself to be flagged. Those flags are on-point and based on evidence, zero speculation. Some people..

Guy who has created the highest number of fake flags most recent fake flags have been tagged as such:

Flag 1220: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser - Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 1412: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as having committed an indictable offence. The accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 1413: Accused User poochpocket is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as the accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid.

Updated 28/Feb/2020

[suchmoon]

Flag on poochpocket (alt account): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413.

Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts.

[JollyGood]

Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts.

He admitted it himself:

Let's make it simple. Here is a question directed at "hacker1001101001". It is a simple yes and no question. "hacker1001101001", is your alt account / have you ever used the account (in any way or form) under the name: "poochpocket"?
If you avoid it or ignore it, then you will leave me no other choice but to post in the investigations section. OP can then cross reference by linking in the first post.

Yes, the account is in control of me. I would also like to mention I have never used it for any scamming purpose hence none, me or the other account deserves a tag or an flag.

Quoted for reference. I thank you for your honesty and sparing me having to post personal information about you (I despise this practice nowadays and try to avoid at all costs). OP please add to the initial post.

You have an line of bad deeds here, you would never be sorry about doxxing someone. So yet I was just more inclined to be honest not afraid of you posting personal info.

[suchmoon]

Please oppose this. There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts.

He admitted it himself:

After the flag was raised. I have removed the opposition but that's not how flags should be done.

[LoyceV]

There is no evidence provided of them being alt accounts.

He admitted it himself:

Yes, the account is in control of me.

The Flag is on poochpocket, not on hacker1001101001. I didn't read all the details, but it doesn't seem right hacker1001101001 can confirm this on behalf of poochpocket. Anyone can claim the exact same thing about my account, that doesn't mean it's true. So it shouldn't count as evidence.

[Lauda]

The Flag is on poochpocket, not on hacker1001101001. I didn't read all the details, but it doesn't seem right hacker1001101001 can confirm this on behalf of poochpocket. Anyone can claim the exact same thing about my account, that doesn't mean it's true. So it shouldn't count as evidence.

This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all.

[LoyceV]

This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all.

This wasn't directed at you or any of your claims, I pointed out that "He admitted it himself" doesn't work.

[Lauda]

This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all.

This wasn't directed at you or any of your claims, I pointed out that "He admitted it himself" doesn't work.

In this case it does, because I am guaranteeing the validity of the evidence. Do you want me to get witnesses and to quote statements for the record? Sigh. If you want, then ask him to post the same confirmation from poochpocket. At that point, after he posts, I would demand you support both flags because of said actions though. Sigh #2.

[JollyGood]

After the flag was raised. I have removed the opposition but that's not how flags should be done.

You are right, there should have been something more concrete self-admitting from both accounts.

The Flag is on poochpocket, not on hacker1001101001. I didn't read all the details, but it doesn't seem right hacker1001101001 can confirm this on behalf of poochpocket. Anyone can claim the exact same thing about my account, that doesn't mean it's true. So it shouldn't count as evidence.

Point taken, both accounts should admit it in order for clarity to prevail

In this case it does, because I am guaranteeing the validity of the evidence. Do you want me to get witnesses and to quote statements for the record? Sigh. If you want, then ask him to post the same confirmation from poochpocket. At that point, after he posts, I would demand you support both flags because of said actions though. Sigh #2.

I think that would be the better thing to do so we can all move on from it, surely he would have no problem admitting it again but from his alt-account this time.

[Lauda]

In this case it does, because I am guaranteeing the validity of the evidence. Do you want me to get witnesses and to quote statements for the record? Sigh. If you want, then ask him to post the same confirmation from poochpocket. At that point, after he posts, I would demand you support both flags because of said actions though. Sigh #2.

I think that would be the better thing to do so we can all move on from it, surely he would have no problem admitting it again but from his alt-account this time.

Fair is fair. I will cross re-request in the other thread. If he is any bit of honest, he will not delay this.

[Timelord2067]

This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all.

Well, you are the guy who in another thread made a threat against me recently to create a flag against me wholly on the belief that my opposing your two false flags constitutes some indiscretion in your mind.

But you know what?

You wouldn't be the first guy to create a false flag against me.

Not even the second or third guy...

I already have five false flags created against my u=131361 main and one false flag created against my mobile-alt u=2640757 account.

So you Lauda would be the guy in lowly seventh place.


That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III} thead - "it's what we''re good at" ^TM.).


Next.

[Lauda]

This is nonsense. Are my claims equivalent to those made by CH? Would I make this up now? The user who hates me is also going to confirm my made up story? Seriously? poochpocket is the alt, end of story. Uniform stance or do not comment at all.

Well, you are the guy who in another thread made a threat against me recently to create a flag against me wholly on the belief that my opposing your two false flags constitutes some indiscretion in your mind.

But you know what?

You wouldn't be the first guy to create a false flag against me.

Not even the second or third guy...

I already have five false flags created against my u=131361 main and one false flag created against my mobile-alt u=2640757 account.

So you Lauda would be the guy in lowly seventh place.


That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III} thead - "it's what we''re good at" ^TM.).


Next.

What in the name of sanity are you talking about? Have you been drinking or something?

[nullius]

Update:  There are now four flags against those who have been involved in and/or promoting the IOTA scam:

• New:  Flag #1417 against mich (pinpoint reference)
• New:  Flag #1416 against domsch (ibid.)
• Flag #1392 against iotatoken (pinpoint reference, previous support request)
• Flag #1388 against Come-from-Beyond (evidence of account’s IOTA rôle in thread OP; previous support request)

My thanks to tyKiwanuka and Gyrsur for bringing forth additional evidence on IOTA-related forum acounts—and of course, to Lauda.

[...]

That would be your legacy Lauda - seventh place creating a false flag against me. (and you're not very good at finding alts - leave it to the professionals in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III} thead - "it's what we''re good at" ^TM.).


Next.

What in the name of sanity are you talking about? Have you been drinking or something?

I am guessing that maybe he means this:

Mind your manners, child. 

nullius is another one of those brain dead shill accounts that's been brought back to life.  Instead of making contact for their concern about a post of mine, they went on a stumbling rant about the post.

Very brain dead nullius - the shill account.

Why is my nick in this thread?

Why is my alt's nick in this thread?

Uups, wrong account.

“LOL.”  If you even deign to notice.

(...etc...)

I would simply ignore it as off-topic.  Don’t you/I/your other alts have important things to do?

[Timelord2067]

FUD

FUD

It's funny how the pair of you seem to have gotten yourselves into a frenzy very recently (around the same time)  I wonder if it has anything to do with some alts that were tagged and bagged around the same time? (or, to keep it on topic, some flags that were planted).

Loosing your source of extra income must be hurting you two guys. 

(Where are your Gangs when you need them to come to your defence I wonder?)