[ANN][0.8.6] Hirocoin - X11 - NGW - Secured Blockchain - Time Warp Limitation

[chaeplin]

Q: "Do the 'orphan' and 'dead' shares in P2Pool's status display hurt me?"
A: They shouldn't - It's normal for some fraction of everyone's shares to end up orphaned or dead. Because payouts are calculated by counting how many shares you have relative to others, everyone with normal configurations is equally "hurt" by this. However, if you have a large proportion of stales, your payout will be hurt. You can see how well you're doing by looking at P2Pool's "Efficiency" (ex: Efficiency: ~110.6% (40-111%)). If 100% doesn't lie within the confidence interval at the end, something is probably wrong (with 95% confidence)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Yea EXACTALY. ITS GARBAGE. As a worker/hasher YOU LOSE ( on your own to a p2p pool ) 8-20% is DOA or rejected, thats a LOT MORE than a reputable MPOS pool.. by orders of magnitude.

Read first

http://whatisp2pool.com/
http://p2pool.in/
https://litecoin.info/P2Pool_mining_guide


Sponsors

Thanks to the Bitcoin Foundation for its generous support of P2Pool.

Thanks to the Litecoin Project for its generous donations to P2Pool.

[1715392073]

1715392073

[1715392073]

1715392073

[DeltaQuebec]

Based on Weekly #'s for this p2p pool + the pool fee of 1% thats a minimum of 5% which is 3-4% MORE than any reputable MPOS pool's fees.

Look @ some of the worker stats.. and thats just their rejected/doa NOT including the 1% fee SEE below

Stop The Lies.

^^^

[reflexmk]

hi, just discovered HIRO, can anyone post a setting for 280 dual X? Should I get x3 scrypt hash? what should WU be? thanks I really like this coin, X11 is the FUTURE.

[DeltaQuebec]

My 280X Dual-X runs about .030 -.035 WU w/standard clocks and 64C @ 10% fans ( 2.06 Mh/s avg )

"intensity" : "18",
"xintensity" : "0",
"rawintensity" : "0",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "darkcoin",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "10240",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1035-1035",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "-20",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.225",
"temp-cutoff" : "80",
"temp-overheat" : "78",
"temp-target" : "72",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "5",
"failover-switch-delay" : "10",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "1",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1"
}

[reflexmk]

My 280X Dual-X runs about .030 -.035 WU w/standard clocks and 64C @ 10% fans ( 2.06 Mh/s avg )

"intensity" : "18",
"xintensity" : "0",
"rawintensity" : "0",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "darkcoin",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "10240",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1035-1035",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "-20",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.225",
"temp-cutoff" : "80",
"temp-overheat" : "78",
"temp-target" : "72",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "5",
"failover-switch-delay" : "10",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "1",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1"
}

thanks for the fast response, will try your settings when I get home. What vdcc are you running, and what brand is your dual-x? Thanks alot.

edit: 1.225 vdcc, didnt see it. What brand is the dual-x?

double edit: and you're using it on regular pool, right?

[DeltaQuebec]

"gpu-vddc" : "1.225",

thanks for the fast response, will try your settings when I get home. What vdcc are you running, and what brand is your dual-x? Thanks alot.

To my knowledge Sapphire is the only one who makes a 'dual X' 280X. If not, then I stand corrected. Mine is a Sapphire.

[reflexmk]

Yep, mine are sapphires also. Cheers, thanks ALOT

[tylerderden]

Q: "Do the 'orphan' and 'dead' shares in P2Pool's status display hurt me?"
A: They shouldn't - It's normal for some fraction of everyone's shares to end up orphaned or dead. Because payouts are calculated by counting how many shares you have relative to others, everyone with normal configurations is equally "hurt" by this. However, if you have a large proportion of stales, your payout will be hurt. You can see how well you're doing by looking at P2Pool's "Efficiency" (ex: Efficiency: ~110.6% (40-111%)). If 100% doesn't lie within the confidence interval at the end, something is probably wrong (with 95% confidence)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Yea EXACTALY. ITS GARBAGE. As a worker/hasher YOU LOSE ( on your own to a p2p pool ) 8-20% is DOA or rejected, thats a LOT MORE than a reputable MPOS pool.. by orders of magnitude.

sounds like you have latency issues bro, nothing wrong with p2p if your latency is good. I personally don't do it anymore because my internet sucks but blaming the entire network because your latency sucks is a little off.

[Operator.concept]

Anyone got any good settings for a 3x r9 270 (not x) rig?

[DeltaQuebec]

Q: "Do the 'orphan' and 'dead' shares in P2Pool's status display hurt me?"
A: They shouldn't - It's normal for some fraction of everyone's shares to end up orphaned or dead. Because payouts are calculated by counting how many shares you have relative to others, everyone with normal configurations is equally "hurt" by this. However, if you have a large proportion of stales, your payout will be hurt. You can see how well you're doing by looking at P2Pool's "Efficiency" (ex: Efficiency: ~110.6% (40-111%)). If 100% doesn't lie within the confidence interval at the end, something is probably wrong (with 95% confidence)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Yea EXACTALY. ITS GARBAGE. As a worker/hasher YOU LOSE ( on your own to a p2p pool ) 8-20% is DOA or rejected, thats a LOT MORE than a reputable MPOS pool.. by orders of magnitude.

sounds like you have latency issues bro, nothing wrong with p2p if your latency is good. I personally don't do it anymore because my internet sucks but blaming the entire network because your latency sucks is a little off.

Um, no.. im talking abt facts, from THEIR dashboard BRO. Ive never put a gpu onna p2p pool, nor would I ever. I did not fabricate that screen shot.. go look for yourself.. the link is a few posts above.

[oknast]

http://poolz.eu:9408 - I am running a P2Pool node in Europe :

ULTRA FAST INTERNET CONNECTION
Unix Server equipped with SSD, tuned for low latency
NOW THE FEE IS 0.5%

How to connect:
Server = http://poolz.eu:9408
Username = your HIRO wallet address
Password = choose a whatever random password

Highlights:
No registration, start mining directly
Lightweight pool frontend, responsive design also perfect for browsing with tablet or smartphone
Node heartbeat live displayed on frontend, updating every 10 seconds also on smartphone and tablet PC
Fast and direct payments (PPLNS) into your wallet instead of a central wallet managed by someone you don't know
Decentralized network, harder to attack
Transactionfee's in a block will also by payed to all miners in the pool
Switch between different p2pool nodes without penalty. Payments will continue, they are all connected --> just setup another P2Pool node or two as backup


DeltaQuebec you are GREAT!! Thanks for the hate!!!

[Operator.concept]

Being a relative newb with cryptocurrencies, I have to admit I don't know which of you is right.

Still, DQ is winning at the moment for me, actual evidence is a good way to win an argument I guess. I'm pretty much put off p2pools now!

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig? 

[Vann]

Being a relative newb with cryptocurrencies, I have to admit I don't know which of you is right.

Still, DQ is winning at the moment for me, actual evidence is a good way to win an argument I guess. I'm pretty much put off p2pools now!

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig?  

DQ is wrong. Yes, you have more rejected shares with a P2P pool vs a stratum pool, but so does everybody else on the P2P pool. The block reward is still divided equally to each miner according to the VALID shares that are submitted, so you do not make less. In fact if your rejected share percentage is lower than the rest of  the miners, you actually GAIN shares from their invalids. What's important is to make sure you have a low latency to pool in order to minimize your rejected shares:

http://www.reddit.com/r/dogemining/comments/1uncvb/the_benefits_of_mining_using_p2pool_better

[ClutchThese]

Being a relative newb with cryptocurrencies, I have to admit I don't know which of you is right.

Still, DQ is winning at the moment for me, actual evidence is a good way to win an argument I guess. I'm pretty much put off p2pools now!

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig?  

DQ is wrong. Yes, you have more rejected shares with a P2P pool vs a stratum pool, but so does everybody else on the P2P pool. The block reward is still divided equally to each miner according to the VALID shares that are submitted, so you do not make less. In fact if your rejected share percentage is lower than the rest of  the miners, you actually GAIN shares from their invalids. What's important is to make sure you have a low latency to pool in order to minimize your rejected shares:

http://www.reddit.com/r/dogemining/comments/1uncvb/the_benefits_of_mining_using_p2pool_better

I'll stick to stratum pool.

Good explanation though.

[oknast]

...I hate to be negative here, but I don't think paying him will make him hate you any less. Surely you should be paying me to convince me poolsz.eu is actually good? 

We need hate. Hate make us better and stronger Operator.concept, if you mine in http://poolz.eu:9408/ we will pay you for your shares  

[oknast]

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig?  

My settings are:

{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "Poolz.Eu",
"url" : "http://poolz.eu:9408",
"user" : "HIROCOINADDRESS",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-engine" : "0-1140",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500-1550",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"worksize" : "256",
"look-up gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "15",
"sharelog" : "50",
"kernel" : "darkcoin",

"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

[ozie]

Q: "Do the 'orphan' and 'dead' shares in P2Pool's status display hurt me?"
A: They shouldn't - It's normal for some fraction of everyone's shares to end up orphaned or dead. Because payouts are calculated by counting how many shares you have relative to others, everyone with normal configurations is equally "hurt" by this. However, if you have a large proportion of stales, your payout will be hurt. You can see how well you're doing by looking at P2Pool's "Efficiency" (ex: Efficiency: ~110.6% (40-111%)). If 100% doesn't lie within the confidence interval at the end, something is probably wrong (with 95% confidence)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Yea EXACTALY. ITS GARBAGE. As a worker/hasher YOU LOSE ( on your own to a p2p pool ) 8-20% is DOA or rejected, thats a LOT MORE than a reputable MPOS pool.. by orders of magnitude.

sounds like you have latency issues bro, nothing wrong with p2p if your latency is good. I personally don't do it anymore because my internet sucks but blaming the entire network because your latency sucks is a little off.

Um, no.. im talking abt facts, from THEIR dashboard BRO. Ive never put a gpu onna p2p pool, nor would I ever. I did not fabricate that screen shot.. go look for yourself.. the link is a few posts above.

Just look up his other posts.

Hes just one angry little kid with no clue what hes talking about.
Well he mined Asscoin so he got what he deserves.

[Thrash]

Being a relative newb with cryptocurrencies, I have to admit I don't know which of you is right.

Still, DQ is winning at the moment for me, actual evidence is a good way to win an argument I guess. I'm pretty much put off p2pools now!

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig? 

There is nothing wrong with p2pool. Just make sure you have a good node with low latency. If you do not have one close setup your own node. I currently have 0.37% DOA. My returns on p2pool in almost all cases run higher than it does on an MPOS pool. It does require you understand how it works to make the most of it. A general statement that p2pool is bad is just not correct. It is no different than saying that you had a bad experience on an MPOS pool so they are all bad.

Just my 0.02 HIRO's worth

Have a good day!

Thrash

[nanoprobe]

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig?  

My settings are:

{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "Poolz.Eu",
"url" : "http://poolz.eu:9408",
"user" : "HIROCOINADDRESS",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-engine" : "0-1140",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500-1550",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"worksize" : "256",
"look-up gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "15",
"sharelog" : "50",
"kernel" : "darkcoin",

"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

And what speed do you get with those settings?

[zeetak]

Being a relative newb with cryptocurrencies, I have to admit I don't know which of you is right.

Still, DQ is winning at the moment for me, actual evidence is a good way to win an argument I guess. I'm pretty much put off p2pools now!

Oh yeah, anyone got any good settings for a 3x 270 (not x) rig? 

There is nothing wrong with p2pool. Just make sure you have a good node with low latency. If you do not have one close setup your own node. I currently have 0.37% DOA. My returns on p2pool in almost all cases run higher than it does on an MPOS pool. It does require you understand how it works to make the most of it. A general statement that p2pool is bad is just not correct. It is no different than saying that you had a bad experience on an MPOS pool so they are all bad.

Just my 0.02 HIRO's worth

Have a good day!

Thrash

+1