Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[senin]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Yes, bonuses for early investors often make up 40-50 percent. It's too much. Thus, ICO teams stimulate such big bonuses to the quick sale of received tokens. In such cases, investors receive up to 200 percent of the profit and collapse the price of the token. Ten percent still makes sense to provide a bonus, but no more. Investors should be interested in holding coins and developing the project. Big bonuses are a way to depreciate issued tokens.

[Mahanton]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Some even give out 200% bonus for its investors as far as i have seen back in the past which its already shady.Too much big discount or bonus is really the main reason why most investors are really targeting for that because even if the price of token decrease on exchange listing they might still able to break even with their investment but comes to a point that ICOs arent already profitable even how big is the bonus given out.

[kramchers]

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think this is just fair enough unlike others who give double the numbers.
Well this early investors are one source of dumping tokens in the market once listed.
I am not against giving them huge bonus as they are the booster of the project though, a lock in period should be implemented and 6 months must be the shortest!

[Mianae]

Yes it is. Provided tokens gets sold  out to others this only means on listing early investors can sell 40% above the purchase of regular buyers therefore leading regular buyers to a 40% loss in their investment. Except those early investors tokens are locked for a period of time, I think it's a bad idea to give 40% bonus.

[Icologies]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think 40% is too big, there must be a re-evaluation from the project. It is true that many token prices have fallen after listings are listed, but this is not greatly influenced by the initial investor bonus.

[omone1]

40% bonus is totally dependent on the nature of project and the team behind it. I bought Tokenpay December 2017 with 100% and I still went ahead to make good profit when they listed in a very bad market in 2018. Although I frown at big bonus these days because of bad state of the market.

[[btc]YSG]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Bonus of upto 40% are way to much even private or early investors, It's just an act of desperation from the project to lure investors, but really, projects with huge potentials will not offer that much, while smart investors will not be tricked by the huge bonuses If the doesn't look too good.

[digitalblock]

Such big bonuses are needed for a reason. This is important because this money is a tool for the development of the project. Here all risk and most of all the investor. Ah and therefore reward for such risks must be big. I do not see anything wrong with the fact that the investor on the pre-sale receives such a bonus.

[cytpoway121]

40% is too much for any project ico or ieo; either pre sale, or public sale.
Such huge percentage gives investors opportunities to dump at any convenient time as long as their profit is within reach

And it’s no 1 reason why most projects vanish

[Perfect35]

There are projects that give bonuses as much as 50%. The worst part of it most times is the private sale. Which is why they do not disclose the bonuses or the price at which the tokens were sold to the private investors. If I may say, I believe 30% bonus should be the maximum. It can still be reduced to something much lower, depending on how the team views it.

[Christinebeauty]

Sometimes if you look at the sell orders of some tokens on the market and you compare it to its ICO price,  then you ask yourself how will those sellers make profit. If they had not earn abnormal bonuses during the token sale, they will never sell that cheap. This is the more reason why most ICO projects usually die the moment they get listed

[South Park]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

It is too much and for several reasons, to begin with a project that gives 40% extra coins to early investors is obviously more concerned about trying to sell their coins than about the quality of the project they can develop, second giving such a high percentage may be an indication of a possible scam, after all if the project was any good will you be so willing to give away so many coins? And finally by giving so many coins to early investors the developers are creating an incentive to sell those coins as soon as they hit the market, since the early adopters have already 40% in profits, and when most early investors sell then the price crashes damaging the image of the coin and its credibility.

[Kwansimaa]

40% bonus for early investors is really a bad decision any team or project manager will ever decide to do and when the token gets listed and being dumped, they focus much attention on bounty hunters instead of their early bird who when they even sell below the ico price does not have any effect on because they bought very cheaply.

[coin-investor]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

This is one of the bad practices of developers, they want the sales to take off, so they offer this very high bonus, I even saw one ICO in the past giving 60% bonus, this is a bad future scenario and invites investors to dump for profit once the token hit the market.
Then they blame the dump to bounty hunters who only has 2 to 5% of the total supply of the coin, this project will lose it's reputation.

[jostorres]

I just went through comments here and some people are just pure hypocrites. How can you say that a newbie who got up to 40% on their investment does not deserve it because it is not realistic?  Then who deserves such amount of profit, the old investors alone? Funny.

The question is, you yourself , imagine that you’re still a newbie and you’re investing for the first time and luckily you happen to get up to 40% on your investment , will you return the money back or refuse to take it, just because you believe that it is not realistic or because you feel like you’re still a newbie, therefore you don’t deserve such an amount? The truth is that you wouldn’t.

So, what newbies are getting shouldn’t be any of your concern. You should focus on your own and stop looking into something that is none of your business. Bitcoin is volatile and the luck can shine on anybody. If it doesn’t work for you then you shouldn’t blame others because they were lucky as newbie .

[mahibul49]

i think 40% bonus is not a big deal for early investor!early investor is the real supporter of the project as they invest their project and support from early stage.but without bonus is best for the whole project

[firmino10]

Giving out 40% bonus to pre sale investors is too much and very ridiculous. This is one of the major reasons why most projects fail and dump on exchanges because the early investors are already at 40% profit so they see no reason to hold for too long, they then dump the tokens.
But instead of project to correct this, they blame bounty hunters for their failure.

[spydee1522]

This is probably one of the greatest mistakes project managers have been doing ever since and they tend out to blame bounty hunters for the cause of dumping. why give 40% bonus to early investors, on what basis and what qualifies them for that? It is time for project mangers to consider this mistake which truly results in dumping and rectify it and stop blaming hunters.

[chanler]

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Each person possibly has a different opinion about this, but I think it is too high and look like to trigger an early dumping price once listed on an exchange. Many investors prefer to sell directly their coins soon once it is listed on exchanges. They may be afraid of a possible sustained decline in price and decide to secure profits faster.

[dtb.agency]

For sure 40% is too much. It's not the way to attract smart investors. Big bonus means low real token value.