Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[Adya]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

of course it is too much. some guys sell the body of deposit and left bonuses. another question that they deserve it as early believers.

[erep]

Initial investors buying 40% bonus private sell will also throw away their tokens if they get a 10% profit. That's normal, not people who want losses because of the new project's uncertainty.

[hosseinimr93]

I think if a project is trustworthy enough and has something to be attractive for investors, there is no need for any bonus or discount to attract investors. Giving bonus is the easiest thing a team can do.
Sometimes bonuses cause the people to not invest in the project. Assume that some people have given 40% bonus at early stages. Now people afraid they dump their tokens. So they decide to not invest in the project. For solving this problem, they give 40% bonuses in next rounds too which means deceiving early stage investors.
So, I think 40% bonus is really big. In my opinion, bonuses shouldn't be higher than 10%.
The biggest problem which is the main reason of price dump in most of the projects, is not these bonuses. Usually, there are very bigger bonuses that are offered to big investors privately. When a token price dump 90% immediately after listing on exchanges, be sure there are some private investors that are making profit even by selling at 90% under ICO price.
Generally, 40% bonus is big. But I appreciate a team which give early investors 40% or even 60% bonus but they don't give higher bonuses to some others privately.  

[sehoon]

I think 40% bonus is too much for early investors. It could cause the token to fall if not executed properly especially if you're gonna execute it in the early stage. The project managers are probably doing this to gain more investors. Can't blame them if they don't know that it can cause it to go down.

[Ultimist]

I believe that such a bonus for early investors contributes not only to the depreciation of the coin, but also indicates fraudulent projects. If the project is serious, the bonus does not exceed 5-10% and it attracts investors not with bonuses, but with its technical component and thoughtful development strategy.

[miropp]

In my opinion, it is a myth that bounty hunters and early investors bring down the cryptocurrency rate. If the project has a competent development strategy, then when the tokens are released to the exchange, investors will not sell their coins, they will be interested in preserving the coins until a significant increase in the value from the price of the ICO.

[alt-fire]

40% can be much if early investors is owned more than 30% of all token supply. If it so - project will see price falling when price will be on main sale positions.

[spydee1522]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

To me 40% is extra too much for early investors not minding that they actually have that trust and belief in the project and so the early investors title but to me it's way too much and should be looked into cos that's one of the major reasons when price fall after listing

Yeah very true but project managers are trying to ignore the fact that early investors are the major dumpers even before bounty hunters come. Its so huge to trust these early investors since most of these investors don't care about the project but their gains right after listing and I think this 40% should be decreased to 2% so that any investor who has no trust in the project stays away.

[zuziekatee]

No matter how high of a bonus you give , a good project will have a volume to absorb the dumping and also it always be has terms and condition applied to it ! Bonus most time is not what crashes the price!

[Wyndesam]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think this percentage is not given in the projects, as now spend more ieo and there are no early investors and bonuses do not give any, and it is better not to invest in ico now.

[Mrsparks]

Its definitely too much.. I wonder where they device such crazy mechanism.. If a 40 percent bonus is to to be issued to private investors it should be over atleast  a year so as to allow the project establish liquidity on exchange.

[Redemption59]

The real dumpers in the crypto industry is investors but since investors do have money, the blame has been shifted towards bounty hunters thinking hunters are the hungry beings but most have also forgotten that most of these investors are also bounty hunters. Giving as big as 40% to any investor who has no interest in a project will surely leads to dump, you can give that 40% and lock for 5years and that will be cool. 40% bonu is huge for early investors.

[Backupnime]

if we think for demand in the future, i think is too much because investor can dump token when listing on market, because supply in market is too much than demand, and this is one factor why token/coin price from ico after listed are under valued, and many people are blame bounty hunter

[Danslip]

if we think for demand in the future, i think is too much because investor can dump token when listing on market, because supply in market is too much than demand, and this is one factor why token/coin price from ico after listed are under valued, and many people are blame bounty hunter

The 40% bonus is more than enough for investors who want to dump the tokens for making more Bitcoin. I usually blame the bounty hunters and teams for the obvious reasons. They don't understand the responsibility of the received tokens in their wallet, these tokens represent the vision of the project. Selling undeviatingly to the market price will absolutely destroy their hard build reputation with the small time frame.

The higher bonus is also form of the pitfall for the traders&investors, they invest in the project after checking the bonus amount per invested Ethereum but they don't think about the inflation rate of the higher turnover coins. The more ciruclated coins mean more dump by the investors after the getting listed on the exchange. By the way, let's don't forget the bounty allocation for the bounty hunters. The bounty hunters will also contribute to the dump on the exchange whenever they get the smelling of the exchange news of the project which they have participated as a bounty hunter.

[anggaem]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

yeah it's too much for me, it can make price tokens unstable I think every investor will immediately throw away his coins when the coin is listed on an exchange.
I think a lot of shitcoins do that in order to get investors but this method will endanger price in the market .

[ccsang]

if we think for demand in the future, i think is too much because investor can dump token when listing on market, because supply in market is too much than demand, and this is one factor why token/coin price from ico after listed are under valued, and many people are blame bounty hunter

I'm not agreed some of your opinion, extra bonus is a free gift to who's support the project in the early stage. Some of people think this the reason for the tokens price dump while listed on exchange, most of them is blaming bounty hunter, but how come they don't blame the project owner? 40% bonus for early investor is not a big deal,  but it's must a potential project.

[103deltafox]

I think 40% as bonus is huge, most times when the prices of tokens crashes after listing, you see it being attributed to bounty Hunters while hunters are given very little of the total supply and as such they can't crash the price of the token. I think the crash is caused by early investors who receive very huge amount of bonus.

[foxincoin]

Yes, it is too high, and case dump of the price

[Pamadar]

if we think for demand in the future, i think is too much because investor can dump token when listing on market, because supply in market is too much than demand, and this is one factor why token/coin price from ico after listed are under valued, and many people are blame bounty hunter

I'm not agreed some of your opinion, extra bonus is a free gift to who's support the project in the early stage. Some of people think this the reason for the tokens price dump while listed on exchange, most of them is blaming bounty hunter, but how come they don't blame the project owner? 40% bonus for early investor is not a big deal,  but it's must a potential project.

A big reason why the project being dumped after being added to exchange, those bonuses are huge enough to enjoy that's why it's really tempting to sell after seeing that the project was successfully added to any exchange, it's a free money to take with those time of wait while investing your money.

Though it's also right that it's the team that should balance the situation in order to continue the progress and avoid being dumped completely.

[t3m4nc0k]

I really hate people who say price drops because of "bounty hunter" and for 40% bonus it's too big for investors and the bonus is far greater than the bounty allocation