Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[HatakeKakashi]

If the project is really legit and the bonuses you get is 40 percent is still high but it depends on them on how much percentage that given to the early investors. Every project gives different bonus to the people who invest early because they wait more months or weeks than the investors. But for the early investors if they get that this is very huge for them and they will get high profit if the token liat to the exchanges.

[1714519480]

1714519480

[1714519480]

1714519480

[TheICE007]

I think 40% bonus is too much, and yes it could also crash the price especially when listed on an exchange with low volume but I think one reason  for the bonus is to bring more investors to the project.

[imstillthebest]

I think 40% bonus is too much,

no . before , ive seen alot of ico's that offers higher bonuses than this  . you can get high bonus the earlier you hop in but fewer bonuses the later .

presenting big bonuses is a kind of promotion to attract people but id say this was a bad move because the higher the bonus will only make you look like a scam ( im not saying all but this is only what i observed to some ico that i see ) they often ended early and cant give what they promise to their investors  .

[r1a2y3m4]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think that the early investors does not take accredited for the price crash. Most scenario tells that this is a fault of the hunters. Most of these hunters, will just sell all their bounties once the bounty was released. So, I don't think 40% bonuses affects this. 40% bonuses can affect buying of coins. So when you buy you might get 40% bonus of the coin. It's actually good thing for that coin and it could make the coin's price go up.

[Ss4sukE]

I think the 40% bonus is still within the standard limit, I often see ICO offering bonuses of up to 50-60%. but this problem is not due to bonuses, but is based on users who make transactions when the token sale is opened in the Exchange. excessive sales which causes the price of tokens to fall.

[akirasendo17]

well its good for early investors but I think its bad and csn hurt a lot to the project, one example is that once the token is release, mostly investors do is dump the coin specially if it has no significance or important function to crypto world, once dump it will stir panic to other investors, and will follow since the price is declining once this happen the project might not be able to survive, since lot of holders
will try to get their investment because of the biggest holder who dumps the coin, and that might be the end of it,

[nxnqauff]

Even after 40% bonus, these investors are in huge loss if I see how the price is on the market after the listing these days. Not sure how these people are even sleeping after so much loses.

[cherryganda]

Even 50% is okay with me, it is a gift to investors and those investors are the main key for the success of the project.
THough those free tokens should be lock as it is one of the main reason why the market is getting a downside once listed.
DO you think bounty hunters is the real reason why they are being dump in the market price? i dont think so!

[bitcoinposts]

40 percent bonus is much need for new ico to attract funds which is necessary to become hot topic in crypto community

[disconnectme]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

40% bonus is not too much for early investors provided there is a lock up period, the problem we have with most of these projects after offering huge bonuses to early backers is that most of the tokens enters the market and cause sell pressure because for a non greedy investors 40% profit is huge and most will like to take their money off the table and allow the remaining to run

[SolarWindMiningCompany]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

It's way too much. This is what they do to attract sales and afterwards they blame bounty hunters for dumping on the community when it's all fallacy. In most cases, such projects take with this high bonus like sportsfix never survived after one month. I won't invest in any project with high bonus to private sales, presale and seed investors except there are factors like lockup and batch release to mitigate dump

[jajorforce]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I am seeing right, most of the imposed over bounty hunter. 40 percent bonus isn't too much too price crashes, even dump market, not even bounty hunter. Any investor can't sell millions token for some USD, without unsold token. Do your research or I can help you more.

[BlacksmithCorporation]

When I first got into this market, I was attracted to the great rewards in the initial ICO round of projects, I am convinced that most newcomers are like that. We think that we will get a good deal if we buy early and buy a lot, but that is not the trick of the projects, They leave a high reward with a countdown, making us feel the need to buy right away.

[Argoo]

Big bonuses for early investors simply encourage them to immediately sell new tokens on the exchange as soon as they appear there. In any case, providing bonuses of 40 percent for investors is too much.
Apparently, teams need to seriously think about changing the attractiveness strategy of their tokens. Now token holders are looking for opportunities to sell them profitably. But they need to be interested in holding them. To do this, teams need to provide passive income. Then the holders of tokens will be a kind of holders of shares, which will bring a steady income. However, they will be interested in holding them.

[Mianae]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Its an exorbitant amount to give to individuals as reward for early investment. Thus act engineers instant dump on exchange which cramples the investment of many persons who weren't part of the bonus. Those at 40% bonus can be inclined to sell off at the price or below investors price.

[vanya.pronin.1983]

It is okay if people are investing big money. How would you like to collect funds on early stages if you cannot offer a very attractive bonus or discount, especially if the minimum amount of investment is above 2-3k USD.

[Burogh]

It is okay if people are investing big money. How would you like to collect funds on early stages if you cannot offer a very attractive bonus or discount, especially if the minimum amount of investment is above 2-3k USD.

For new projects, attracting investors is certainly difficult and one way to attract them is to provide a large bonus. I think there is nothing wrong with this strategy, if it is feared that it could disrupt prices after the initial listing, I think it depends on the project.

[slashz9]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

it depends on the project it self, if the project is good the price will not dump, but will decrease at the beginning list on the exchange.
recently, i hear airdrop about KLAY, and they say the price is 1499 sathoshi they gift 5 billion token, let see is it will dump or not.
basicly, the price will drop for a while after listing, but if this project is good, it will rise again.

40% was too little in this market.
100% or more would be good.

 i think dev want kill his project it self, if you get bonus 100% all people will compete to sell quickly.
40% is already too much,but this is market, nobody can predict it.

[glendall]

we can't blame the bounty hunter or the first investor who gets a 40% discount, the project team should be to blame, because they don't make anticipations, they should have made anticipations so the market doesn't fall,
if they do not have anticipation then they are not professional, because they cannot see the risk of what they have decided and done.

[Shallow]

When a team launch a project and think the best way to attract investors is by giving exorbitant bonuses then they should be ready to face the music, unless they put stringent conditions on ground to protect their token price. As for the early investors there is no need to blame them because everyone will surly do behave like them if given the same opportunity. Furthermore, I can't say if the bonus is too much or not it's left for the team to decide, because even if you tell the team is too much they won't heed to it.