Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[btcltcdigger]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Any % is too much if the bonus isn't locked from dumping in some way. As most investors (and by this, i'm referring to the regular joe) treats the bonus as profit and sells it immediately, reasoning that he still has coins he paid for, so why not sell off the bonus for profit.

Dollar cost average i guess...

[Ashong Salonga]

It depends upon the project because for me I see it as a marketing strategy of the project developers to attract or caught the attention of potential investors which totally lead for many potential investors to dive in into a certain project that offers such a big opening reward for early investors maybe as a token of appreciation. The only bad thing that happens upon giving out a big reward such as 40% bonus for the early investors is the concern of them might be dumping the token price once it was already listed into an exchange since investors are much focusing into the fruit of their investments and not totally to the token price that will come out right after the listing. Giving out such a big bonus is not that bad as long as the bonus will be used fairly in which the price will not be dumped right after listinf that can affect the rewards of the bounty hunters that will be benefiting to the result of the listing in which the token rewards will now be valuable as a payment of work done for promoting the project.

[Ken_terrance]

Honestly giving away unnecessary bonuses will affect a project after, even if the team are very rich investors will dump when they feel like they have too much profits to be earned which means the project gives early investors every reasons to dump the token or coin

[Sanugarid]

I think that is a big bonus, most of the projects that I have met that give big bonuses like that experience dump when listing in the market. And most good projects do not provide such a large bonus, because even without a large bonus investors will remain interested in the project because of their good products. If they get 40% bonus, they will sell 20% below the ICO price because they still make a profit.

Indeed, for a early investors and to think that the market is not that wealthy as of now. That is really a too much bonus because some early investors do not really earn that much at first because they do not know how to do it very well. But if you really study every important information, losing money maybe a bad luck only for you. I can surely say that you are well informed in every investing techniques you can really earn.

Honestly giving away unnecessary bonuses will affect a project after, even if the team are very rich investors will dump when they feel like they have too much profits to be earned which means the project gives early investors every reasons to dump the token or coin

Definitely, but that is just only their technique to gain more investors to support their project. Evert project is giving bonuses just to encourage investors to support them.

[Meowth05]

40% amount of bonus will totally bring and lure out investors however, this amount is no small this might actually affect the allocations of the token yet as everyone said the token might get dumped right after the listing. By that way, the token will might just end up like any other tokens that placed in the depth of the market.

[Almasani]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

The 40% bonus is not a small amount compared to what is given to campaign participants who work for 2 to 3 months, even more. Most projects only provide 2 to 5% of the total supply for campaign costs.
Although this is often referred to as a bounty, or bounty hunter, but precisely is the cost of the worker. If a 40% bonus circulates in the exchange, it will cause the token price to down. But this is not a problem, and I think this is a natural thing. But there are projects that sell tokens of the remaining IEO or ICO after listing to the exchange. This makes the price of tokens drop and will harm investors.

[prof7bit]

40% amount of bonus will totally bring and lure out investors however, this amount is no small this might actually affect the allocations of the token yet as everyone said the token might get dumped right after the listing. By that way, the token will might just end up like any other tokens that placed in the depth of the market.

It is still dangerous to enter the cryptocurrency market until other financial markets have begun their recovery. It is still not entirely clear how it will be possible to get out of a difficult financial situation.

[Utoy101]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Since the early days of icos, the problem of huge bonuses has been a major problem to project development. To me, I'd say it's a huge sum of amount giving upto 40% bonus and some project do give more, project developers see it as a way of luring investors to come purchase their token during the tokensale stage but the action has done lots of damage to many projects especially at their infant state when they list newly on exchanges, these early investors sold off at any price available so far there are in gain no matter how small or little

[BlackFor3st]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I can't say that it is too much because genuine projects will surely think this ahead before deciding to give 40% to the early investors meaning they will only limit the tokens that are available for this bonus in order to make sure that their token/coin price will not crash after reaching the exchange. For example, they will only allocate like 10-20% of their tokens that will be available for 40% bonus and only the early bird will get it.

And with regard to exchange issue, we should not blame the bounty hunters nor the investors because they are doing their job in order to profit. What we should blame are the project owners who were unable to increase the demand of their token/coin upon reaching the exchange as it is the main reason why their token crashes badly as the seller is more compare to the buyer.

[nikki4]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

They can attribute their blame on bounty hunters but in true sense CEO know that only bounty hunters can't dump price. Personally I can tell you that only 40 percent bonus can't dump price. Price should dump 40 percent for early bonuses and another 60 percent or 100-200 percent for bounty hunters. But still we are seeing that most token price is more dump than this, so 40% isn't took much.

[Iyanu14]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Most of the crashes in the price could be attributed to early investors rather than bounty hunters. Even if bounty hunters are involved, it will be few.  Even if bonus are to be given for the investors, it should be done in such a way that it won't affect the price negatively.  To me 40% bonus is too much. Investors will just dump it immediately it is listed on any exchange.  There is no way too much bonus will not affect price negatively.

[Esterklu]

Yes, that's a pretty big discount. This is also one of the reasons why the price of tokens has dropped significantly. However, if the project has a good team and is fundamentally solid, then the price will still rise sooner or later.

[CETAN.IO]

We have a bonus part for investors in the amount of 0.7% per day of the amount of their deposit, not in the moment but on the increase! this allows you to get a complex percentage, at each stage of ICO its percentage!

[Cryptrx]

Depending on the release period of the tokens, anything more than 10% bonus can be detrimental to a project's survival since the investors can easily sell cheap and still make profit.

[White Christmas]

I think that is a big bonus, most of the projects that I have met that give big bonuses like that experience dump when listing in the market. And most good projects do not provide such a large bonus, because even without a large bonus investors will remain interested in the project because of their good products. If they get 40% bonus, they will sell 20% below the ICO price because they still make a profit.

That is also my own perspective, isn't the 40% bonus for the  investors are kind of huge? I think it would be better if the percentage was just like or kind of 15%-20% only so that
the price of the coins or tokens will not be fall or dump and maybe it is a good for those investors I guess?

[Youghoor]

Absolutely, offering 40% bonus in any fundraising is too much and investors are likely to dump their tokens as soon as possible when it goes on exchange. I think the best figures is to be within the ranges of 10-20% with maximum ever being 25%. Anything above this can lead to the collapse of the project in the future.

[restuibu]

of course, because they almost get half of the tokens purchased and that will inevitably lead to a very large dump, in the end the initial investor will blame the bounty hunter as the cause of dump (good scenario from an early investors if get a lot of bonuses)

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

in my opinion it is 40-50% bonus given by the project to investors is stupid, why? it will have a negative impact on prices in the market, and it happens !, almost all projects that give a big bonus when IEO or ICO starts, now no one can survive, they should know that

[coin_1122]

Absolutely, offering 40% bonus in any fundraising is too much and investors are likely to dump their tokens as soon as possible when it goes on exchange. I think the best figures is to be within the ranges of 10-20% with maximum ever being 25%. Anything above this can lead to the collapse of the project in the future.

You are right, companies are giving higher percentages in order to attract the investors, but through higher percentages, the company is collapsing after listing in the exchanges. 10% are really the best choice for the company to give a bonus to the investors, a company should always aim for the long term.

[aemma]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Yes I think it is quite too much for new or early investors and when such happens there is every tendency it will crash the token price. There have been many projects which did this, and of course the token price was affected badly forcing the project to be worthless. The truth is, most times the team don't think of the impact of most things such as this one because at that point in time or during the public sale, their sole aim is to raise money without giving concern to the future price of the token. Another funny thing is, some projects which do this, will still in turn blame bounty hunters when it is obvious the problem is from the team.