Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign?

[Davian144]

be careful with a project scenario like that, it's clearly a red warning for you. according to common sense if a good project certainly has many participants. but if the project you mean has 1 participant, I doubt it.

That's right, because everyone is after a good project, there is no way for prize hunters to leave or pass a project that has proven to be good, and I also doubt that the project participants are just one person.

[sana54210]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That can never be the case and it would be impossible for them to have one participant because it would not have much effect on them, if through I participant, they expect that at least 100 persons will be drawn to the project, and their target is 10,000, which means they need about 1000 participants, so why would they give just one participant all the money when the person as only delivered just one person.

Everything has clause, and I am sure that they would have policy guarding against that. I don’t think they will pay the 1 participant the money involved, the moment they have one participant, they would have channeled it into other source of advertising and even probably stop the campaign of signature. I have never even come across just one person signature campaign.

[Ghenjer]

If this is the case, it will be very clear that the allocations given will be reduced because the participant's reasons are very minimal, because of course there are various reasons to pay for everything because the developer certainly doesn't want to give most of the tokens to just one person, but if an honest team certainly have to pay for it all because of existing regulations and if the rules are violated it has damaged existing rules or existing agreements.

that's true, but the problem is I also don't believe that the developer will give all token to that participant. according to common sense if the developer gives it all in automatically the participant will sell it immediately when it receives, and then a dump occurs. this is what I think is impossible if the developer shares all tokens for 1 participant.

[boranes]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Only in theory. Campaigns will always have more than just one participant and reward allocation will drop if there are few participants.

according to common sense if the developer gives it all in automatically the participant will sell it immediately when it receives, and then a dump occurs.

The same event will occur with many bounty participants, in this case one participant will sell everything and in case with many bounty participants everyone will sell, final result should be the same.

[Ss4sukE]

a good project always has a lot of participants involved in it, if a project has only one participant I think it's not a good project, yes but this is just my speculation and I think everyone who is here also has the same thought. my suggestion is better to look for other projects that have at least a lot of participants, but I don't say this as a guarantee, I mean much better than projects that only have 1 participant.

[robelneo]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That would make that participant whale and they won't allow that since they have an option to change the rules so unfortunately, I doubt if they will honor that they might transfer it to other bounties with many participants, and my take is the project is not that good, bounty hunters are very quick to leave a project for another project that what they think has a better chance to get in the market.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

It depends on projects and bounty manager I think.
I have seen projects where only three participants were there and at the end they shared entire allocated tokens(lottery   ).
I have also seen projects where there are very less participants, rewards were reduced to great extent mentioning not raising the funds as expected.
Now a days, I am seeing projects mentioning the rewards criteria based on the participants. In one project it was the condition that if there are less than 100 participants join, rewards will be reduce to half of what is allocated.

[irixo10]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Although this can hardly be true, but let's assume it is. In this case, this is why there is need for good managers, if this should happen the manager will most likely reduce the allocation for that Campaign and channel it to other campaigns with huge participants. Also, most times, at the discretion of the team, the manager might reduce the allocation then send it back to the team, because the team might not be happy paying huge for a campaign they didn't achieve much results from. I have seen most campaigns where one of the rules indicates that, if a certain number of users or participants aren't achieved, the team or the manager will take appropriate actions.

[Kezacky]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Although this can hardly be true, but let's assume it is. In this case, this is why there is need for good managers, if this should happen the manager will most likely reduce the allocation for that Campaign and channel it to other campaigns with huge participants. Also, most times, at the discretion of the team, the manager might reduce the allocation then send it back to the team, because the team might not be happy paying huge for a campaign they didn't achieve much results from. I have seen most campaigns where one of the rules indicates that, if a certain number of users or participants aren't achieved, the team or the manager will take appropriate actions.

and that's true I don't think the manager will ever send all tokens to one participant, even though the manager is responsible. at least if the project is successful, the team will automatically reduce the allocation of prizes to single participants. To be honest, I just heard about this, as long as I'm in the crypto industry I haven't seen a project that only has one participant in the signature campaign.

[meanwords]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In your fantasy world yes, but if we are talking about the reality here, he/she will not. The most scenario that is likely to happen would be the project would just cancel that particular bounty because there's no participants joining. Even if the project is a scam one, they are not that stupid to let one person to just take all the rewards for him/herself.

[jessyj48]

If only one bounty hunter promotes a project then it won't make a difference because the reason developers want bounty hunters to help promote projects is to create better awareness for the project, if you are the only one on the spreadsheet you might get nothing in return

[dimonstration]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Projects owner or admins will not make it happen . Some projects in Bounty Threads already requires number of participants if that number is not reached some amount of it will be transfer to other allocation like in social media. Its also impossible that a legit project will only get 1 participant seeing the number of users in this forum its definitely not gonna happen in any good project. There might only be few participants if that project requires some installing or registration in other software to be able to join or to acquire the wallet needed to participate but I doubt only one will try it.

[tenakha]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In your fantasy world yes, but if we are talking about the reality here, he/she will not. The most scenario that is likely to happen would be the project would just cancel that particular bounty because there's no participants joining. Even if the project is a scam one, they are not that stupid to let one person to just take all the rewards for him/herself.

I totally agree with you. If the project is good, there will not be 1 person on the whole list, or if it is bad, you can not rely them about reward. Even the BM himself does it for less money. For one person only? Even if there is more reward than developers expect, they do not give it. Also if you look at the rules, they have the authority to change the rules if needed. "They do not feed anyone easy."

[Vaculin]

If only one bounty hunter promotes a project then it won't make a difference because the reason developers want bounty hunters to help promote projects is to create better awareness for the project, if you are the only one on the spreadsheet you might get nothing in return

Exactly and you are not contributing to the project even if it will be successful and I don't think the team would not see that.
You might be getting paid but you can't expect to get the original reward that was promise, it's understandable I guess, just to play it fair on both sides.

[Cheesus]

No, it's impossible to give all tokens to one participant. Because it is not helpful for any project. That one guy can dump or manipulate the token price if he gets all the tokens from the signature campaign. Bounty manager will send tokens by 2% or 5% highest. Though I don't think a good project can have only one signature participant.

[ImSuparmin]

The big prize for one participant in the signature campaign depends on the bounty that we follow and also depends on the rank we already have, the higher the rank we have, the greater the prize we will get.

[gurunanakji777]

I don't think only 1 participant is there in the signature campaign whereas a project is successful. If such a scenario happens I believe it all depends on bounty manager whether to pay signature campaign coins to 1 participant or can change the rule to pay the coins due to only 1 participant in the signature campaign.

[ImSuparmin]

in my opinion will not get the sum of all tokens (signatures), because a project can be called successful if a lot of projects that follow the bounties, if there is 1 person who follows the bounty, maybe I think that it is a scam bounty.

[Seghokendil]

as far as I know a good project always has many participants who join in it but if the project has only one participant I think the project is one of the bad projects.

[lienfaye]

in my opinion will not get the sum of all tokens (signatures), because a project can be called successful if a lot of projects that follow the bounties, if there is 1 person who follows the bounty, maybe I think that it is a scam bounty.

Accepting 1 participant to advertise the project is really unlikely and will not going to happen in reality. We know the more participants, the more people to spread awareness and bring investors so the team would not choose to get 1 person only.

And if ever this case happened, I think the team will reduce the allocation for the campaign so its just a too good to be true offer.