Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign?

[HabiebRiziq]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If we suppose there is a signature campaign with only 1 person participating in it, I think the project cannot run and what happens is that the project will fail because the promotion is only done by one person, of course many investors are of the opinion that the project is not good. But in reality, I never saw that there was a signature campaign with only 1 person participating.

[jajorforce]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

There will be made regulations for equal distribution when in some campaigns has low participate. Like rewards will recalculate for where many number of participants. Although for more problem same kind now fixed rewards is for all campaign hunters

[Landak]

It can be possible happen. but I'm sure the rules or allocations will change when the bounty is finished with various reasons (usually the allocation will be reduced). it's better not to be too happy first when that really happens lol

[Dangki01021991]

The awards for this signature campaign are very convincing. Participants will receive a lot of tokens. This is really great is not it?

[fuer44]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

for example there is only one participant, there are rules, right? for example accounts with certain levels starting from jr. member to legendary, there is a calculation each for stake every week. So, even though the total prize allocation will be 2,000,000 tokens, only one participant will still be given prizes according to the account calculation and also the stake that is earned every week based on the rules of the bounty. if possible the project is successful and there is a bonus so the rest of the tokens are given everything, it is the right of the team. The point is that each participant will receive a reward according to the account and stake they get.

[m0Ray]

In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.

[gwaposakon]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Normally the allocated stakes would be divided to participants which would mean more coins for them. But in reality, bounty managers re-proportionate the rewards to smaller portion and add the remaining to other bounty campaigns which are joined by many participants. I have experience joining a signature campaign which only a few joined and the manager decreased the total rewards and added it to their social media campaign which has many participants.

[Kunotcoin]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

No way that's not true or even going to happen since before the campaign was started they already arrange that if the cap for the participants was not reached automatically reduce the pool, that's the common practice or in the other they just cancel that campaign for the reason of lacking of participants.

[btcdie]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.

[tambok]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.

If he is the only participant, then, it is his lucky day for having the whole stake for that certain bounty, and it is not his fault, and he earned what he has worked for, and if the token's value is good, then its a life changing for him, he choose to stay despite that no one is believing in that project and doesn't want to earn its signature, so it his reward for believing. Well, for bounty manager, I do hope that he won't add himself and cheat.

[Gotumoot]

No campaign will provide 2,000,000 million worth of altcoin to just one person. And no campaign will be successful if only one person joins the bounty.
First of all 2 million is great especially if the total coin supply is low.
Secondly it can lower the price of an altcoin. Because this token holder can dump a large amount of his reward.

[desticy]

See the spreadsheet company signatures for the project Sessia. Due to the fact that many bounty hunters left the company, the rest received quite a large reward, for example,
when compared with their YouTube company or others. Therefore, this is completely possible, and quite logical. The Sessia is not the only precedent of this in the bounty market.

[gabbie2010]

They just have to slash the token payable to a single participant in a signature campaign of course the management knows the limitation and implication of paying a whole lot to one person, if he decides to dump the token after listing in an exchange its going to cause a likely dump in the price of the token thus a set back to the success of the project, however I doubt it if we can have a participant in any signature campaign in this forum considering the huge numbers of forum members.

[lumeire]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If we see the ethics then it should be allocated to only one individual. But in real life scenario this will never happen as if the ICO or project is a real deal then people will definitely join in to promote that project and in other case where the project sounds fishy then only no one will join the bounty campaign so it would either be a big loss for that person or it will eb a shared bounty amongst many individuals.

[Shasha80]

I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.

[pandanaran]

In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.

yes, I also think that it is impossible for the project to only have one participant in the signature campaign, for example there is, I think the team will not continue the project (minimal participants / scammed projects), good projects always have many participants. so the OP can redefine about such a project, in my opinion it includes the criteria of a fraud project.

[lienfaye]

I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.

This is not possible as we know most projects prefer to have many participants (depends on their budget) to advertise the project and spread awareness to crypto community. If ever there's a weird project who will only accept one participant, I think after the duration of the advertisement they will reduce the allocation for the sig campaign since they only hire 1 participant.

[TheGreatPython]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

but I have never seen a signature campaign followed by just one person. I think if the bounty project is devoid of followers the promotion is not running optimally, but if there is then the manager must make payments professionally.

It will never be possible because the project will not even raise any capital for them to be able to meet up, if there are no people to promote them, surely it will be very impossible to raise the marketcap and at the end they will even close the project which will make that one single hunter to lose its time and expectation. When it comes to campaign, I have never seen any project that has less than 20 campaign managers.

The only thing is that if the number of participants does not exceed that 20, they will have upper hand in able to have more but not everything because there are still some criteria that they will use to make payment too such as the number of people they have on their social media handle as usual, so op should erase that.

[Palider]

These events are unrealistic and I think that in reality they will not provide the entire bounty pool for just one participant. Because it has a huge impact on the price of the coin when it is listed on the market. It also depends on the supply of the coin so if the supply is low it is certain that the price of the coin will fall and this may cause the project to destroy.

[magicrypto]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It depends from bounty manager, if there will be a small ammount of participants, bounty campaign can be cancelled or invalidated. If project is successful there are will be a lot of bounty hunter, so dont worry about that