[CLOSED] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+

[Questat]

I am not sure if someone has suggested this idea before, but we all know the outreach of no minimum post count campaigns like CM!!!

I suggested this before, the chipmixer rule, but you explain it well, so thanks for giving that idea to this campaign.

Well, we can be very much sure that greedy spammers would try to reach their 25/30 posts somehow to grab the highest pay but on the other hand, this would differentiate spammers and non-spammers.

I think if a poster have enough time to spend in the forum, they can meet even 50 posts per week, I've seen a lot of posters in the CM campaign who are consistent with reaching the limit paid post, but they are good posters, not spammers, so I guess I disagree with the word greedy and spammers.

[btcltcdigger]

I think if a poster have enough time to spend in the forum, they can meet even 50 posts per week, I've seen a lot of posters in the CM campaign who are consistent with reaching the limit paid post, but they are good posters, not spammers, so I guess I disagree with the word greedy and spammers.

Problem here is that very high percentage of "paid posters", ie signature campaign participants, are only doing it for the money. If the rule is 25, they will dish out 25 and that's it, won't log in til the end of the week.
But now BM is actually restricting them from posting on the "good old post farming megathreads" and it becomes a problem, because now they have to turn on that light bulb in their head and post something constructive and helpful to the community.

It's even worse in the altcoin sig campaigns, where you have threads with 50+ posts with same exact answer, only worded differently, and it counts. I guess old habbits die hard

[examplens]

All participants in BestChange Signature Campaign they should feel privileged because they are part of this program.
My advice to all participants, when you post something here on Bitcointalk, just think, does anyone read you post, and whether your signature carries any significance.
I fully understand the campaign manager if he can't accept posts in mega discussion's threads like posts in "Altcoin Discussion > Is it risky to invest in new crytpo coin/tokens?" can anyone find me a constructive post here? it is written here only to fill the number of posts quota, to be honest, no one read anything from there. that is, there are no readers, signature it's not read.
if someone is involved in a signature campaign, they should know something about the company which hired them, and there must be mutual interest where it's advertisements will be shown.
Bestchange have nothing with gambling, and it is not their priority to have his signature in the gambling section, but they still have a bunch of posts there. Mine too 
they are engaged in exchange and financial matters, but I did not see many posts there from his participants, although it would be logical for them to be present there.

It's simple, some discussion can be useful after 50 pages, but also some may be useless just after a few posts. Many here either do not understand what constructive discussion means, but needs to be considered, what is a benefit for an employer ^{(signature campaign owner)} if they just post and full fil some numbers of the posts counts.
For example, I represent the interests of Bestchange, and if they have a result from my work, I guess it will be more job for me, more money for me and ...

So, again it's no matter if someone post in 4 pages or 44th page if the discussion is useless and no one care. It is a waste of signature owners money. All users must keep this in mind.

Bonus advise to all users, any posts in "mega discussion" thread are almost always worthless, they need to be avoided. if it is difficult, then you should avoid Bitcoin payment campaigns.

[DaCryptoRaccoon]

#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name: MagicByt3
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2269783
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 958
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 59
BTC Address: 3JjsGHYQH8yVJA5G4mgPNHuoX4DHmU5fis

[AB de Royse777]

"He is the payer and we are the beggar, and beggar can't be a chooser".

Excuse me! Sorry, I was just reading and found this is too offensive to read.

I really do not see how I am a beggar here. That's not how it's working for me. There is a price for my signature space and I have given it to BestChange because I think the price worth it for me, although I am a GreedyBitcoiner and would like more sats on my way:-D

But I can not accept that I am begging here.

Since I have my post in here already, so I would like to write a little more about this matter.
I think (I can't remember properly) long ago I was suggesting Best_Change to reduce number of participants. Keep only good quality posters who are really not counting how many posts they made in a week, but they are posting because they are engaged in the conversations.
And perhaps they can pay these good valuable poster more than they are paying now as an incentive because from the reduction of participants they will already save from the weekly budget.

A personal observation: When someone is wearing CM signature it's by default that this is a good forum member, but we still can not tell anyone with close eyes that if someone is wearing BestChange signature then they are a good forum member.

BestChange is already paying a lot of money considering the number of participants they have then why not follow something that will give them a very high standard.

In this process if I find myself out of a spot then I think I am fine by knowing that a better one should have a spot before me.

Cheers,

[Vispilio]

#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk username: Vispilio
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=982288
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2887
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 98
BTC Address for Payouts: bc1qjpms8lghlmd5at6h3h72udgy3elznt9gd32zgx

[Avirunes]

Just coming here to apologize Best_Change for not posting as according to what they were asking for. I was aware about the spam megathreads but didn't realized that they also considered gambling discussion threads into those kind of spam threads as well. But anyway what done is done. I always usually post in such threads since I love to talk about such things so I had no intention of spamming in my defense. I understand Best_Change's decision and I will gladly accept this in a good way to improve my posting style by trying to post in other sections as well.

Thanks for hearing me out. Have a good journey everyone.  

Thanks @wozzek23 for helping me out with the detailed report.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Just coming here to apologize Best_Change for not posting as according to what they were asking for. I was aware about the spam megathreads but didn't realized that they also considered gambling discussion threads into those kind of spam threads as well. But anyway what done is done.

No need to apologize mate, I think you did great for the past weeks you did for bestchange campaign, and Im sure  they appreciate your promotions for them. Good luck on your future campaigns. Youre a reputable member of the forum and mostly recognized you (even myself)

BestChange said, they are not closing their doors for possible reentry on the campaign. So chances that you can regain your slot in the future. Good luck again.

[The Cryptovator]

"He is the payer and we are the beggar, and beggar can't be a chooser".

Excuse me! Sorry, I was just reading and found this is too offensive to read.

I really do not see how I am a beggar here. That's not how it's working for me. There is a price for my signature space and I have given it to BestChange because I think the price worth it for me, although I am a GreedyBitcoiner and would like more sats on my way:-D

But I can not accept that I am begging here.

Yea, you are right here. I think "Taker" is more appropriate than beggar. Edited my reply.

You deserve +1 merit, but I am out of smerits now .

[TheUltraElite]

Application withdrawn.

I hate to say this but I am withdrawing my application.

I fell that the users of this forum should be free to post anywhere they wish to. Some of the gambling threads are for predictions and specific game discussion. Although I am not a frequent poster but I do read some of the posts there and in Wall Observer thread and some of them a entertaining. In my opinion that should actually improve the marketing engagement of the campaign.

Considering the fact that I post regularly even when not wearing a signature recently, I would not like to be under the shackles of "Post only in <5page threads" - No, I would rather post freely but I avoid the more than 15 page replies - those are seriously spam threads but 5 pages is a very low number and will include a large volume of false positives.

Hence I would like to apologize to the manager for wasting their time with my application and wish them good luck with the future of this campaign.

[NavI_027]

Guys I know this is hard to accept but we must all (whether you belong on the excluded, remained or even those who are not participants) understand that "Best_Change's house, Best_Change's rules". That's it. Yeah very sad to know that he choose to punish the violators instead of giving them another chance but I don't see anything wrong about it either. I believe that his final verdict was based on what he think is better for the campaign, nothing more and nothing less. All we can do is to support and respect it.

That's why I'm glad that Avirunes finally accepted CM's decision with a smile. What a huge sign of respect and humility! I do hope others follow his lead and start moving on as well. Besides, making the argument even longer won't bring good benefits for us in the first place. God bless you guys .

"He is the payer and we are the beggar, and beggar can't be a chooser".

Excuse me! Sorry, I was just reading and found this is too offensive to read. [...]

Yea, you are right here. I think "Taker" is more appropriate than beggar. Edited my reply.

You deserve +1 merit, but I am out of smerits now .

I got you bro, here's 2 merits (you can now send merit to him ) for your effort of correcting your side. I appreciate it. At least you now realized that being a campaign participant is a decent work. We owe no one because we are working for that money and not simply asking for it.

[coinfinger]

^ Hey I humbly accept manager's decision as well .

(Just stating what led to breach the rules and requesting another chance should not be interpreted as disobedience. I am extremely sorry if I have sounded like that. Honestly my intention was not that.)

[wozzek23]

I respect all the decisions of Best_Change and I like to apology if I was sounding like aggressive and not obeying rules and decisions.
I wish them grand success with their ventures . More Power to bestchange!!!

[Ziskinberg]

^ Hey I humbly accept manager's decision as well .

No permanent campaign here so I admire that kind of attitude and that's what we need. Accept and just thank the campaign owner for giving us an opportunity to work, as without them we won't have something to promote. I can sense that this campaign will last, the way how people care for the improvement of the campaign, I'm really amazed, and the continued changes of the rules always aimed for the win-win situation between the participants and the campaign itself.

[Text]

I once dreamed of being included in this campaign, and because I subscribed to this thread. I also often keep track of events here and take the opportunity to be given a chance. However, in any signature campaign, only the manager or owner knows who is eligible to be accepted into a campaign. They have their own rules. So if you do not like the policy, do not join. That's just the way it is. When told to avoid posting in said sections / boards, just follow if you want to stay longer. One participant has to adjust and not the manager even if he or she makes changes to the rules. Now, if you have been removed from the campaign, maybe just respect and accept. If you ever want to go back, prove yourself worthy.

[Best_Change]

Hi guys. Accepting of applications is stopped. We will announce new participants in a few hours.

UPD

We have selected the following participants to join our signature campaign, warm welcome to:

zasad@
CryptopreneurBrainboss
20kevin20
Upgrade00

Please update your avatar and signature.

[Questat]

Congratulations to the members who got selected, especially for 20kevin20 who is part of the playbetr campaign. good luck on there mate, hope you will enjoy your stay and congrats to  Bestchange for successfully selecting the best participants. 

[The Cryptovator]

Attention:

Seems Best_Change forgot to announce the newly added rules. Here is it;

- We reserve the right to modify/add campaign rules, change pay rate, accept/deny posts, remove/accept participants, and stop the campaign at any time for any reason. We are not obliged to explain any decision taken by our team. You are applying to this campaign means you have accepted our rules.
  

zasad@
CryptopreneurBrainboss
20kevin20
Upgrade00

Welcome to the borad.

[20kevin20]

Thank you for accepting me into the campaign. I will make sure to update everything needed in a matter of hours, as soon as my current campaign week finishes.

I salute everyone else who is on board of this sig campaign - glad to be part of it from now on. Congratulations to the other accepted members as well!

EDIT: Thank you, @Questat for congratulating me

[Francis Freeman]

#Proof Of Authentication

Bitcointalk Name: Francis freeman
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=733047
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 739
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 0
BTC Address: 3B5g77XPc9Ra5T7mN3BXJaLvvvfoiAFL1f

Thanks for considering

Edit : Fixed profile link and BTC address .