Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[xzone]

Cheers to another bloody shit poster who's obviously got little or no knowledge of football and I don't exaggerate when I say something like this.
I'm not even boggled it's been the norm in the gambling section go spam whatever way you like. I also do not blame people who underappreciates Bruno Fernandez, in due time he'll be gone from the club so they can rest. With tue way things are going, Manchester United are obviously waiting for Gareth Southgate and if Erik Ten Hag is being sacked Bruno Fernandez would be one of the players definitely leaving this Manchester United side because how can you such a dead coach who wasn't even a great player in his playing days.

Bruno Fernandez has even doubled up whatever Manchester United spent on him, take it or leave it. Even Roy Keane has been forced to agree after several criticisms of the Portuguese Magician.

He should discuss with what plans they have for the club. In the next couple years he'll be approaching 31, I hope he looks at the plans of the club four to five steps ahead.

I feel like Bruno could be considered possibly the best player in the last 10 years of Manchester United. Not just like in talent or just a season or so, if you go back for the past 10 years, and see which player stayed and still helped after all this time, nobody else did. Either people left, or people just didn't do that well more than a few seasons.

Bruno on the other hand both stayed, and he did amazingly well too for all this time. And not like he gets bored or tired, it could be his 44th game of the season and if he needs to sprint he still sprints and does what he has to do. That has to be the most important part because a lot of people miss that part, if you can arrange something like that then you know what you are doing.

One of the players I respected the most this season was Bruno Fernandes. I have been talking about this with my friends for a few days, he is one of the biggest star players of the team. It is not right to just look at the statistics, his statistics are not bad at all, but I think he has a special place in the team. Now, when he is on the field, Manchester plays much better and he manages to contribute positively to the team in every aspect

[SUPERSAIAN]

There was great interest in Julián Álvarez, especially from PSG. Today City made a statement, loan offers for Álvarez will not be accepted this Summer. The player's playing time will increase. It's the right move for City, he could guarantee his place in the rotation. I don't understand why he says he wants to play more when he played almost all the games last season. He missed only two games in the league and came on as a substitute in only five games.

This means that Man City refuses to sell this player or loan him to another club, thus making the excuse that this player will be played more time meaning he will become a regular player for Man City even though we also know that this player is also played by Pep in every important match and he is rarely absent and is also rarely a substitute player, looking at his statistics, he is also quite good this season, he scored 11 goals and 9 assists, he can be relied on by Pep in the front line, so I think PSG or other clubs who are interested in him should step down because Man City has no intention of sell it or loan it out and the player also prefers to play at Man City which is a big and strong club in the EPL and of course more convincing for his future.

I don't know what you are talking about, dude. After acquiring Mbappe for Real Madrid, they did not even think of adding another centre-forward player to the team. This season, they won the Champions League even without their centre-forward and transferred Mbappe. Why should they be interested in Halaand?

He has an ongoing contract with Manchester City. Even if his contract expires, Manchester City will be very willing to sign him for a new contract.

[baeva]

Everything needs a process and Ten Hag is doing that with Manchester United.
What happened in the past was very much embedded in the character of Manchester United, so Ferguson's departure made this team lose direction and there was no manager who was able to continue what Ferguso had built and now Manchester United is being built in a different way and I see the progress continuing. to a better way.
Man City was also built using a long process, but they have strong enough finances to be able to make a strong team like now and for Manchester United I think the process and time they will go through will also produce results in the future.

I agree, things are never been easy to have changes specially which are depended on performance and quality Sir Alex Ferguson done impressive work here with after him now we have long time things are going from bad to worse even they are having too many coaches, but they fail to bring success like him but now as we are having some positive things from Eric Ten Hag mostly peoples are still not happy, and they want to have all without any hard job and manageable as they want which is not ideal thing.

Even I am also having problems with the Eric Ten Hag strategy which prevent them from having good results and going at the top but still he is doing good and having ability to bring this team at the good level which is they deserved, but this all has never been easy while things need good mind and strategy which will bring all on good level.

So he's only got one trophy this season out of the good stuff and otherwise his stats are just awful. Why should he be kept? For his pretty words? They're not backed up by anything, just defeats over the course of the season. I think it's a mistake to keep him for one more season, you have to change all the time....

Sometimes there are several reasons why the coach should be retained we as viewers can only see from the outside while management can see from all aspects, if management asks the fans of course they want a new coach because in the last few seasons the coach has failed to achieve the best results meaning that opportunities must be given to new coaches. Ten Hag's best achievement was in 2022/2023 while bringing Manchester United to finish in 3rd place but this season the results were really bad, Man United finished in 8th place.

The thing that makes Manchester United even worse is that their statistics for the season are very disappointing only 18 wins from 38 matches, scored 57 goals and conceded 58 goals lol what can we expect from this record everything looked worse. Brentford who finished in 16th place, could score 56 goals meaning that the Man United striker is equivalent to the Brentford striker.

I wouldn't compare like that exactly, I think the result of this goal difference in goals scored and conceded is due to poor tactics and match formation. They don't just need to change the coach who tried to build something all season and failed - they also need to buy players, review and rebuild the squad. I think only a new coach can do that without bias

[Renampun]

...

...

I think it is very inappropriate for Manchester United to sell Bruno Fernandes because after all, it seems like Bruno Fernandes is still the main choice for Manchester United's main squad. Moreover, Erik ten Hag will also still be the manager of Manchester United nextseason and as such,  it will certainly be difficult for Erik ten Hag to make big changes quickly for next season. Unless, if Manchester United sacks Erik ten Hag and then appoints a new manager, then it is likely that a major reshuffle could also occur. After all, Bruno Fernandes also has a contract until 2026 and at the age of 29, then I think it is still very feasible for Manchester United to keep Bruno Fernandes.

Fernandes has actually played quite well so far, it's just that Ten Hag doesn't have the best way to tame the squad he handles. There are rumors that several former Man Utd players say that the only person worthy of managing Man Utd now is Zidane, they are very confident that Zidane will be able to return Man Utd's glory as when it was still managed by Alex Ferguson. The composition of Man Utd's players is actually very good and just like you, I also think that Fernandes is currently 29 and he is still fit to play for Man Utd for some time to come.

[gabbie2010]

There was great interest in Julián Álvarez, especially from PSG. Today City made a statement, loan offers for Álvarez will not be accepted this Summer. The player's playing time will increase. It's the right move for City, he could guarantee his place in the rotation. I don't understand why he says he wants to play more when he played almost all the games last season. He missed only two games in the league and came on as a substitute in only five games.

Don't be surprised why Manchester City chose to reject their predecessor, because after many rumors that several City players would leave, Manchester City had to prepare more suitable replacements. Alvarez is quite dominant in his current position so the most important option for Manchester City is to continue to give Alvarez more playing time so he can become a replacement figure which will be much needed in the future.

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

[Docnaster]

There was great interest in Julián Álvarez, especially from PSG. Today City made a statement, loan offers for Álvarez will not be accepted this Summer. The player's playing time will increase. It's the right move for City, he could guarantee his place in the rotation. I don't understand why he says he wants to play more when he played almost all the games last season. He missed only two games in the league and came on as a substitute in only five games.

Don't be surprised why Manchester City chose to reject their predecessor, because after many rumors that several City players would leave, Manchester City had to prepare more suitable replacements. Alvarez is quite dominant in his current position so the most important option for Manchester City is to continue to give Alvarez more playing time so he can become a replacement figure which will be much needed in the future.

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

Yesterday, I read a report that Chelsea are trying to sign Julian Alvarez to the team but what wasn't stated in the report was if it was on permanent basis or on loan offer. Though many people will argue with me but if I'm to be a club manager, I'll easily pick Julian Alvarez ahead of Erling Haaland because he's more of a team player than his Norwegian teammate. Julian Alvarez does fall deep when the opposing team defense is becoming too hard to break and creates chances for others to score and he's also better than Haaland in terms of foot work.
If Manchester City is now open to loan the Argentine out for next season, I think it's a good decision that'll favor Alvarez because it'll give him more playing time to reach the peak of his potentials. If not Chelsea, Alvarez should go to another big club in England and prove himself.

[snipie]

I wouldn't compare like that exactly, I think the result of this goal difference in goals scored and conceded is due to poor tactics and match formation. They don't just need to change the coach who tried to build something all season and failed - they also need to buy players, review and rebuild the squad. I think only a new coach can do that without bias

Well in Sir Alex Ferguson era, Manchester United name was shining and things in the team weren't great after him. Ten Hag saved Manchester United in the beginning from a disastrous season and he was able to win a trophy at least this season. I wouldn't say that he was the saviour or the best choice but at least he tried but Manchester United needs more qualified players and to rely less on players that no longer can add something to the team.
I agree that a new coach and new strategies are a must to improve the team especially with a comprehensive staff that could give some money to recruit new players so a better outcome would be expected.

[SOKO-DEKE]

The new boss of Chelsea, Enzo Maresca, I don't know much about him. But I have heard a lot of people say that he is not going to be a good coach for Chelsea. I don’t know how true that is.

Honestly, I don’t really know much about him either, and I have seen Chelsea fans hyping him, but I don’t longer care about what people say about a coach if I haven’t seen his performance. Let’s see how he will perform when the season starts, maybe he is really worth the hype, and maybe he is a better coach than Pochettino which Chelsea sacked. But left to me, I still think Chelsea should have just allowed Pochettino to stay in the club. I heard he signed only one year contract with Chelsea, but with the way pochettino performed towards the end of the season, they should have extended his stay in the club.

Let's just see what will happen and how Chelsea's performances will be next season under Enzo Maresca as head coach. It is really hard to predict how his performance is going to be in managing Chelsea. Enzo Maresca has a good record as a coach, but like many other good coaches, he may also find it difficult to manage Chelsea. I don't think it is going to be easy for him. I wish they had given Pochettino enough time; it would have been better.I don't think changing the head coach frequently can easily solve Chelsea's problems. Chelsea needs to give any coach a good period of time to see how their performance looks. It is not easy to be a manager for just a season and take a weak club back to its standard.

[CroverNo01]

I wouldn't compare like that exactly, I think the result of this goal difference in goals scored and conceded is due to poor tactics and match formation. They don't just need to change the coach who tried to build something all season and failed - they also need to buy players, review and rebuild the squad. I think only a new coach can do that without bias

Well in Sir Alex Ferguson era, Manchester United name was shining and things in the team weren't great after him. Ten Hag saved Manchester United in the beginning from a disastrous season and he was able to win a trophy at least this season. I wouldn't say that he was the saviour or the best choice but at least he tried but Manchester United needs more qualified players and to rely less on players that no longer can add something to the team.
I agree that a new coach and new strategies are a must to improve the team especially with a comprehensive staff that could give some money to recruit new players so a better outcome would be expected.

Manchester United have good players,what they lack at the moment to me is a good coach.A good coach is someone who can come to the team,and motivate those boys at the club,inject into them a winning mentality,and always encourage them whenever they make mistakes.Coach don't always criticize players,else,they will fumble and play rubbish on the field.When players are not inform,it is the work of the coach to build confidence back into those players so they can perform well.Take a look at how Arteta revive every dead thing in Arsenal,and they are now competiting fiercely for the tittle.For two seasons now,they've been the only team challenging City for the tittle.

[red4slash]

Fernandes has actually played quite well so far, it's just that Ten Hag doesn't have the best way to tame the squad he handles. There are rumors that several former Man Utd players say that the only person worthy of managing Man Utd now is Zidane, they are very confident that Zidane will be able to return Man Utd's glory as when it was still managed by Alex Ferguson. The composition of Man Utd's players is actually very good and just like you, I also think that Fernandes is currently 29 and he is still fit to play for Man Utd for some time to come.

Bruno's role in the squad this season is indeed much better than what he did in the previous season as well as with the big ego problem being a bit muted this season. But because Manchester United's performance is not too good, Bruno's condition is also carried away even though if you look in terms of actual performance Bruno is one of the players who is above average for this season.

Ten Hag's strategy is sometimes confusing. Not only for those of us watching but for the players as well because sometimes we can see chaotic schemes that actually make Manchester United's condition not too good in the end.
What is surprising is why until now Manchester United have not given a good response even though if you look at the current conditions it is actually quite appropriate if Manchester United are looking for new alternatives as a coach.

[rahmad2nd]

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

Rumors are that it's not just Paris Saint-Germain who wants Julian Alvarez's services, because Chelsea are also being linked with one of the Manchester City strikers. from the papers I've read, making that happen this summer seems like it's going to be very difficult, despite Alvarez's demands for more playing time. However, it is very likely that City will not accept the offer for the Argentine player to leave the Etihad. which means, Chelsea and PSG have to look for other options to recruit a productive striker in this summer's transfer window. I'm very sure Pep will keep this player. Even though he often acts as a supersub, he is a player who really contributes to City, especially when Haaland is injured. That's why Alvarez will be retained because of his contribution and he is an important part of Pep Guardiola's plans. If City let Alvarez join another club in the summer transfer window, that means one less strength. in other words, City must find a replacement to complete the squad. Instead of doing so, Pep seems to be taking an approach with this Argentinian striker. Well, I'm not sure if Alvarez will leave the Etihad anytime soon.

[Furious 7]

In this transfer window we are going to have many clubs are going for their squads overhaul which will make interesting changes so right now talking about any change is too early but still I also feel he needs to stay here.

This will be a concern because next season there will be several clubs including big clubs that will make changes which in the end will slightly reduce their probability in the trophy race.

Currently, if you look at the situation, it is likely that several clubs such as Manchester United, Liverpool and Chelsea are 3 clubs that are still considered big and will make changes, especially Chelsea and Liverpool at this time not only some players are threatened with leaving now the coach has started to leave and this will obviously be a little doubtful because the new coach may not be as good as before.

This condition makes Mancehster City the one who will benefit because however with their current situation it is clear that they will become favorites again which fortunately there are Arsenal who can be competitors.
Although in recent news it is said that Manchester City is also likely to lose some of its core players but until now it has only been a rumor.

[Hyphen(-)]

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

Julián Álvarez have the choice to make here, he should either chose between regular playing time and staying on the bench which I am sure he will chose regular playing time because every player wants to play. Looking at it in another point of view, Álvarez might soon be a first choice striker in Manchester if Pep leaves the team because I am sure once Pep leaves, Haaland will definitely leaves as well.
Therefore, I think City are not willing to let Alvarez go so that he can represent Haaland in the future; and likewise if he leavers for PSG and PSG eventually sign Osimhen, he will still face the same problem he do face here.

[DaNNy001]

...

...

I think it is very inappropriate for Manchester United to sell Bruno Fernandes because after all, it seems like Bruno Fernandes is still the main choice for Manchester United's main squad. Moreover, Erik ten Hag will also still be the manager of Manchester United nextseason and as such,  it will certainly be difficult for Erik ten Hag to make big changes quickly for next season. Unless, if Manchester United sacks Erik ten Hag and then appoints a new manager, then it is likely that a major reshuffle could also occur. After all, Bruno Fernandes also has a contract until 2026 and at the age of 29, then I think it is still very feasible for Manchester United to keep Bruno Fernandes.

Fernandes has actually played quite well so far, it's just that Ten Hag doesn't have the best way to tame the squad he handles. There are rumors that several former Man Utd players say that the only person worthy of managing Man Utd now is Zidane, they are very confident that Zidane will be able to return Man Utd's glory as when it was still managed by Alex Ferguson. The composition of Man Utd's players is actually very good and just like you, I also think that Fernandes is currently 29 and he is still fit to play for Man Utd for some time to come.

Well I don't know how certain about the case of zidane being the perfect fit for Manchester united but I do understand that he is one of the few coaches that has potential and again why I don't feel confident with zidane is that he has only managed a real Madrid side which actually posses the height of high class when it comes to player ratings, with the like of Ronaldo , modric benzema and so many great it's definitely going to hard not to be successful in one way or the other.

[Leviathan.007]

Manchester City had a good competition for the Premier League title this season. Both Arsenal and Liverpool were very close to Manchester City at one point. But  Liverpool was not able to bring in three points consistently towards the end of the season. That was something which gave Manchester City some breathing space. But Arsenal was always competing very closely with Manchester City. In the end, Arsenal was always behind. Either they had played one match more compared to Manchester City or if they had played the same number of matches they were behind in terms of points. Other than that Manchester City did not have any other competition from any other team in the English Premier League. Maybe this is becoming the real farmers league day by day. In the next season, there is a big possibility that only Arsenal will be able to give Manchester City some competition.

Manchester city manager did a great job to allowed Manchester city to win the title again in this season, because Arsenal and Liverpool where very close to Manchester city in this season that made many people to believe that Arsenal or Liverpool will going to win the title, but the season ended up in the favour of Manchester city. Now that the season has come to pass in the premier league competition, I don't know if Manchester city will going to bring in new potential players or they will continue with their players next season, because they managed to win that title this season which will be part of something that will make their management to sign in some new players. If Arsenal president will going to replace their current manager, it will make Arsenal not to come close to Manchester city next season, because their manager is a talented manager that have good possession for Arsenal to always dominate.

In fact, Manchester City's performance this season is not very good, it's just that they were able to overcome some momentum very well so that towards the end of the season Guardiola was able to secure the top of the standings. For next season I still believe that Manchester City will still be able to defend the title, I don't see any significant threats except that Arsenal is very likely to become a strong challenger again.

Arsenal will perform the bottle job again next season and no doubt about that considering how good manchester city at this moment. There is no question that Arsenal will not win the EPL again, given how they have been playing. It's enough to use buzzwords about Arsenal to win the trophy since two decades ago. I've been hearing it for more than ten years. It has demonstrated how Arsenal is not good enough to win the EPL and other clubs are superior compared to the arsenal.
EPL competition is too difficult for Arsenal to handle. It is better to aim for minimum achievement rather than continuously thinking big, which would always yield zero results. It will hurt you.

Manchester City will win the EPL again next season and no doubt about that. This is undeniably true given the city's current consistency in the EPL by winning it 4 times in a row has proven how city must be winning it soon. City will soon become a serious contender to win the competition. I believe no club will be able to compete with Manchester City next season considering pep is also strengthening its squad.
Im not believing arsenal to compete again next season. I'd rather than take other club for this. Chelsea and liverpool will comeback stronger under their new coaches.

Chelsea spent lots of money on their last coach as he tried to make many changes in this team and improve the team. Now since they started working with Enzo Maresca, they started hiring players for Maresca to have a better team in the next season. Chelsea is trying hard to get back to the top of the table again.
The first player they bought for Maresca was Tosin Adarabioyo the former player of Fulham, he signed the contract with Chelsea for four years.

[Leviathan.007]

Usually, any player will think about getting retired when they get older, and playing at an older age cannot be easy for any player.
Jamie Vardy is a 37-year-old player who plays for Leicester and he is a legendary player in this team. Leicester is happy to have a player in this level in the team and that's why they extended the contract of Jamie Vardy for a longer time.
Jamie Vardy joined Leicester back in 2012 and he played in 464 games for his team. He scored 190 goals during these years. Now he extended his contract for one more year.

[Winterfrost]

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

Julián Álvarez have the choice to make here, he should either chose between regular playing time and staying on the bench which I am sure he will chose regular playing time because every player wants to play. Looking at it in another point of view, Álvarez might soon be a first choice striker in Manchester if Pep leaves the team because I am sure once Pep leaves, Haaland will definitely leaves as well.
Therefore, I think City are not willing to let Alvarez go so that he can represent Haaland in the future; and likewise if he leavers for PSG and PSG eventually sign Osimhen, he will still face the same problem he do face here.

Alvarez is a great striker, I wonder why Pep prefers playing Haaland than him, a club like Mancity who is contesting for the big titles should not let their striker be a player who is not adding any value in the build up instead he relies on the stress of build ups from his player just to do the finishing. A lot is expected as a striker not just scoring free goals alone, and Alvarez is the kind of player. You can see him in the mid field, wing or any position doing cool passes aswell compared to Haaland.

[Weawant]

Manchester United have good players,what they lack at the moment to me is a good coach.A good coach is someone who can come to the team,and motivate those boys at the club,inject into them a winning mentality,and always encourage them whenever they make mistakes.Coach don't always criticize players,else,they will fumble and play rubbish on the field.When players are not inform,it is the work of the coach to build confidence back into those players so they can perform well.Take a look at how Arteta revive every dead thing in Arsenal,and they are now competiting fiercely for the tittle.For two seasons now,they've been the only team challenging City for the tittle.

Encouragement and believing in the ability of that player is something most times only a coach can do better than anyone else, if a coach is making a player believe he's good, other people's opinion may not matter much because the coach is the first and most important critics to the player but whenever the coach is doing the opposite of encouraging the players, their performance is definitely not going to make sense.

Arteta and guardiola, even klop are good examples of how much a coach can impact a team, Arsenal might not have won a trophy in the last few seasons, but their present form is a threat to many teams both in the English league and the other leagues, I believe that if Manchester united gets a good coach who can go beyond just criticizing and quarrelling the players, they are going to so much better, Rashford needs a coach who's going to make him understand how much he can achieve if he puts in more effort to bringing out his best and so are many other Manchester united players.

Any team that really wants to improve and make a whole lot of progress, the ability of the team lays mostly in the ability of their head coach because they will be playing according to his instructions and tactics, so I'd the coach is giving Instructions that may not help the players, then most definitely they are not going to perform as much as they should have done if they had a better coach who has been encouraging them well enough.

[TelolettOm]

Unfortunately, Bruno was at Man United and in the end, he was unable to perform optimally. Yes, his performance was bad, just say it was bad. because with a purchase of that size, the performance should be much better, not a little better. especially if you look at the size of the salary. That's really not balanced.

Whether it's because of Ten Hag's inability to optimize himself and position Bruno, or if Bruno himself is apparently unable to adapt well to the club. In short, why is this recorded as the worst purchase with that poor performance.  

Several times, Bruno was unable to appear consistent, but when it mattered he was able to make a contribution, as happened in the FA Cup final some time ago with an extraordinary no-look assist. But if we talk about overall performance, sometimes it can't be used as a benchmark for whether it's good or bad, and maybe this is a natural instinct in times of uncertainty.

I think his role is still quite significant at Manchester United and it would be a shame if he left. Manchester United must at least prepare a midfielder who is much more capable than him and at the moment it doesn't seem like there is one. Erik Ten Hag likes to experiment with the Red Devils squad and we can't blame him considering the number of injured players this season. Well, it would be very nice if every problem could be resolved well and bring major victory to the team.

Yes, the problem is, Unietd has many shortcomings in all areas. So, that's quite a dilemma for Manchester United. If they sell Bruno, then they have to get a player who can at least be better than him. However, for example, even if the player is good, can he really make a good contribution too? If the other lines at Man United are still the same or mostly the same? Or will he be able to succeed if the club management and coaches are still the same? Ah, Man United is still having problems so far and still has shortcomings in all lines, as well as in its coach and management.

However, if we talk about a coach for Man United, we will definitely blame Hag. But again, is there anyone who can be like Ten Hag in the future if he leaves Man United. The problems at Manchester United are very complex, should everything be completely overhauled, from management, players, to coaches? 

[Hirose UK]

There was great interest in Julián Álvarez, especially from PSG. Today City made a statement, loan offers for Álvarez will not be accepted this Summer. The player's playing time will increase. It's the right move for City, he could guarantee his place in the rotation. I don't understand why he says he wants to play more when he played almost all the games last season. He missed only two games in the league and came on as a substitute in only five games.

Don't be surprised why Manchester City chose to reject their predecessor, because after many rumors that several City players would leave, Manchester City had to prepare more suitable replacements. Alvarez is quite dominant in his current position so the most important option for Manchester City is to continue to give Alvarez more playing time so he can become a replacement figure which will be much needed in the future.

In as much as Haaland is injury-free every season definitely Julián Álvarez would have a limited playing time, though Guardiola had played the duo in some matches I think it hasn't yielded positive results that is why Alvarez is usually on the bench in most matches though Guardiola had tried to give him game time , from my own point of view if PSG can guarantee him a regular playing time then he should leave because he is expected to play regularly for his club to retain his role on national team (Argentina) striker else another striker might take his position.

But I don't think so, Julian Alvarez has gotten quite dominant playing time, even though he can't do it full time, but he can show his performance as an attacking player who is also very talented.
Just look at almost all of the Premier League and UCL matches this season, he is always involved and has provided quite lot of goals and assists for Manchester City, the potential that Julian Alvarez has is really very clear that he will become an important player for Manchester City.
Moreover, Julian Alvarez is player who is able to play well every time Pep trusts him to be included in the Manchester City squad to finish the match, I doubt he will be let go easily if another team wants him.
Moreover, he also still has quite long contact with Manchester City, there are many opportunities to be able to increase his title winnings in the future, if he prioritizes his career then I sure he will not leave, especially for PSG.