Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[Jody.Drummer]

Meanwhile, the management mistake was even worse when he fired Pochettino who had worked hard to rebuild Chelsea's strongest performance and this is a big mistake that Chelsea has often experienced since last season, which is always trying to change the coach when they are trying to improve Chelsea's future and I agree with If Chelsea really wants to get good results, you should try to look at Manchester City, which has successfully won various titles just by retaining its old coach.

I agree with you. I think Pochettino has given his best this season. His performance deserves appreciation and is still worthy of being retained as a coach. Chelsea is building their squad. I think it will take years and have to be consistent. Like what City did by building a squad for years until they finally managed to get the treble winner. Enzo Maresca is a good coach. I can't wait to see his performance in pre-season.

Looking at the progress shown by Pochettino this season, he actually deserves to be retained by Chelsea. However, it seems that Chelsea saw it from another point of view so they fired him and didn't give Pochettino a longer chance, or they really wanted an instant process in one season where the coach could give them a big achievement. That is something difficult, because when Pochettino was appointed as coach, we know how Chelsea was at that time. So, in my opinion, Chelsea was very hasty in making a decision.

We'll see whether Chelsea's decision is right or not, because we don't have a guarantee that in the hands of the new coach they will be able to show something better or not. We have also seen that when they fired Thomas Tuchel at that time, they didn't even show changes that led to something good. Instead they show something worse.

[mamesso]

~Snip~

I agree with you. I think Pochettino has given his best this season. His performance deserves appreciation and is still worthy of being retained as a coach. Chelsea is building their squad. I think it will take years and have to be consistent. Like what City did by building a squad for years until they finally managed to get the treble winner. Enzo Maresca is a good coach. I can't wait to see his performance in pre-season.

It's not easy to handle a big team like Chelsea, pressure always comes from all angles when the club's performance is unstable. Pochettino almost found the right formula to improve Chelsea's performance, but the increase in performance that Chelsea experienced as the season drew to a close meant that Pochettino failed to make his team finish in a better position.

Chelsea management took the decision to dismiss Pochettino too early, if he was given the opportunity for at least one more season, perhaps Chelsea could provide competition in the title race. Now that a new coach has arrived, they have to start from zero again to build their squad. Usually coaches will have difficulty determining a suitable strategy in several official matches, Enzo Maresca has to repay the trust given by Chelsea management to improve the club's performance.

[Blitzboy]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Messy Chelsea. Big club, big money, big egos, no stability. They want everything now. Now, Ten Hag. His Manchester United performance was decent. But he had time. The season was his chance to create his team. Chelsea? A spinning door. They fire managers faster than I fire Apprentice contestants. Both Pochettino and Maresca are good. The best coach cant win with a chaotic team. Plan, vision, and patience are essential. They should let the coach coach. They'll keep failing unless they figure that out.

[Frankolala]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Messy Chelsea. Big club, big money, big egos, no stability. They want everything now. Now, Ten Hag. His Manchester United performance was decent. But he had time. The season was his chance to create his team. Chelsea? A spinning door. They fire managers faster than I fire Apprentice contestants. Both Pochettino and Maresca are good. The best coach cant win with a chaotic team. Plan, vision, and patience are essential. They should let the coach coach. They'll keep failing unless they figure that out.

A good coach cannot fix the problem of Chelsea in just a season and I don't know why the management cannot just understand that. I was expecting that with the recent performance of Chelsea's towards the end of the season they will give Pocchetino another chance but they were so quick to sack him, of which it is now that I feel that he has started understanding the players and building the team.

What if the new coach is unable to revive Chelsea will he get sacked at the end of next season, then Chelsea will never be in dorm if they cannot be patient with a coach that will bring back the club to lime light

[indah rezqi]

A good coach cannot fix the problem of Chelsea in just a season and I don't know why the management cannot just understand that. I was expecting that with the recent performance of Chelsea's towards the end of the season they will give Pocchetino another chance but they were so quick to sack him, of which it is now that I feel that he has started understanding the players and building the team.

What if the new coach is unable to revive Chelsea will he get sacked at the end of next season, then Chelsea will never be in dorm if they cannot be patient with a coach that will bring back the club to lime light

I think it's all because Chelsea wanted instant results when they spent a lot of money in the transfer window, Pochettino was equipped with expensive players but failed to meet expectations. It seems that Chelsea management doesn't look at the process, but they look at everything in the results, maybe Pochettino career will be safe if Chelsea manages to finish in the top four of the standings and thus get a ticket to the Champions League next season. It is true, Pochettino succeeded in making Chelsea appear consistent towards the end of the season, in fact their performance was very convincing to compete next season, but management and club officials considered that Pochettino was not worth keeping.

On the other hand, Enzo Maresca is now the new hope for Chelsea fans, but his dismissal will always haunt him if Chelsea fail to appear consistent next season. The journey to starting next season is still very far away, Enzo Maresca has plenty of time to prepare the team according to his wishes, and we'll see how he moves in the next transfer window. I think Chelsea really needs a quality striker, as well as recruiting a central defender to cover the hole left by Silva.

[Issa56]

A good coach cannot fix the problem of Chelsea in just a season and I don't know why the management cannot just understand that.

Chelsea wants quick changes in their performance, they want a coach that will be able to fix their problem in just a season, which will be really difficult for them to get. If they want their performance to improve, then it’s going to be over some period of time and won’t be just a season. I will say Pochettino was getting everything right for Chelsea before he was sacked. Let’s just imagine that pochettino stays in Chelsea for like one more season. We will see  great changes in Chelsea’s performance, but they decided to sack him, and they think the new coach will change everything within just a season. Even Chelsea fans are not happy with Pochettino being sacked because they are beginning to see changes in Chelsea's performance.

What if the new coach is unable to revive Chelsea will he get sacked at the end of next season

If they can sack Pochettino, then what do you expect? He will also be sacked. If Chelsea is not able to have patience with Pochettino, then any of their coaches who perform poorly within a season will also be sacked.

[Oluwa-btc]

A good coach cannot fix the problem of Chelsea in just a season and I don't know why the management cannot just understand that. I was expecting that with the recent performance of Chelsea's towards the end of the season they will give Pocchetino another chance but they were so quick to sack him, of which it is now that I feel that he has started understanding the players and building the team.

What if the new coach is unable to revive Chelsea will he get sacked at the end of next season, then Chelsea will never be in dorm if they cannot be patient with a coach that will bring back the club to lime light

The truth is they've never had a god coach, the closet to challenging was Mauricio Pochetino who had a bad start but then made good progress finally in the second half of the season.
The only coach I can recall that had quick and immediate impact with Chelsea was Antonio Conte because he already came in to meet a already made squad and he utilized them very well.

I believe in my heart that's it's same for Enzo Maresca and that he will do his best next season, all we need is backing from the management and freedom. The fans I'm sure are passionate. They will support even when they're not having a impressive season. Not even Pep Guardiola, Mikel Arteta, Jurgen had a great season non.

This particular will do well, when you go see how he reads the game with Leicester City you'll know.

[Jegileman]

I think a good coach is part of the problem of the Chelsea team, the problem of Chelsea team escalated when they sacked Thomas Tuchel as their manager they failed to replace him with a better experience coach who would have helped the team to get back to form because as at the time when Tuchel was having a difficult moment in winning matches the team was already struggling in all aspects the better Idea would have been given the manager a little more time until a better replacement is brought in.

I didn’t also likes when Thomas Tuchel was sacked, it was uncalled for that time and maybe the abrupt sack of him without regards for all what he has done for the team brought all this bad luck to them since that time. I really loved his coaching style and because of few poor performance, it didn’t mean they should have sacked him. I am sure if he wasn’t sacked that time, they would have finished in a better position than they did that season. Tod Bohely should learn from his mistakes so that his bad decisions don’t affect the whole club.

Tod Boehly misunderstood the problem with the team at that time not that he couldn't manage the team,  as some one who wants fast results he swang into action to spend money thinking that getting some quality players and getting another manager would help to salvage the problem in the team but that didn't work at for the team but I think getting a good result for Chelsea is possible anyways especially seeing how they improved in their last few matches before the end of the season so hopefully they are going to have a good next season if they maintain their performance and the winning mentality they have got right now.

Chelsea’s performance improved in the last few matches of the season but don’t still think this form can be continued even after sacking the coach that improved their performance and brought them to finish on that position? I just hope the new coach can show something different and make the team better than they are in the next season. A lot of fans are now believing in their lost club for a while now, so the new manager should make that hope to be revived more in the players, fans and team management once again.

[ginsan]

By looking at this situation, the point is that we cannot fully blame Chelsea for Poche's departure now even though this initially happened because of poor communication and cooperation but still we must also know that sacking and resignation are 2 different things so we do not have to fully say that this is Chelsea's fault.
From the beginning, Poche's appointment as coach was doubtful but he did a good job towards the end of the season even though the beginning and middle of the season were not very good in terms of performance.

As I said before, the situation will remain the same as 2 seasons ago where Chelsea will again feel the strength with a new coach who will definitely do a scheme and game that could even be directly different from this season so things like this cannot be changed because after all this is a certainty where when a new coach then there needs to be a situation where a reshuffle is definitely done to make the squad fit the criteria.

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

[DaNNy001]

By looking at this situation, the point is that we cannot fully blame Chelsea for Poche's departure now even though this initially happened because of poor communication and cooperation but still we must also know that sacking and resignation are 2 different things so we do not have to fully say that this is Chelsea's fault.
From the beginning, Poche's appointment as coach was doubtful but he did a good job towards the end of the season even though the beginning and middle of the season were not very good in terms of performance.

As I said before, the situation will remain the same as 2 seasons ago where Chelsea will again feel the strength with a new coach who will definitely do a scheme and game that could even be directly different from this season so things like this cannot be changed because after all this is a certainty where when a new coach then there needs to be a situation where a reshuffle is definitely done to make the squad fit the criteria.

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

[imamusma]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Messy Chelsea. Big club, big money, big egos, no stability. They want everything now. Now, Ten Hag. His Manchester United performance was decent. But he had time. The season was his chance to create his team. Chelsea? A spinning door. They fire managers faster than I fire Apprentice contestants. Both Pochettino and Maresca are good. The best coach cant win with a chaotic team. Plan, vision, and patience are essential. They should let the coach coach. They'll keep failing unless they figure that out.

Many consider that Pochettino dismissal was a mistake, because the coach from Argentita has started to show signs of development in a better direction, as seen in their last few matches this season. Chelsea management is much more arrogant than Manchester United management, Ten Hag is very lucky to still be trusted to manage Manchester United next season. It's true, the current Chelsea owner is not much different from the previous owner in terms of patience, but in my opinion Roman Abramovich is more ambitious.

Chelsea vision and mission is of course quite good, their main target is to win trophies, but in this case the manager takes a big risk if they fail to meet expectations, because management will not tolerate failure. Currently, Enzzo Maresca plans tranfer for the future are not known for certain, what is clear is that he will again overhaul the depth of the squad by recruiting several new players. The latest rumors say that Trevoh Chalobah, Armando Broja, Conor Gallagher, Ian Maatsen, Lukaku will reportedly be released in the next transfer window. I think Enzzo Maresca can use the money from the sale of this player to smooth out his plans to build a team, I hope Chelsea can recruit Osimhen from Napoli.

[QueenVera]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea performance this season is certainly beyond the expectations expected by the current management, so it is not surprising that Pochettino was sacked Although able to make Chelsea finish in the Conference League zone this season, Chelsea of course are now starting to build a squad with a strong foundation and also rely on young players so it is not surprising that Todd Boehly as the owner of Chelsea budgeted a lot of money to recruit talented young players,  not only young players, but now also Chelsea are starting to trust their long-term project to a young coach who does have a lot of experience.

Pochettino dismissal certainly indicates if the Chelsea owner is not satisfied with Pochettino performance, and we can say if with the big money that has been spent by Chelsea so far, of course the level of the Conference League zone is not what they expected, it seems that Chelsea management next season has high expectations and of course they want to get instant results and maybe even if Chelsea new coach will not last long at Chelsea if he Unable to meet the targets implemented by Todd Boehly.

ETH in his fist season was able to at least get a 3rd place finish and that’s really a great position for a big club at the end of the season. Well if ETH was in a club like Chelsea with current management, then I don’t think he will be sacked because of the stand of finishing 3rd which means UCL slot. Now you can see how the Chelsea board just want to achieve results and as such you can see how they keep sacking managers in a bid to at least attain UCL spot next season.

 The board wants to keep spending greatly in a bid to achieve success quickly and as such they will keep making rash decisions for the team. ⁠At this point, you can imagine how pressured the new coach will be because at this point you can see how Poch brought up this team from 12th to 6th in space of 3 months. The club doesn’t want to stay down in that little position because they have really invested greatly in the club and as such their expectation is high.

 ⁠At this point and the way the management want success then you can say that long term project isn’t on their mind except the coach performs well to an extent. Now I wish the new coach real luck because I’m tired of the instability at Chelsea and the way they handle their Management situations.

[Marvell1]

If one actually thinks that Manchester United needs to have a great squad,  greater than the one they have right now, they are simply mistaken.  at the same time if someone actually thinks that the problem of Manchester United is actually not the coach I have to say they are really stupid.  and let me tell you there are people like that. I also have heard people say that he should stay the coach of Manchester United for another season.  because that will actually bring Manchester United better results.  I was like,  of course, he is going to get better results in the next season because it can't get any worse compared to what they have done in this season.

Anyway Manchester United has been able to win the FA Cup and I think that is the only positive thing that can take away from the season.  I hope they will be able to realize that having Ten Hag as the coach of United actually is a big mistake. And Manchester United being able to win the FA Cup should not change that fact

If this is what you think, then you have a long way to go with football truthfully. That Manchester United squad needs improvement and I can't argue with whoever doesn't see it that way. How can a person with football knowledge say Manchester United need no improvement? Go read and watch the comments of the past legends that has played for the club. Most of you have difficult watching lol I'm not fazed.

When you want to talk about the problem of the club, it all start from the Glazers the owners of Manchester United, all they care is making profits. The squad might have faced difficulties this season but we know they had injuries and you can't overlook that. And if you want to evaluate him as a manager howndo y'all forget his first season? Making blunt arguments with just a season, Nonsense!!

There's no better replacement out there, to can't just sack him for who to replace him? Potter? Southgate? Maybe they should just sack him already so whoever that comes in might help relegate the club. Having baseless disco here is so tiring.  Ponder why people can't talk tactics with facts and pure stats. The stats don't lie go see for yourselves.

So you think Manchester United could not get better results with the squad that they already have right now? There are coaches who are bringing in better results by spending half the money that Manchester United has spent. I guarantee that by giving this same squad to someone like Xabi Alonso or Anchelloti, they are going to bring even more competitive results in the Champions League. But for some reason Ten Hag is unable to do anything. Yes, there are problems in the squad. Harry Maguire would have been long gone if someone else was the coach. Antony would definitely have performed a lot better under someone else. There is a chance that he wouldn't have been in the Manchester United squad in the first place but that's another story. It is damn sure that the squad has the capability of bringing in better results than they are doing right now.

And you saying there are no good coaches available right now? Really? Anybody that's out there is unable to bring in better results compared to Ten Hag? And I don't understand why it is OK to bring in a fidget spinner” for 95 million and it is not OK to spend a big amount for a good coach. I am sure if Manchester United actually had thrown an unbelievable amount of money to even Alonso, or Jose Mourinho, they would have agreed. Especially with the history that Manchester United has.

At this point, those who are actually defending Ten Hag are definitely bots and NPC’s.

[Weawant]

I agree with you. I think Pochettino has given his best this season. His performance deserves appreciation and is still worthy of being retained as a coach. Chelsea is building their squad. I think it will take years and have to be consistent. Like what City did by building a squad for years until they finally managed to get the treble winner. Enzo Maresca is a good coach. I can't wait to see his performance in pre-season.

I have always bought into this opinion since I learned pochettino has been sacked, I know it's been the tradition of Chelsea management to sack their coaches at will especially if within the shortest given time you are unable to deliver as they have expected of you, but with pochettino I saw really different and I can't even say for sure why exactly they will let go of him even without a very valid reason enough because I personally don't think there's any.

Chelsea started off poorly this season and it felt like they weren't going to have a decent finish but then pochettino was able to keep fin tuning their tactics and strategy till towards the end of the season when he was able to get series of wins which gave them a productive end and a very decent finish such that even Manchester united that was far ahead of the now had to run behind them and depend on winning the FA cup to be able to participate in another league game aside the premier league by next season but it was really different with Chelsea.

The board just seem not to have that patients enough to give coaches time enough to be able to see if they can get their teams soughted out before letting go, it's not workable with every coach, some Coach needs More than a season to be very productive enough meanwhile some other may be very good In their first season a d turn out terrible in the next just like that which is send in Manchester united.

[Josefjix]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

[Nheer]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

In Chelsea i don’t think its about where they finish rather about winning trophies and instilling a good play in the team. If the overall performance is good then the owners will believe the project is promising and can deliver in a few years. With Pochettino performance this season i don’t think the team looks ready to challenge for the title that why they replaced him.

In Ten Hav situation, if he were to be Chelsea’s coach he will definitely be sacked despite winning the FA cup because the team doesn’t look ready at all and it’s almost as if he is not teaching the players anything or has a specific style of play at all. Pochettino was even better and he got sacked so if Ten Hag was to be a Chelsea coach he would have been sacked mid season.

[TopT3ns]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

The Chelsea owner wants to see the title so any coach who fails to achieve the target will be fired, we know that since Chelsea was taken over, Chelsea has had several coaches and that will happen before Chelsea actually wins the title or at least is in 2nd place in the standings. I understand what the owner expects is normal because he prepared a sufficient budget to bring in players so there is no reason not to achieve the target.

From several media I see that Chelsea has a new coach, Enzo Maresca will handle Chelsea for next season, is it strange that the contract is only for 2 seasons? I'm not familiar with Enzo Maresca but I'm based on history he has sufficient experience in the Premier League starting as Assistant Manager and Manager. His best achievement was bringing Leicester City back to the Premier League.

[mv1986]

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

I have said it elsewhere that I absolutely don't see how you think that Pochettino is a great coach. You say he should be given more time. Ok, I get that point because you are talking about a specific club. But if we look at how much time he spent already in his professional career in football, what are the titles to his name that you can bring up? Zero. He hasn't won anything in years and years as a coach. Yet you claim he needs more time, but I wonder for what? To build a team? How many clubs has he had that won anything? Please don't bring up that he won Ligue 1 with PSG...

[Docnaster]

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

I have said it elsewhere that I absolutely don't see how you think that Pochettino is a great coach. You say he should be given more time. Ok, I get that point because you are talking about a specific club. But if we look at how much time he spent already in his professional career in football, what are the titles to his name that you can bring up? Zero. He hasn't won anything in years and years as a coach. Yet you claim he needs more time, but I wonder for what? To build a team? How many clubs has he had that won anything? Please don't bring up that he won Ligue 1 with PSG...

After the UEFA Europa League final, Atalanta manager was asked how he feels now that he's finally won a trophy after several years of trying and he simply told the media that he doesn't buy the idea that a manager's tactical strength should be judged by the number of trophies he's won and in as much as I completely do not buy his idea, i think it's he made some sense with his statement.
There's every possiblity that top manager might be very good but still didn't win a trophy. Mauricio Pochentino haven't won a trophy as we all know but I don't think there's any denying the fact that the Argentine manager is a very tactician that's good as rebuilding and improving the condition of any team he manages. Chelsea have been very poor in their previous two season before Pochentino was appointed and I don't think it's fair for anyone to expect him to instantly improve the team after taking over. Chelsea were beginning to pick up good form in the last games of the season which made me think that Mauricio have finally found the best style for the club so I don't think it was fair to sack him after just one season.