Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[X-ray]

Chelsea have no flimsy excuse to make for their poor results in league games, because they made significant signings this season. The blues having a draw tie with Liverpool and recording a shocking defeats against Westham united, points out that they're still lacking the fundamentals of winning a game. The defendlines and frontlines is not fully supported in games, they tend to face blunders from these areas, but the midfield is quite brilliant and balanced in performance. Chelsea have tough difficulties to handle in the squad this season. Mauricio Pochettino will fixes the present challenges they're facing in matches.

We shall wait until the middle of the season. We can't judge it once chelsea was just only facing two matches in EPL. We must wait until the middle of the season. If there will be no improvements to happen with chelsea and i wanna say if the club is a complete flop.
The defensive lines were making too many mistakes during the previous matches. I saw that the problem was with some players like gallagher. Chelsea needs to sort out the garbage players who were putting the club into the disadvantage.
Chelsea wants to sign a new striker, but they're also trying to get Lukaku back in the starting lineup as a backup for the club once chelsea cannot buy a new striker till the end of season.
The midfield is still lack of discipline. Chelsea needs to avoid unnecessary thing like the match against westham once it has gotten penalty.

[naira]

Erik Ten Hag's strategies have in fact generated a lot of debate on how well they work to open up scoring opportunities for the opposition. Perhaps some elements of the tactic's implementation have not worked as well as anticipated. A team's attacking performance may occasionally be enhanced by improved player communication and a stronger knowledge of the game as intended by the coach. Injuries or player rotations can also have an impact on a player's ability to consistently put together winning game combinations.

Manchester United recently acquired a striker, so choosing who to start is a difficult tactical choice. Considerations could include a player's level of physical fitness and their ability to adjust to the game system being used. In addition, player rivalry can have an impact on how much time a player gets to play for a team.

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

[rendravolt]

It seems Mason Mount couldn't have the good performance we were expecting to see when he joined Manchester United and he wasn't the successful transfer we were expecting to see. Rio Ferdinand, the former player of Manchester United said Ten Hag is the reason for the bad performance we see from Mount. Ferdinand said we can't judge him for two games but one reason for bad performance is because of his position in Manchester United.



https://www.goal.com/en/news/mason-mount-position-concern-man-utd-rio-ferdinand-erik-ten-hag/bltbddb5a59fa1dfe28

Mason Mount maybe good to whatever level but he is one of these players that has nothing to show and play, another player from his Chelsea days who has been hyped. When you take time to watch him, you know he is a big flop.
I never liked his type of game but since Erik Ten Hag wanted him to be his perfect midfied signature this season, then I became open enough to see the good in him and what he has got to offer. Currently, you can't use him ahead of Bruno Fernandez, because Bruno Fernandez creates better goal scoring opportunities than Mason Mount.

If Mason is positioned right behind the number nine he will do better than this, But dumping Bruno Fernandez behind would be stupid. If that will make them.have a good combination, maybe Erik Ten Hag should give is a trail.

Just like what you think, I actually had more expectations for Mount when Erik ten Hag was interested in bringing him to Manchester United. But looking at the first two matches to defend Manchester United, it is clear that the quality is not commensurate with the costs that have been spent. At least Mount has to prove as one of the important players at the club by making goals or assists. But in fact he always can't maximize anything and I think Manchester United's decision to give the jersey number 7 feels very heavy for a player who has flopped in the previous team.

Apart from that, I agree with Erik ten Hag's rather unwise decision to put Bruno behind and it is better for him to be in his starting position. I think Erik ten hag has to evaluate Mount's performance in these two matches considering that this week's match is very important for Manchester United to get 3 additional points after last week they did not get anything against Spurs.

[zuzie]

The current manager of Tottenham Hotspur Ange Postecoglou has shown that he's a very skilled and experienced manager who can successfully bring out the best from his Tottenham squad without the presence of Harry Kane at the club. 
That being said, I think the effect of losing a big player like Harry Kane who's been the club's seasonal top score for almost a decade will be definitely felt in the nearest future by the club. Harry Kane has been very instrumental to the progress and positive results of the club for a long period of time and would definitely be missed

Tottenham are often unstable in their performance like last season where they appeared consistently at the start of the season but towards the end of the season they lost their form and failed to close the season in the best place.

Well, we are also presented with their best performance when they beat Manchester United in the second match that has been played. But if you look at the pattern of their play, of course Tottenham have a forward line that is not so aggressive in the two they have played. Because the goals scored against Brentford came from their bottom line players and when the match against Manchester United the goals that were created also came from their midfielders so we judge that Tottenham have had a fairly aggressive decline in front line after being left out by Harry Kane.

Apart from that, Richarlison, who filled in for the place left by Harry Kane, was unable to make a contribution in the two matches he has played.

Even though what we saw from Tottenham against Manchester United at the start of the match was not good, Tottenham slowly began to find a rhythm in the game and slowly made it difficult for Manchester United's defense. Dominantly, in the first half, you were dominant and neat, but you couldn't score against Tottenham.
And finally in the second half Tottenham was able to score a goal that was created by Spurs in the 83rd minute and successfully doubled the score to 2-0 and Tottenham still maintained their lead in the remaining minutes of the last minute of the game.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Just like what you think, I actually had more expectations for Mount when Erik ten Hag was interested in bringing him to Manchester United. But looking at the first two matches to defend Manchester United, it is clear that the quality is not commensurate with the costs that have been spent. At least Mount has to prove as one of the important players at the club by making goals or assists. But in fact he always can't maximize anything and I think Manchester United's decision to give the jersey number 7 feels very heavy for a player who has flopped in the previous team.

A player is fully responsible for his performance and career and if a player fails from one club to another, another and the same failure from coach to another one, it seems that player has some own issues. He must changes himself, improves his weakness to be used more by his coach and can contribute more for his club.

Erik Ten Hag possibly did not use Mason Mount to maximize the player ability and contribution but Mount can not blame all things including his poor performance on Ten Hag. He is no longer a young player and nearly touches his cap and won't be able to upgrade himself too much more. It is too soon to consider his transfer to Manchester United is a failure for him but I am not surprised if we return in next few months, after this season and say the same thing.

[Ahli38]

Erik Ten Hag's strategies have in fact generated a lot of debate on how well they work to open up scoring opportunities for the opposition. Perhaps some elements of the tactic's implementation have not worked as well as anticipated. A team's attacking performance may occasionally be enhanced by improved player communication and a stronger knowledge of the game as intended by the coach. Injuries or player rotations can also have an impact on a player's ability to consistently put together winning game combinations.

Manchester United recently acquired a striker, so choosing who to start is a difficult tactical choice. Considerations could include a player's level of physical fitness and their ability to adjust to the game system being used. In addition, player rivalry can have an impact on how much time a player gets to play for a team.

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

Well that's right. I personally think that Erik Ten Heg is too focused on tactics but he is not good at making his troops understand each other. Harmonization between the players at the Manchester United club looks very awkward. The players became a little selfish among each other. Everyone seemed to want to highlight himself. So that team unity or cohesiveness in the game is not well established. I feel the competition for the individualism of the players at this club is too thick. And this is Erik Ten Heg's job to be able to make all the players more harmonious with each other. I still remember last season when Cristiano Ronaldo was at this club. Several times Cristiano Ronaldo was in an empty position but the other players from Manchester United instead ignored Cristiano Ronaldo and the player forced himself to execute a shot that ended in failure.

[Zoomic]

Erik Ten Hag's strategies have in fact generated a lot of debate on how well they work to open up scoring opportunities for the opposition. Perhaps some elements of the tactic's implementation have not worked as well as anticipated. A team's attacking performance may occasionally be enhanced by improved player communication and a stronger knowledge of the game as intended by the coach. Injuries or player rotations can also have an impact on a player's ability to consistently put together winning game combinations.

Manchester United recently acquired a striker, so choosing who to start is a difficult tactical choice. Considerations could include a player's level of physical fitness and their ability to adjust to the game system being used. In addition, player rivalry can have an impact on how much time a player gets to play for a team.

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

There is nothing wrong with the strategy of Manchester United coach. We all have watched him when he was in Ajax and we saw that his strategy paid off. He is known for being discipline and his pattern of play is high pressing. That is why he always need energetic and young players who will be able to cover high km while on the pitch. The major problem of Manchester United is average players.

There are no or no much world class players in Manchester United squad that will achieve what their coach wants. Their frontline is poor and midfield is also poor. The defence line is not organised. So Manchester United need to invest in good players in order for Eric strategy to work effectively.

[asriloni]

Even though what we saw from Tottenham against Manchester United at the start of the match was not good, Tottenham slowly began to find a rhythm in the game and slowly made it difficult for Manchester United's defense. Dominantly, in the first half, you were dominant and neat, but you couldn't score against Tottenham.

I think that it's not totenham that was strong but i believe if manchester united performed so badly against totenham. All of the goals by totenham being made by martinez. This is the reason why Manchester United supporters bestowed upon him a new moniker, Lisandro Meguire.
He played like meguire. All of goals were coming from his mistake. The indescribable feeling I have can only be expressed through honesty, and I must admit that the defenders of Manchester United were the worst. The players could not getting away from making blunder.
MU was always loosing due to the blunders being made by its defenders.

And finally in the second half Tottenham was able to score a goal that was created by Spurs in the 83rd minute and successfully doubled the score to 2-0 and Tottenham still maintained their lead in the remaining minutes of the last minute of the game.

I must say that if it's not totenham but lisandro meguire who has been scoring all of goals for totenham. Totenham would not able to win against MU if lisandro meguire was not making blunders.
Lisandro meguire must fuck off.

[QueenVera]

Even though what we saw from Tottenham against Manchester United at the start of the match was not good, Tottenham slowly began to find a rhythm in the game and slowly made it difficult for Manchester United's defense. Dominantly, in the first half, you were dominant and neat, but you couldn't score against Tottenham.

I think that it's not totenham that was strong but i believe if manchester united performed so badly against totenham. All of the goals by totenham being made by martinez. This is the reason why Manchester United supporters bestowed upon him a new moniker, Lisandro Meguire.
He played like meguire. All of goals were coming from his mistake. The indescribable feeling I have can only be expressed through honesty, and I must admit that the defenders of Manchester United were the worst. The players could not getting away from making blunder.
MU was always loosing due to the blunders being made by its defenders.

And finally in the second half Tottenham was able to score a goal that was created by Spurs in the 83rd minute and successfully doubled the score to 2-0 and Tottenham still maintained their lead in the remaining minutes of the last minute of the game.

I must say that if it's not totenham but lisandro meguire who has been scoring all of goals for totenham. Totenham would not able to win against MU if lisandro meguire was not making blunders.
Lisandro meguire must fuck off.

I guess you meant Lisandro Martinez because Harry Maguire the former captain have been benched for over a long time in Manchester united and didn't start in the match against Tottenham rather it was Lisandro Martinez and Rafael Varane who are the preferred choice in the centre back position that started the game, however the problem of Manchester United in that match was not coming from Martinez, I think there problem is not even the defence line but the midfield, Mason Mount and Bruno Fernandes are almost alike and not fit to play the midfield together, also the Defensive Midfield Casimiro ain't in the good form and would need a challenge in that position to help him pick up.
 Also Rashford is playing out of position and Manchester really need a striker so as for Rashford to move to his preferred position, another player that's underperforming is the Brazilian winger Antony he's not lining up to the amount he was bought for and needs to be benched, i also think Gernacho is not really to play as a starter in the club and performs better when introduced from the bench, lastly united needs be hasty in offloading about 2 more players as a to get in new arrivals to strengthen weaker positions especially the midfield area.

[Xcode7]

Erik Ten Hag's strategies have in fact generated a lot of debate on how well they work to open up scoring opportunities for the opposition. Perhaps some elements of the tactic's implementation have not worked as well as anticipated. A team's attacking performance may occasionally be enhanced by improved player communication and a stronger knowledge of the game as intended by the coach. Injuries or player rotations can also have an impact on a player's ability to consistently put together winning game combinations.

Manchester United recently acquired a striker, so choosing who to start is a difficult tactical choice. Considerations could include a player's level of physical fitness and their ability to adjust to the game system being used. In addition, player rivalry can have an impact on how much time a player gets to play for a team.

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

There is nothing wrong with the strategy of Manchester United coach. We all have watched him when he was in Ajax and we saw that his strategy paid off. He is known for being discipline and his pattern of play is high pressing. That is why he always need energetic and young players who will be able to cover high km while on the pitch. The major problem of Manchester United is average players.

There are no or no much world class players in Manchester United squad that will achieve what their coach wants. Their frontline is poor and midfield is also poor. The defence line is not organised. So Manchester United need to invest in good players in order for Eric strategy to work effectively.

Currently Manchester United has quality players in almost every line.
This is just the start of the season so we can't conclude anything, last season Ten Hag managed to improve Manchester United's performance with proof they managed to start in the top 4 but indeed what happened at the start of this season was a little disappointing.
Erik Ten Hag has made this team what he wants, slowly and indeed this squad is still not perfect especially up front they haven't played well until now, but I think this is what is called a process, we as fans just need to be patient just.
Regarding strategy, I don't doubt Ten Hag, he has proven it with Manchester United last season and with Ajax a few seasons before.

[Docnaster]

It seems Mason Mount couldn't have the good performance we were expecting to see when he joined Manchester United and he wasn't the successful transfer we were expecting to see. Rio Ferdinand, the former player of Manchester United said Ten Hag is the reason for the bad performance we see from Mount. Ferdinand said we can't judge him for two games but one reason for bad performance is because of his position in Manchester United.



https://www.goal.com/en/news/mason-mount-position-concern-man-utd-rio-ferdinand-erik-ten-hag/bltbddb5a59fa1dfe28

Mason Mount maybe good to whatever level but he is one of these players that has nothing to show and play, another player from his Chelsea days who has been hyped. When you take time to watch him, you know he is a big flop.
I never liked his type of game but since Erik Ten Hag wanted him to be his perfect midfied signature this season, then I became open enough to see the good in him and what he has got to offer. Currently, you can't use him ahead of Bruno Fernandez, because Bruno Fernandez creates better goal scoring opportunities than Mason Mount.

If Mason is positioned right behind the number nine he will do better than this, But dumping Bruno Fernandez behind would be stupid. If that will make them.have a good combination, maybe Erik Ten Hag should give is a trail.

Just like what you think, I actually had more expectations for Mount when Erik ten Hag was interested in bringing him to Manchester United. But looking at the first two matches to defend Manchester United, it is clear that the quality is not commensurate with the costs that have been spent. At least Mount has to prove as one of the important players at the club by making goals or assists. But in fact he always can't maximize anything and I think Manchester United's decision to give the jersey number 7 feels very heavy for a player who has flopped in the previous team.

Apart from that, I agree with Erik ten Hag's rather unwise decision to put Bruno behind and it is better for him to be in his starting position. I think Erik ten hag has to evaluate Mount's performance in these two matches considering that this week's match is very important for Manchester United to get 3 additional points after last week they did not get anything against Spurs.

Mason Mount's current performance in Manchester United isn't pleasing to watch and that's why fans of the club currently believe that his signing was a waste of resources.
But I think the England international will adapt to the playing style of the club in future time. He's trying to adapt to the playing pattern and philosophy of the club. Mount in my own opinion has the potentials to become a great signing for the red devils but needs more time to start displaying the best part of himat the club.

[naira]

There is nothing wrong with the strategy of Manchester United coach. We all have watched him when he was in Ajax and we saw that his strategy paid off. He is known for being discipline and his pattern of play is high pressing. That is why he always need energetic and young players who will be able to cover high km while on the pitch. The major problem of Manchester United is average players. 

That doesn't mean that what Erik Ten Hag implemented at Manchester United will have the same effect, right? You need to know that placing something must be in its proper place. Meanwhile, the current position of Manchester United players is not in accordance with the demands of Erik Ten Hag. You are right at Ajax he has picked up positive points even buying a former player who was at Ajax would not be a match.

Look again at the striker, is there beauty playing on the pitch? to be honest everything is still beyond expectations. Manchester United is a club with a myriad of achievements, it has become the biggest club that has ever existed, it's not the same if it has to be equated with Ajax. Manchester United is still Manchester United and so is Ajax, the competition is different, the implementation will also be different, including the players in it.

[LordShanken]

There is nothing wrong with the strategy of Manchester United coach. We all have watched him when he was in Ajax and we saw that his strategy paid off. He is known for being discipline and his pattern of play is high pressing. That is why he always need energetic and young players who will be able to cover high km while on the pitch. The major problem of Manchester United is average players. 

That doesn't mean that what Erik Ten Hag implemented at Manchester United will have the same effect, right? You need to know that placing something must be in its proper place. Meanwhile, the current position of Manchester United players is not in accordance with the demands of Erik Ten Hag. You are right at Ajax he has picked up positive points even buying a former player who was at Ajax would not be a match.

Look again at the striker, is there beauty playing on the pitch? to be honest everything is still beyond expectations. Manchester United is a club with a myriad of achievements, it has become the biggest club that has ever existed, it's not the same if it has to be equated with Ajax. Manchester United is still Manchester United and so is Ajax, the competition is different, the implementation will also be different, including the players in it.

Manchester United team has not performed very well in the last few seasons. But the team is expected to do something great this season. Because the performance of the team players seems like they are united to do something good.

[snipie]

Mason Mount's current performance in Manchester United isn't pleasing to watch and that's why fans of the club currently believe that his signing was a waste of resources.
But I think the England international will adapt to the playing style of the club in future time. He's trying to adapt to the playing pattern and philosophy of the club. Mount in my own opinion has the potentials to become a great signing for the red devils but needs more time to start displaying the best part of himat the club.

Lionel Messi needed a whole season to get back his form in PSG. That is a top player, why should people want a player like Mason Mount to play at maximum performance after just few matches?
I understand the frustration of fans especially Manchester United ones but they have to calm down a bit and not frustrate the player mentally, he just escaped from Chelsea bad performance seasons.

[tusandii]

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

Ten Hag is a fairly reliable coach and he can understand the situation of a football club which is trained to be able to create a truly capable force and be able to compete with other big clubs.
Right now maybe Manchester United's players are not that good in every game but when Ten Hag familiarizes the players with the ideal strategy then it is likely that it won't take long for Ten Hag and his players to have the strength they want.
I believe in Ten Hag's ability as a coach that one day Manchester United will really be able to become the king of England like a few years ago.

[QueenVera]

Ten Hag is a fairly reliable coach and he can understand the situation of a football club which is trained to be able to create a truly capable force and be able to compete with other big clubs.
Right now maybe Manchester United's players are not that good in every game but when Ten Hag familiarizes the players with the ideal strategy then it is likely that it won't take long for Ten Hag and his players to have the strength they want.
I believe in Ten Hag's ability as a coach that one day Manchester United will really be able to become the king of England like a few years ago.

They'll only go back to glory days when the leach in the Club decides to sale the club to Sheikh Jassim who's plans for the club would definitely help take them back to the glory days of Sir Alex Ferguson's Era, presently the team seems disorganized and it's obvious that the glaziers family are not longer competent in handling the affairs of the club and also the board is filled with people with less football ideas.
 It's obvious that they didn't make the right choice of midfield this season, with Mason Mount bought for about £65m and having played just 2 matches in the premier league and sidelined due to a recent injury, I wonder who's in charge of the medicals that don't give them the rightful informations of new arrival and make them to sign unfit and injury players that money they bought Mount with would had been enough to lure both Amrabat and Gravenberch into their squad and strengthen the midfield because they the most area that reaally needs to br strengthened in their team.

[piebeyb]

Mason Mount's current performance in Manchester United isn't pleasing to watch and that's why fans of the club currently believe that his signing was a waste of resources.
But I think the England international will adapt to the playing style of the club in future time. He's trying to adapt to the playing pattern and philosophy of the club. Mount in my own opinion has the potentials to become a great signing for the red devils but needs more time to start displaying the best part of himat the club.

Lionel Messi needed a whole season to get back his form in PSG. That is a top player, why should people want a player like Mason Mount to play at maximum performance after just few matches?
I understand the frustration of fans especially Manchester United ones but they have to calm down a bit and not frustrate the player mentally, he just escaped from Chelsea bad performance seasons.

Most fans can only press for players to perform well, they don't understand the process, because the process can't be done in an instant, the process of adapting new players to other players can take time, so for that we also have to understand that we will never know in the middle of the season or the end of the season Mount can do better at manchester united.

We also shouldn't be able to blame some players just like that because in a club playing with eleven players and where out of the eleven there are players who may be less productive so to find a solid playing style is rather difficult, so it takes time to be able to produce a good game, it should be everyone supports without bringing down players, it's a loyal fan.

[Iroh]

Mason Mount's current performance in Manchester United isn't pleasing to watch and that's why fans of the club currently believe that his signing was a waste of resources.
But I think the England international will adapt to the playing style of the club in future time. He's trying to adapt to the playing pattern and philosophy of the club. Mount in my own opinion has the potentials to become a great signing for the red devils but needs more time to start displaying the best part of himat the club.

Surely not all fans of the club would think bring him in was a waste of funds. obviously, fans of the club would want their team to play better and can get really impatient when their expectations aren't met.
He should be spared from all the negative comments as it's just too early to judge and condemn him to be a waste of resources. Hopefully time to fully settle in ibefkre he starts dazzling is what he really needs. He would have lots of games to prove himself. Hopefully he does. The sooner, the better. I would hate to join others later on and start thinking he's a waste of resources.

[Mustang Shelby]

Erik Ten Hag's strategies have in fact generated a lot of debate on how well they work to open up scoring opportunities for the opposition. Perhaps some elements of the tactic's implementation have not worked as well as anticipated. A team's attacking performance may occasionally be enhanced by improved player communication and a stronger knowledge of the game as intended by the coach. Injuries or player rotations can also have an impact on a player's ability to consistently put together winning game combinations.

Manchester United recently acquired a striker, so choosing who to start is a difficult tactical choice. Considerations could include a player's level of physical fitness and their ability to adjust to the game system being used. In addition, player rivalry can have an impact on how much time a player gets to play for a team.

In my opinion, Erik Ten Hag is too demanding of an ideal strategy while the abilities of the players are not too appropriate. Erik Ten Hag can be said to be a strict and idealistic coach, but that is still not comparable to the poor condition of Manchester United's players. Just look at how blunt the front line is, even building attacks is still not sharp. We are consumed by the media exaggerating Manchester United players, because the facts are very far from what is being talked about. Rashford is having a hard time being consistent, Antony and Garnacho still want to highlight their respective skills. I like Erik Ten Hag and he is on the right track but at the moment the capacity he has is lacking.

In fact, Eric Ten Hag has produced important tactical formations for Manchester United. The players are playing pretty well, too. Now it seems that Manchester United is not drawing a good graphic, the team still has some shortcomings.

[hyudien]

Ten Hag is a fairly reliable coach and he can understand the situation of a football club which is trained to be able to create a truly capable force and be able to compete with other big clubs.
Right now maybe Manchester United's players are not that good in every game but when Ten Hag familiarizes the players with the ideal strategy then it is likely that it won't take long for Ten Hag and his players to have the strength they want.
I believe in Ten Hag's ability as a coach that one day Manchester United will really be able to become the king of England like a few years ago.

They'll only go back to glory days when the leach in the Club decides to sale the club to Sheikh Jassim who's plans for the club would definitely help take them back to the glory days of Sir Alex Ferguson's Era, presently the team seems disorganized and it's obvious that the glaziers family are not longer competent in handling the affairs of the club and also the board is filled with people with less football ideas.

You know and I quite agree that if Man United changed ownership by Sheikh Jassim all matters including the quality of the team, both management and players, would be much more secure. Seeing how the budget spent by the Glazer family on the transfer foam was minimal, Erik Ten Hag shopped for players in a very economical way. For this reason, you cannot maximize the players that are brought in other than adjusting to a makeshift budget. Everything was proven and the results of the purchase did not have such a big impact on Man United's current game. In fact, you could say there were no aggressive changes, especially in the attack line, which was just like that.