Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2019, 11:05:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 [739] 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Hardfork block 1042000 - Merge Mine w/BTC!  (Read 1024351 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
BitcoinCharlie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
May 13, 2017, 01:36:38 PM
 #14761

When I go to run ./unobtaniumd for the first time it says I need to reindex for the auxpow. I type yes and then it just repeats a y down the screen. Is this correct? How long does it take?
not exact figure have been told yet in this regard i am also in waiting list for this.
Join the active UNO chat group on Telegram app.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEIAq9IOEd4Z5BlyYA 
@pospow you may receive a faster answer to your question by joining the UNO Telegram forum at the above link.

We welcome you!

Unobtanium - The crypto commodity you keep! |
Hate Inflation? You'll love $UNO
1556017533
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556017533

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556017533
Reply with quote  #2

1556017533
Report to moderator
1556017533
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556017533

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556017533
Reply with quote  #2

1556017533
Report to moderator
1556017533
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556017533

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556017533
Reply with quote  #2

1556017533
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
edgar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1001


View Profile
May 13, 2017, 05:29:27 PM
 #14762

When I go to run ./unobtaniumd for the first time it says I need to reindex for the auxpow. I type yes and then it just repeats a y down the screen. Is this correct? How long does it take?
not exact figure have been told yet in this regard i am also in waiting list for this.

this does not sound like my experience running unobtanium qt on win

reindex took a few minutes and wallet was ready upon completion



phatkiller
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 13, 2017, 11:17:23 PM
 #14763

When I go to run ./unobtaniumd for the first time it says I need to reindex for the auxpow. I type yes and then it just repeats a y down the screen. Is this correct? How long does it take?
not exact figure have been told yet in this regard i am also in waiting list for this.
This happened to me as well the first time i ran Unobtanium and Prototanium,  what i did was run like this: ./unobtaniumd -reindex&

This allowed it to boot up without asking that question and started syncing.

Anytime after that I only used: ./unobtaniumd&

This worked for both unobtaniumd and unobtanium-qt each on separate machines.

sirsmokesalot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 14, 2017, 01:27:36 PM
 #14764

When I go to run ./unobtaniumd for the first time it says I need to reindex for the auxpow. I type yes and then it just repeats a y down the screen. Is this correct? How long does it take?
not exact figure have been told yet in this regard i am also in waiting list for this.
This happened to me as well the first time i ran Unobtanium and Prototanium,  what i did was run like this: ./unobtaniumd -reindex&

This allowed it to boot up without asking that question and started syncing.

Anytime after that I only used: ./unobtaniumd&

This worked for both unobtaniumd and unobtanium-qt each on separate machines.

Cool man, thanks for the positive contribution! Nice to see some new names poking about and sharing! I think this is the time to get on the Uno train.

I doubt i am the only person who has had this thought so ima throw it out there, what if this accumulator is Wulong? What if he came back? So far the trends fit his m.o the buying up and selling down weak hands shake out all while amassing more and more. Granted that would be the m.o of anyone trying to make the market move, but what if Cheesy

We can't grow when we won't criticize ourselves!
-->>>Unobtanium - The crypto you keep!<<<--
CrystalSufir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 15, 2017, 01:56:04 PM
 #14765

Tone's MA #53 - Bitcoin the Rock of Stability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqKl7RDPS7o

Unobtanium is mentioned: 31:42
natmccoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 880
Merit: 1000

twitter.com/natmcmolecule


View Profile
May 15, 2017, 08:26:13 PM
 #14766

Tone's MA #53 - Bitcoin the Rock of Stability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqKl7RDPS7o

Unobtanium is mentioned: 31:42

Question: Will some of the more limited supply altcoins like Unobtanium have value as collectibles in the future?

Answer: Unobtanium? Is that really an altcoin because I've never freaking heard of it. Hold on a second. Opens tab to research Unobtanium then immediately forgets about it. No, no they won't. Because what is securing that coin? There's no security in that altcoin.

My response: 10 PH/s is securing it, but you wouldn't know it's merge mined with bitcoin because you stopped researching it immediately after you opened the tab in order to advertise your $9,000 Casascius coin! FFS! Alright buddy, I'll be sure to share that clip in the future when UNO is highly valuable. We'll all get a good laugh.

CrystalSufir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 15, 2017, 08:36:32 PM
 #14767

10PH/s is a lot but does it really count when 79.7 % of last 1000 blocks were mined by one miner?
And there was 219 orphan blocks at 26 march 2017.  The technology is in progress, but is security in progress?
natmccoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 880
Merit: 1000

twitter.com/natmcmolecule


View Profile
May 15, 2017, 09:25:37 PM
 #14768

10PH/s is a lot but does it really count when 79.7 % of last 1000 blocks were mined by one miner?
And there was 219 orphan blocks at 26 march 2017.  The technology is in progress, but is security in progress?

I actually don't know, I've wondered about that before. If it's a mining pool then theoretically customers could migrate if an unsavory decision was being made. I'd guess that kind of majority creates a vulnerability to potential attacks by the pool operator? Maybe that's something we should all focus on, improving mining pool hash distribution.

I have also spoken about raising the minimum block reward from 0.0001 to 0.001 (if it drops below 0.001 at the millionths block, which I haven't been totally convinced that it will). Such a low reward (0.0001/block, ~0.05 UNO/day, 1/20th of what it is now) may make hashrate distribution even worse. In the telegraph app recently it seemed like 3 of 3 people said if it goes to 0.0001 we should keep it there. I'm of the opinion that we should wait and see, but reconsider if hashrate &/or distribution falters significantly.

I'm also not sure about orphan blocks, can anyone comment on that? Is it a problem? IIUC, it's about UNO's somewhat fast block generation rate (3 minutes) coupled with the sometimes significant shifts in hashrate (with the coin ranging from about 1-10 PH/s lately). I suppose it is "inefficient", but it doesn't seem to cause any significant issues.

CrystalSufir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 12:05:50 PM
 #14769

Raising the minimum block reward is SIMPLY STUPID. What makes you unconvinced about block reward?
Let's assume that price will be also 20x higher, to archieve that goal unobtanium community have 4 halvings on horizon and 29 months.
learminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 12:11:31 PM
 #14770

Since you were wondering wether or not it was a typo Nat, this is from the UNO sourcecode:

CrystalSufir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 01:14:41 PM
 #14771

right now it's: 0.00195312  per block
after halving:  0.00097656
after halving:  0.00048828
after halving:  0.00024414
after halving:  0.00012207
after halving:  0.00001000
The last halving seems not a halving.
0.0048 Uno per day.
natmccoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 880
Merit: 1000

twitter.com/natmcmolecule


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 06:02:51 PM
 #14772

Since you were wondering wether or not it was a typo Nat, this is from the UNO sourcecode:


Ahh, thank you Learnminer! This is the answer I've been trying to get for some time.

I understand why people are opposed to raising the minimum block reward. I've even said in the past that I'm in support of UNO development as long as it doesn't touch the maximum coin count or the block reward. I was just thrown off that people had been saying '250 years to mine!' for years, then when I ran the calculation it was 2,500 years.

I'll shut up about it (other than celebrating halvings) unless we run into related problems that may be caused by the 0.0001 reward.

Edit: Oh, 0.00001  Shocked

That's even lower than I was thinking, so actually there is a typo on the website, just not in the direction I was thinking. So it's ~25,000 years to reach completion? Well like I said, we'll see what the hashrate and hashrate distribution looks like at that reward level.

Be sure to fix that part of unobtanium.uno Learnminer: "finishing with a minimum subsidy of .0001 after 15 halvings."

natmccoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 880
Merit: 1000

twitter.com/natmcmolecule


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 06:14:45 PM
 #14773

after halving:  0.00012207
after halving:  0.00001000
The last halving seems not a halving.


Ya... It should go 0.00012207 > 0.00006103 > 0.00003052 > 0.00001526 > 0.00001000

Maybe there's a typo in the source code and they meant to code for a 0.0001 minimum?  Huh

learminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 16, 2017, 08:41:36 PM
 #14774

My bad, I was looking in the wrong repo (the launch one from 2013), it was a typo and has since been fixed! Current repo:

FallingKnife
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018


Unobtanium: Rare, Fair, Vetted.


View Profile WWW
May 18, 2017, 12:38:16 PM
 #14775

UNO is at 9 PHS right now.

For the record, here's UNO's position on coinmarketcap's currency list at this moment.






This rally is approaching Wolong territory in marketcap.

In terms of longevity, it's exceeding Wolong's stamina.

Will $20 UNO soon be the new normal?

FallingKnife
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018


Unobtanium: Rare, Fair, Vetted.


View Profile WWW
May 18, 2017, 12:54:37 PM
 #14776

The UNO forum at Cryptocointalk.com has a great new look. Check it out.

https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/forum/2423-unobtanium-uno/

Cross posting to cryptocointalk, reddit, twitter, is encouraged. Help UNO expand its community.

cragv
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 19, 2017, 12:03:36 AM
 #14777

Hi all, it's been a while but I'm still around. Today I come to you in need of a little help! I have 149kg in a Cryptapus paper wallet from Dec 2014 that I'd like to import. I'm having a problem importing the private key to my updated and current UNO Bluechist wallet, which itself holds more UNO correctly and without error.

Someone else had this problem in 2015:

When trying to import a private key in Bitcoin core v0.10.0rc1 I'm getting:

Invalid private key encoding (code -5)

Address was generated at Blockchain.info.

I'm trying to import the address with:

Code:
importprivkey yourPrivateKeyInWalletImportFormat "TheLabelThatIWant"

As described here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/How_to_import_private_keys_v7%2B

Blazr came to the rescue...

I have two keys to import, one starts with 'D' the other with 'C', same error with both.

Your private keys aren't in Wallet Import Format, they are base58 which doesn't work with Bitcoin Core.

On blockchain.info, go to import/export > export unencrypted and on the dropdown "select private key format" select "Bitcoin-Qt Format". They should begin with 5, K or L.

I have no idea why blockchain.info uses base58 as the default format, they really should change that to WIF. Almost no clients use base58.


Like the OP there, it appears my private key is stored in unencrypted Base58 format (58 character private key, starts with '6') and I need to convert it to Bitcoin-qt format. Blazr's advice to the other poster seems to be just what I need to do - however, it appears Blockchain.info has now removed the Export tool from their wallet.

Is there anywhere else I can get my paper wallet address into the right format? Sincere thanks for anything you can suggest! -Craig

ps. cryptocointalk looks great! easy on the eyes Smiley
learminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 19, 2017, 11:56:39 AM
 #14778

Like the OP there, it appears my private key is stored in unencrypted Base58 format (58 character private key, starts with '6') and I need to convert it to Bitcoin-qt format. Blazr's advice to the other poster seems to be just what I need to do - however, it appears Blockchain.info has now removed the Export tool from their wallet.

Is there anywhere else I can get my paper wallet address into the right format? Sincere thanks for anything you can suggest! -Craig

ps. cryptocointalk looks great! easy on the eyes Smiley


Hi craigv, maybe this Reddit post can help.


cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
May 19, 2017, 12:17:57 PM
 #14779

Hi all, it's been a while but I'm still around. Today I come to you in need of a little help! I have 149kg in a Cryptapus paper wallet from Dec 2014 that I'd like to import. I'm having a problem importing the private key to my updated and current UNO Bluechist wallet, which itself holds more UNO correctly and without error.

Someone else had this problem in 2015:

When trying to import a private key in Bitcoin core v0.10.0rc1 I'm getting:

Invalid private key encoding (code -5)

Address was generated at Blockchain.info.

I'm trying to import the address with:

Code:
importprivkey yourPrivateKeyInWalletImportFormat "TheLabelThatIWant"

As described here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/How_to_import_private_keys_v7%2B

Blazr came to the rescue...

I have two keys to import, one starts with 'D' the other with 'C', same error with both.

Your private keys aren't in Wallet Import Format, they are base58 which doesn't work with Bitcoin Core.

On blockchain.info, go to import/export > export unencrypted and on the dropdown "select private key format" select "Bitcoin-Qt Format". They should begin with 5, K or L.

I have no idea why blockchain.info uses base58 as the default format, they really should change that to WIF. Almost no clients use base58.


Like the OP there, it appears my private key is stored in unencrypted Base58 format (58 character private key, starts with '6') and I need to convert it to Bitcoin-qt format. Blazr's advice to the other poster seems to be just what I need to do - however, it appears Blockchain.info has now removed the Export tool from their wallet.

Is there anywhere else I can get my paper wallet address into the right format? Sincere thanks for anything you can suggest! -Craig

ps. cryptocointalk looks great! easy on the eyes Smiley

Hi,

Please try to import the private key in Electrum_uno. It seems to usually do a good job picking the correct format... Also, what is the first character of the string of the private key? Don't post more than the first character obviously.

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
four3200
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 253



View Profile WWW
May 19, 2017, 06:03:59 PM
Last edit: May 20, 2017, 12:41:03 PM by four3200
 #14780

The UNO pool is a symptom of BTC.
The issue is the same for BTC.  UNO is just a microcosm.

If you blame UNO then you condemn BTC.  Visa Vera.

Main idea is competition between miners is good enough, and that it is not in the interest of the dominate pools to corrupt the integrity of the block chain.

UNO is rare.  And keeping up with the Jones.
UNO just holds its place in the continuum given all ships are rising in this tide.
BTC has grasped 'store of value' as its last straw.
UNO is that 'store of value' riding on BTC tech/network.
Seek stability, BTC still faces daily operation cost in the millions, UNO not so much, like $20/day.
'store of value' TITLE belongs to UNO.
(for the SHA256D network industry ... yes industry)

The question is is what happens on the downside?

Great to be a base pair!  Know your reserve capital, trade off and trade back in.
Wink

UNO proves itself on that downside cycle.

Also, very cool to notice the very wide range of prices depending on the coin trading against UNO.  Very cool.

■▐ ▎▬▬▬▬▬▬ 5 YEAR CROWDSALE▐ ▎■BUY UNO ▬▬▬▬▬▬▐ ▎■
bigDog9kiloasicTALKTop-apocalypse#420jfa#PR0#form#coin#POSpoll#simpleDEX#open
Pages: « 1 ... 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 [739] 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!