DEEPTHOUGHToftheDAY:: bitcoin days destroyed is seen as a plus (the longer the coins do not move) ... UNo has 191k coins ... so not only is it difficult to be high volume BUT it is a BAD THING ... hence less volume good? [But maybe super velocity for a small percent (say 1% / 2000 coins) that trade back and forth acting as means to conduct transactions] ... any thing 'old' that moves on the chain will be detected by the high freq traders and defensive/offensive measures taken to handle the price flux.
the high freq traders will watch the exchange addies like hawks and (the PROs) will know if a large stack of coins (might be) entering the books. quants running autobots.
you could be moving coins on the chain just for fun to get people used to coins moving. Uno has the advantage of not haveing a huge satoshi-wallet that would cause panic if things would be moving. I'd recommend to move in chunks, not huge amounts. Biggest private wallet is 2.2% of coins. That's alright.
The only thing really threatening is the cryptsy-wallet i think. Just pray they keep the shop afloat until people were able to buy it out.
-----
i have a theory about coins:
coins with premine/presale and a community expecting things spoon fed will not go anywhere. Either you need a huge team and budget to get things going or the core team ends up being worked up. Often enough people can't find consensus in such working-groups and the project fails because of conflicts about how to spend the budget. They also consume huge recources because they will be looking at it as a job and expect to be payd fulltime.
I think in case of coins the only way to really get it going is the wise approach Blazr2 took: put a project out there, that is totally fair and see what happens. The Dev can't be responsible for promotion and all the other stuff because he end up with too much work.
The only way to get a coin really going is to have it as fair as uno and a community that is aware that the work will not be done for them, they have to do it themselves. The swarm-thing. People expecting it fed with the spoon pay a price for that.
Bitcoin is the same. The people holding it know they have to promote it (satoshi won't do it for them).
So i think in a few years down the road we'll see that 95% or more of established and resilient coins are the ones with a fair start, good distribution, no premine/presale and communities that are aware it is up to them to get it rolling.
I think only coins with fair start and good longterm community have a chance to stick.
The more people take on responisbilities because they are holding the coin and want it to apprechiate, the more solid the coin is.
