Chips.gg | CASINO & SPORTSBOOK | 200% DEPOSIT BONUS | 3000+ GAMES

[panjul07]

There is a new Beat The Boss challenge on Chips. This time, you have to hit higher than 592x multiplier and you'll win $1000.

Looking at the multiplier target to beat itself looks not that hard but the hardest part here is to beat the highest multiplier by other players because it is not as simple as "hit higher than 592x and win a share of the $1000 prizepool".
Currently, someone need to hit more than 1462x in order to beat the 3rd highest multiplier on this contest.
I have tried this contest long time ago when I was still actively playing here but I never won it although I've hit the bigger multiplier than the initial target because other players were hitting much bigger multiplier.

[crwth]

There is a new Beat The Boss challenge on Chips. This time, you have to hit higher than 592x multiplier and you'll win $1000.

Is it the event where a streamer sets the standard? The multiplier? A crazy win by a streamer to achieve that 592x. Crazy. You should do a crazy bankroll type of thing and make sure you bet a minimum amount so you have the maximum tries to reach that multiplier. I haven't reached that high yet. 

[Synchronice]

There is a new Beat The Boss challenge on Chips. This time, you have to hit higher than 592x multiplier and you'll win $1000.

Looking at the multiplier target to beat itself looks not that hard but the hardest part here is to beat the highest multiplier by other players because it is not as simple as "hit higher than 592x and win a share of the $1000 prizepool".
Currently, someone need to hit more than 1462x in order to beat the 3rd highest multiplier on this contest.
I have tried this contest long time ago when I was still actively playing here but I never won it although I've hit the bigger multiplier than the initial target because other players were hitting much bigger multiplier.

Oh, my bad, I thought that you were automatically a winner if you were the first one to hit 592x multiplier but I was wrong. I read terms right now and as it looks, you have to hit higher than 592x in order to be in the leaderboard and the top 3 biggest multipliers on the leaderboard will win a cash prize. $1000 is a little for that, isn't it? But the good thing is that $0.20 is the minimum bet and not higher numbers.

Is it the event where a streamer sets the standard?

To be honest, I don't know.

Chips.gg updated their user interface 21 hours ago. There isn't a much difference, you'll still feel like at home but they changed the layout structure of the website. Do you guys like a new design?

[Shishir99]

Is it the event where a streamer sets the standard? The multiplier?

Yes, it is. Last week, their streamer Serena hit that 592x multiplier on Le King slot, and this became the standard for this week's challenge. Actually, some whales eventually chase these multipliers. As you can see, Someone named Donavito has already hit a massive 6830x on this slot already, and he is holding the first position. Now, someone has to hit at least 1463x if they want to win the 3rd prize, which is only $200. I don't think it is worth chasing if you do not want to gamble for fun only.

Chips.gg updated their user interface 21 hours ago. There isn't a much difference, you'll still feel like at home but they changed the layout structure of the website. Do you guys like a new design?

Just checked after seeing your comment. The new UI looks more modern and goes with the current casino standard. I can see the Live win section now, which I think they added in the last update. Or am I wrong?

[panjul07]

Looking at the multiplier target to beat itself looks not that hard but the hardest part here is to beat the highest multiplier by other players because it is not as simple as "hit higher than 592x and win a share of the $1000 prizepool".
Currently, someone need to hit more than 1462x in order to beat the 3rd highest multiplier on this contest.
I have tried this contest long time ago when I was still actively playing here but I never won it although I've hit the bigger multiplier than the initial target because other players were hitting much bigger multiplier.

Oh, my bad, I thought that you were automatically a winner if you were the first one to hit 592x multiplier but I was wrong. I read terms right now and as it looks, you have to hit higher than 592x in order to be in the leaderboard and the top 3 biggest multipliers on the leaderboard will win a cash prize. $1000 is a little for that, isn't it? But the good thing is that $0.20 is the minimum bet and not higher numbers.

It is basically like a normal multiplier contest but there is a minimum multiplier to be one of the winners, the 592x is the lowest target so anyone with higher than 592x will have a chance to win but still it depends on the other entries by other participants.
The prize is decent enough as it is 500-300-200 especially compared to the minimum bet requirement, it is just hard to win unless you are lucky enough to hit top 3 multipliers (above 592x).

[Shishir99]

It is basically like a normal multiplier contest but there is a minimum multiplier to be one of the winners, the 592x is the lowest target so anyone with higher than 592x will have a chance to win but still it depends on the other entries by other participants.
The prize is decent enough as it is 500-300-200 especially compared to the minimum bet requirement, it is just hard to win unless you are lucky enough to hit top 3 multipliers (above 592x).

Yeah, but for the current contest, it seems like 592x or even a 1000x is not enough to win the 3rd prize. The leaderboard shows that the current 3rd position is holding a massive 1462x multiplier. If someone wants to take the 3rd place, they will have to hit a 1463x+ multiplier. If that were a 100x or a 200x, I would have said that people should try to hit that. But we are talking about nearly 1500x multiplier, which is kinda rare.

We usually see multiplier contests in this forum, and these are exclusive on the BitcoinTalk forum only. Usually the forum members compete with each other. But when it comes to the global slot multiplier contest, hundreds of unknown whales can hit massive multipliers. I won't suggest people chasing these multipliers.

[Synchronice]

It is basically like a normal multiplier contest but there is a minimum multiplier to be one of the winners, the 592x is the lowest target so anyone with higher than 592x will have a chance to win but still it depends on the other entries by other participants.
The prize is decent enough as it is 500-300-200 especially compared to the minimum bet requirement, it is just hard to win unless you are lucky enough to hit top 3 multipliers (above 592x).

That's true, everyone with the higher than 592x has the chance to win something but the competition is so tough, you need to be very lucky. Previous minimum bet requirement was 247x on The Magic Cauldron slot.
By the way, I enjoy such challenges, especially when the minimum bet is eligible for participating. If you love playing slots, such a challenge makes it very competitive against other players and you try to beat your competitors, which adds another thrill to the whole gambling process.

[Haunebu]

I showed the history of my bets. I compared the odds with other bookmakers. The odds are no different. All other casinos pay me money. And this casino just stole all the winnings and do not respond. I did not make arbitrage bets. Let the casino check my every bet and show me what I did wrong. I was simply accused of arbitration without any evidence and my money was stolen.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539851.0
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/07/21/UA1Iz5.jpeg

Just checked your case and it does seem like Chips screwed you out of your money using their TOS as a shield since it seemed like you were value betting. They should have paid you your winnings and limited your account instead.

I advise you to move on asap since you won't be getting your winnings, but you at least got back your deposit. Looks like I'll be avoiding this site for sportsbetting going forward.

[Synchronice]

Just checked your case and it does seem like Chips screwed you out of your money using their TOS as a shield since it seemed like you were value betting. They should have paid you your winnings and limited your account instead.

I advise you to move on asap since you won't be getting your winnings, but you at least got back your deposit. Looks like I'll be avoiding this site for sportsbetting going forward.

I place bet on MMA and boxing events on Chips.gg because sometimes they have boosted odds on my picks but I can't disagree with you about one thing, there are problems about sports betting. To be honest, I didn't have any problem but I saw many complains, although, from my understanding, these problems were caused by the sportsbook provider BetBy. As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

[hd49728]

I place bet on MMA and boxing events on Chips.gg because sometimes they have boosted odds on my picks but I can't disagree with you about one thing, there are problems about sports betting. To be honest, I didn't have any problem but I saw many complains, although, from my understanding, these problems were caused by the sportsbook provider BetBy. As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

You posted a reasonable way of thinking and your approach is safe. I really don't think betting on a same match at different gambling sites that use a same sportsbook provider is a careful bet approach. I don't accuse anyone but if it is not for arbitraging bet intention, a gambler does not need to bet on two or more different sites on a same match, with different odds, while a sportsbook provider is only one.

If a sportsbook provider does not have effective tool for arbitraging bet detection, your bet activities can be not noticed but otherwise, your accounts will possibly red flagged and have big problems.

[Haunebu]

As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

You do have a point since sportsbooks usually share data among themselves using a common provider and this is how arbers are caught. However, some sites just steal customer winnings by using arbitrage betting as an excuse when the truth is something else entirely.

There is no guarantee that playing at a single Betby supported sportsbook instead of multiple ones will safeguard your winnings since they can simply lie without providing any proof.

[memehunter]

As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

You do have a point since sportsbooks usually share data among themselves using a common provider and this is how arbers are caught. However, some sites just steal customer winnings by using arbitrage betting as an excuse when the truth is something else entirely.

There is no guarantee that playing at a single Betby supported sportsbook instead of multiple ones will safeguard your winnings since they can simply lie without providing any proof.

People often dont realize that arbitrage betting is way more risky. No casino wants these type of bets and they can easily identify them by just looking at the bet amounts. IMO, this is a problem for a very small miority who is taking advantage of this. If you are a normal bettor (not necessarily a loser) there are very less chances that you will face any problem anywhere.
You are right, casinos are getting more and more equipped to ban these arb players through data sharing and new technology.

[DaNNy001]

As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

You do have a point since sportsbooks usually share data among themselves using a common provider and this is how arbers are caught. However, some sites just steal customer winnings by using arbitrage betting as an excuse when the truth is something else entirely.

There is no guarantee that playing at a single Betby supported sportsbook instead of multiple ones will safeguard your winnings since they can simply lie without providing any proof.

People often dont realize that arbitrage betting is way more risky. No casino wants these type of bets and they can easily identify them by just looking at the bet amounts. IMO, this is a problem for a very small miority who is taking advantage of this. If you are a normal bettor (not necessarily a loser) there are very less chances that you will face any problem anywhere.
You are right, casinos are getting more and more equipped to ban these arb players through data sharing and new technology.

Before ever I got so indulge in gambling I use to have this friend of mine who actually made gambling looked so easy and this was back in day ofcourse and the method he used for arbitrage betting on different casino and believe even this type of bet style is not easy and the risk involved is something else because you might get your account banned and no way to come out of it but for him that started early he was at a slight advantage because the system hasn't yet recognize this type of betting that much but the money he used in playing this games was crazy and I wouldn't even dare if I had the chance.

[Synchronice]

As I understood, many sportsbooks use BetBy and this company collects analyzes from each of them and often accuses you of using arbitraging. To my mind, it's better to gamble only on one BetBy supported sportsbook instead of two or more BetBy supported ones if you want to avoid problems.

You do have a point since sportsbooks usually share data among themselves using a common provider and this is how arbers are caught. However, some sites just steal customer winnings by using arbitrage betting as an excuse when the truth is something else entirely.

In this case, it's not Chips.gg that doesn't pay winning to customers. They use 3rd party provider, BetBy for sportsbook, so as I understood, Chips does what BetBy tells them to do. Seriously, I don't know who is an abuser and who is a victim when people open such scam accusation threads.

There is no guarantee that playing at a single Betby supported sportsbook instead of multiple ones will safeguard your winnings since they can simply lie without providing any proof.

There is no guarantee but it's a safer approach to my mind.

Before ever I got so indulge in gambling I use to have this friend of mine who actually made gambling looked so easy and this was back in day ofcourse and the method he used for arbitrage betting on different casino and believe even this type of bet style is not easy and the risk involved is something else because you might get your account banned and no way to come out of it but for him that started early he was at a slight advantage because the system hasn't yet recognize this type of betting that much but the money he used in playing this games was crazy and I wouldn't even dare if I had the chance.

I think that these days every casino tries to have similar odds to protect themselves from arbitrage betting because if you leave that loophole on your website, there is no way to detect smart person, who does arbitrage betting because they'll have multiple accounts from multiple locations on multiple people's names.
Well, if they bet 50K and similar money, then it will really be possible to detect them because such a high bidders aren't millions of people.

[hd49728]

In this case, it's not Chips.gg that doesn't pay winning to customers. They use 3rd party provider, BetBy for sportsbook, so as I understood, Chips does what BetBy tells them to do. Seriously, I don't know who is an abuser and who is a victim when people open such scam accusation threads.

It is shared information and it is what we knew so far. I kind of agree with this reason as BetBy as a service provider shared their cheating detection to Chips.gg and requested action from Chips.gg.

Similarly, I used to read cases like if a casino feels something wrong with activities of an account in a game, they can ask for support from a game provider for more details. It means casinos and game providers share information with each other.

I think that these days every casino tries to have similar odds to protect themselves from arbitrage betting because if you leave that loophole on your website, there is no way to detect smart person, who does arbitrage betting because they'll have multiple accounts from multiple locations on multiple people's names.
Well, if they bet 50K and similar money, then it will really be possible to detect them because such a high bidders aren't millions of people.

I believe casinos know that but sometimes they compete with each other in given odds to users. In addition, there is chance of time lag in their odd updates so that there is always possible probability of odds differences among different casinos. Arbitrage gamblers actually use tools to scan around different casinos and do their cheating works.

[gunhell16]

There is a new Beat The Boss challenge on Chips. This time, you have to hit higher than 592x multiplier and you'll win $1000.

Is it the event where a streamer sets the standard? The multiplier? A crazy win by a streamer to achieve that 592x. Crazy. You should do a crazy bankroll type of thing and make sure you bet a minimum amount so you have the maximum tries to reach that multiplier. I haven't reached that high yet. 

What if a bettor places a maximum bet and then hits a 592x multiplier? That player would surely get rich instantly. But honestly, pure luck would be their only defense
for something like that to happen.

As for me, I've accepted that I won't experience those kinds of winning multipliers because I usually only put small amounts into the casino where I gamble most of the time.
That's because my deposit money is limited, and I simply enjoy the act of gambling itself.

[panjul07]

-snip

-snip-
We usually see multiplier contests in this forum, and these are exclusive on the BitcoinTalk forum only. Usually the forum members compete with each other. But when it comes to the global slot multiplier contest, hundreds of unknown whales can hit massive multipliers. I won't suggest people chasing these multipliers.

Whales or non whales can hit massive multipliers, this kind of contest is pure luck contest so whales has no other advantage except that they have much more balance to keep chasing compared to small bankroll players.
Small bankroll players may beat whales in this contest with a big luck so do not think that whales will always win this kind of contest.
Chasing the multipliers to win one of the prize is fine as long as we know the probability and we know how much to spend so we can play responsibly.

[tima90]

Why are the casino representatives silent? They just hid and didn't answer. I showed you all my bets. I proved that I did not violate any rules. This is just fraud on their part. No need to run away from the problem. Let's solve it

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539851.0
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/07/21/UA1Iz5.jpeg

[Shishir99]

Why are the casino representatives silent? They just hid and didn't answer. I showed you all my bets. I proved that I did not violate any rules. This is just fraud on their part. No need to run away from the problem. Let's solve it

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539851.0

It's not like they did not respond to you here and on their platform. It's not like you don't know what you did. You were accused of doing value betting and arbitrage betting. The casino confiscated all your winnings, and they returned your initial deposit to your account and enabled withdrawal for your account. This is a standard practice in the sportsbook industry.

Since they have already declared the decision is final, you are unlikely to get any response from them anymore. You will waste your time and theirs by writing here and there. If you love doing arbitrage betting or value betting, find casinos that support arbitrage betting.

[hd49728]

It's not like they did not respond to you here and on their platform. It's not like you don't know what you did. You were accused of doing value betting and arbitrage betting. The casino confiscated all your winnings, and they returned your initial deposit to your account and enabled withdrawal for your account. This is a standard practice in the sportsbook industry.

Since they have already declared the decision is final, you are unlikely to get any response from them anymore. You will waste your time and theirs by writing here and there. If you love doing arbitrage betting or value betting, find casinos that support arbitrage betting.

Chips.gg representative replied there with this answer. After that, they considered that the case was closed and no longer mind about it.

This user did not satisfy with this answer and solution of Chips.gg and continues his complain. Surely he has rights and freedom to do this, but I don't think Chips.gg mind about it after they already closed the case.

See this again.

canceling your winning bet is shitty and no one likes that, but you also agreed to their terms when you created an account and made those bets.

If you can not move on with this, you must feel painful while there will be nothing changed.