Duelbits.com | Casino & Sportsbook | VIP | Instant withdrawals!|ARGENTINA & AVFC

[Solosanz]

There are few promotions from Duelbits to football and MMA fans.

Manchester City vs Burnley, over 3.5 goals the odds was 2.20 now 3.00.

Barcelona vs Real Madrid, both teams to score the odds was 1.70 now 2.50.

Edwards vs Usman trilogy, Leon Edwards to win by KO the odds was 6.50 now 8.00.

Jiri's MMA picks: Gunnar Nelson, Justin Gaethje & Leon Edwards all to pick up wins the odds was 11.00 now 14.00.

I think only the football promotions are worth to bet, since the MMA promotions looks like unlikely or hard to happen.

Source: https://duelbits.com/promotions/man-city-burnley-odds-boost
https://duelbits.com/promotions/el-clasico-boosted-odds
https://duelbits.com/promotions/mma-odds-boost-ko
https://duelbits.com/promotions/jiri-mma-picks-boost

[1714909552]

1714909552

[1714909552]

1714909552

[1714909552]

1714909552

[1714909552]

1714909552

[Eternad]

I think if he choos a low volatility slots, $100 wagering isn't that hard.  It means he just need to wager a total of $100 and is not necessary to deplete $100 bankroll.  Betting on Dice may probably needs $15  to fulfill that $100 wagering at a 98% chance of winning, maybe a little less on Plinko.  

Calculating with that statistics, I believe it is worth a try to get 50 free spins since at a minimum bet it cost $10 plus the potential to win bigger amount.

According to the rules of the bonus that included on bonus. You can only received the 50 free spin when you play on selected slot games. You have no choice to play on low volatility slot game or less house edge game like plinko and dice. Duelbits know how to give fair bonus because their reward has no wagering requirements. They will become a foundation if they give bonus without wagering requirements while the requirements itself can be claim without any possibility for them to have a profit.

[tusandii]

we can leave the responsability for the casino but I also like to bring responsability to myself when acting
I mean, an user has to check the terms of the place he's depositing money
then the user can KYC before depositing or before winning to save some hours of headache

Yes, there is no point delaying the KYC when you know that you will be needing to do KYC if you win big and want to withdraw. It is always better to complete the KYC requirements before playing/depositing. Better complete the formalities of the casino before playing.

If indeed the casino requires KYC it would be better for us to provide KYC at the beginning without having to delay the delay because after all if we play in a casino that has KYC but we don't provide it then later there will be a message which is usually sent via email for us to immediately complete the requirements The KYC and this seems to be very annoying.
After all, we also don't know what will happen in the future, for example, if we later win a game with big profits and want to withdraw everything, there will definitely be KYC requirements that are requested by the casino for these large withdrawals.
So it's better to provide what is needed and felt important at the start of entering the casino so that later on we don't get a few problems or obstacles.

[babygun]

- snip

The most interesting and in my eyes, the only interestkng one is the boosted odds on BTS for Barcelona vs Real Madrid. Increase of 50% and chances that both teams scores at least one time are pretty high so there is a lot of value in this bet.

[worle1bm]

All of the Duelbits reward doesn’t have a wagering requirements after fulfilling the requirements to get it. I claim promotion like this before and I remember that you will receive all the profit from the free spin directly to your wallet which is instantly available to withdraw.

They have already set a wagering requirement of $100 to get the free spins so yes there would be no such after requirements if you want to withdraw the money I think.But you have to risk $100 also but if you are getting 50 free spins then it's worth trying it if you are gambling so take the risk and who knows you get some good profits into your account.

[Bitinity]

I think if he choos a low volatility slots, $100 wagering isn't that hard.  It means he just need to wager a total of $100 and is not necessary to deplete $100 bankroll.  Betting on Dice may probably needs $15  to fulfill that $100 wagering at a 98% chance of winning, maybe a little less on Plinko. 

Calculating with that statistics, I believe it is worth a try to get 50 free spins since at a minimum bet it cost $10 plus the potential to win bigger amount.

The eligible games that qualify for the $100 wager requirement is limited to some games as quoted below:

Eligible games
BGaming: Four Lucky Clover, Mechanical Clover, Lucky Oak, Bonanza Billion, Gangsterz
Pragmatic Play: Clover Gold, Wild Wild Riches, Gold Party, Rainbow Gold, Wild Wild Riches Megaways
Spinomenal: Irish Treasures Leprechauns Fortune, Irish Treasures, Irish Lucky Dice Dice, Book Of Irish Treasures

It means that betting on dice and plinko is not counted, even if you wager $1,000, you will not get the 50 free spins. This offer is also limited to those who received the email, so anyone who are interested to participate need to check their inbox first. I received this email as well but I'm not going to take this offer because I'm not really familiar with all the selected games for the $100 wager requirement.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

If indeed the casino requires KYC it would be better for us to provide KYC at the beginning without having to delay the delay because after all if we play in a casino that has KYC but we don't provide it then later there will be a message which is usually sent via email for us to immediately complete the requirements The KYC and this seems to be very annoying.
After all, we also don't know what will happen in the future, for example, if we later win a game with big profits and want to withdraw everything, there will definitely be KYC requirements that are requested by the casino for these large withdrawals.
So it's better to provide what is needed and felt important at the start of entering the casino so that later on we don't get a few problems or obstacles.

Currently to go through KYC does not only happen to users who get big wins but also applies to users who claim some promotions as I experienced
it is clear that casino uses this method to avoid cheating or abuse so we have to consider if we get an attractive promotion offer which applies almost in all casinos
I know some users don't like KYC but they forget about it when following one of the promotion so it is like being trapped, here I just remind the risks.

[abel1337]

If indeed the casino requires KYC it would be better for us to provide KYC at the beginning without having to delay the delay because after all if we play in a casino that has KYC but we don't provide it then later there will be a message which is usually sent via email for us to immediately complete the requirements The KYC and this seems to be very annoying.
After all, we also don't know what will happen in the future, for example, if we later win a game with big profits and want to withdraw everything, there will definitely be KYC requirements that are requested by the casino for these large withdrawals.
So it's better to provide what is needed and felt important at the start of entering the casino so that later on we don't get a few problems or obstacles.

Currently to go through KYC does not only happen to users who get big wins but also applies to users who claim some promotions as I experienced
it is clear that casino uses this method to avoid cheating or abuse so we have to consider if we get an attractive promotion offer which applies almost in all casinos
I know some users don't like KYC but they forget about it when following one of the promotion so it is like being trapped, here I just remind the risks.

Yep, Big winners and promotion grabbers are the one who are commonly get a KYC request from the casino. I just noticed it from various threads here in this forum and I personally experienced it given that I don't take promotions and I don't win that big enough. I also don't know if casinos are doing random KYC request from their pool of gamblers but as far as I can tell, Losers who doesn't withdraw that much are the one who are least likely to get KYC request from those casino. I believe that it is a way that casino do to avoid cheaters and abusers from their casino since they can be cheated and of course they just don't want to giveaway their own money.

[serjent05]

All of the Duelbits reward doesn’t have a wagering requirements after fulfilling the requirements to get it. I claim promotion like this before and I remember that you will receive all the profit from the free spin directly to your wallet which is instantly available to withdraw.

They have already set a wagering requirement of $100 to get the free spins so yes there would be no such after requirements if you want to withdraw the money I think.But you have to risk $100 also but if you are getting 50 free spins then it's worth trying it if you are gambling so take the risk and who knows you get some good profits into your account.

True, especially when you got lucky in a slot game while meeting the requirement to get the 50 free spins.  We have seen several players in the forum winning 1000x to 5000x and even maximum wins on their favorite slot.  So I also think that it worth risking the $100 wagering amount to claim the 50 free spins bonus.  Aside from that, the slot where the free spin is rewarded has good multiplier rewards.  If one got lucky, he may be able to get huge winnings from the game.

[traderethereum]

I got a limited promotional offer from Duelbits today. Based on the terms of the offer, I will receive 50 free spins on Clover Bonanza slots by wagering 100$ only. There will be no wagering requirement on the free spin winnings. Has anyone else received this limited bonus message?

I don't think I got the promo email. I thought it was given to people who have reached a certain level.
My account is about to reach Joker and it's only about 8%-9% less to reach it.
And I only received two promo emails as below:





For the free bet, I'm not sure I've used it or can still use it but later, I'll check it in my account.
For a bonus of 30% top-up deposit, hopefully, we can get it even if we only deposit the minimum amount

[tusandii]

If indeed the casino requires KYC it would be better for us to provide KYC at the beginning without having to delay the delay because after all if we play in a casino that has KYC but we don't provide it then later there will be a message which is usually sent via email for us to immediately complete the requirements The KYC and this seems to be very annoying.
After all, we also don't know what will happen in the future, for example, if we later win a game with big profits and want to withdraw everything, there will definitely be KYC requirements that are requested by the casino for these large withdrawals.
So it's better to provide what is needed and felt important at the start of entering the casino so that later on we don't get a few problems or obstacles.

Currently to go through KYC does not only happen to users who get big wins but also applies to users who claim some promotions as I experienced
it is clear that casino uses this method to avoid cheating or abuse so we have to consider if we get an attractive promotion offer which applies almost in all casinos
I know some users don't like KYC but they forget about it when following one of the promotion so it is like being trapped, here I just remind the risks.

For promotions that are quite interesting and profitable, casinos usually ask for KYC or verify their data for customers who want to claim bonuses.
This is one of the strategies of the casino to still get KYC from every customer but in a way that is more subtle and doesn't seem obligatory because I'm sure casinos also realize that most gamblers don't like KYC.
If indeed KYC is really needed, such as when withdrawing large amounts of money, even though gamblers don't like and object to KYC, they still have to give it in order to be able to take the money in the casino's wallet.
I think if this is a big trusted casino then there is no need to worry too much about the risk of giving a KYC.

[Solosanz]

For promotions that are quite interesting and profitable, casinos usually ask for KYC or verify their data for customers who want to claim bonuses.
This is one of the strategies of the casino to still get KYC from every customer but in a way that is more subtle and doesn't seem obligatory because I'm sure casinos also realize that most gamblers don't like KYC.

You're seems like saying KYC casino is taking advantage to force their user to submit KYC when the gambler joined a promotion, but that's a way for the casino to know if the participants weren't using multiple accounts because it's not fair to the other gamblers.

Simple, if you're worried about KYC, just gamble with small amount money and don't join any promotion or free money/spin, the casino wouldn't ask you to submit KYC since your account have normal activities.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

You're seems like saying KYC casino is taking advantage to force their user to submit KYC when the gambler joined a promotion, but that's a way for the casino to know if the participants weren't using multiple accounts because it's not fair to the other gamblers.

Casinos do have tools to detect gambler information from IP address, device information used for login and betting, betting pattern and more so that they are able to detect suspicious cheating accounts. Sometimes they don't need KYC information to conclude multi-accounts or cheating.

I think for promotion and small bonus events, KYC is not necessary to conclude cheating cases. KYC is only helpful for complicated cases with too big capital and casino need to have it to handle cases very confidently to avoid exploitation on their budget as well avoid unnecessary damage on their reputation by wrong initial handle.

Simple, if you're worried about KYC, just gamble with small amount money and don't join any promotion or free money/spin, the casino wouldn't ask you to submit KYC since your account have normal activities.

It's true to read rules of events like free spins before joining it. If you see rules are not attractively good enough or contains some requirements you don't like because you see it violates your privacy, simply ignore those events.

[Bitinity]

Simple, if you're worried about KYC, just gamble with small amount money and don't join any promotion or free money/spin, the casino wouldn't ask you to submit KYC since your account have normal activities.

It's true to read rules of events like free spins before joining it. If you see rules are not attractively good enough or contains some requirements you don't like because you see it violates your privacy, simply ignore those events.

Not completely true in general because I've experienced myself (not in Duelbits) where I played normally with small amount, did not take any bonuses/promotions but the casino ask me to do KYC on my 1st withdrawal request worth no more than $200. That's not the point though, taking bonus/promotion is fine as long as we do not try to abuse it. In most cases, many small players were asked to do KYC because their accounts are suspected for abusing the bonuses.

[slapper]

~snip~

For promotions that are quite interesting and profitable, casinos usually ask for KYC or verify their data for customers who want to claim bonuses.
This is one of the strategies of the casino to still get KYC from every customer but in a way that is more subtle and doesn't seem obligatory because I'm sure casinos also realize that most gamblers don't like KYC.
If indeed KYC is really needed, such as when withdrawing large amounts of money, even though gamblers don't like and object to KYC, they still have to give it in order to be able to take the money in the casino's wallet.
I think if this is a big trusted casino then there is no need to worry too much about the risk of giving a KYC.

Wow! Exactly! We adore fresh ideas like that! As someone who occasionally goes to the casino, I understand why some individuals would feel uncomfortable giving out sensitive information, but I also know that Know Your Customer protocols are crucial. Isn't balance key?

Have you considered why KYC makes us uncomfortable? Is it because we're fearful of giving our personal information or because we've been trained to value privacy above everything else? I think we should provide our information if we trust the casino.

Casinos are only attempting to avoid frauds and money laundering, which benefits customers. Let's welcome KYC and agree it's best in the long term.

[worle1bm]

It's true to read rules of events like free spins before joining it. If you see rules are not attractively good enough or contains some requirements you don't like because you see it violates your privacy, simply ignore those events.

Right if you are not comfortable with the rules then don't participate at all in them because after that you won't have any excuses and we are not forced to do anything.Like for KYC if we are comfortable with it we can proceed further and if not then we have choices also so choose accordingly.

[Beparanf]

It's true to read rules of events like free spins before joining it. If you see rules are not attractively good enough or contains some requirements you don't like because you see it violates your privacy, simply ignore those events.

Right if you are not comfortable with the rules then don't participate at all in them because after that you won't have any excuses and we are not forced to do anything.Like for KYC if we are comfortable with it we can proceed further and if not then we have choices also so choose accordingly.

Yeah. This is a simple analogy but many are still ignoring because they have self interest. Many people keeps questioning the need of KYC of the casino because they want to play but they don’t want to submit their details for unknown reason. They are criticizing the casino in hopes that KYC will be lifted if many people demanded to remove it which will not gonna happened because the law is asking for it and not the casino itself.

Casino like Duelbits do what’s best on how they will limit requiring KYC to their customers. It took my account 2 years before I was required KYC here. This show how good Duelbits on not implementing KYC as long as they can avoid it.

[babygun]

Yeah. This is a simple analogy but many are still ignoring because they have self interest. Many people keeps questioning the need of KYC of the casino because they want to play but they don’t want to submit their details for unknown reason. They are criticizing the casino in hopes that KYC will be lifted if many people demanded to remove it which will not gonna happened because the law is asking for it and not the casino itself.

Casino like Duelbits do what’s best on how they will limit requiring KYC to their customers. It took my account 2 years before I was required KYC here. This show how good Duelbits on not implementing KYC as long as they can avoid it.

Some will probably disagree, but I think more and more casinos are implementing KYC, even for small withdrawals and even if there is no suspicious activity on your account. I can understand that some want to stay anonymous but I don't really have a problem doing it, if it is a legit casino. Similar as Bitiniy, I have been asked to do KYC on several casinos, for small withdrawals.

[dimonstration]

Some will probably disagree, but I think more and more casinos are implementing KYC, even for small withdrawals and even if there is no suspicious activity on your account. I can understand that some want to stay anonymous but I don't really have a problem doing it, if it is a legit casino. Similar as Bitiniy, I have been asked to do KYC on several casinos, for small withdrawals.

Agree on this. Some casino don’t consider anymore the amount of withdrawal or the size of bank roll to implement KYC. There’s a lot of new casino that implement KYC before a user can withdraw their money or before they do their first deposit. I believe due to the regulatory compliance that pushing casino to be more aggressive when it comes on collecting data from their customer as part of the AML policy and anti-cheat system of the casino.

[tranthidung]

Agree on this. Some casino don’t consider anymore the amount of withdrawal or the size of bank roll to implement KYC. There’s a lot of new casino that implement KYC before a user can withdraw their money or before they do their first deposit. I believe due to the regulatory compliance that pushing casino to be more aggressive when it comes on collecting data from their customer as part of the AML policy and anti-cheat system of the casino.

Days without KYC on centralized platforms will end soon. It is out of centralized platforms to control their policies on KYC and AML because they must obey government and regulation so that their platforms can legally operate without problems with governments. They must protect their companies first and customers will have two options that they don't like but have no choice left: staying and doing KYC or leaving and finding another platform to use.

Mostly, if it is a platform that is highly trusted and that user really like, he will do KYC to continue using his account. Privacy and freedom in cryptocurrency and on centralized platforms will be censored more with time.