Duelbits.com|Casino & Sportsbook|VIP|Instant withdrawals!| Suarez, McGregor

[Slow death]

Duelbits: Unveiling the Illusion of "The Most Rewarding Casino"

Hold up, everyone!

Let's break down the smokescreen that Duelbits is throwing around. They claim to be "The Most Rewarding Casino," but let's see what's really going on behind the curtain:


The bottom line: Duelbits' grand claims of being "The Most Rewarding Casino" crumble when faced with the cold, hard facts. The discrepancies in rewards and bonuses, coupled with the removal from Freebie Friday after raising concerns, unveil a disturbing pattern.

It's time for transparency and accountability. As a player who has been caught in their web of promises, I urge fellow members to scrutinize their claims and dig deeper before being lured by Duelbits' facade. Let's stand united against these deceptive practices and demand fair treatment for all.

Let's not be fooled by the illusion of rewards – it's time to reveal the truth.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5464671

your case is very complicated, I see that you have already opened a scam accusation against them, but looking at your thread that is in the scam accusation section, I see that you have not posted evidence, the only photo that is in your thread is a photo which shows that you've had dialogue with their support, that's all you have in your thread. as their support said you on may 25th unsubscribed, so you must post evidence in this thread that show you receive promotional emails from them since may 25th until today, take pictures of those promotional emails, at least pictures of the last ones emails from this month

this will make the casino look at your case again and be able to see if there is a problem on their part and correct it if that is the case. but if you don't provide this evidence then it will be very hard to believe your case and also the casino will not be doing a deeper investigation without you having shown proof. something I also saw in your post made in this thread, was that you said that you bet a lot of money but you get little bonus, but people who bet little money are getting more bonus than you. how do you know other people are getting more than you even though they bet little money?

I hope they don't have many accounts at the casino, it's hard to post pictures of these people's accounts without it getting weird and people thinking that you have many accounts, but at the same time that if you had a form of someone else who bets little money and wins plus bonus if you could show proof of this in your scam accusation thread, it would be of great importance for the casino to investigate what is going on with your account. i hope you can solve your problem

[Mahdirakib]

~snip~

Looks like you are just disappointed for losing your deposits on Duelbits. The bonuses of Duelbits are transparent. The level up bonus, rakeback, weekly, monthly depends on the house edge of the game. So, don't compare your total bonus amount with other user based on the total wagered amount only. Perhaps, you have unsubscribed the promotional messages by mistake. Can you show the proof of the promised bonus which you haven't received from Duelbits?

[Beparanf]

The bottom line: Duelbits' grand claims of being "The Most Rewarding Casino" crumble when faced with the cold, hard facts. The discrepancies in rewards and bonuses, coupled with the removal from Freebie Friday after raising concerns, unveil a disturbing pattern.

Attacking the marketing tag line just to connect your existing concern? I read your issue and it seems like the support gives you a reasonable explanation on how you didn’t receive your bonus from the promotion. There’s no way they will remove you without any notification because I myself experienced being exclude on certain promotion but notify me through email.

Duelbits has a rewarding VIP rewards on top the rakeback. It’s very hard to prove your case since it’s determing whether you really unsubscribe or not.

[kingbj21]

Duelbits: Unveiling the Illusion of "The Most Rewarding Casino"

Hold up, everyone!

Let's break down the smokescreen that Duelbits is throwing around. They claim to be "The Most Rewarding Casino," but let's see what's really going on behind the curtain:


The bottom line: Duelbits' grand claims of being "The Most Rewarding Casino" crumble when faced with the cold, hard facts. The discrepancies in rewards and bonuses, coupled with the removal from Freebie Friday after raising concerns, unveil a disturbing pattern.

It's time for transparency and accountability. As a player who has been caught in their web of promises, I urge fellow members to scrutinize their claims and dig deeper before being lured by Duelbits' facade. Let's stand united against these deceptive practices and demand fair treatment for all.

Let's not be fooled by the illusion of rewards – it's time to reveal the truth.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5464671

your case is very complicated, I see that you have already opened a scam accusation against them, but looking at your thread that is in the scam accusation section, I see that you have not posted evidence, the only photo that is in your thread is a photo which shows that you've had dialogue with their support, that's all you have in your thread. as their support said you on may 25th unsubscribed, so you must post evidence in this thread that show you receive promotional emails from them since may 25th until today, take pictures of those promotional emails, at least pictures of the last ones emails from this month

this will make the casino look at your case again and be able to see if there is a problem on their part and correct it if that is the case. but if you don't provide this evidence then it will be very hard to believe your case and also the casino will not be doing a deeper investigation without you having shown proof. something I also saw in your post made in this thread, was that you said that you bet a lot of money but you get little bonus, but people who bet little money are getting more bonus than you. how do you know other people are getting more than you even though they bet little money?

I hope they don't have many accounts at the casino, it's hard to post pictures of these people's accounts without it getting weird and people thinking that you have many accounts, but at the same time that if you had a form of someone else who bets little money and wins plus bonus if you could show proof of this in your scam accusation thread, it would be of great importance for the casino to investigate what is going on with your account. i hope you can solve your problem

https://imgur.com/a/4gKkmVX

Duelbits quietly chose to cast me out from the coveted "Freebie Friday" club after my candid reviews. Coincidence? I think not. This action reeks of an attempt to silence criticism rather than genuinely addressing the glaring issues at hand.

Regarding your point about providing evidence of promotional emails, I must clarify that I have not received any promotional emails from Duelbits since feb, as indicated by their support. I have not unsubscribed from these emails and should have continued to receive them based on my account preferences and activity. Unfortunately, Duelbits has not provided any evidence or records to substantiate their claim.

[kingbj21]

~snip~

Looks like you are just disappointed for losing your deposits on Duelbits. The bonuses of Duelbits are transparent. The level up bonus, rakeback, weekly, monthly depends on the house edge of the game. So, don't compare your total bonus amount with other user based on the total wagered amount only. Perhaps, you have unsubscribed the promotional messages by mistake. Can you show the proof of the promised bonus which you haven't received from Duelbits?

My concerns go beyond mere frustration over lost deposits; they revolve around the principle of holding a platform accountable for their promises and the stark gap between those commitments and the harsh reality I've encountered.

You're right in acknowledging that Duelbits' bonuses are intricately tied to the house edge of games – a concept I've grasped. However, the elephant in the room remains the significant contrast in rewards bestowed upon players with comparable or even lesser wagering amounts. Take the example I mentioned earlier: a player with substantially less wagering managed to garner much larger bonuses than I did, even though I stand at a higher level. This discrepancy raises genuine concerns about the platform's fairness and transparency.

Regarding Duelbits' claim of my unsubscribing from promotional messages on May 25th – here's where things don't add up. I assure you, I haven't intentionally unsubscribed. Yet, I haven't received any promotional emails from them between February and May – a period when I was actively wagering and trying to level up. If there's been an oversight on my part, I expect Duelbits to produce records or evidence of the said promotional emails.

As evidence of promised bonuses based on activity, I offer this link: [Proof Link: https://imgur.com/a/ygL4KIw]. Ordinarily, the CRM team sends out freebie Fridays, each valued at $500. Curiously, since February to May, I haven't received any – a stark departure from the frequency I previously enjoyed based on my activity. Interestingly, this shift coincided with my Trustpilot review about them in January.

Now, let's revisit the comparison:

User ID: 44242331-1f86-54e7-922d-43536681a124:

Total Wagered: $674,027.23
Total Rewards: $9,334.05
Instant: 25.99% ($2,426.66)
Level up bonus: 24.44% ($2,281.88)
Monthly: 12.99% ($1,213.30)
Daily: 12.94% ($1,207.93)
Weekly: 12.88% ($1,202.37)
Other: 10.73% ($1,001.91)
Your Numbers:

Total Wagered: $1,039,711.58
Total Rewards: $7,077.40
Other: 54.66% ($3,869.00)
Level up bonus: 14.14% ($1,001.42)
Instant: 12.64% ($894.62)
Weekly: 6.26% ($443.68)
Daily: 6.16% ($436.10)
Monthly: 6.11% ($432.58)


My intention in highlighting these issues isn't just to voice grievances, but to spotlight potential irregularities that warrant illumination. We, as players, invest not only our funds but also our faith in casinos, making transparency and accountability paramount.

[kingbj21]

The bottom line: Duelbits' grand claims of being "The Most Rewarding Casino" crumble when faced with the cold, hard facts. The discrepancies in rewards and bonuses, coupled with the removal from Freebie Friday after raising concerns, unveil a disturbing pattern.

Attacking the marketing tag line just to connect your existing concern? I read your issue and it seems like the support gives you a reasonable explanation on how you didn’t receive your bonus from the promotion. There’s no way they will remove you without any notification because I myself experienced being exclude on certain promotion but notify me through email.

Duelbits has a rewarding VIP rewards on top the rakeback. It’s very hard to prove your case since it’s determing whether you really unsubscribe or not.

Most rewarding casino - lmfao?

It's disheartening to see a casino make bold claims about 50% rakeback and then fall short in delivering on that promise. I did not intentionally unsubscribe from promotional messages, and there's been a notable drop in bonuses following a Trustpilot review. It's this discrepancy that's being questioned.

[l3pox]

that's not the main reason for everyone
some use a VPN for privacy concerns, not to avoid restrictions for streaming or whatever
there are many different kinds of users around.

one more time: it's better to avoid vpns if you plan to gamble on KYC casinos.

But how can anyone looking for privacy gamble on a KYC AML compliance platform,  once you sign up on such a platform to gamble you should know and be ready to provide them with your KYC document anytime and that is no longer privacy,  choosing to now use VPN to hide your ip address on such casino is needless at this point unless you are prepared to take any problem that may arise along the way while gambling on that site.
I for once will only use a VPN to access decentralized platforms only,  if and where those platforms are restricted to my original IP,  but aside from such situations,  I try as much as possible to avoid VPN usage.

VPN usage has other reasons besides privacy (online protection in some hack cases, as an example)
and maybe you can do kyc but don't want to leak your IP, or you kyc with an address which is not your main one
many possibilities

playing devil's advocate a bit here because I agree with you that with gambling platforms it's probably better to avoid vpn, idk

I find it troublesome to keep turning the VPN on and off.

[peter0425]

If I ever get a ban on any casino, I will simply just stop playing there, no matter how used I've gotten to the casino, there are several other casinos around, I will just pick another, and I am very sure that I will also get used to that new casino after playing there for one week or less.

There are thousands of casinos in the crypto space, and perhaps hundreds of them are reputable. Sure, it's easy for you to find a casino. However, what if you get banned? What if the casino freezes your funds? I think you should also limit your exposure to a certain casino. Just put an amount that you are willing to let go in case things go bad.

It's still important to be aware of the possible consequences once we break the rules so we can easily move on, and go with our 2nd option.

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

[l3pox]

If I ever get a ban on any casino, I will simply just stop playing there, no matter how used I've gotten to the casino, there are several other casinos around, I will just pick another, and I am very sure that I will also get used to that new casino after playing there for one week or less.

There are thousands of casinos in the crypto space, and perhaps hundreds of them are reputable. Sure, it's easy for you to find a casino. However, what if you get banned? What if the casino freezes your funds? I think you should also limit your exposure to a certain casino. Just put an amount that you are willing to let go in case things go bad.

It's still important to be aware of the possible consequences once we break the rules so we can easily move on, and go with our 2nd option.

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

i'm not that sure if non-kyc casinos are rare because of regulations
I think it's probably more because of bankroll and difficulty to do it on-chain, probably it's easier to make it centralized, idk

we're seeing looksrare pivoting from being a nft marketplace to be a gambling platform.
and rollbit grew a lot these past months

[so98nn]

If I ever get a ban on any casino, I will simply just stop playing there, no matter how used I've gotten to the casino, there are several other casinos around, I will just pick another, and I am very sure that I will also get used to that new casino after playing there for one week or less.

There are thousands of casinos in the crypto space, and perhaps hundreds of them are reputable. Sure, it's easy for you to find a casino. However, what if you get banned? What if the casino freezes your funds? I think you should also limit your exposure to a certain casino. Just put an amount that you are willing to let go in case things go bad.

It's still important to be aware of the possible consequences once we break the rules so we can easily move on, and go with our 2nd option.

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

i'm not that sure if non-kyc casinos are rare because of regulations
I think it's probably more because of bankroll and difficulty to do it on-chain, probably it's easier to make it centralized, idk

we're seeing looksrare pivoting from being a nft marketplace to be a gambling platform.
and rollbit grew a lot these past months

Somehow centralised can also make your funds secure if something goes wrong. Like account getting hacked, casino’s getting shut down or maybe if someone scammed each other then KYCed account can actually form the evidences since you will have the history against your financials. If shown time to time in our accounts then it can be tracked.

However, those players who are scared or uncomfortable about sharing their KYC should not chose such casinos at all. Let us say they have privacy concerns or they fear that their KYC can get leaked etc etc. There could be hundreds of reasons.

Centralised or decentralised, a trusted casino can make things easier for us. So just chose and play.

[l3pox]

If I ever get a ban on any casino, I will simply just stop playing there, no matter how used I've gotten to the casino, there are several other casinos around, I will just pick another, and I am very sure that I will also get used to that new casino after playing there for one week or less.

There are thousands of casinos in the crypto space, and perhaps hundreds of them are reputable. Sure, it's easy for you to find a casino. However, what if you get banned? What if the casino freezes your funds? I think you should also limit your exposure to a certain casino. Just put an amount that you are willing to let go in case things go bad.

It's still important to be aware of the possible consequences once we break the rules so we can easily move on, and go with our 2nd option.

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

i'm not that sure if non-kyc casinos are rare because of regulations
I think it's probably more because of bankroll and difficulty to do it on-chain, probably it's easier to make it centralized, idk

we're seeing looksrare pivoting from being a nft marketplace to be a gambling platform.
and rollbit grew a lot these past months

Somehow centralised can also make your funds secure if something goes wrong. Like account getting hacked, casino’s getting shut down or maybe if someone scammed each other then KYCed account can actually form the evidences since you will have the history against your financials. If shown time to time in our accounts then it can be tracked.

However, those players who are scared or uncomfortable about sharing their KYC should not chose such casinos at all. Let us say they have privacy concerns or they fear that their KYC can get leaked etc etc. There could be hundreds of reasons.

Centralised or decentralised, a trusted casino can make things easier for us. So just chose and play.

thinking centralized services are more secure is a missconception, in my opinion, take the FTX case as an example
nobody tought it would fail, it was big, in the billions, with huge partnerships, backed by celebrities, with a stadium with the name of the exchange, and out of nowhere: gone. puf. zero. zilch. nada...

the safest option is probably having your own keys and having a good system to avoid 5-dollar wrench attacks
apart from that you'll always carry some third part risk be it from centralized entities be it from smart contracts (descentralized)

[Coin_trader]

thinking centralized services are more secure is a missconception, in my opinion, take the FTX case as an example
nobody tought it would fail, it was big, in the billions, with huge partnerships, backed by celebrities, with a stadium with the name of the exchange, and out of nowhere: gone. puf. zero. zilch. nada...

the safest option is probably having your own keys and having a good system to avoid 5-dollar wrench attacks
apart from that you'll always carry some third part risk be it from centralized entities be it from smart contracts (descentralized)

Centralized services is really risky but we have no choice in terms of casino since most of preferred game provider and games like live casino is not decentralized. It’s impossible for some games to convert to decentralized manner which is the limitation of decentralized casino that makes them less popular even though they are more safer than centralized casino.

Trust issue is a big deal too on casino industry compared to exchange since many casino owners turn into scam especially if they don’t have legal obligation or reputation to protect so for casino, I preferred centralized services over decentralized since they are proven working for a long time without any issue for me.

[FanEagle]

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

Well, if the law states that you have to have KYC to operate as a casino then you have to get that information, that's just how it is. There are a few, even at the very top, that do not ask for it straight up and only ask for it when something happens but I have to say that's going to be a troublesome thing on the long run.

I think it's quite important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it's out of casinos hands to ask for it or not, if they do ask for it then they can exist, but if they do not ask for it then they will be basically considered as a illegally managed casino and the governments will be after them. I think gambling being illegal is a tough decision, I still think it should be legal.

[peter0425]

If I ever get a ban on any casino, I will simply just stop playing there, no matter how used I've gotten to the casino, there are several other casinos around, I will just pick another, and I am very sure that I will also get used to that new casino after playing there for one week or less.

There are thousands of casinos in the crypto space, and perhaps hundreds of them are reputable. Sure, it's easy for you to find a casino. However, what if you get banned? What if the casino freezes your funds? I think you should also limit your exposure to a certain casino. Just put an amount that you are willing to let go in case things go bad.

It's still important to be aware of the possible consequences once we break the rules so we can easily move on, and go with our 2nd option.

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

i'm not that sure if non-kyc casinos are rare because of regulations
I think it's probably more because of bankroll and difficulty to do it on-chain, probably it's easier to make it centralized, idk

we're seeing looksrare pivoting from being a nft marketplace to be a gambling platform.
and rollbit grew a lot these past months

It is not actually rare mate because there are still casino sites that is KYC free but they are outnumbered by those centralize casino like what we are seeing now.
and also you are correct about  the difficulties because of bankroll  and on-chain.

Well, if the law states that you have to have KYC to operate as a casino then you have to get that information, that's just how it is. There are a few, even at the very top, that do not ask for it straight up and only ask for it when something happens but I have to say that's going to be a troublesome thing on the long run.

I think it's quite important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it's out of casinos hands to ask for it or not, if they do ask for it then they can exist, but if they do not ask for it then they will be basically considered as a illegally managed casino and the governments will be after them. I think gambling being illegal is a tough decision, I still think it should be legal.

of course businesses are required to follow the laws or else they wiill operate illegally .and that is the risk also players must pay.

[lienfaye]

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

Well, if the law states that you have to have KYC to operate as a casino then you have to get that information, that's just how it is. There are a few, even at the very top, that do not ask for it straight up and only ask for it when something happens but I have to say that's going to be a troublesome thing on the long run.

I think it's quite important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it's out of casinos hands to ask for it or not, if they do ask for it then they can exist, but if they do not ask for it then they will be basically considered as a illegally managed casino and the governments will be after them. I think gambling being illegal is a tough decision, I still think it should be legal.

It is necessary for these casinos to abide the law to be able to get a license, that includes asking for KYC. We don't want to play on a casino without license, right? Because that means they're not operating legally. Thus, it's quite common now for a centralized casinos to ask their players to verify their identity. Though some of them (as you've said) don't ask beforehand and will just do it after something happened or you win huge and exceeds the withdrawal limit to be ask for kyc.

Nevertheless, it's understandable if many gamblers still don't like this idea but that's how it is, if you want to continue playing then expect this procedure will be ask sooner or later.

[so98nn]

managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?

and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .

Well, if the law states that you have to have KYC to operate as a casino then you have to get that information, that's just how it is. There are a few, even at the very top, that do not ask for it straight up and only ask for it when something happens but I have to say that's going to be a troublesome thing on the long run.

I think it's quite important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it's out of casinos hands to ask for it or not, if they do ask for it then they can exist, but if they do not ask for it then they will be basically considered as a illegally managed casino and the governments will be after them. I think gambling being illegal is a tough decision, I still think it should be legal.

It is necessary for these casinos to abide the law to be able to get a license, that includes asking for KYC. We don't want to play on a casino without license, right? Because that means they're not operating legally. Thus, it's quite common now for a centralized casinos to ask their players to verify their identity. Though some of them (as you've said) don't ask beforehand and will just do it after something happened or you win huge and exceeds the withdrawal limit to be ask for kyc.

Nevertheless, it's understandable if many gamblers still don't like this idea but that's how it is, if you want to continue playing then expect this procedure will be ask sooner or later.

Looking at the deep discussion about KYC and also the non-ending one, those who have issues with the KYC should either quit gambling or maybe they should go and play at l-a-s v-a-g-u-s.  No one will identify you but only few thousands peeps will be watching you play at the casino, or may be you getting nicely recorded on the CCTV footage of the casino. If you end up winning huge amounts of money then either someone is going to notice you now and then and end up with new friends!

What is better? Sitting at home in your comfort chair and doing KYC that will also be recorded with legal process and will never ever be looked at again ever unless something mysterious happens at your end or may be at the gambling site end. May be I will prefer the second one and keep up with KYC. Oh wait its already done and looks like everything is fine for me. 

[nukerboy]

Duelbits is by far the best site in terms of affiliate commissions I have been working with. For $25 000 wagered by my referral they paid me almost the same commission as another website paid me for $180 000 wagered by him there too.
I like also the fact that you know exactly what your bonuses will be

[Coin_trader]

Duelbits is by far the best site in terms of affiliate commissions I have been working with. For $25 000 wagered by my referral they paid me almost the same commission as another website paid me for $180 000 wagered by him there too.
I like also the fact that you know exactly what your bonuses will be

Hmmm, Duelbits offers the standard commission rate of 10% of the house edge according to the recent article published by Duelbits on this https://help.duelbits.com/en/articles/5351626-affiliates-explained. I wonder how come you get a commission almost the same to the total wager of your referral while your commission is just based on the home edge.

I'm not familiar on the full affiliate program of Duelbits but it's intriguing to saw a affiliate commission like this. What's you commision rate if you will since I knew that some special user can have special offer by the casino.

[BitcoinPanther]

thinking centralized services are more secure is a missconception, in my opinion, take the FTX case as an example
nobody tought it would fail, it was big, in the billions, with huge partnerships, backed by celebrities, with a stadium with the name of the exchange, and out of nowhere: gone. puf. zero. zilch. nada...

FTX won't fail if the management don't do illegal trades and does not intentionally drain the FTX fund to fund their other companies investment plans.  Imagine moving $8B of funds to its sister company Alameda, any centralized company will get bankrupt if majority of its fund is moved out to be used by other company.

As long as the centralized company is able, reputable and have good marketing, and offer an insurance of the deposited funds, it somehow minimize the loses of the client.  Unlike losing a private key of your non-custodial wallet or being infected by balance draining malware, you will never get a refund since it is your own fault that you lose your funds. 

Looking at the deep discussion about KYC and also the non-ending one, those who have issues with the KYC should either quit gambling or maybe they should go and play at l-a-s v-a-g-u-s.  No one will identify you but only few thousands peeps will be watching you play at the casino, or may be you getting nicely recorded on the CCTV footage of the casino. If you end up winning huge amounts of money then either someone is going to notice you now and then and end up with new friends!

I highly agree, we don't need to whine about KYC implementation, we are not forced to play in a casino platform, it is our own free will that we register on the site. Since the terms of service is already laid out, we need to follow it once we chooses to agree and register on the site.  Else, no need to create any drama or issue about KYC, just avoid or quit playing if we have an issue about it.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Hmmm, Duelbits offers the standard commission rate of 10% of the house edge according to the recent article published by Duelbits on this https://help.duelbits.com/en/articles/5351626-affiliates-explained. I wonder how come you get a commission almost the same to the total wager of your referral while your commission is just based on the home edge.

I'm not familiar on the full affiliate program of Duelbits but it's intriguing to saw a affiliate commission like this. What's you commision rate if you will since I knew that some special user can have special offer by the casino.

If referring based on house edge then the main factors that impact revenue are commission rate and the type of game played because every game offers a different edge for example commissions on slot games are 3-4x higher than Dice game so if a referral plays a slot game (3% edge) for $25000 wagered then the commission will be the same as the referral who played Dice game (1% edge) for $75,000 wagered so don't be surprised if we get different commissions from each casino.

Here is my income from referrals 3.5%  edge x 769 wagered x 10% commission rate = $2.69 total earnings
There is a slight difference in commissions but I assume it's a combination edge (3-5%) from several games
Correct me if I miscalculated.