Duelbits.com|Casino & Sportsbook|VIP|Instant withdrawals!| Up to 50% Rakeback

[michellee]

Having multiple accounts isn't allowed and even if he had requested support to close his first account, he should have confirmed from them that his account is closed and he has opened a new one or at least should have asked permission to open the 2nd account. These things may seem small initially, but they can create problems specially if you have high balance in your gambling account and suddenly you found that your account is frozen because you violate the terms and conditions. I think in this case, he should be fine if he has proofs of all those conversion with the support team.

Something even with support approval it still very adviseable to have them closed that account first, or better still make sure the balance on that account is cleared down to zero before you create and deposit into the newly created account.


The reason for this is that, why most casinos are against multiple accounts is that the gambler may likely make you of both of them to cheat the casino, so there is a likely system configuration that report two accounts that belong to same person and are active and one way to know an account is active is when there is activities on the Said account such as gaming or have deposits and withdrawals activities on them both.

If we can tell the reason why we want to close our first account and why we make another account, I think the casino may allow and will not do anything with our account. But if that is strict casinos, they will not allow that and will not accept our reason and still block or ban us. It is why we need to explain our condition and just hope they can understand the reason and allow us to make another account. But if they still prohibit, we don't have to against them because that can make us get another problem.

[Haunebu]

There's always that one which is better than the other but dont expect that the differences are that in huge gap. It will be just that too small if ever there are those numbers differences.

This is incorrect. You are generalising here because there are plenty of crypto gambling sites out there who definitely offer way better bonuses with proper gaps which makes sense since they are trying to outcompete each other.

Duelbits clearly don't seem to care much about their reputation within this forum anymore which is why they aren't trying to rectify any of their recent issues at all.

[Jaycoinz]

Having multiple accounts isn't allowed and even if he had requested support to close his first account, he should have confirmed from them that his account is closed and he has opened a new one or at least should have asked permission to open the 2nd account. These things may seem small initially, but they can create problems specially if you have high balance in your gambling account and suddenly you found that your account is frozen because you violate the terms and conditions. I think in this case, he should be fine if he has proofs of all those conversion with the support team.

Something even with support approval it still very adviseable to have them closed that account first, or better still make sure the balance on that account is cleared down to zero before you create and deposit into the newly created account.


The reason for this is that, why most casinos are against multiple accounts is that the gambler may likely make you of both of them to cheat the casino, so there is a likely system configuration that report two accounts that belong to same person and are active and one way to know an account is active is when there is activities on the Said account such as gaming or have deposits and withdrawals activities on them both.

If we can tell the reason why we want to close our first account and why we make another account, I think the casino may allow and will not do anything with our account. But if that is strict casinos, they will not allow that and will not accept our reason and still block or ban us. It is why we need to explain our condition and just hope they can understand the reason and allow us to make another account. But if they still prohibit, we don't have to against them because that can make us get another problem.

I think the casino don't allow this sort of thing because of the fact that their is high probability of the users getting to use it as a means of arbitrate betting which is considered as cheating and taking advantage of the casino, I have once mistakenly opened an account with stake.com once and forgot the password and when I created the second one the casino sent a direct demanding a closure of one of the account and to do KYC for proper detailing.

[Z_MBFM]

Having multiple accounts isn't allowed and even if he had requested support to close his first account, he should have confirmed from them that his account is closed and he has opened a new one or at least should have asked permission to open the 2nd account. These things may seem small initially, but they can create problems specially if you have high balance in your gambling account and suddenly you found that your account is frozen because you violate the terms and conditions. I think in this case, he should be fine if he has proofs of all those conversion with the support team.

Something even with support approval it still very adviseable to have them closed that account first, or better still make sure the balance on that account is cleared down to zero before you create and deposit into the newly created account.


The reason for this is that, why most casinos are against multiple accounts is that the gambler may likely make you of both of them to cheat the casino, so there is a likely system configuration that report two accounts that belong to same person and are active and one way to know an account is active is when there is activities on the Said account such as gaming or have deposits and withdrawals activities on them both.

If we can tell the reason why we want to close our first account and why we make another account, I think the casino may allow and will not do anything with our account. But if that is strict casinos, they will not allow that and will not accept our reason and still block or ban us. It is why we need to explain our condition and just hope they can understand the reason and allow us to make another account. But if they still prohibit, we don't have to against them because that can make us get another problem.

I think the casino don't allow this sort of thing because of the fact that their is high probability of the users getting to use it as a means of arbitrate betting which is considered as cheating and taking advantage of the casino, I have once mistakenly opened an account with stake.com once and forgot the password and when I created the second one the casino sent a direct demanding a closure of one of the account and to do KYC for proper detailing.

If the casino site has something like this mentioned in its ToS, then of course they will not allow it. All casino sites have almost the same ToS with only a few changes. And those changes may be due to the rules and legal processes of a country and some personal decisions of that casino site.

If multiple accounts are prohibited then if someone is using multiple accounts and their security system can track it then they can ban that user or demand kyc at any time because they have clearly written it in their ToS. So first of all read the ToS then start gambling on a few sites if you are a conscious gambler

[Forsyth Jones]

Duelbits appears sponsoring football matches on digital boards (those LED boards that display digital ads for sponsoring companies behind the goal).



The other day, I was watching a random football facts and curiosities video on YT. It discussed about the rise and fall of Manchester United player Antony Santos, recounting the story, jokes, and memes (Antony Prime, G.O.A.T), and his return to his "prime"...

The Duelbits name appears in a very brief frame, but long enough for me to recognize the Duelbits logo. Of course, I don't know the date of this match or how many times the Duelbits name has appeared on soccer fields.

Unfortunately I don't remember the minute/second of the frame, but in the image above, it indicates the position of the video in which it appears.

Unfortunately, the video doesn't have automatic dubbing (it's not in English), but it does have automatic subtitles if you're interested. I'll leave the video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lZRErsL7P4

[OcTradism]

If the casino site has something like this mentioned in its ToS, then of course they will not allow it. All casino sites have almost the same ToS with only a few changes. And those changes may be due to the rules and legal processes of a country and some personal decisions of that casino site.

Legit companies must write their own ToS, and if they do like you said, it is like plagiarism, that can be used as one of evidence against them. If a company has a plagiarized ToS, it can be very harmful for their reputation if it is detected anytime by community.

You perhaps implied that there are similar terms in ToS while there are not many different terms, but surely ToS must be written authentically by a company team, not copy and plagiarize.

If multiple accounts are prohibited then if someone is using multiple accounts and their security system can track it then they can ban that user or demand kyc at any time because they have clearly written it in their ToS. So first of all read the ToS then start gambling on a few sites if you are a conscious gambler

I'm doubtful that any casino allows multiple accounts on their site as this action is very dangerous for their business. It can lead to many types of exploitation and abuse like bonus in deposit bonus program, contests and other cheating activities. It's reasonable why all casinos are against multiaccounting on their platforms and this actitivity is universally not tolerated by companies in online gambling industry.

[fillippone]

I do not see the really problem about this. Why should it be a problem to give personal details, if there is nothing to hide? For sure they will not share any information with others.
Most gamble sites do not publish the KYC on their site, and when you win much money they will always ask it as well. So then it is much better to state this KYC in the terms. Only good.
Only good thing is that they run this site with a valid license. We saw many unlicensed casino's the last time.

Its all about personal preferences obviously. In this case you think that it is not a big deal to do KYC but it is a big deal for some other users including me. There are still many people want to gamble anonymously especially in bitcoin/crypto gambling sites. I myself prefer not to send my personal details for my gambling activities so I will always look for gambling site with no KYC. In case of a big win, it depends on how big the win is because value is something subjective.

I think we should care more about our privacy. I am not a big gambler, but for sure I wouldn’t do with KYC.
No need for them to know who I am. Also I am not sure how the State should be informed of my betting.
Say no to this KYC nonsense.

[Hhampuz]

I think we should care more about our privacy. I am not a big gambler, but for sure I wouldn’t do with KYC.
No need for them to know who I am. Also I am not sure how the State should be informed of my betting.
Say no to this KYC nonsense.

It is a nice thought and if it weren't for politics we might be there, but once these casinos become large enough and have enough volume they are more or less forced to enforce these rules to avoid being shut down. I can assure you that no upper management of any large casino enjoy having all of this in place as it would be much easier for them to just let it be completely anon. The money alone that is spent can be quite crazy..

[ultrloa]

I do not see the really problem about this. Why should it be a problem to give personal details, if there is nothing to hide? For sure they will not share any information with others.
Most gamble sites do not publish the KYC on their site, and when you win much money they will always ask it as well. So then it is much better to state this KYC in the terms. Only good.
Only good thing is that they run this site with a valid license. We saw many unlicensed casino's the last time.

Its all about personal preferences obviously. In this case you think that it is not a big deal to do KYC but it is a big deal for some other users including me. There are still many people want to gamble anonymously especially in bitcoin/crypto gambling sites. I myself prefer not to send my personal details for my gambling activities so I will always look for gambling site with no KYC. In case of a big win, it depends on how big the win is because value is something subjective.

I think we should care more about our privacy. I am not a big gambler, but for sure I wouldn’t do with KYC.
No need for them to know who I am. Also I am not sure how the State should be informed of my betting.
Say no to this KYC nonsense.

For sure many people would love the idea about NO-KYC requirement needed here, but government interfere and they regulate online casino that's why this annoying requirements is there.

So I guess the only thing we could do for now for our safety is to choose the best casino operating around so have less worries that our identity will get compromise.

People have two choice either to continue or to stop dealing with the casino. But so far we can see that many take the risk that's why big casino still became more successful.

[Mahdirakib]

Duelbits appears sponsoring football matches on digital boards (those LED boards that display digital ads for sponsoring companies behind the goal).

Maybe Duelbits have done it just for testing purposes. Every casino which has a sponsorship deal with Premier League clubs will follow this method from the 2026-27 season. Because Premier League clubs have agreed to not show the betting sites name in front of the shirts on match day. The agreement was made on the April Month of 2023, which will be effective at the end of the 2025-26 season.

Premier League clubs have today collectively agreed to withdraw gambling sponsorship from the front of clubs’ matchday shirts, becoming the first sports league in the UK to take such a measure voluntarily in order to reduce gambling advertising.

The clubs are allowed to show the name of the betting sites in some other parts though, including advertising hoardings.

[ryzaadit]

The clubs are allowed to show the name of the betting sites in some other parts though, including advertising hoardings.

BTW, there has some nice loophole for the sponsor.

In other casino (BK8) they using BK8 News as the sponsor of the main. Not exactly direct to their casino site name, they using their news website as sponsor name and maybe want to avoid these kind of restrictd.

Somehow, casino could using these kinda of tricks.

[Lida93]

It is a nice thought and if it weren't for politics we might be there, but once these casinos become large enough and have enough volume they are more or less forced to enforce these rules to avoid being shut down. I can assure you that no upper management of any large casino enjoy having all of this in place as it would be much easier for them to just let it be completely anon. The money alone that is spent can be quite crazy..

Not just anyone is in the know about the burden that these casinos bear in ensure the maintenance of the KYC policy as instructed by the authority to be enforced. Of which as a matter of fact a lot of these casinos wouldn't hesitate to exclude the KYC as a mandatory requirement towards a continuous use of their platform by a customer. But obviously like you said, they have no option but to adhere in order to still remain in business.

[Lucius]

I think we should care more about our privacy. I am not a big gambler, but for sure I wouldn’t do with KYC.
No need for them to know who I am. Also I am not sure how the State should be informed of my betting.
Say no to this KYC nonsense.

It is a nice thought and if it weren't for politics we might be there, but once these casinos become large enough and have enough volume they are more or less forced to enforce these rules to avoid being shut down. I can assure you that no upper management of any large casino enjoy having all of this in place as it would be much easier for them to just let it be completely anon. The money alone that is spent can be quite crazy..

People who value their privacy are certainly not the ones who will be delighted with KYC - not only because they don't want to give their personal data to someone, but because they very often see how such data are misused or hacked. It especially bothers me when companies hire other companies for that work - so is it difficult to protect such data with encryption and store it offline?

[pusaka]

It is a nice thought and if it weren't for politics we might be there, but once these casinos become large enough and have enough volume they are more or less forced to enforce these rules to avoid being shut down. I can assure you that no upper management of any large casino enjoy having all of this in place as it would be much easier for them to just let it be completely anon. The money alone that is spent can be quite crazy..

Not just anyone is in the know about the burden that these casinos bear in ensure the maintenance of the KYC policy as instructed by the authority to be enforced. Of which as a matter of fact a lot of these casinos wouldn't hesitate to exclude the KYC as a mandatory requirement towards a continuous use of their platform by a customer. But obviously like you said, they have no option but to adhere in order to still remain in business.

Again, it's all about rules and keeping business running. I think we can all agree that it's a bit uncomfortable to undergo KYC to play. However, we can't completely question the casino's reasons for implementing this, as there must be a reason behind it.

If we asked everyone whether they prefer KYC or not, I think everyone would answer the same thing: they don't want KYC. However, these rules aren't implemented based on user polls, but rather on other policies, even policies from authorities (interference from parties other than the casino itself).

[pinhead666]

I think we should care more about our privacy. I am not a big gambler, but for sure I wouldn’t do with KYC.
No need for them to know who I am. Also I am not sure how the State should be informed of my betting.
Say no to this KYC nonsense.

  --Yeap,

If there were no KYC system, many people would have shown a lot of interest in these games and would have played them. If there were a KYC system, many casino players would have turned away after seeing it. Many people come to play the game for a short period and are not interested in completing KYC.

As a result, ordinary casino players seek KYC-free sites where they can play freely and come and go. Many players want to protect their privacy, but they are not interested in doing KYC when they come to play such games.

[tbct_mt2]

If there were no KYC system, many people would have shown a lot of interest in these games and would have played them. If there were a KYC system, many casino players would have turned away after seeing it. Many people come to play the game for a short period and are not interested in completing KYC.

As a result, ordinary casino players seek KYC-free sites where they can play freely and come and go. Many players want to protect their privacy, but they are not interested in doing KYC when they come to play such games.

BTCGOSU can help gamblers to easily filter KYC-free casinos and have a list of such casinos before picking one to use. The site also has written many reviews that can be used as references for gamblers in their researching and selection making process.

The list is available and there are no-KYC casinos to choose but it's like centralized exchanges which can change their ToS and policies in particular KYC policy any time. Gamblers as users of any centralized online casinos must be aware of this risk and have proper fund management on online platforms. They can enjoy no KYC on online gambling sites but always have plan B for their exits.
https://www.btcgosu.com/no-kyc-casinos/

Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

This thread inactive for almost a week, you didn't find anything guys?  so a few hours ago I checked my account and I saw a notification regarding $5 free bet also 6 offers on the rewards page well I used free bet on sports betting and chose 3 matches for 1 parlay bet luckily I won $20 so just try check your account, who knows you might be lucky.   Also don't forget to check the rewards page because I think there are some interesting offers, now I am trying the original game promo + Weekly tournaments.

[Bitinity]

This thread inactive for almost a week, you didn't find anything guys?  so a few hours ago I checked my account and I saw a notification regarding $5 free bet also 6 offers on the rewards page well I used free bet on sports betting and chose 3 matches for 1 parlay bet luckily I won $20 so just try check your account, who knows you might be lucky.   Also don't forget to check the rewards page because I think there are some interesting offers, now I am trying the original game promo + Weekly tournaments.

The question is no longer fit to me because I've left this casino by asking of account closure few months ago after there is no clear explanation why I got excluded from their tournament as well as I am no longer able to claim all other bonuses. Of course I do not visit duelbits again since that time because there is no reason for me to come back to visit what are available in duelbits recently. Good to see that you are still able to get something from duelbits, keep playing as what you used to do and do not participate and win too much reward/tournament or other promotions to avoid of being limited/excluded.

[xLays]

This thread inactive for almost a week, you didn't find anything guys?  so a few hours ago I checked my account and I saw a notification regarding $5 free bet also 6 offers on the rewards page well I used free bet on sports betting and chose 3 matches for 1 parlay bet luckily I won $20 so just try check your account, who knows you might be lucky.   Also don't forget to check the rewards page because I think there are some interesting offers, now I am trying the original game promo + Weekly tournaments.

I always check my duelbits account every friday because of the UFC Jackpot I haven't received any kind of reward like that.
I guess I get one before, but it was only for specific game/sport and couldn't be used on parlays.

Ive never joined any Duelbits tournaments, especially those with wagering requirements, since I know I dont really have chance with my low bankroll. lol
I'm okay with UFC Jackpot. What's good about the UFC Jackpot is that you dont need to place bet or risk anything you just need to be VIP rank to join.

Anyway, just reminding you guys in case you havent made your UFC Jackpot prediction yet go predict now. Only a few hours left.
And congrats on your freebet win...

[gunhell16]

Having multiple accounts isn't allowed and even if he had requested support to close his first account, he should have confirmed from them that his account is closed and he has opened a new one or at least should have asked permission to open the 2nd account. These things may seem small initially, but they can create problems specially if you have high balance in your gambling account and suddenly you found that your account is frozen because you violate the terms and conditions. I think in this case, he should be fine if he has proofs of all those conversion with the support team.

Something even with support approval it still very adviseable to have them closed that account first, or better still make sure the balance on that account is cleared down to zero before you create and deposit into the newly created account.


The reason for this is that, why most casinos are against multiple accounts is that the gambler may likely make you of both of them to cheat the casino, so there is a likely system configuration that report two accounts that belong to same person and are active and one way to know an account is active is when there is activities on the Said account such as gaming or have deposits and withdrawals activities on them both.

If we can tell the reason why we want to close our first account and why we make another account, I think the casino may allow and will not do anything with our account. But if that is strict casinos, they will not allow that and will not accept our reason and still block or ban us. It is why we need to explain our condition and just hope they can understand the reason and allow us to make another account. But if they still prohibit, we don't have to against them because that can make us get another problem.

You know, as far as I know, no casinos allow multiple accounts, and I don't know of any crypto casinos in this industry that allow multi-accounts for their casino players, why? Do you know of any reputable casinos that allow multiple accounts?

Because in my opinion, if the casino finds out specifically if this gambling platform is reputable, then for sure there is no doubt that they will definitely find another
account where they will see such violations regarding their rules.