ㅤ

[Pmalek]

I have noticed several of RainbowKun's threads in Bitcoin Discussions. He seemed like a very philosophical type of member, but he posted huge threads and walls of text where you simply lost focus after a while. I started reading his content more deeply after someone (maybe an alt of his) created a thread in Meta in which he was hailed for his discussions and research. I remember asking him in one of his threads whether everything he writes is the fruit of his own imagination and knowledge or if he is using some sources and articles while creating content. In that case, he needs to post references to the original material he used to construct his threads. He said he didn't, and that it's all his. Since I couldn't find plagiarized content, I believed what he said was true.

I am guilty of meriting some of his threads. I guess I was made to look like a fool like so many of us here. I noticed that he wasn't part of any signature campaign and neither are some of the other users that Ratimov mentioned in this thread. Maybe that was supposed to come later. Shame really if all this is true. He looked like a unique type of member. I guess not...      

[1715163859]

1715163859

[RainbowKun]

I have noticed several of RainbowKun's threads in Bitcoin Discussions. He seemed like a very philosophical type of member, but he posted huge threads and walls of text where you simply lost focus after a while. I started reading his content more deeply after someone (maybe an alt of his) created a thread in Meta in which he was hailed for his discussions and research. I remember asking him in one of his threads whether everything he writes is the fruit of his own imagination and knowledge or if he is using some sources and articles while creating content. In that case, he needs to post references to the original material he used to construct his threads. He said he didn't, and that it's all his. Since I couldn't find plagiarized content, I believed what he said was true.

I am guilty of meriting some of his threads. I guess I was made to look like a fool like so many of us here. I noticed that he wasn't part of any signature campaign and neither are some of the other users that Ratimov mentioned in this thread. Maybe that was supposed to come later. Shame really if all this is true. He looked like a unique type of member. I guess not...       

Pmalek, I am very impressed with you. We have communicated in some posts, and I have also received your kind suggestions. I believe you have also read some of my articles. Do we believe others' slander because of some data piled up by others?
This is my response to Ratimov's defamation of me that I just finished writing. I hope that each of us should have the ability to think and judge independently, instead of directly listening to other people's slander.

Ratimov, do not get deluded by pride or hatred

[LoyceV]

Look at the structure of bb-codes, the structure of the table itself. It was created by the same person.

When I created big tables, I took inspiration from other posts that made very nice tables. That doesn't make me the same person.

And besides, do you seriously think that a newcomer with a registration date of August 17, 2021 comes to the forum and after 2 days already has the skills to build complex tables?  

I think it's possible: BBCode is used on many different sites, and many people have skills they learned before Bitcoin(talk) even existed.
I'd say it's much more suspicious (for being someone's alt) that he's so interested in Merit and plagiarism, just 2 days after registering.

kxwhalexk is now banned BTW.

Well, I tried to give him a chance to correct his plagiarism. Too bad it wasn't enough to change his ways.
I'm still not convinced he's part of a large alt gang, but who knows, maybe I'm just getting soft and too hopeful.

[mv1986]

There is a main account, RainbowKun, which earns merits and distributes it to its alts.

I highly doubt that. RainbowKun makes decent posts and I see no reason for him to create an army of shitposters.

He did however Merit a few people who were congratulating him on his achievements, and right after that many low-ranking accounts made a similar post to get Merited:

Congratulations! !

Congratulations

First of all, congratulations

I instantly noticed those posts, but didn't want to pursue it back then. My interpretation was that RainbowKun had no idea they were only posting for Merit, and he fell for it.

Can you use BBCode from the full Merit history if you post Merit transactions, so I can easily click the link to the post?

There are several topics on the forum where newbies can get merit

That explains why you're currently the #1 Top Merit sender to banned accounts in the last 180 days. Meriting Newbies is tricky sometimes.

Also, who wants to add this farm to ignore and put ~

Excluding them from your Trust list makes no sense, most of them have never left feedback.

I'm trying to add those members to my ignore list, but every time I click on "ignore member options" the page just keeps loading and comes back with an error on the bitcointalk server--and that's been happening for several days.

It's "normal" to get a time-out when your ignore list is too long. You'll have to ignore them one by one by clicking Ignore on one of their posts.

Seriously, @Ratimov, just check when I recommended him for some merits because I was following his posts for a while. I agree with Loyce here and I also had a private conversation with RainbowKun where we exchanged research papers. Does anyone really think that farming shit posters would deal with

"Nested Institutions and the Retardation of the Adaptive Process" - Sung Chull Kim*  

or

"Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics"

 - David Sloan Wilson · John M. Gowdy

or

"The Empathic Civilization" by Jeremy Rifkin. (https://www.ted.com/talks/jeremy_rifkin_the_empathic_civilization)

?

With all due respect, but RainbowKun also tells the truth when he says to never have begged for a single merit. It was me who recommended him, then he went from 17 merits to where he is now...  If he is an account farmer, well, hats off to him! Probably the best and most ambitious one I have ever seen, all for just getting some merits to feed his 60 + accounts as claimed by Ratimov.

Really?

Edit: I am all against account farmers, but this would be an enormously out of order case of what we are used to here on this forum. Just my two cents.
@Ratimov I value the type of analysis you did in regards to its depth, but this guy RainbowKun, something doesn't add up here. He is deeply scientifically interested, writes back in private. He could have asked me to comment publicly to let his threads shine even more due to activity. That was not the case. I don't know...

[dkbit98]

I have seen some of your questions about me here, please wait for the reply of my independent article.

I have one question for you:
- Are you sad because your twin friend and biggest fan supporter kxwhalexk is now banned for plagiarism?

Please immediately, immediately, remove my name from your list.

Oh don't worry, we are all on some lists, but you can just continue dancing like a butterfly every day  

I'm still not convinced he's part of a large alt gang, but who knows, maybe I'm just getting soft and too hopeful.

Maybe you are just getting old and eyesight is getting weaker
I am not sure for all accused members are being Rainbow alts, but I was mostly suspecting on kxwhalexk.

[mindrust]

Finally it is happening. Some super nerd with too much free time is trolling the fuck out of the forum with ~100 accounts and possibly will end the forum for good.

[RainbowKun]

Seriously, @Ratimov, just check when I recommended him for some merits because I was following his posts for a while. I agree with Loyce here and I also had a private conversation with RainbowKun where we exchanged research papers. Does anyone really think that farming shit posters would deal with

"Nested Institutions and the Retardation of the Adaptive Process" - Sung Chull Kim* 

or

"Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics"

 - David Sloan Wilson · John M. Gowdy

or

"The Empathic Civilization" by Jeremy Rifkin. (https://www.ted.com/talks/jeremy_rifkin_the_empathic_civilization)

?

With all due respect, but RainbowKun also tells the truth when he says to never have begged for a single merit. It was me who recommended him, then he went from 17 merits to where he is now...  If he is an account farmer, well, hats off to him! Probably the best and most ambitious one I have ever seen, all for just getting some merits to feed his 60 + accounts as claimed by Ratimov.

Really?

Edit: I am all against account farmers, but this would be an enormously out of order case of what we are used to here on this forum. Just my two cents.
@Ratimov I value the type of analysis you did in regards to its depth, but this guy RainbowKun, something doesn't add up here. He is deeply scientifically interested, writes back in private. He could have asked me to comment publicly to let his threads shine even more due to activity. That was not the case. I don't know...

Yes, mv1986, thank you for your recommendation at the time. I really only had 17 merits at that time. I had a great time communicating with you. Until today, few people really understand the value of my philosophical articles about Bitcoin, because most people will just think of them as a wall of words when they see them. You are my soulmate, we can conduct academic exchanges very well. I am particularly disappointed with bitcointalk now. Here is mixed with violence. I believe that if your level is not a hero but a novice, you may also be regarded as my alt. Blessings for you.

I have seen some of your questions about me here, please wait for the reply of my independent article.

I have one question for you:
- Are you sad because your twin friend and biggest fan supporter kxwhalexk is now banned for plagiarism?

Please immediately, immediately, remove my name from your list.

Oh don't worry, we are all on some lists, but you can just continue dancing like a butterfly every day 

I'm still not convinced he's part of a large alt gang, but who knows, maybe I'm just getting soft and too hopeful.

Maybe you are just getting old and eyesight is getting weaker
I am not sure for all accused members are being Rainbow alts, but I was mostly suspecting on kxwhalexk.

I was very angry, because kxwhalexk wrote a post related to me and it was regarded as my alt, until today I was implicated in it. This is the biggest falsehood.

[dkbit98]

I was very angry, because kxwhalexk wrote a post related to me and it was regarded as my alt, until today I was implicated in it. This is the biggest falsehood.

He was not banned because of you being his alt account, but because he made multiple plagiarism with translation from chinese and presented it as his own words.

[RainbowKun]

LoL, explain to someone RainbowKun that he can ask all his explanations and questions in this thread. Hike, he does not know this and began to spam with the same type of topics:  

- Ratimov, do not get deluded by pride or hatred
- Everyone please look at my merit sending record.


We need more, moooooore. Let him create 100 topics of the same type, otherwise, from 1 topic, many people do not understand anything. I can imagine what will happen to the section if each alt will also create several topics with a discussion of the same issue.  

I really don't know there are such forum rules, I only focus on writing. But are you so happy about slandering others? Is your heart so evil?

@Ratimov,I don't understand why you attacked me so viciously. We have nearly no contact with each other. In the past two months, I spent most of my energy writing, publishing articles and communicating with those who responded to me. That's extremely time-consuming.

But, to my astonishment, you spent almost nine days piling up irrelevant date, which made you seemingly professional and convincing and in the end reaching a decision that I, RainbowKun, is an evil liar, operating 80 accounts for merit and Bounty.

Just because some newbies gave me merit and I gave them back, then they became my alt army? Don't you think it too ridiculous yourself?

As is said earlier, once I have smeit, I give it to replies valuable to me, especially those of newbies to encourage them. That made my posts attractive for newbies and that’s all.

I figured out my habit:
1. As long as I have smeit, I give it away.
2. Smerits are sent to replies valuable to me, especially those from newbies to encourage them.
3. Whoever send me merit and leave high-quality reply, I'll give smerit back to show my gratitude. I believe many users here have similar habit.

Merit Abuse

And then the scale of the farm becomes visible and how the cheater managed to pump all his altos. The scheme is as follows. There is a main account, RainbowKun, which earns merits and distributes it to its alts. Those, in turn, distribute it further, along the way receiving merit from other merit sources, just users and help services.

You mentioned that my purport is to build a merit farm and distribute them to my army. Anyone I have ever sent merit to belongs to the army. This is my complete merit data, everyone can judge whether I am running merit farm or not.

Why these heroes and legends are not included in my alt army? The merit I gave them is more than that I sent to newbies.


August 25, 2021, 05:56:54 AM: 1 to   skarais   for   Re: Take a look at the future of Bitcoin from the gold standard system   
August 25, 2021, 02:45:14 AM: 1 to   SquallLeonhart   for   Re: Take a look at the future of Bitcoin from the gold standard system   
August 25, 2021, 02:38:59 AM: 1 to   GreatArkansas   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin called “Bitcoin”?   
August 24, 2021, 08:11:14 AM: 1 to   d5000   for   Re: Take a look at the future of Bitcoin from the gold standard system   
August 20, 2021, 03:29:33 AM: 1 to   d5000   for   Re: What is the nature of the value of Bitcoin?   
August 19, 2021, 02:50:52 AM: 1 to   hatshepsut93   for   Re: Why did Satoshi Nakamoto name the first block of Bitcoin Genesis Block?   
August 19, 2021, 02:49:41 AM: 1 to   Darker45   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin called “Bitcoin”?   
August 18, 2021, 08:09:22 AM: 1 to   Maxine4466   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin called “Bitcoin”?   
August 18, 2021, 07:25:41 AM: 1 to   gwdf1   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin called “Bitcoin”?   
August 18, 2021, 06:52:36 AM: 1 to   Ryder Kudrow   for   Re: What’s consensus?   
August 18, 2021, 06:49:25 AM: 1 to   Kakmakr   for   Re: What’s consensus?   
August 18, 2021, 02:29:00 AM: 1 to   Arvin01   for   Re: Why Bitcoin mining isn’t a waste of energy?   
August 17, 2021, 09:54:02 AM: 1 to   jinneas   for   Re: Bitcoin brings us true freedom of thought   
August 16, 2021, 03:24:43 AM: 1 to   Liamttw   for   Re: Think about the "decentralization" of bitcoin from seven different aspects   
August 14, 2021, 07:14:30 AM: 1 to   Kimberl2020   for   The risks of using Bitcoin   
August 14, 2021, 02:06:49 AM: 1 to   DooMAD   for   Re: What’s consensus?   
August 13, 2021, 04:38:37 AM: 1 to   pooya87   for   Re: Bitcoin Development Team   
August 13, 2021, 01:44:19 AM: 1 to   defi-Dany   for   (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)   
August 12, 2021, 08:39:45 AM: 1 to   kxwhalexk   for   My first bitcoin shopping   
August 12, 2021, 07:25:39 AM: 1 to   slaman29   for   Re: What’s the nature of currency?   
August 12, 2021, 06:19:40 AM: 1 to   franky1   for   Re: Why we say the creation of Bitcoin is an Internet of value?   
August 12, 2021, 01:53:34 AM: 1 to   Tim-BTC   for   Re: What is Bit Civilization?   
August 11, 2021, 07:23:53 AM: 1 to   HaleyOccam   for   Re: What is Bit Civilization?   
August 11, 2021, 06:20:27 AM: 1 to   CryptopreneurBrainboss   for   Do you still have thoughts of picking Gold over Bitcoin, read this.   
August 11, 2021, 02:14:01 AM: 1 to   DapanasFruit   for   Re: The relationship between Bitcoin and human civilization   
August 10, 2021, 04:08:38 AM: 1 to   amishmanish   for   Re: What’s the nature of currency?   
August 09, 2021, 01:07:21 PM: 1 to   Pmalek   for   Do you know the difference between Bitcoin and bitcoin?   
August 09, 2021, 04:18:52 AM: 1 to   Maidak   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin in the highest level of trust?   
August 09, 2021, 02:25:52 AM: 1 to   Kiley33   for   Re: Some inspiration in the future of Bitcoin from the history of paper money   
August 08, 2021, 09:45:49 AM: 1 to   Poker A-k   for   Re: Is Bitcoin possible to build a new "Bretton Woods system"   
August 08, 2021, 09:04:57 AM: 1 to   Lily Garver   for   Re: What is the nature of the value of Bitcoin?   
August 06, 2021, 01:45:05 AM: 1 to   lovesmayfamilis   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 11:28:17 AM: 1 to   Mikayla Buckley   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin in the highest level of trust?   
August 05, 2021, 11:28:04 AM: 1 to   mk4   for   Re: Why is Bitcoin in the highest level of trust?   
August 05, 2021, 11:02:58 AM: 1 to   gredinger   for   I am a member of this community, I am running for US House of Representatives.   
August 05, 2021, 05:57:17 AM: 1 to   Connor Britton   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 05:47:29 AM: 1 to   NathanielParker   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 03:50:35 AM: 1 to   caryoscar   for   Re: Bitcoin and Keynes Plan   
August 05, 2021, 03:29:28 AM: 1 to   StanleyBoyle   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 03:29:18 AM: 1 to   kxwhalexk   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 03:26:07 AM: 1 to   Pmalek   for   Re: The principle of entropy reduction in Bitcoin mining   
August 05, 2021, 02:20:22 AM: 1 to   icopress   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 05, 2021, 02:20:13 AM: 1 to   igehhh   for   Re: Value bitcointalk brought to me in my work summary of July   
August 04, 2021, 08:00:01 AM: 1 to   Aliceooo78   for   Re: Bitcoin comes first and blockchain comes later   
August 04, 2021, 05:16:33 AM: 1 to   amishmanish   for   Re: The principle of entropy reduction in Bitcoin mining   
August 04, 2021, 04:25:04 AM: 1 to   DapanasFruit   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 04, 2021, 03:59:32 AM: 1 to   Mcphail   for   Re: The principle of entropy reduction in Bitcoin mining   
August 04, 2021, 02:16:10 AM: 1 to   The Pharmacist   for   Bitcoin videos on Youtube....and a suggestion for our possible BCT channel.   
August 04, 2021, 02:05:24 AM: 1 to   davis196   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 04, 2021, 02:05:12 AM: 1 to   marilynmanson21   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 04, 2021, 02:04:05 AM: 1 to   kaggie   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 04, 2021, 02:03:49 AM: 1 to   The Pharmacist   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 04, 2021, 02:01:32 AM: 1 to   Hydrogen   for   Re: Why can Bitcoin change human relations of production?   
August 03, 2021, 12:28:07 PM: 2 to   The Pharmacist   for   First time paying in person with bitcoin: Computer Heads   
August 03, 2021, 09:19:40 AM: 1 to   HaleyOccam   for   Re: Why can Bitcoin change human relations of production?   
August 03, 2021, 08:04:55 AM: 1 to   Roy Asher   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 03, 2021, 08:04:49 AM: 1 to   jinneas   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 03, 2021, 08:04:39 AM: 1 to   mk4   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 03, 2021, 03:40:25 AM: 1 to   EvieLannister   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 03, 2021, 03:40:17 AM: 1 to   Kiley33   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 11:55:38 AM: 1 to   nakamura12   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 11:38:14 AM: 1 to   KevinRosa   for   Re: Some inspiration in the future of Bitcoin from the history of paper money   
August 02, 2021, 10:13:39 AM: 1 to   DapanasFruit   for   Re: Some inspiration in the future of Bitcoin from the history of paper money   
August 02, 2021, 07:32:16 AM: 1 to   pawanjain   for   Re: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization   
August 02, 2021, 06:06:57 AM: 1 to   amishmanish   for   Re: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization   
August 02, 2021, 04:33:50 AM: 1 to   nullius   for   Bitcoin: The Social Phenomenon   
August 02, 2021, 04:33:04 AM: 1 to   Jazmin Leslie   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 04:32:40 AM: 1 to   amishmanish   for   Re: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization   
August 02, 2021, 03:14:44 AM: 1 to   Liamttw   for   Re: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization   
August 02, 2021, 02:55:18 AM: 1 to   GeorgeJohn   for   Re: Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?   
August 02, 2021, 02:29:41 AM: 1 to   franky1   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:29:15 AM: 1 to   anotherdayyyy   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:29:02 AM: 1 to   Jazmin Leslie   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:28:14 AM: 1 to   Pmalek   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:27:26 AM: 1 to   franky1   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:26:18 AM: 1 to      kaggie   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:25:25 AM: 1 to      kxwhalexk   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
ugust 02, 2021, 02:22:55 AM: 1 to      Jazmin Leslie   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:22:08 AM: 1 to      StanleyBoyle   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:21:31 AM: 1 to      SquirrelJulietGarden   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
August 02, 2021, 02:20:20 AM: 1 to      Shamm   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 02:01:47 PM: 1 to      kaggie   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:32:32 PM: 1 to      Charles-Tim   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:32:15 PM: 1 to      lovesmayfamilis   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:30:58 PM: 1 to      kxwhalexk   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:30:44 PM: 1 to      Aliceooo78   for   (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)   
July 30, 2021, 12:30:10 PM: 1 to      The Pharmacist   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:29:34 PM: 1 to      mk4   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:29:15 PM: 1 to      Poker Playerfor   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:22:59 PM: 1 to      ETFbitcoin   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:20:57 PM: 1 to      The Pharmacist   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:20:40 PM: 1 to      Lucius   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:20:03 PM: 1 to      kxwhalexk   for   Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.   
July 30, 2021, 12:15:06 PM: 1 to      Aliceooo78   for   Re: Do you know any game theory tucked inside Bitcoin?   
July 30, 2021, 12:00:07 PM: 1 to      ShowOff   for   Re: Can Bitcoin truly evolve into super-sovereign currency?   
July 30, 2021, 11:59:56 AM: 1 to      20kevin20   for   Re: Can Bitcoin truly evolve into super-sovereign currency?   
July 30, 2021, 11:59:10 AM: 1 to      franky1   for   Re: Can Bitcoin truly evolve into super-sovereign currency?   
July 30, 2021, 11:51:07 AM: 1 to      valentine wheelerfor   Re: Bitcoin and Triffin Dilemma   
July 30, 2021, 11:50:54 AM: 1 to      defi-Dany   for   Re: Bitcoin and Triffin Dilemma   
July 29, 2021, 08:35:54 AM: 2 to      StanleyBoyle   for   Re: Can Bitcoin truly evolve into super-sovereign currency?   
July 29, 2021, 06:15:59 AM: 1 to      thecodebear   for   Re: Why do many mainstream economists always oppose Bitcoin?   
July 28, 2021, 10:21:45 AM: 2 to      mv1986   for   Re: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source   
July 28, 2021, 10:21:03 AM: 1 to      Kiley33   for   Re: Take a look at the future of Bitcoin from the gold standard system   
July 23, 2021, 08:36:43 AM: 1 to      BlackHatCoiner   for   Re: Why do many people call Bitcoin "digital gold"?   
July 23, 2021, 08:32:23 AM: 1 to      satoshi   for   Re: Bitcoin does NOT violate Mises' Regression Theorem   
July 23, 2021, 08:27:04 AM: 1 to      BlackHatCoiner   for   Re: Why do many people call Bitcoin "digital gold"?   
July 22, 2021, 11:20:16 AM: 1 to      xenon131   for   Re: Do you know any game theory tucked inside Bitcoin?   
July 12, 2021, 05:54:24 AM: 1 to      Lucius   for   Re: Have you noticed many newbies/junior members opening threads lately?   
July 09, 2021, 03:42:46 AM: 1 to      Welsh   for   Re: Bitcoin is the creation of Satoshi from zero to one   
July 09, 2021, 03:01:06 AM: 1 to      AicecreaME   for   Re: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization   


I have listed the names of these people separately, so everyone can see how many legends and heroes there are, and how many novices there are.

Are these all my alt army?

   Aliceooo78   
   amishmanish   
   BITCOIN4X   
   Caldear   
   caryoscar   
   COOLCRYPTOVATOR   
   CryptoBuds   
   CryptopreneurBrainboss   
   d5000   
   Daniel91   
   dansus021   
   ETFbitcoin   
   EvieLannister   
   Halab   
   HaleyOccam   
   hosseinimr93   
   hugeblack   
   Husna QA   
   Hydrogen   
   igehhh   
   JillianTaft   
   jinneas   
   John Jefferson   
   kaggie   
   Kiley33   
   kxwhalexk   
   LeGaulois   
   LFC_Bitcoin   
   Liamttw   
   LoyceV   
   Macadonian   
   mk4   
   Mpamaegbu   
   mv1986   
   NathanielParker   
   netplus   
   NotATether   
   o_e_l_e_o   
   paxmao   
   Pmalek   
   Pokapoka124   
   Ratimov   
   Rikafip   
   Robinson66   
   Roy Asher   
   Royse777   
   Saidasun   
   Sterbens   
   The Pharmacist   
   Tina H   
   valentine wheeler   
   vapourminer   
   Welsh   
   worle1bm   
   yhiaali3   

[KingsDen]

Merit Sent to:
August 20, 2021, 12:05:03 PM: 1 to PastorNick
August 19, 2021, 08:46:25 AM: 1 to PastorNick
July 16, 2021, 01:16:18 PM: 1 to Aliceooo78
Received to:
August 17, 2021, 06:53:23 AM: 1 from anotherdayyyy
August 01, 2021, 02:02:07 PM: 1 from Jazmin Leslie
July 27, 2021, 07:04:28 AM: 1 from HaleyOccam

Again, some kind of coincidence.

I have been accused severally for merit begging because according to them I do not merit lower ranking members. I merit only established members.
When the accusations were ongoing, a user @PastorNick entered my profile, compiled all the topics I created from inception, also analysed the boards I post and the merits I recieved from each board. Very nice tabular work with links to the topics inserted.
Who among us here will have smerit without meriting such a user for an excellent work??
I just wish all these distractions will end and everyone enjoys the forum.

[mindrust]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

[mv1986]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

With the difference being that money laundering actually makes you money. He gave away most of his smerits to well established forum members. Now if we say that he is really really sophisticated and clever in his approach, trying to ramp up 60 + accounts, he needs about 6000 merit points to bring his 60 accounts to Full Member status, assuming that he evenly distributes the merit among his accounts all the time. He wouldn't do that though because he is sophisticated. So he rather needs about 20,000 merit points and would still know it looks suspicious. I just don't get the point here, am I missing something? What the hell would this dude's motivation be to write these insane walls of texts, some of which I myself checked for copyright violations, in order to rank up his alt account army? When is he even going to post with this allegedly 60 + alts army sufficiently often in order to rank them up, giving them smerit without getting detected etc. You probably get the point.

Simultaneously discusses with me scientific research via PM. Ironically speaking, if this is his way to build an alt army and he one day achieves his goal, I'd be impressed. When I don't have the time (which happens quite often as I am self-employed) to be active here on this forum and post frequently, I can't even manage to fulfill my sig campaign requirements. If this guy is running the RainbowKun account and 60 more alts, that really makes me laugh. Only possibility would be if he employs people to help him out, but then still, are there so many accounts that actually got merit and ranked up yet? If the allegations were true, is he making progress with his evil plan?

[RainbowKun]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

I never wanted to hurt anyone, nor did I intend to be an enemy of anyone. I have been focusing on writing for these two months. But now I have suffered the most vicious attack. My reputation has been severely damaged. I am particularly angry about this and I am disappointed that there is such a scum on the forum. He will definitely pay the price for its slander.

[mindrust]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

With the difference being that money laundering actually makes you money.

You can milk the shit of this forum with 100 alts. I am sure you are smart enough to figure how.

[mv1986]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

With the difference being that money laundering actually makes you money.

You can milk the shit of this forum with 100 alts. I am sure you are smart enough to figure how.

You kind of took your quote out of context. Yes you can earn money on this forum and yes if you have an army of decently ranked accounts you can earn a lot. I don't know how well these Twitter and what not campaigns pay because I don't even have an active Twitter account and would also not consider participating anyway due to lack of time. I have tried with my account to get into one of the casino sig campaigns but that was close to impossible, also because I have times where I just can't be present.

To make a lot of money off of this forum as I see it you need to have highly ranked accounts, a strong reputation and a lot of time.

If someone (here: allegedly RainbowKun) starts out to farm a 60 alt account army with the posting quality he creates (no matter whether we like the content, but just the effort he seems to be putting in), how the heck do you see him ever get near the level to finally make that pay off? This is what I don't get. I am not denying you can earn money on this forum. For someone who is unknown and doesn't provide specific services to the forum, it is almost impossible as a newbie to ever get to one of the higher ranks. Maybe Senior, but Hero/Legendary, not really. Unless you only post in the right threads. I mention this because Loyce even pointed out that RainbowKun is posting in the wrong places to get merits. So considering that this RainbowKund guy even posted in the wrong places, decreasing his chances substantially to receive a decent amount merits, does make the allegations of Ratimov even more unlikely to be true. That is just my opinion, but what does my opinion account here?

Anyway, let's see how this pans out. In the private discussions I had with RainbowKun about scientific research I can only tell I was never of the opinion that he could be an account farmer. No account farmer would ever put the effort into private conversations besides managing 60 + alt accounts on top of managing the main account posting pages long articles almost every day.

[Kittygalore]

The accounts are fairly new so I don't see how they're going to make a lot of money in those accounts, they can't join the campaigns in the forum since there's a requirement for ranks and sometimes merit received and I think that the accused don't seem to have the time to do all of those especially knowing how the accused makes their threads really long. Plus, there's no damning evidence that it's an account farm.

[mindrust]

This is like money laundering.

When you raise tens of hundreds of alts, and produce some good quality word salads, you'll attract some legit forum users as well.

Exchanges, casinos and mixers do that all the time. Their big customers are CP sellers, drug sellers, terrorists etc but it is your legit money that washes their huge dirty money.

I am not saying that Rainbowdude is a acc farmer or not even though the evidences that were provided kinda make sense. I just didn't look deeply into it.

I am just saying what he could be doing here. So any legit dude that merited Rainbow is now being used against us.

With the difference being that money laundering actually makes you money.

You can milk the shit of this forum with 100 alts. I am sure you are smart enough to figure how.

If someone (here: allegedly RainbowKun) starts out to farm a 60 alt account army with the posting quality he creates (no matter whether we like the content, but just the effort he seems to be putting in), how the heck do you see him ever get near the level to finally make that pay off? This is what I don't get.

So you aren't as smart as I thought. How disappointing.

[DdmrDdmr]

I’d still like to see an explanation from @RainbowKun to what @nutildah pointed to here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356476.msg57786379#msg57786379

The highlighted text points to a clear, albeit small (but relevant) text spinning from Wikipedia on a given phrase concerning the Triffin Dilemma. We seem to be tiptoeing away from addressing this issue.

Of course, we could also add to the equation at least 5 posts that were edited today to add a reference to Wikipedia or else, which has been included today:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351130.msg57545893#msg57545893
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351995.msg57580263#msg57580263
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351847.msg57574343#msg57574343
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351477.msg57560295#msg57560295
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349730.msg57480332#msg57480332

[RainbowKun]

I’d still like to see an explanation from @RainbowKun to what @nutildah pointed to here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356476.msg57786379#msg57786379

The highlighted text points to a clear, albeit small (but relevant) text spinning from Wikipedia on a given phrase concerning the Triffin Dilemma. We seem to be tiptoeing away from addressing this issue.

Of course, we could also add to the equation at least 5 posts that were edited today to add a reference to Wikipedia or else, which has been included today:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351130.msg57545893#msg57545893
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351995.msg57580263#msg57580263
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351847.msg57574343#msg57574343
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351477.msg57560295#msg57560295
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349730.msg57480332#msg57480332

I understand what you mean. Here I express my opinion. I hope you will read my article carefully. Let’s take Triffin’s Dilemma as an example:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351847.msg57574343#msg57574343

First of all, the title of my article is "Bitcoin and Triffin Dilemma". I combined the historical event of Triffin Dilemma to illustrate my understanding of Bitcoin. The ultimate goal is to explain the status of Bitcoin's future development.

Triffin’s dilemma is a known historical event. It belongs to common sense problems in economics and history. The conclusion of Triffin’s dilemma is also a well-known conclusion in history. I use this point of view to illustrate my understanding of Bitcoin. Anyone with a background in history and economics can explain in detail what the Triffin dilemma is. This is common-sense and universal information. The Triffin dilemma is explained in detail in the wiki. I put the wiki here to let more people understand what Triffin’s dilemma is.

From this point of view, I have come to the conclusion that Bitcoin will be the best choice for super-sovereign currencies. We will eventually get a new global currency and financial system with Bitcoin as the core.

In this article, the Triffin dilemma is a known historical event. The subject of my article is about Bitcoin, which is an independent point of view. The other articles are similar, you can read them carefully. If you still have any questions, I can explain to you the origin of the point of view in each article.

I explained my understanding of Bitcoin from different perspectives through specific events in history. Every article is the result of my deep thinking. I recorded the thought process and finally came to my conclusion. Should we describe a known historical event as evidence of plagiarism?

[UserU]

Now you guys mentioned it... I recalled The Ghoul (presumably alt) posting a Chinese image link some time back, which I hardly ever saw as far as I remember:

https://i.loli.net/2021/08/05/LA1mM9y7VcUgk8Q.png

Source: https://github.com/marktext/marktext/issues/426

This definitely sounds very sus.