OrangeFren.com - instant, KYC-free, exchange comparison

[joker_josue]

But exchange operators don't want to do this. It would decrease the number of confiscations and that's not in their dirty interest. 

The question is not even to reduce confiscations.
If they had this type of tools they would reduce the number of customers. Because many stopped using the platform.

Thus, in case any AML alerts arise, they continue with the client.
They will always earn some fee from that transaction.

[Pmalek]

The question is not even to reduce confiscations.
If they had this type of tools they would reduce the number of customers. Because many stopped using the platform.

Thus, in case any AML alerts arise, they continue with the client.
They will always earn some fee from that transaction.

That's also a possibility. However, it can work the other way as well. I think many people have certain coins they believe wouldn't pass these AML and "dirtiness" checks at centralized exchanges and they don't want to try and deposit them there. But if there was a sure way to have those coins tested before making a transaction, people could do that and perhaps see surprising results. If UTXOs you believe aren't "clean enough" suddenly receive a good rating and you don't mind using a CEX, that would give you the confidence you need to do it.

[examplens]

If the user used our link we'd be able to refund him already, but because he didn't we can only pressure GhostSwap to assist him. (Which itself is proving very effective!)

That's a pretty shitty way that GhostSwap does its business to be honest. When their partners (like you) are watching, they play nice. When they are gone or can't see, they will perform shotgun KYC or confiscations or their liquidity partners will. And to the end user it doesn't matter where the coins are now and who is asking the questions. The money isn't in the end user's pockets.

I honestly do not see a single justified reason why escrow at OF would not cover all stuck orders at an exchanger. If it is Ghostswap funds and there is enough evidence that the order is valid, there should be no obstacles.
I assume that in some AML analyses, a parameter would have to be added: "swap through OF" = AML risk score 0%