Royse777 is Casino Critique

[dkbit98]

maybe they are just angry (although I think it is the same person) because they were not accepted in some of their campaigns. However, they prefer to perform with newly created accounts because they do not want to compromise the possibility of participating in some of their future campaigns.

100% butthurt trolls.

If it's Royse777, dkbit98 knows it too and in this case what he has written in this thread would be completely dishonest. The fact that he talks about balls, pussy and conspiracy theories, without clearly stating that it is not Royse777 who is behind the account makes me think even more strongly that it is him.

Sure, I know who is behind Satoshi account, and I know all other bitcointalk secrets because I am unwilling member of 33 degree high secret occult dt membership  
I don't care who is behind Casino Critique and I don't care about anything related with this Casino thing, so I think you need to drink your medication or check-in for vacation in your local mental hospital.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

User CasinoCritique is not the only one in that business, as far as I know, several old members of the forum are involved in it. I believe that it is not difficult to determine if the need arises.

Full disclosure: I've been helping to edit the Casino Critique website, and although I'm not part of their team I am involved in this, and therefore my reputation now that I've announced it.  I'm not fact-checking, just editing for grammar and the like.

IMO making a big deal out of who's behind the official CC account is a waste of mental energy, because as I said previously the team members (in other words, the people who'd have their feet under the fire if the project turned out to be a scam) have made their identities known.  If you're going to focus on anything, it ought to be who has control over any funds CC has received so far--and I don't have an answer to that.  To my understanding, no decisions are going to be made about use of funds without the 2-of-3 sig security thing in action, so if you're already starting to point fingers, the targets of said fingers are already there.

Also: I happen to believe that there's no intent to scam investors with the CC project.  I think the members behind it really do want to create a casino review site that's going to succeed.  That said, I do understand the skepticism by OP and others (though I think it's overblown given that the team members are listed by name on the CC website).  This isn't exactly like that case we had a while back where some relatively trusted members misused charity funds.  This a group of forum members whose reputations are worth something to them and likely worth more in potential or actual money than they could get by pulling off a scam by colluding to pull in investment money for a fake casino review site.

I've been wrong before, but my gut and my experience is telling me I'm right on this one.

[Stalker22]

OP, since there is no evidence for your point, you are just making baseless accusations. I am merely stating a fact, I have no ulterior motive in this.

Can you please explain why you think Royse777 and Casino Critique are related?

[KingsDen]

You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

One more coward with no balls using his alt account and speaking about some nonsense dt secret conspiracy theory that nobody really cares about, and all this without any proof,
I don't care about anything you say until you use your real account.
Go get a life.

It is fine to use an alt account to make some accusations,  but what is not fine is making a baseless accusation. However, there is no crime, I have seen people who woke up and head directly to reputation to outpour their illusionary thinking.

In as much as I support the use of alt accounts when it's absolutely needful, I am somewhat skeptical why the accuser should create a new account with Royse's name. It would have been a generic username that could be re-useable when the need arises.

On the one hand I'm not very clear about the OP's accusation either, but on the other hand, what's Royse777's problem in coming to this thread and saying whether or not he's the one running the account?

There's no obligations or whatsoever that demands that Royse777 comes to make some statements here. It is fine he comes up with a statement and it is also fine if he doesn't. Remember Royse777 was involved in one Bitlusy saga, if he is actually launching a new project, it is OK to not associate his identity to it. The personality behind the Royse777 account is a genuine personal who has gathered nice reputation in the forum, but the name Royse777 recently got attacks and somewhat stained. Even in business, it's OK to disassociate a certain brand from the other.

Yet, Op is just a baseless accusation and that is what it remains until proven otherwise.

[JollyGood]

Royse777 has been caught, no matter how hard his buddies try to hide him.

After Bitlucy777 fiasco, he is now back with Casino Critique trying to raise 10 BTC, in collusion with his DT friends.

Let's hope no one is foolish enough to throw their money away.

Keeping aside for a moment the member/members behind Casino Critique, he/she/they want to raise 10 BTC for what exactly? Do you have any forum links and their official website address?

What are/is Casino Critique supposed to be doing if they ever get started?

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

True. It is difficult to argue with that point, why would the OP be hiding their identity?

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

seriously, who the fuck died and made you the king of the forum?   if Theymos says its ok to use a alt account, then you need to shut the fuck up with your threatening curse words. you little pussy

Please try to refrain from using profanities because it really drags the post or the whole thread in to the gutter. Surely we can try to engage in a civil conversation.

[DireWolfM14]

This thread is a prime example of why I'm getting really tired of the reputation board.  It's gotten to be full of self-important busy-bodies attempting to build their own reputations by besmirching the reputations of others.

To those of you who are concerned about the reputation of CasinoCritique; if you don't like the project, don't invest.  The reason CasinoCritique asked me to assist as an escrow is because he felt that my reputation (along with Hhampuz') would reassure folks that they would not get scammed.  Now, I have one of the signing keys and Hhampuz has another, without at least one us going rogue the funds will make it to where they are destined; i.e. paying for services and the wages of the team members.

What's my involvement?  Just as I described above; I'm holding one of the signing keys.  That's it.  If I'm asked to sign a transaction I will require documentation/invoices/receipts to ensure that the funds aren't being misappropriated.  It's my belief that my integrity and honor are the reasons I was asked in the first place, and if I see anything funny going on with the funds, I will be first to cry foul.  If you trust that at least two members of the Escrow team are not out to scam anyone, then rest assured that the project will not turn into a scam.  That's not the same thing as saying that the project will succeed, that you'll have to assess for yourselves.

As for any speculation to who's behind the CasinoCritique account, you'll just have to keep speculating.  Yes, I do know, but I will not be disclosing that information.  I made a promise to keep it secret, and I intend to honor my word.  But by no means does that mean I will allow a scam to occur under my nose.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Keeping aside for a moment the member/members behind Casino Critique, he/she/they want to raise 10 BTC for what exactly? Do you have any forum links and their official website address?

I think there's an ANN thread somewhere, but their website (or at least for the fundraising part) is here.

I've gone over the contents of the entire site, but as I was just doing a proofreading and making suggestions, I didn't retain details about the overall picture of how much money they're trying to raise.  10BTC is indeed a lot; I'll have to go back and look to see for myself what their goals are as far as that's concerned.  

What they want to achieve is all spelled out on their website, though, and probably in their ANN thread (I think one exists, anyway).  They're trying to start up a crypto casino review site and form partnerships with, I think, advertisers.  The fine details of their business plan, I have no idea about.

I made a promise to keep it secret, and I intend to honor my word.  But by no means does that mean I will allow a scam to occur under my nose.

Same here to the first part, and though I'm not part of the team if I suspect anything scammy, I'll blow the whistle faster than a ref with his eyes on a goofy NBA rookie.

Edit: CC has their IBCO page where they're looking for investors (revenue-sharing partners), but I don't see where they've laid out a goal of how much bitcoin they're trying to raise.  Maybe I need more coffee--and I also haven't re-read their website, either.

[Agbe]

You create this thread only to attacked and accused Royse777 of Bitlucy which case I believed has been settled. But you know that your cased has not been settled since then did you pm him or Bitlucy company about the complain?  This your account was created on the September 18, 2022, 07:19:19 PM and you created this thread on the September 18, 2022, 08:28:52 PM. The space is just about 1hour. And I also believe that, your motive of opening this account is to attack Royse777 because of what happened in Bitlucy. Remember he not the owner of the company but was the just a manager who was trying to partner with the company. Therefore, if you are accusing him from Bitlucy issue then you have to bring some real evidences to back up your allegation. Because that case has been closed but is like you were not satisfied with the judgement, so you want to reopen the case again, then evidences are the things lawyers will use to give judgement. As it is, your accusation  is lagging merit, there it is null and void. I also believed that this is not your real account in the forum. You create this account because of Royse777. Please can you state your reasons of the accusation?

[examplens]

(although I think it is the same person)

I don't know if you are referring to me, although I understand you don't, as I think BitcoinGirl.Club refers to other accounts.

how could I take you into refers if you didn't post on this topic? This is your first post here unless the OP's account is yours or @stfu yahoo registered only to give a response to yahoo62278.
at the beginning of your post, you say that it is justified on your part that you do not use the primary account in this discussion, while at the end of the post you consider it dishonourable if the CC user does not use his main account.

Full disclosure: I've been helping to edit the Casino Critique website, and although I'm not part of their team I am involved in this, and therefore my reputation now that I've announced it.  I'm not fact-checking, just editing for grammar and the like.

just to be clear, I'm not accusing anyone here, I'm just pointing out the fact that several older (more experienced) members of the forum are involved in the whole thing. someone as part of the team, someone as a 3rd service. That's why I think that the identity behind the CasinoCritique account is not a mystery and there are certainly members who know who manages that account. if it matters at all.

I've been following the whole project a little bit since its first appearance, and we have a similar attitude that this is not a scam scheme. Plus, the funds will be held by two reputable members as an escrow.

[DireWolfM14]

Edit: CC has their IBCO page where they're looking for investors (revenue-sharing partners), but I don't see where they've laid out a goal of how much bitcoin they're trying to raise.  Maybe I need more coffee--and I also haven't re-read their website, either.

When I was approached to assist with escrow I was told the goal was to raise a specific dollar amount (expressed in USD) that is less than 1BTC, even at today's price.  But for some, I guess it's easier to shitpost hate, stupidity, and dumb questions directed at sockpuppeting trolls.  Those answers can be found by reading the website, which (by design) is easy to find.

[PaperWallet]

I checked the website. It's a joke. They say "buy one get one free" for the private sale, maximum 1000 chip for private sale. What if someone, as an example, has 2 BTC addresses. It reminds me of the "pay 1 btc, get 2 btc back, maximum 5 btc per person". Are you going to confiscate his funds, like you justify confiscating funds of all players on the casinos advertised here lol

These are individuals with no hope of achieving anything useful for other humans. They can only live hiding behind their screens and scamming others. So even if the project is not a scam in itself, it will be advertising scams as it is done on this forum

And @DireWolf14 being the one "just holding the keys" as he claims is another joke. The reality is he is to be trusted to verify receipts, which is another job, and nobody knows if he's done any of this before (if he's ever got a job before anyway)

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Royse777 has been caught, no matter how hard his buddies try to hide him.

After Bitlucy777 fiasco, he is now back with Casino Critique trying to raise 10 BTC, in collusion with his DT friends.

Let's hope no one is foolish enough to throw their money away.

Lolz, the worst kind of accusation on this forum is one without any form of evidence, I believe alot of users have mentioned this in their comment on this thread, but what I want you to understand is that, without any form of evidence, your accusation against Royse777 is nothing other than spam.
And I know you know that your accusation post if spam, this is why you didn't make this post with your real/main account, but rather choose to hide behind an alt account.
What exactly did you or do you hope to achieve from this?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

What if someone, as an example, has 2 BTC addresses. It reminds me of the "pay 1 btc, get 2 btc back, maximum 5 btc per person". Are you going to confiscate his funds, like you justify confiscating funds of all players on the casinos advertised here lol

I can't speak for the team, but participation in the profit sharing (by buying chips) is anonymous, so there's really no way for Casino Critique to know if someone is buying chips using different addresses.  In addition, the rules state that using multiple addresses is prohibited but they didn't specify in writing what would happen if they found out someone was doing that (that I remember, anyway).  

These are individuals with no hope of achieving anything useful for other humans. They can only live hiding behind their screens and scamming others. So even if the project is not a scam in itself, it will be advertising scams as it is done on this forum

The above really has me wondering where all your bitterness is coming from.  There's certainly a risk in buying chips, and that risk is that there won't ever be any revenue to share.  That should be clear if you read the terms and conditions page and the details of the revenue pool setup, so there's nothing being withheld as far as I know.  

Unless the team really did get together and cook up a scheme with a scam website, scam advertising, and all the rest--which I seriously doubt, given the reputations of the bitcointalk members listed on the CC site--this is simply some people who want to start a business reviewing online casinos.  

So we'll see.  I'm not sure what happens if a small amount of money is raised through the chip sale, i.e., if they're going to go ahead with the plan or return the money or what.  For the life of me, I can't remember if that was covered in the terms & conditions page.

This thread is a prime example of why I'm getting really tired of the reputation board.  It's gotten to be full of self-important busy-bodies attempting to build their own reputations by besmirching the reputations of others.

Bah, it's always been like this.  Well maybe not all the time, but I'd say for most of the time I've been a member here there's been plenty of reputation-smearing drama in this section.  I don't mind it at all, as it offers up opportunities to debate issues and establish whether people can be trusted or not.  Sometimes if you don't challenge things or even talk about them, assumptions are made that can be completely wrong.

By the way, have you seen what's popular on Youtube these days?  It's non-stop besmirching of everything, because that's what people watch.

[LoyceV]

If you trust that at least two members of the Escrow team are not out to scam anyone, then rest assured that the project will not turn into a scam.  That's not the same thing as saying that the project will succeed, that you'll have to assess for yourselves.

That's a whole lot better than the large majority of the ICOs, Forks, DeFis and NFTs we've seen over the past years. Many of those took millions, all combined they took billions.
I'm not much for investing in any of those, but I do believe a thorough escrow setup is much better than what most others have done.

[Timelord2067]

r, but on the other hand, what's Royse777's problem in coming to this thread

You mean other than he probably doesn't know the thread was created?

I've had the same thing where DT Trolls will aganise over every key stroke I've made and weap that I haven't taken their bait all the while I've been offline for a day or two or just am blissfully unaware of the thread.


OP as others have said here: grow some balls.

[dkbit98]

To those of you who are concerned about the reputation of CasinoCritique; if you don't like the project, don't invest.  The reason CasinoCritique asked me to assist as an escrow is because he felt that my reputation (along with Hhampuz') would reassure folks that they would not get scammed.  Now, I have one of the signing keys and Hhampuz has another, without at least one us going rogue the funds will make it to where they are destined; i.e. paying for services and the wages of the team members.

So you guys are holding the keys for all funds and coins received on CasinoCritique address?
If this is true than I see no risk for anyone to get tricked or scammed, unless you all collude and ruin your forum reputation forever, that is highly unlikely to happen.
Just don't start any CSW Faketoshi style trust so you could claim that you are the real CasinoCritique later  

That's a whole lot better than the large majority of the ICOs, Forks, DeFis and NFTs we've seen over the past years. Many of those took millions, all combined they took billions.
I'm not much for investing in any of those, but I do believe a thorough escrow setup is much better than what most others have done.

I think that Casino Critique even gave some free chips for bitcointalk forum members, they never forced anyone to invest anything, and they didn't made some pink happy promises.

[JollyGood]

Thank you for the information ThePharmacist,  I knew almost nothing about the project though the name might have been mentioned once or twice somewhere.

I had a brief look at the ANN thread and it is something worth examining in detail but this part did make me laugh: "The brainchild of a group of reputable Bitcointalk members. Casino Critique is comprised of a handful of Bitcointalk old-timers. Our ultimate goal is to be one of the leaders in Casino Guide in the year 2027."

So the team leader and probable brains behind the project is Little Mouse?

And reputable naim027 is banned right? I guess better to use that name when seeking funds rather than his alt-account called Dic3L0v3r because that would be a real put-off for investors  

I have had little or no interaction with most of the names on the list therefore am unable to make a judgement call on them all but I see nothing there at all that gives me any confidence in this project. Just by looking at the names of some members listed that I have no time for, I would be inclined to advise all to look at the project with caution.




On a serious note, I think it is clear having someone as reputable and trustworthy as Hhampuz (who is part of a very small group I trust) as an escrow-only gives the group the opportunity to use his name and reputation as a way to entice investors either by design or by default.

Do you not feel maybe by having your name attached to this project (even as an unpaid contributor) you are risking your reputation? I mean if they have a well respected forum member such as yourself saying you are helping out on their website it could in the eyes of investors and newbies be taken as you giving the project a seal of approval-to-invest and I am sure that is not your intention.

[examplens]

On a serious note, I think it is clear having someone as reputable and trustworthy as Hhampuz (who is part of a very small group I trust) as an escrow-only gives the group the opportunity to use his name and reputation as a way to entice investors either by design or by default.

Do you not feel maybe by having your name attached to this project (even as an unpaid contributor) you are risking your reputation? I mean if they have a well respected forum member such as yourself saying you are helping out on their website it could in the eyes of investors and newbies be taken as you giving the project a seal of approval-to-invest and I am sure that is not your intention.

DireWolfM14 is also part of escrow there, I would suggest you read his post in this thread, you probably missed it. He is very clearly explained his position in the whole story (I believe that Hhampuz also has a similar statement)
Check here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5414027.msg60969839#msg60969839

[AnotherAlt]

Just by looking at the names of some members listed that I have no time for, I would be inclined to advise all to look at the project with caution.

I am not a potential Investor. But do you still suggest everyone consider the project cautiously after reading Direwolf's statement?

What's my involvement? Just as I described above; I'm holding one of the signing keys. That's it. If I'm asked to sign a transaction I will require documentation/invoices/receipts to ensure that the funds aren't being misappropriated. It's my belief that my integrity and honor are the reasons I was asked in the first place, and if I see anything funny going on with the funds, I will be first to cry foul. If you trust that at least two members of the Escrow team are not out to scam anyone, then rest assured that the project will not turn into a scam. That's not the same thing as saying that the project will succeed, that you'll have to assess for yourselves.

I believe Hhampuz and Direwolf are among the most trusted escrows in this forum. I don't see anything scammy here after reading that. But, I also wouldn't be surprised if you Stick with your statement after understanding what Direwolf said. Because you always see everything with caution and it's become your favorite thing to do. I didn't forget that you Distrust my Judgment Just because I made This and This posts.

A piece of Friendly advice: Don't hunt for ghosts everywhere. LOL

[NotATether]

Guys, see what the OP did?

He just fired an accusation at our direction and disappeared.

He intends to sow discord between us. So don't fall for his bait.