AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Nullifier?

LoyceV perfectly summarized the core security failure here. From an adversarial and systems design perspective, a "blindly constructed partial UTXO set" breaks the fundamental trustless model of Bitcoin.

To expand on why this is mathematically and architecturally impossible from scratch, we have to look at the validation invariants:

1. The Negative Proof Dilemma (Inflation & Double Spends)
If Node A has a complete UTXO set, and a transaction points to an input that doesn't exist, Node A safely rejects it as a double-spend or invalid minting.
However, if your node only knows the last N blocks, and a transaction points to a historical input created 5 years ago, your node cannot distinguish between:

• A valid, old unspent output.
• An invalid transaction spending coins created out of thin air by a malicious miner.

To be secure, a node must be able to prove a negative (that a UTXO does not exist anywhere in the entire historical state).

2. How the Bitcoin Solves This
Your intuition about wanting storage savings is valid, but the execution requires cryptographic anchors rather than just cutting off old blocks blindly. Bitcoin Core handles this through two advanced architectures:

• AssumeUTXO (Bitcoin Core Native): Instead of guessing the state from recent blocks, the node uses a hardcoded, community-verified SHA256 hash of the UTXO set at a specific block height (e.g., block 800,000). The node loads this trusted snapshot instantly to validate new transactions, while quietly syncing the historical ledger from Genesis in the background to cryptographically verify the snapshot later.
  
• Utreexo (Dynamic Accumulators): This is a cryptographic research implementation that shrinks the UTXO set into a compact Merkle-mountain-range accumulator. Instead of storing an 80GB+ UTXO set, the node only stores a few kilobytes of hashes, and transaction spenders must provide a cryptographic proof (inclusion proof) showing that their UTXO exists.
  

[UchihaSarada]

What's the verdict on Nullifier?

LoyceV perfectly summarized the core security failure here. From an adversarial and systems design perspective, a "blindly constructed partial UTXO set" breaks the fundamental trustless model of Bitcoin.

To expand on why this is mathematically and architecturally impossible from scratch, we have to look at the validation invariants:

1. The Negative Proof Dilemma (Inflation & Double Spends)
If Node A has a complete UTXO set, and a transaction points to an input that doesn't exist, Node A safely rejects it as a double-spend or invalid minting.
However, if your node only knows the last N blocks, and a transaction points to a historical input created 5 years ago, your node cannot distinguish between:

• A valid, old unspent output.
• An invalid transaction spending coins created out of thin air by a malicious miner.

To be secure, a node must be able to prove a negative (that a UTXO does not exist anywhere in the entire historical state).

2. How the Bitcoin Solves This
Your intuition about wanting storage savings is valid, but the execution requires cryptographic anchors rather than just cutting off old blocks blindly. Bitcoin Core handles this through two advanced architectures:

• AssumeUTXO (Bitcoin Core Native): Instead of guessing the state from recent blocks, the node uses a hardcoded, community-verified SHA256 hash of the UTXO set at a specific block height (e.g., block 800,000). The node loads this trusted snapshot instantly to validate new transactions, while quietly syncing the historical ledger from Genesis in the background to cryptographically verify the snapshot later.
  
• Utreexo (Dynamic Accumulators): This is a cryptographic research implementation that shrinks the UTXO set into a compact Merkle-mountain-range accumulator. Instead of storing an 80GB+ UTXO set, the node only stores a few kilobytes of hashes, and transaction spenders must provide a cryptographic proof (inclusion proof) showing that their UTXO exists.
  

this post
gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 51.9% AI GPT

The shift away from real-world utility in favor of speculative memecoins and superficial "AI-wrapper" tokens is undoubtedly one of the major structural issues of the current market cycle. Most modern projects focus entirely on token economics rather than the system's actual utility.

However, if you are looking for that classic Proof-of-Work (PoW) ethos—where hardware performs genuinely useful computations beyond merely hashing arbitrary numbers—the narrative has shifted toward **DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks)** and High-Performance Computing (HPC).

From a systems and back-end perspective, a subset of Proof-of-Work is emerging that seeks to redirect GPU mining power toward machine learning training and rendering workloads:

• **Decentralized Computing and Rendering:** Instead of traditional mining pools, protocols are emerging where nodes utilize raw GPU power for 3D graphics rendering or AI model training, receiving direct compensation in native utility tokens. This bridges the gap between infrastructure and real-world demand. **Zero-Knowledge Proof Generation (ZK-Mining):** As privacy infrastructure matures, hardware power—previously dedicated to solving useless cryptographic nonces—is being redirected toward generating complex ZK proofs. This represents a genuine, non-speculative cryptographic service essential for network privacy and scalability.

The challenge with legacy utility tokens was their struggle to achieve real-world adoption. Today, if a project aims to offer a decentralized service (such as storage, computing, or privacy), it must compete with AWS or Google Cloud on uptime and latency—a feat extremely difficult for a fully decentralized PoW chain to achieve without complex consensus optimizations.

This tool hasn't disappeared; it has simply evolved from simple transactional coins into complex infrastructure layers. If you have mining equipment ready for repurposing, this is certainly a niche worth revisiting.

gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 56.8% AI GPT
sapling.ai 99.8% fake

That’s an interesting idea; I commend you for submitting a "Request for Comments" (RFC) before diving straight into coding.

As a system and backend architect, I see a few critical bottlenecks in your proposed technical design—specifically regarding architecture and game theory—that need to be addressed before any code is written:

1. Vulnerabilities in the "Block-on-Demand" consensus mechanism
While disabling continuous block production (minting) seems efficient from a storage perspective, it introduces dangerous security vectors in a decentralized structure:

• Time-stamping and Clock Drift: Without regular block intervals, establishing a precise, immutable, and universally agreed-upon timeline becomes extremely difficult. If a node submits a transaction after a long period of inactivity, validating the exact mathematical sequence and preventing the manipulation of historical states turns into a complex nightmare.
  
• DoS Attack Vector and Liveness Issues: If the chain only activates on demand, an attacker could force the system to generate artificial blocks by flooding it with low-fee transaction requests; this would lead to a sudden, unexpected spike in resource consumption across validator nodes.
  

2. Dedicated Layer 1 (L1) Security vs. Shared Security (The 51% Attack Issue)
You mentioned preferring a dedicated L1 (or App-chain) over smart contracts on Ethereum or Polygon. However, a new, standalone L1 will face the challenge of low economic security in its early stages. If your network has only a few dozen validators, the cost of launching a 51% attack—and altering data regarding the timestamp or ownership (authorship) of a valuable literary work—would be dangerously low.

An Alternative Architectural Path:
Instead of launching a fragile, standalone L1 from scratch, why not consider an App-Chain or a Rollup based on shared security? (For example, utilizing a Data Availability—or DA—layer like Avail or Celestia alongside a standalone rollup, or a chain built on Substrate or Cosmos). This approach allows you to tailor the execution environment precisely to content-publishing workflows while benefiting from the robust cryptographic security of a larger network.

From a developer's perspective, the strength of a decentralized protocol hinges on the stability of its consensus mechanism. If your block production is irregular, how do you plan to manage mempool synchronization during peak traffic and high-concurrency scenarios? I look forward to hearing your thoughts on your approach to state validation during periods of low transaction volume.

gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 19.9% AI GPT
sapling.ai 73.5% fake

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on mabji1?

hey there, your intuition is correct the physical limitations of the universe make a 216-bit search space functionally identical to an infinite search space.

Concern usually stems from whether the "reduction" (the 40 bits) is controlled (a known parameter) or uncontrolled (a flaw/vulnerability). If it is a known, fixed reduction that still leaves the attacker with an astronomical number of combinations to check, the system remains robust.

[purple_sparkles]

I took a look through these user's posts and they've both been doing this for at least months. Whereas Razmirraz posts rote LLM output, at least purple_sparkes frames the prompt with something like "reply to this in the first person". Both types of output are the same in terms of content value.

I use Google Translate and ChatGPT to check the translations of my posts. I use ChatGPT because Google Translate sometimes doesn't produce the best translations, using both resources ensures higher-quality translations for my messages. But I never use ChatGPT to generate posts on its own, every post I have made was written entirely by me. And according to this post, the forum rules do not prohibit translating messages using translation tools or AI, provided the meaning of the original text is not distorted. When using AI, I instruct ChatGPT to translate my message verbatim, without making any changes. Therefore I do not believe I violated the forum rules, and I consider the one year ban to be unfair. I may not be the best poster on the forum, and some might think I don't contribute much value, but I am making an effort, and I believe I am improving.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Muskanrani (with 42 posts and 0 Merit)?
He went from this:

Can you tell me what kind of posts will do here ?
How the rank is increase ?
After which rank the income will start ?

To this a month later:

DESTROYING BITCOIN (YOUR FAULT)

There are several  genuine reasons due to we never be able to destroy Bitcoin. Primarily it's a Decentralized Network not a central server or company that can be switched off .

Some authentic  reasons  to make sure that it is impossible to destroy Bitcoin :

1)  NO SINGAL POINT OF FAILURE :
The main reason is that Bitcoin is not running under a single server, country or authority in fact thousands of independent nodes  or computers across the world running and maintaining it.

2)GLOBAL BACKUP :
Even the government announce to shut down all the nodes who are running Bitcoin even then the remaining nodes will continue to operate this network without any interruption .

3) CRYPTOGRAPHIC SECURITY:
The Bitcoin network is secured with latest modern cryptographic security it is design with mathematically rules which is  immposible to break because it has computational limits.

4) ECONOMIC INCENTIVES:
To destroy this network someone had to control 51% of  global mining power for executing such an attack would require high expenditure of Billions of dollars .
If someone attack on it then the value of network will drop and his billions of dollars become waste so it is more profitable to secure the network rather then to compromise it .
  
5) VALUE & IMPORTANCE OF BITCOIN :
Total supply is strictly capped on 21 Million coins no government or any authority can print any extra Bitcoin. Bitcoin works as a hedge in front of inflation Any government ,bank or third party will not freeze or block the transaction or your assests your money is completely under your control .

Lastly why attempting to destroy it is " your fault"

Basically by taking a aggressive dicision or short position against Bitcoin or funding an infrastructure attack inevitably results in high financial loss because it is a self-healing network.

 Basically when any government or institute try to destroy it or ban it then it became more resilient or decentralized.

Do you honestly believe all the government of the world combined can shut down a network that has no central server ,no head office and no CEO to target???

What do you think about a person who aggressively wanted to destroy the Bitcoin is it a advantage for him or self-destruction???

How would you destroy an assest where private keys exists only in the owner's mind completely beyond the reach of any bank to freeze

WHAT MOTIVATES YOU ABOUT BITCOIN

Most of the people join Bitcoin by seeing price pump and fast gain but if you understand its protocol and architecture deeply then you realize that it is more worthfull then the financial returns .Beyond market cycles the most attractive things of Bitcoin is its  mathematical elegance ,cryptographic resilience and economic game theory. Major points that motivates you about Bitcoin are:

1)MATHEMATICAL CERTAINITY IN AN INFLATIONARY WORLD

Traditional fiat currencies system rely on human authority and central policy decision where money supply will increase at any time  the most effective point of Bitcoin is its algorithm monetry policy  21 million hard cap is not under at any central bank in fact it is enforced by SHA-256 consensus rule .Predictable scarcity is the actual motivation .

2) ZERO COUNTERPARTY RISK

Ever first time in history Bitcoin provides true digital property rights by self-custody , seed phrases and cold storage . In traditional banking your money is internationaly not yours . But now when you hold your private keys then no third-party can freeze , censor or reverse your transactions.

3) DECENTRALIZED SECURITY

By aligning economic self-interest with network consensus the cost of attacking the network is more then the honest mining with market .This self-sustaining economic equilibrium inspires me the most about Bitcoin because in dynamic miner own self-interest is align with network security .

4)PERMISSIONLESS FINANCIAL INCLUSION

It is the biggest revolutionary step to do borderless transactions throughout the world  without any geographical barrier or without any permission. It is the gold standard of Bitcoin global  peer-to-peer cash system whether the management is doing on layer 1 or layer 2

There are some questions are running in my mind which i want to ask are:

*  Do you believe that in future Layer 2 scaling can successfully drive global adoption by maintaining the Bitcoin main immutability???

* According to your opinion which is the major motivation factor at self-custody time Management or Raw security??

* At the end i am very curious to know your opinion about what motivates you about BITCOIN??

[acroman08]

-snip

This is what I got using the AI detectors Nutildah has for this thread. I also ran them on a plagiarism checker and didn't get any hits.

-snip

gptzero: 100% human
copyleaks: 0% no AI detected
sapling: 0% fake
quillbot: 0% of text is likely AI
zerogpt: 0% AI gpt
stealthwriter: 100% human
originality: Likely Original - 100% Confidence

-snip

gptzero: 2% AI, 98% human
copyleaks: 0% no AI detected
sapling: 0% fake
quillbot: 0% of text is likely AI
zerogpt: 0% AI gpt
stealthwriter: 52% human
originality: Likely Original - 100% Confidence

[FinneysTrueVision]

-snip

This is what I got using the AI detectors Nutildah has for this thread. I also ran them on a plagiarism checker and didn't get any hits.

Unfortunately most free detectors will give you a false negative if the AI content has been humanized. The only reliable one is Pangram and when I checked Muskanrani’s three most recent posts, they were all detected as 100% AI, with two of them also detected as paraphrased/rewritten, or in other words, humanized.

[nutildah]

I use Google Translate and ChatGPT to check the translations of my posts. I use ChatGPT because Google Translate sometimes doesn't produce the best translations, using both resources ensures higher-quality translations for my messages.

The problem is even if you are telling the truth, you are not using ChatGPT to write very compelling posts. For example, a lot of your posts are like this:

There can be all kinds of situations related both to external conditions and to the participants themselves. For example, the weather or the condition of the venue may simply be unsuitable. It can also happen that one of the participants, including animals, is unable or not ready to take part in the competition for some reason. Things don’t always go smoothly, especially when it comes to smaller-scale competitions, where the organization of the event can sometimes be less reliable.

This is on the 3rd page of a generic topic which probably shouldn't have been opened in the first place. You're just addressing the subject title without bothering to acknowledge any of the previous conversation, and you're not adding anything of substance or value to the conversation. In other words, this is not a worthy use of AI, IMO. Posts like this should probably be deleted as low value either way.

Here's another example post where it doesn't really matter if its AI or not:

Casino bonuses are a good thing; people just don’t always understand how they should be used. In any case, when we play using bonus points, we don’t risk losing our own money. And ultimately, it’s up to us what we do with them. If there are certain conditions attached to the bonus, we can decide whether we want to meet those requirements or not.

I'm sorry if it seems unfair because that thread in particular is filled with similar-quality posts, but using AI for the sake of polishing what would otherwise be a low value post is not a worthy use of AI, and your account should probably be banned altogether.

You can open a sigban appeal thread in Meta if you'd like but I have to let you know now I am not inclined to reverse the ban without some additional perspective that I may be missing.

[LoyceV]

I also ran them on a plagiarism checker and didn't get any hits.

Unfortunately most free detectors will give you a false negative if the AI content has been humanized.

I'll trust my gut feeling instead of automated detectors. If someone switches from barely English sentences to irrelevant long posts with a high level of English, it's very obvious it's came from a chatbot.

[Cointikka]

Alright well if you'd like to be the 8th, please provide some examples of success that suggest your detector would be a good addition. In lieu of hard data that would suffice. It would be nice to have another tool at our disposal. Thanks.

I request that you give it a try once. I have listed all the updates, and I can assure you I have tested it. You can do a verification of the code.

After reading your reply I have worked on the AI text checker. It took me some time to get it done but it is now complete and has been updated.
This is how it works:
When you go to AI text detector. You will see two tabs; I am certain that you have seen it before after reading your reply.
Now comes the best part. I am going to list how it works, as it makes understanding the UI simple. You need to click on the tab that says Bitcointalk User(by UID)

• Enter the UID
• Click on Fetch last 20 posts
• It will display the last 20 posts written by a user
• Then click on Check this post
• As soon as you click, the system uses all three AIs to verify the text content
• After that, it displays the result.
• After the update, the result is now evaluated using all three AIs, and a final result is shown. [/b]
  

The three AIs do their job perfectly, but I feel the third AI does its job efficiently. BTW, the first AI, which is a JSON application, cannot be considered an AI now. I am working on teaching it as of now. So if anyone wants to ignore its results, then I am okay with it.

[nutildah]

I request that you give it a try once. I have listed all the updates, and I can assure you I have tested it. You can do a verification of the code.

OK I tested 3 recently-reported, obviously-AI posts and added your results to the lists for comparison:

LoyceV perfectly summarized the core security failure here. From an adversarial and systems design perspective, a "blindly constructed partial UTXO set" breaks the fundamental trustless model of Bitcoin.

To expand on why this is mathematically and architecturally impossible from scratch, we have to look at the validation invariants:

1. The Negative Proof Dilemma (Inflation & Double Spends)
If Node A has a complete UTXO set, and a transaction points to an input that doesn't exist, Node A safely rejects it as a double-spend or invalid minting.
However, if your node only knows the last N blocks, and a transaction points to a historical input created 5 years ago, your node cannot distinguish between:

• A valid, old unspent output.
• An invalid transaction spending coins created out of thin air by a malicious miner.

To be secure, a node must be able to prove a negative (that a UTXO does not exist anywhere in the entire historical state).

2. How the Bitcoin Solves This
Your intuition about wanting storage savings is valid, but the execution requires cryptographic anchors rather than just cutting off old blocks blindly. Bitcoin Core handles this through two advanced architectures:

• AssumeUTXO (Bitcoin Core Native): Instead of guessing the state from recent blocks, the node uses a hardcoded, community-verified SHA256 hash of the UTXO set at a specific block height (e.g., block 800,000). The node loads this trusted snapshot instantly to validate new transactions, while quietly syncing the historical ledger from Genesis in the background to cryptographically verify the snapshot later.
  
• Utreexo (Dynamic Accumulators): This is a cryptographic research implementation that shrinks the UTXO set into a compact Merkle-mountain-range accumulator. Instead of storing an 80GB+ UTXO set, the node only stores a few kilobytes of hashes, and transaction spenders must provide a cryptographic proof (inclusion proof) showing that their UTXO exists.
  

this post
gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 51.9% AI GPT

Cointikka.net: Mixed / uncertain — 36%
The signals below disagree with each other, so this is genuinely uncertain — worth a closer read rather than trusting one number.

The shift away from real-world utility in favor of speculative memecoins and superficial "AI-wrapper" tokens is undoubtedly one of the major structural issues of the current market cycle. Most modern projects focus entirely on token economics rather than the system's actual utility.

However, if you are looking for that classic Proof-of-Work (PoW) ethos—where hardware performs genuinely useful computations beyond merely hashing arbitrary numbers—the narrative has shifted toward **DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks)** and High-Performance Computing (HPC).

From a systems and back-end perspective, a subset of Proof-of-Work is emerging that seeks to redirect GPU mining power toward machine learning training and rendering workloads:

• **Decentralized Computing and Rendering:** Instead of traditional mining pools, protocols are emerging where nodes utilize raw GPU power for 3D graphics rendering or AI model training, receiving direct compensation in native utility tokens. This bridges the gap between infrastructure and real-world demand. **Zero-Knowledge Proof Generation (ZK-Mining):** As privacy infrastructure matures, hardware power—previously dedicated to solving useless cryptographic nonces—is being redirected toward generating complex ZK proofs. This represents a genuine, non-speculative cryptographic service essential for network privacy and scalability.

The challenge with legacy utility tokens was their struggle to achieve real-world adoption. Today, if a project aims to offer a decentralized service (such as storage, computing, or privacy), it must compete with AWS or Google Cloud on uptime and latency—a feat extremely difficult for a fully decentralized PoW chain to achieve without complex consensus optimizations.

This tool hasn't disappeared; it has simply evolved from simple transactional coins into complex infrastructure layers. If you have mining equipment ready for repurposing, this is certainly a niche worth revisiting.

gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 56.8% AI GPT
sapling.ai 99.8% fake

Cointikka.net: Likely AI-generated — 66%
Based on the overall pattern the ML models and sentence structure picked up on — see the breakdown below for specifics.

That’s an interesting idea; I commend you for submitting a "Request for Comments" (RFC) before diving straight into coding.

As a system and backend architect, I see a few critical bottlenecks in your proposed technical design—specifically regarding architecture and game theory—that need to be addressed before any code is written:

1. Vulnerabilities in the "Block-on-Demand" consensus mechanism
While disabling continuous block production (minting) seems efficient from a storage perspective, it introduces dangerous security vectors in a decentralized structure:

• Time-stamping and Clock Drift: Without regular block intervals, establishing a precise, immutable, and universally agreed-upon timeline becomes extremely difficult. If a node submits a transaction after a long period of inactivity, validating the exact mathematical sequence and preventing the manipulation of historical states turns into a complex nightmare.
  
• DoS Attack Vector and Liveness Issues: If the chain only activates on demand, an attacker could force the system to generate artificial blocks by flooding it with low-fee transaction requests; this would lead to a sudden, unexpected spike in resource consumption across validator nodes.
  

2. Dedicated Layer 1 (L1) Security vs. Shared Security (The 51% Attack Issue)
You mentioned preferring a dedicated L1 (or App-chain) over smart contracts on Ethereum or Polygon. However, a new, standalone L1 will face the challenge of low economic security in its early stages. If your network has only a few dozen validators, the cost of launching a 51% attack—and altering data regarding the timestamp or ownership (authorship) of a valuable literary work—would be dangerously low.

An Alternative Architectural Path:
Instead of launching a fragile, standalone L1 from scratch, why not consider an App-Chain or a Rollup based on shared security? (For example, utilizing a Data Availability—or DA—layer like Avail or Celestia alongside a standalone rollup, or a chain built on Substrate or Cosmos). This approach allows you to tailor the execution environment precisely to content-publishing workflows while benefiting from the robust cryptographic security of a larger network.

From a developer's perspective, the strength of a decentralized protocol hinges on the stability of its consensus mechanism. If your block production is irregular, how do you plan to manage mempool synchronization during peak traffic and high-concurrency scenarios? I look forward to hearing your thoughts on your approach to state validation during periods of low transaction volume.

gptzero.me AI 100%
Copyleaks 100% AI Text
originality.ai Likely AI 100% Confident
stealthwriter.ai AI detected 0% human
zerogpt 19.9% AI GPT
sapling.ai 73.5% fake

Cointikka.net: Likely AI-generated — 65%
Based on the overall pattern the ML models and sentence structure picked up on — see the breakdown below for specifics.

Alright so it pretty much got 2 out of 3 correct, although without as much confidence as most of the other detectors. The problem with combining results from different detectors is sometimes a detector is just wrong. So the overall signal is being muddied by a false negative. As FinneysTrueVision pointed out, humanized texts are rarely captured by free-tier detectors, but when they are, their results shouldn't be combined with false negative results.

This is why the guidelines in this thread say any 3 detectors (or just 2 for cases of AI humanization) with a 70%+ "AI" report will suffice. While 65% and 66% are pretty close to 70, I wouldn't use the results from this detector when other detectors more accurately report the posts as 100% AI.

• Enter the UID
• Click on Fetch last 20 posts
• It will display the last 20 posts written by a user
• Then click on Check this post
• As soon as you click, the system uses all three AIs to verify the text content
• After that, it displays the result.
• After the update, the result is now evaluated using all three AIs, and a final result is shown.
  

Unfortunately you can't go backward after checking one post... You have to restart the process. I suggest adding a "back" button after a user post has been checked. Or perhaps do it on the same screen.

[Cointikka]

~~

Thanks for checking the application to detect AI text. I have worked on your feedback and I have spent all my day with this tool to get it the confidence that you are asking for. I have a small issue that I am currently working on. As soon as I am certain that the detector is accurate, I will post it here. I would again request you to check it. Again, thanks for the feedback, as it has helped me a lot in improving the AI text detection tool.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitrecovery? He's spamming his links in my topic, and my gut feeling tells me it's chatbot verbal diarrhea:

Thank you LoyceV: how your address database powers free seed recovery and a suggestion to offload your server bandwidth

Hi LoyceV,

First and foremost, I want to express immense gratitude on behalf of our team and the broader Bitcoin recovery community for your dedication in compiling and maintaining the daily database of Bitcoin addresses with a positive balance on addresses.loyce.club.

Your data dumps serve as the backbone of our open-source desktop software, xxxxxxx (xxxxxxxx). The software is 100% free and runs completely offline on the user's local machine. When people lose 1 to 2 words from their BIP-39 seed phrase or face scrambled unnumbered lists, the primary hurdle is usually that they do not know their original receiving address. Standard tools like btcrecover simply fail without a known address.

We take your daily address dump, index the active UTXO addresses with balances greater than zero (currently over 58000000 funded addresses), and compile it into a compact 256MB in-memory Bloom filter. This allows regular Bitcoiners to test hundreds of thousands of candidate phrases per second on their own hardware and instantly identify their funded wallet in RAM without needing to remember their public address. Your continuous archive has directly enabled dozens of people to recover their locked coins completely free of charge.

Regarding the server load and bandwidth issues you mentioned in this thread:

I noticed you mentioned facing recurrent server traffic spikes, bandwidth quotas, and strain on your VPS from automated scrapers and high-volume downloads of multi-gigabyte files. Having handled similar data distribution challenges, I would like to offer a practical setup that could reduce your hosting load to near zero while keeping your dumps publicly accessible:

• 1. GitHub Releases as an automated global CDN: GitHub allows release assets up to 2 GB per file (your compressed .tsv.gz archive fits well within this limit at roughly 600 to 800 MB). GitHub provides virtually unlimited download bandwidth backed by Fastly and Azure edge networks at no charge. You can keep your scripts and maintenance private in a private GitHub repository, and use a simple GitHub Action or a 3-line Bash script with the official GitHub CLI (

Code:

gh release create

) to automatically upload your daily build as a public release asset. Users and scrapers download directly from GitHub's global edge at 10 Gbps speeds, completely bypassing your VPS bandwidth.[/li]

[li]2. Cloudflare R2 object storage ($0 egress fees): If you prefer not to use GitHub, you can set up a Cloudflare R2 bucket. Unlike AWS S3 or standard hosting providers, Cloudflare R2 charges exactly $0.00 for outbound bandwidth (zero egress fees), regardless of how many terabytes users download. You only pay standard storage ($0.015 per GB per month, which is literally pennies for your dump size). A nightly

Code:

rclone sync

or

Code:

aws s3 cp

command from your crontab pushes the updated archive to R2 in a few seconds, and all public download traffic hits Cloudflare CDN instead of your origin server.[/li]

Either of these approaches would permanently solve the bandwidth exhaustion problem, shield your server IP address from direct scraper traffic, prevent downtime, and ensure the Bitcoin community always has reliable, high-speed access to your invaluable work.

Thank you once again for your tireless contribution to the Bitcoin ecosystem over all these years. If you need any assistance setting up the automated GitHub or R2 push scripts, I would be more than happy to share our deployment configs.

Best regards, xxxxxxxxx Team[/quote]

[Cointikka]

Hi @nutildah

I worked on your feedback, and I am excited to share that my AI detection models are far better than what you tested earlier. I am also eager to see you test it once again. I took the liberty of working on the @LoyceV post with my upgraded AI detection page. I am posting a few screenshots for you guys to try it.

BTW.. Model-2 can now detect anyone using Grammarly or a translator, as it will give a verdict that it is AI-generated content, whereas Model-1 does not. Since I use Grammarly, you will see that most of my written content is flagged as AI by Model-2.

Here is the first screenshot:


Here is the next screenshot with a detailed explanation, read section by section.

I am still working on UI refinement. As of now, I am confident that you will like it. I will post detailed info in my thread on the Project Development board later.

Edited with quote:

Edit: So as an example, I used your UID @joniboini to do a test wheteher the Model 2 can detect that you are using a translator and I found it works fine like a good wine. I am posting the screenshot. BTW.. After entering the UID, my page does allows me to check all your last 20 posts. I did it and checked it.

Here is the first screenshot. I would request you to give it a try with my UID  

The post where you used a translator which are now equipped with AI

The post where my Model 2 said yes is because it was written in your native language or normal English, which it cannot detect


And this one
I am working on multilingual detection, and if that gets going then you will be able to find those who are using AI on your local boards.

That proves that if you write in your native language or if you write in plain English without any assistance or transalate then, then both models will not detect a user as human like it used to be before AI came into existence.
Thanks..

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitrecovery? He's spamming his links in my topic, and my gut feeling tells me it's chatbot verbal diarrhea:

This is what I got:

https://bitlist.co/post/67156403

# How to recover a  when standard tools fail?

According to research from blockchain analytics firms including Chainalysis and Glassnode, between 3 and 4 million bitcoin remain trapped in wallets with no possibility of access by their rightful owners. In the overwhelming majority of instances, this catastrophe is not caused by elliptic curve cryptographic breaks, network exploits, or protocol flaws in Bitcoin itself. The root cause is almost always the physical vulnerability of analog storage media and inevitable human error during backup creation and handling:

-.-

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.io: 100%

Thank you LoyceV: how your address database powers free seed recovery and a suggestion to offload your server bandwidth

Hi LoyceV,

First and foremost, I want to express immense gratitude on behalf of our team and the broader Bitcoin recovery community for your dedication in compiling and maintaining the daily database of Bitcoin addresses with a positive balance on addresses.loyce.club.

Your data dumps serve as the backbone of our open-source desktop software, bitResurrector (https://ai-seedfinder.com/bitresurrector). The software is 100% free and runs completely offline on the user's local machine. When people lose 1 to 2 words from their BIP-39 seed phrase or face scrambled unnumbered lists, the primary hurdle is usually that they do not know their original receiving address. Standard tools like btcrecover simply fail without a known address.

We take your daily address dump, index the active UTXO addresses with balances greater than zero (currently over 58000000 funded addresses), and compile it into a compact 256MB in-memory Bloom filter. This allows regular Bitcoiners to test hundreds of thousands of candidate phrases per second on their own hardware and instantly identify their funded wallet in RAM without needing to remember their public address. Your continuous archive has directly enabled dozens of people to recover their locked coins completely free of charge.

-.-

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.io: 100%

https://bitlist.co/post/67159431

[ANN] bitResurrector - BIP-39 Seed Phrase Recovery for Idle & Legacy GPU Mining Rigs
Repurpose Dormant Mining Hardware | Native C++ / OpenCL / AVX2 | 100% Free & Open Source | Targetless 256MB RAM Bloom Matrix

[Official Portal] · [Documentation & Guides] · [Demonstration Video]


Turn Unprofitable / Idle Mining Hardware into a High-Speed Recovery Engine

The economics of classic GPU mining have reached a dead end. Bitcoin PoW belongs entirely to industrial ASIC data centers, and altcoin mining barely covers electricity costs. Across the globe, millions of NVIDIA and AMD graphics cards sit powered off, gathering dust.

Yet those dormant GPUs represent massive parallel cryptographic compute capacity. While unmined Bitcoin supply shrinks to just ~1.3M BTC, analytical studies estimate that over 3.7 million BTC remain trapped on-chain simply because wallet owners lost words, spilled coffee over paper cards, mixed up unnumbered metal washer backups, or wrote seeds in ambiguous two-column formats.

bitResurrector v3.0.3 gives legacy and idle mining rigs a powerful new purpose: high-throughput, local seed phrase reconstruction and wallet asset recovery.

-.-

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.io: 100%

_{*Just check this one user and that used my credit so much lol.}

[Cointikka]

Another example how good AI content detector is on cointikka.net. I did a random check and found this user using AI.

I’ve recently started an open-source experimental project:

https://github.com/Aminmasoud123/Reactive-AI

The idea is to explore an AI architecture where the system continuously observes changing signals and maintains evolving internal states, rather than treating every input as an isolated event.

The basic concept is:

Changing Signals
       ↓
Internal State
       ↓
Measure Change
       ↓
Update State
       ↓
Reaction
       ↓
Updated State
       ↺


The current prototype is based on simple mathematical signals, but I’m interested in exploring whether the same idea could be applied to real-time crypto data, such as price, volume, volatility, or order-book changes. I’m curious whether this approach could be useful for things like anomaly detection, market signals, or real-time risk analysis. I know there are related approaches such as state-space and recurrent models, so I’m mainly experimenting to see if this particular idea leads anywhere interesting.

Any feedback or suggestions are welcome

AI Text Detector results (cointikka.net/ai-text-detector.html):
Punctuation check: Normal (no stripping pattern detected)
Humanizer artifacts: none found
Model 1 (Gradient): AI-likely (91%)
Model 2 (TMR): AI-likely (98%)
Passage scan: 1/2 passages at 70%+ AI (strongest 90%, median 45%)

Headline figure: 98% — the higher of the two models (Model 2), not an average.

Report threshold: 1 detector(s) at 70%+ of 3 required.
  This tool: 98% (counts as one detector)

Text length: 139 words
Checked: 2026-09-20 14:05 UTC
This is the detailed response version of my app, which is available for free for the community. I am waiting for your response@nutildah . Thanks..

[Shishir99]

This is the detailed response version of my app, which is available for free for the community. I am waiting for your response@nutildah . Thanks..

I am sure the community appreciates your hard work, but you don't have to keep pushing something.
The community will use your tools if they like the tool. You just provide them with your update, and they will check if they want. He didn't reply doesn't mean he didn't see your previous post. He might have more important things to do instead of writing you a reply. Give the community enough time to evaluate your tools, and they will eventually use the tools if the tool quality is good enough. Just don't take it personally. I am saying this because you seem in a rush.

[Cointikka]

I am sure the community appreciates your hard work, but you don't have to keep pushing something.
The community will use your tools if they like the tool. You just provide them with your update, and they will check if they want. He didn't reply doesn't mean he didn't see your previous post. He might have more important things to do instead of writing you a reply. Give the community enough time to evaluate your tools, and they will eventually use the tools if the tool quality is good enough. Just don't take it personally. I am saying this because you seem in a rush.

I do understand it, and I think you are trying to hack into a discussion where your expertise is not required. Please put me on your ignore list. I have already done it. Stop! It is high time you did it.
EDIT:
BTW.. Model-2 says you are using AI  
Model 2 (TMR): ⚠️ AI-likely (97%). That means you are using Google Translate or an AI to come up with an English write-up. I can see. I can infer what you have been doing here on Bitcointalk. Please and it is requested, hold your thoughts before replying.

[nutildah]

I do understand it, and I think you are trying to hack into a discussion where your expertise is not required. Please put me on your ignore list. I have already done it. Stop! It is high time you did it.

Shishir99 has been contributing to this thread since 2022. Your first post here was to announce your AI detector. Before I make any incorrect assumptions, maybe you can help me understand your end goal: do you want us to replace our current system with your detector, or do you want us to add it to the list of detectors we are using?

[AakZaki]

I do understand it, and I think you are trying to hack into a discussion where your expertise is not required. Please put me on your ignore list. I have already done it. Stop! It is high time you did it.

I think your tool is too heavy to use Bro, 2.8GB of RAM should be able to unlock more web AI Detectors.
I'm not sure users who use a PC or Laptop that has limited RAM will use your AI Detector.

What's more, some of the AI Detectors in the OP are still working fine, so I agree with Shishir99, you don't need to force it. If you continue to improve your tools and can reduce the RAM needed to unlock your tools, I'm sure your tools will be needed by this community as well.