AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Shishir99]

I do understand it, and I think you are trying to hack into a discussion where your expertise is not required. Please put me on your ignore list. I have already done it. Stop! It is high time you did it.

Seems like you took it personally already. No, I am not going to ignore your account. It seems you are good at using AI tools to create a website and some useful tools. I am sure some of these tools can be used by the community, and I appreciate your hard work.

EDIT:
BTW.. Model-2 says you are using AI  
Model 2 (TMR): ⚠️ AI-likely (97%). That means you are using Google Translate or an AI to come up with an English write-up. I can see. I can infer what you have been doing here on Bitcointalk. Please and it is requested, hold your thoughts before replying.

This actually proves that your tools need a lot more work to improve them. I did not use any AI, translator, or whatever fucking tools you can name. If you see something, either it is a false positive, or the tool itself is fucked. I was trying to be cool and relaxed while writing this, but after reading this shit, I can feel pakhitheboss again. Is that you?

[lovesmayfamilis]

I was trying to be cool and relaxed while writing this, but after reading this shit, I can feel pakhitheboss again. Is that you?

It's amazing how we can respond to some of the seemingly familiar habits and writing styles of people. Sometimes, without seeing a person, his nature is so acutely felt. I've seen the same thing in TokenTikas posts.😆

[Cointikka]

Shishir99 has been contributing to this thread since 2022. Your first post here was to announce your AI detector. Before I make any incorrect assumptions, maybe you can help me understand your end goal: do you want us to replace our current system with your detector, or do you want us to add it to the list of detectors we are using?

Thanks for the reply and I understand that you are a busy person. My intention was never to force the product, but only to get feedback from you, as you have been handling the AI spam within this forum for a long time. I do not want to replace the system nor do I want to change it. I need to know only if my detector is fit to fight this competitive space with other detectors as you have the expertise and knowledge of using them. If you think that my detector is fit or can be considered to be one on that list then I will be happy and I will know that I am moving in the right direction how to make it more sturdy and robust with new updates.

My reply to that guy was direct because I do not think writing anything just for the sake of writing is justified when the discussion is about the free tool that I have built & my urge to seek your feedback.

I think your tool is too heavy to use Bro, 2.8GB of RAM should be able to unlock more web AI Detectors.
I'm not sure users who use a PC or Laptop that has limited RAM will use your AI Detector.

All the tools that are listed on my website are privacy focused. Nothing stays on the server side as everything is stored and runs using the browser. For an AI detection tool like mine, it will get downloaded onto the browser cache and it will use the user's system resources to run itself. What I can do here is that I can give the choice to the user to use both the AIs or only one.

I do not want to force my product, but I was seeking feedback like yours on this thread. The user you were referring to does not have any idea why and what I was looking for as he might have not checked the previous chats of mine. That is the reason I gave a direct reply to him and he is on my ignore list. 

[Shishir99]

The user you were referring to does not have any idea why and what I was looking for as he might have not checked the previous chats of mine. That is the reason I gave a direct reply to him and he is on my ignore list. 

What idea are you talking about, dude? I check this thread every few days, and I have read your posts here. Stop assuming things on your own. I see you have an announcement thread for your website cointikka.net, which you bought a few months ago since your cointikka.com domain has expired and you cannot buy it back again. It is listed for sale for around a thousand bucks on Hugedomains. You have some good tools on your website, and I appreciate your hard work. What else do you expect me to know about your website?

I also know that pakhitheboss has been referring to your old domain cointikka.com on this forum back in 2020 and 2021, and you guys were exchanging merits back then. What else do you expect me to know about you?

[Cointikka]

The user you were referring to does not have any idea why and what I was looking for as he might have not checked the previous chats of mine. That is the reason I gave a direct reply to him and he is on my ignore list.  

I also know that pakhitheboss has been referring to your old domain cointikka.com on this forum back in 2020 and 2021, and you guys were exchanging merits back then. What else do you expect me to know about you?

I did assume that you are a guy known for spamming but everyone here ignored it as you were contributing. I thank my instincts and I can now see a red tag telling the same. You keep on doing your work of spamming and creating a myth of someone responsible to the community. Your reply is highly respectable. I removed you only from my ignore list as I wanted to reply. You are back on that list and please do not spam this thread if you do not have a slight understanding what you are writing, just like Dying something from your local board.
EDIT: Come up with a concrete evidence. Before telling substansical evidence.  I do not have time to check it but if any AI hunter can do the job then check one by one word and distinguise his paragraphs. You will find that he has been using AI.

He is using AI one word/sentence to translate it from his native language and then he posts the whole text in the forum.

BTW.. Again, you are spamming this thread ..

Edit 1: Cointikka.com is a spammed domain and that is why I stopped working on it. As usual, you and your employer still do not know what spam is? Your are spamming on this thread.

[Shishir99]

Garbage removed

You don't want to piss me off, kid. I am in a bad mood today.
Accusing me of spamming this thread? You are doing the same shit in this thread.
How about making a deal? What if you cannot prove what you accused me of? My English is probably bad, but good enough to write on a forum. I do not use AI or any fucking translator. You pajeets may need it because "Dond tell me whad do do"  

We are still talking about AI though, so not off-topic.

[BlackBoss_]

hadesdex
Two posts, results are not good.
This newbie is a candidate to be nuked.

Two things decide confirmation priority and neither is the amount of bitcoin being sent. Miners order transactions by fee rate, satoshis per virtual byte, so a 1 BTC transaction built from one input can confirm faster than a 0.01 BTC transaction sweeping twenty inputs. The absolute fee only matters together with how much block space the transaction consumes. If a transaction is stuck, the fixes are RBF, which replaces it with a higher fee version, or CPFP, where you spend the unconfirmed output at a high fee and drag the pair through together. One caveat already raised above and worth repeating: services that track the first txid, mainly exchanges and payment processors, can break when RBF changes the txid, so check the recipient side before bumping. And when the mempool is quiet, consolidating small inputs into one UTXO at a few sat/vB is cheap preparation for the next congested period.

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI 100%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector Fake 99.1%

The CPFP conditions mentioned earlier in the thread are worth spelling out, since that is where people get stuck. CPFP only works if the stuck transaction paid one of your own addresses, and that unconfirmed output has to be large enough to carry the child transaction spending it — the child needs a fee that covers both transactions' combined size at the fee rate you are targeting. If the stuck output is small, or it went to an exchange deposit address, you cannot CPFP it and your options shrink to RBF or waiting out the mempool.

That is also why the RBF caveat upthread matters in practice. A replacement gets a new txid, and services that follow the first-seen txid (exchanges crediting deposits, payment processors) can silently stop tracking it, so you end up opening a support ticket instead.

My order of preference: enable RBF at broadcast time if the wallet offers it, check the fee rate against a mempool estimator before sending rather than after, and consolidate small UTXOs while fees are low so future transactions are small in vBytes and cheap to bump.

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI 0%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector Fake 94.1%

[BlackBoss_]

CharlesPower

Hey everyone,

Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about the actual limits and trajectory of Bitcoin adoption. We all know Bitcoin is heavily anchored as digital gold and a macro store of value, but what about its original promise as a medium of exchange?

Looking at the ongoing improvements with Layer 2 scaling solutions like the Lightning Network, transaction speeds and fees have improved dramatically compared to earlier years. At the same time, traditional payment rails (like credit cards, wire transfers, and cross-border processors) still feel clunky, expensive, and heavily gatekept.

However, if we look ahead to the next few years, do you think Bitcoin can realistically handle a massive chunk of everyday online commerce? Or will it always remain primarily a settlement layer and store of value, leaving day-to-day transactions to stable coins or other networks?
I’m curious to hear how people here view the trade-offs, especially regarding user experience, volatility, and global scalability. Let’s discuss!

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI text 100%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector AI-generation score: 99.7%

I agree that using the Bitcoin base layer for every transaction would create a serious bottleneck, especially during periods of high demand. The coffee example makes the point pretty well—nobody wants to pay several dollars in fees just to make a small payment.

But I think that limitation is also why Layer 2 solutions are so important to Bitcoin’s long-term scaling. The goal doesn’t necessarily have to be putting every coffee purchase directly on the blockchain. If most everyday transactions can happen on faster and cheaper layers while Bitcoin remains the settlement and security layer, it could potentially scale much further without sacrificing the properties of the main network.

So for me, the bigger question isn't whether Bitcoin's base layer can process every transaction—it clearly isn't designed for that. The interesting question is whether the surrounding layers can scale enough while still providing users with a simple and reliable payment experience.

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI text 0%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector AI-generation score: 99.6%

I was mainly thinking about Bitcoin competing with traditional online payment systems, rather than just competing with other cryptocurrencies.

I agree that comparing raw transactions per second makes Bitcoin look very limited, especially against established fiat payment rails. But I also think TPS alone can be a bit misleading because Bitcoin’s scaling model is different. The base layer doesn’t necessarily need to process every individual payment if second-layer systems can handle the majority of transactions and periodically settle back to Bitcoin.

The real question for me is whether those layers can provide the same convenience people expect from traditional payments while still keeping Bitcoin’s decentralization and security. If they can, the lower base-layer TPS may not be as important as it initially appears.

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI text 100%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector AI-generation score: 99.2%

[lovesmayfamilis]

AI Content Detected
Rahul09

When it comes to Bitcoin, one of the first questions people usually ask is:
Where will the price go next?

However, understanding the Bitcoin market should not be limited to price movements alone.

The Bitcoin market is influenced by many different factors, and the importance of each factor can change from one market cycle to another. Some of the key areas to watch include ETF flows, exchange balances, long-term holder behavior, miner activity, derivatives positioning, liquidity, network activity, and macroeconomic conditions.
It is also important to understand the reason behind a price movement.

For example, Bitcoin's price may rise because of strong spot demand or because of increased leverage. Although the price is rising in both cases, the underlying market conditions can be very different.
Similarly, a decrease in the amount of BTC held on exchanges should not automatically be considered bullish. We also need to understand why BTC is leaving exchanges and what other market signals are showing at the same time.

For this reason, I believe it is more useful to observe multiple indicators together rather than relying on a single metric.

For those who follow these factors closely, I'd like to ask:

If you had to monitor Bitcoin metrics besides price, which areas would you focus on, and why? What are the limitations of the metrics you rely on?
More importantly, what combination of signals would make you change your current interpretation of the market?
I'd be interested in hearing both technical and fundamental perspectives.

quillbot 90%
Copyleaks 100%
dechecker.ai  90%

[Xal0lex]

Please check this text

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594893.0

[Abelly]

Please check this text

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594893.0

I scanned the post you mentioned. Below are the results:

https://app.gptzero.me/ Human 93%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector No AI detected.
https://originality.ai/ No AI detected.
https://stealthwriter.ai/ 59% Human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector 9% AI
https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector No AI detected.

[nutildah]

I found another account which may or may not be part of a farm with other sigbanned accounts:

kriminall

This user was slated to be sigbanned based on post quality alone but a closer look reveals they are using AI to write their posts:

Lazio is doing great again. They won 2-0 away at Venezia, securing their fourth win in five matches. Lazio are one of only three undefeated teams in the league. They've had a fantastic start to the season. They're competing for a Champions League spot, and so far everything is going like a dream. Their next match is almost a month away against Monza, and they have a very high chance of beating them. Could Lazio be the surprise of the Italian League this year?

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

I hope that happens and we see a new champion. The Bundesliga had started to become boring because Bayern Munich was constantly winning the title; their draw in the second match brought excitement to the league. This match was a confidence booster, especially for Schalke, as they had suffered a heavy defeat in their opening game but managed to secure a draw against a powerhouse like Bayern Munich. They can now raise their hopes of staying in the league. As for Bayern, they may have drawn this match, but they remain highly likely to be crowned champions by the end of the season. If Dortmund wants to win the title, they must play well in every match and avoid dropping points. In particular, they need to take at least four points from the two Der Klassiker matches against Bayern.

Sapling: 94.9% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

It's true that teams aiming for the championship in high-quality leagues like the Premier League, Bundesliga, Serie A, and La Liga might not take the Conference League seriously. It's not as prestigious a competition as the Champions League or Europa League. However, teams aiming for success in Europe and wanting to add a trophy to their collection pay close attention to it. In fact, while it might seem easy, there are very tough opponents. Rangers were considered favorites against Jablonec, but they were eliminated and can't even qualify for the Conference League. So, despite appearing easy, it will be a highly competitive cup.

Sapling: 99% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

They've been doing the exact same thing all year:

Al Hilal were lucky to find the equalizer in the 90th minute. They almost lost and narrowly avoided their first defeat of the season. They dropped two points, and now Cristiano Ronaldo's Al Nassr have renewed their hopes. Al Qadsiyah almost won their match, playing magnificently against Al Hilal. Al Ahli are in second place, and the gap is now only three points. If Al Nassr win their match tomorrow, they will also reduce the gap to three points. This year's Saudi Arabian Pro League could see the most competitive championship race in recent years. Although Al Hilal are still undefeated, the teams behind them are following very closely.

Sapling: 96.6% Fake
ZeroGPT: 61.6% AI GPT (pretty close)

Accounts that use AI to churn out low value posts like these should probably be banned altogether.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Jr. Member Sowat?
He posted a generic low-value post on the Dev board, in a topic that asks for user experiences:

Unstoppable Wallet appears to be a promising open-source, non-custodial option for managing multiple assets within a single wallet. It offers privacy and flexibility features like being Tor enabled, Wallet Connect and not having to create accounts.

Also, it's great to see the wallet is based on a community model, which means anyone can utilize the wallet and send bug reports and features requests. Like any other wallet, new users should pay attention to security, supported networks and wallet backup options.

Overall, it does seem that it is worth trying.

Most of his Merit comes from Ribust, who (as expected) came from the same local board.

Another post from this guy:

People generally focus on the short-term trend in the Bitcoin price action, yet sometimes it is good to look beyond that.
There are indications of an upcoming accumulation stage in Bitcoin after the recent correction. The overall market sentiment has turned cautious, weak hands have exited the market, and long-term holders are waiting for opportunities.

Here are some observations:

1. Technical Picture
At the moment, Bitcoin is trying to establish a solid base after the significant breakout. Holding vital support zones may suggest that buyers are not giving up.

2. Market Sentiment
While fear is growing after a correction, historically such periods offered good buying chances.

3. Long-Term Growth & Adoption
Adoption of Bitcoin is increasing as more institutions become interested in it and awareness is spreading around the world. All these can be very beneficial for the long-term future of Bitcoin.
But let’s not forget about the risk factors. Uncertainty in the economy, regulation and liquidity issues can affect prices quite unpredictably.

In my opinion, Bitcoin might remain volatile in the short-term perspective, but its fundamentals and increasing adoption makes it interesting for the long-term future.

What do you think?

Is Bitcoin currently in an accumulation phase, or will there be another large drop before the next bullish wave starts?

[Abelly]

What's the verdict on Jr. Member Sowat?

See the results here:

People generally focus on the short-term trend in the Bitcoin price action, yet sometimes it is good to look beyond that.
There are indications of an upcoming accumulation stage in Bitcoin after the recent correction. The overall market sentiment has turned cautious, weak hands have exited the market, and long-term holders are waiting for opportunities.

Here are some observations:

1. Technical Picture
At the moment, Bitcoin is trying to establish a solid base after the significant breakout. Holding vital support zones may suggest that buyers are not giving up.

2. Market Sentiment
While fear is growing after a correction, historically such periods offered good buying chances.

3. Long-Term Growth & Adoption
Adoption of Bitcoin is increasing as more institutions become interested in it and awareness is spreading around the world. All these can be very beneficial for the long-term future of Bitcoin.
But let’s not forget about the risk factors. Uncertainty in the economy, regulation and liquidity issues can affect prices quite unpredictably.

In my opinion, Bitcoin might remain volatile in the short-term perspective, but its fundamentals and increasing adoption makes it interesting for the long-term future.

What do you think?

Is Bitcoin currently in an accumulation phase, or will there be another large drop before the next bullish wave starts?

https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector 99%
https://www.zerogpt.com/ 23% AI
https://app.gptzero.me/ 100% AI
https://undetectable.ai 59% AI GPT
https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector 36% AI

Unstoppable Wallet appears to be a promising open-source, non-custodial option for managing multiple assets within a single wallet. It offers privacy and flexibility features like being Tor enabled, Wallet Connect and not having to create accounts.

Also, it's great to see the wallet is based on a community model, which means anyone can utilize the wallet and send bug reports and features requests. Like any other wallet, new users should pay attention to security, supported networks and wallet backup options.

Overall, it does seem that it is worth trying.

https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector 80%
https://www.zerogpt.com/ 10% AI
https://undetectable.ai  23% AI GPT
https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector 20% AI

[BlackBoss_]

Sarah Jordan

The discussion around minors engaging with Bitcoin presents a mix of valuable educational opportunities and significant practical risks. On the positive side, early exposure can foster strong financial literacy, a practical understanding of blockchain technology, and the development of patience and research skills. When guided properly, it can channel a young person’s energy into a productive, legal pursuit and help them understand legitimate ways to build wealth over time.

However, these benefits come with substantial risks that require strict management. Legally, minors cannot open their own exchange accounts due to regulatory requirements, forcing reliance on parents to manage custodial accounts. Financially, Bitcoin’s extreme volatility can lead to devastating losses, which may cause severe psychological distress rather than serving as a harmless learning mistake. Young people are also highly vulnerable to irreversible cryptocurrency scams, phishing, and social engineering, as there is no customer service to recover lost funds. Furthermore, framing Bitcoin as the primary alternative to youth criminality creates a misleading false dichotomy that ignores traditional, proven paths like standard education and conventional savings. There is also a real danger that a developing brain might become overly obsessed with price fluctuations, turning a supposed intellectual challenge into a source of anxiety and a distraction from holistic, real world development.

https://app.gptzero.me/ AI 100%
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector AI text 100%
https://originality.ai/ Likely AI 100% confident
https://stealthwriter.ai/ AI detected 0% human
https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector AI-generation score: 99.7%