AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Danish Ali]

I dont know if anyone reported him/her before, but he/she use AI constantly and woke up after two years.


Fantazy999

Don’t let it get to you—time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong! People on Twitter laughed at me too when I said back in October that a bear market had begun—but then they started keeping a very close eye on me!! Whether you’re a believer or a skeptic, the chart is always the same; it repeats itself!!! That’s why you’ll spend years just talking about it instead of actually trading!! Right now, I’ve been shorting Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, Gram, and ZEC—I’ve seen an ROI of over 1000% on each of them over the past month... all in the same direction!! Meanwhile, you can just keep holding your spot positions and watch your money melt away before your very eyes.

Sapling: 100% AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% Mix

What does how long I’ve been on the forum have to do with anything?? I started trading actively in 2020, and I’ve made far more from speculation than I ever would have just by holding. I’ve shorted Ripple alone about 20 times, with gains of 5,000–6,000% each time. I’m not interested in "holding"—it’s just not profitable! Your logic seems to be: "If only you’d started back in 2018..." But you clearly didn’t think this way in 2018, so don’t try to lecture me about the past! Tell me what’s happening right now.

Sapling: 96.5 % AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 99% Mix

Holding stocks in 2026—that’s just absurd... How much would you even need to invest in this illiquid crap to actually make a profit??? And look, unless you have trading experience—or access to a skilled trader (a *real* trader, not some con artist)—you’re unlikely to see any success. The algorithms keep stock prices stuck in the same range for years; you’d be better off trading crypto—at least there’s some volatility there... Don’t worry, though—exchange bots won’t let the price drop or climb too drastically.

Sapling: 99 % AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

As a speculator who once reached the top 4 in ROI on Binance, I can tell you one thing: It is always more profitable to be a speculator! In spot trading, you’ll never have enough capital to keep averaging down. And perhaps the most interesting point is that 90% of the coins that existed in 2023–2024 have already been delisted! Eventually, another 90% will face the same fate—delisting. If you buy at the wrong time, you could end up losing 10x your investment—so, in what way is spot trading actually advantageous? Only speculators make money in this market! As for "holders"—just look at how they wait 2–3 years, hoping to at least break even! Take the XRP "cult," for instance—they waited 8 years just to get back to their entry price! Spot trading is like a prostitute: the money is technically yours, but everyone else gets to use it—except for you. All you’re left with are the coins you’re holding.

Sapling: 99 % AI
Pangram: 70% AI
Gptzero: 100% MIX

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Yorubasrm?

In October 2026, two incidents caught my attention in the crypto community. On October (21–22), BitcoinTalk was temporarily shut down after a serious security vulnerability in (PHP) was disclosed. The administrator decided to update the server and conduct security checks considering the potential risks. Before that, there had been several attack attempts but Cloudflare prevented them. No evidence of a successful hack was found in the subsequent investigation.

On the other hand: Binance faced a major security incident in the same month.

Here comes my question: If BitcoinTalk can make the decision to temporarily shut down in advance considering potential risks, then couldn't major exchanges like Binance also take similar precautionary measures if they detected early signs of security risks?

Of course, the technical situations of the two incidents are not the same and not claiming that the hacking could have been prevented for sure if Binance had been temporarily shut down.

However, one thing is clear that the way hackers are improving their techniques nowadays, the security systems of platforms also need to become faster and more effective. In my opinion, temporarily shutting down operations may create some inconvenience for users but that inconvenience is much better than facing a major security breach.

What do you think? In the case of crypto platforms, should preventive measures be more important than compensation and recovery after a hacking incident?

My gut feeling tells me this Newbie from the usual local board is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on Meta.

Update: my Report was marked Bad, so I've also removed my neutral feedback.

[Shishir99]

What's the verdict on Newbie Yorubasrm?

In October 2026, two incidents caught my attention in the crypto community. On October (21�22), BitcoinTalk was temporarily shut down after a serious security vulnerability in (PHP) was disclosed. The administrator decided to update the server and conduct security checks considering the potential risks. Before that, there had been several attack attempts but Cloudflare prevented them. No evidence of a successful hack was found in the subsequent investigation.

On the other hand: Binance faced a major security incident in the same month.

Here comes my question: If BitcoinTalk can make the decision to temporarily shut down in advance considering potential risks, then couldn't major exchanges like Binance also take similar precautionary measures if they detected early signs of security risks?

Of course, the technical situations of the two incidents are not the same and not claiming that the hacking could have been prevented for sure if Binance had been temporarily shut down.

However, one thing is clear that the way hackers are improving their techniques nowadays, the security systems of platforms also need to become faster and more effective. In my opinion, temporarily shutting down operations may create some inconvenience for users but that inconvenience is much better than facing a major security breach.

What do you think? In the case of crypto platforms, should preventive measures be more important than compensation and recovery after a hacking incident?

Pangram 100% AI
Originality - 65% Likely AI

However, I checked his other posts, which seem to be human-written. This might be the first post he generated using AI.

[Yorubasrm]

My gut feeling tells me this Newbie from the usual local board is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on Meta.

I have tried to express my own opinion and wanted to know about the matter. If asking to know something is also mixed up with a chatbot, I have nothing more to say here.

However, I checked his other posts, which seem to be human-written. This might be the first post he generated using AI.

Hello generally, I tried to write the texts by myself. I also tested them with the few checkers that give accurate answers, they do not detect them as ai-generated write.

[LoyceV]

Newbie AstraQuant is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on the tech board:

Two separate things are worth keeping apart here. The last few characters of a legacy address are a checksum, so a mistyped address is normally rejected, but that tells you nothing about whether you hold the keys. A readable ending is possible by chance, though a four-letter word at the end is rare enough that it is also what a deliberately generated vanity address looks like, so I would not treat it as proof of anything either way. The practical test is to write down the seed phrase on paper, then restore it in a well-known open-source wallet and check that the same address appears. Until that matches, do not send anything meaningful to it, and if you do test, use a very small amount first. Never type your seed phrase into a website or give it to anyone who messages you, and keep the paper backup offline.

[lovesmayfamilis]

User: sopiandi

After Alvin_talk complained about this user's posts, he changed them, and naturally the moderators, when clicking on the link, see completely different posts. However, the use of AI has remained at the same level. He writes posts using AI, and then modifies them. I see double abuse here...

I am leaving here the same links to the posts given in the first report by Alvin_talk, only now modified by sopiandi.

In my view, hacking is nothing new; it’s just that the scale is now much larger, involving greater sums of money and increasingly sophisticated technology.
I have been using crypto exchanges since 2015—platforms like Justcoin (which has since shut down)—and my guiding principle has remained the same:

"An exchange is a place for conducting transactions, not for storing assets."

Furthermore, based on my own personal experience,
most users lose their assets not because a major platform gets hacked, but rather due to phishing—such as fake airdrop claim links, fraudulent promotions, or even impostor customer service representatives.

This happens frequently on platforms like Telegram, and I personally often receive phishing emails in my primary inbox. Therefore,
in my opinion, the most effective—albeit rather tedious—security measure is to enable Google Authenticator for every account,
and to never record or store your recovery phrases or private keys online.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero: 100%

Honestly, the most important thing is not to let the price dictate your day. I run a small shop, so I treat my BTC like business capital. I keep one wallet for daily use and testing, and another for savings that I almost never touch. That way, when the price turns red, you don’t panic-sell, because you don’t even see the savings wallet.
Also, always send a small test transaction before moving a large amount, and keep a record of where your backups are. It’s rushing—not the market itself—that causes most people to lose their coins.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
sapling: 92.7%

I really like this analogy, and based on my own personal experience, I’d like to add one distinction that is often overlooked by many beginners like myself.
Some time ago, I managed to regain access to this forum solely because the password was saved on my wife’s device—my own device had completely stopped working.

There is no reset process for a private key or recovery phrase. For instance, I still have some keystore files from MyEtherWallet dating back to 2016, but I have never been able to recall the exact password I used for them.
There is no support contact that can recover these, nor is there a "forgot password" feature; it is quite possible that I will never be able to access them again.

So, in my view, if you lose the only key to an account—like an email account—that account is gone forever, and there is no one who can create a copy of it for you.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
sapling: 95.3%
pangram:71%
quillbot: 40%

[nutildah]

nutildah, I understand you very well. I also understand your concern, but I think there’s one point you’re missing. I use these English posts with translations, and most likely the tool I’m using translates them with the help of AI—to be honest, I don’t know much about this topic, but I can say that much for sure.
I can tell you that if we translate the posts you’ve tagged again into Turkish and test them on Pangram, we’ll still get a 100% “human” response. In fact, I’ve already translated and tested the first three. I can send you a screenshot again if you’d like.
I’m not testing it on Sapling because of the issue I mentioned above.You can translate all of the posts you've tagged into Turkish using GPT Zero and Zero GPT and give them a try.

I can go back pretty far in your post history and find many more posts that are clearly AI-generated. It seems you had previously been accused of using AI on Altcoinstalks as well.

I will not remove the ban, and if you return to doing what you were doing before, I will issue a new sigban for 2 years.

BTW.. I request you to please give it my tool a try.

I'm sorry but I'm not downloading hundreds of megabytes to my computer to run your tool. I do appreciate the transparency in what you're doing, as in you made a choice to let the user know that's what the tool was doing. Since the overall goal of this thread is to remove AI posts from the forum, please feel free to use your tool to report AI posts in this thread, by adding it as one of the detectors you use. If you feel your detector's results are good enough on their own, I encourage you to report AI posts using your detector only, and then we can see if the moderators agree. Thanks.


Disappointing to see one of the worst AI posters of all-time recently accepted to a signature campaign, even after 3 neutral tags on their account emphasizing how terrible their post quality is. I have issued this user a 360-day sigban.

[libert19]

What's the verdict on Newbie Yorubasrm?

...

My gut feeling tells me this Newbie from the usual local board is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on Meta.

Update: my Report was marked Bad, so I've also removed my neutral feedback.

I saw that topic in meta, it looked ai to me too. So, ran it through some ai detectors, few shown human, few shown ai, and one was certain that it was AI, so I reported the topic with link to that detector which was certain (https://www.humanizeai.pro/detector — still 100% 🤘 ). Meanwhile, I saw your tag, and I was like — '+1 good' looks like and I was mildly surprised to see it turned out to be a bad report.

Impressive on mods that they use their own brain tho, I mean there was literally a link showing it's ai for certain and loycev also thought the content to be ai :salute:

Edit:

I also tested them with the few checkers that give accurate answers, they do not detect them as ai-generated write.

Why would anyone do that unless they were copy/pasting AI text and trying to avoid getting caught?

Point.

[nutildah]

I saw that topic in meta, it looked ai to me too. So, ran it through some ai detectors, few shown human, few shown ai, and one was certain that it was AI, so I reported the topic with link to that detector which was certain (https://www.humanizeai.pro/detector — still 100% 🤘 ). Meanwhile, I saw your tag, and I was like — '+1 good' looks like and I was mildly surprised to see it turned out to be a bad report.

Pangram says its 100% AI (granted we are talking about the same post), although 'ol faithful Sapling only shows 27.5% AI and GPTZero says 0%. This is a classic case of tweaking the prompt to evade detectors; this is how I know:

I also tested them with the few checkers that give accurate answers, they do not detect them as ai-generated write.

Why would anyone do that unless they were copy/pasting AI text and trying to avoid getting caught?

[execijutiere]

I can go back pretty far in your post history and find many more posts that are clearly AI-generated. It seems you had previously been accused of using AI on Altcoinstalks as well.

I will not remove the ban, and if you return to doing what you were doing before, I will issue a new sigban for 2 years.

You’re still talking about my English posts, and I wrote all of them with the help of a translation tool. When we translate all of them into Turkish, you’ll see that they’re 100% human-written.

On Altcoinstalks, I received a warning not for AI but for burst posting. I proved that it was just a minor misunderstanding, and we resolved it there.

[nutildah]

You’re still talking about my English posts, and I wrote all of them with the help of a translation tool. When we translate all of them into Turkish, you’ll see that they’re 100% human-written.

The problem is I no longer trust that the detectors can analyze the Turkish language. I shouldn't have tried to analyze them not knowing if they were any good at it. At least with English language posts I have some idea.

Here's the real problem. For posts like these, which is the majority of your English language posts:

Kasımpaşa drew 1-1 at home against Kocaelispor. Kasımpaşa looks set to avoid relegation. By securing a draw against Kocaelispor, Kasımpaşa earned a crucial point, raising its total to 32 and widening the gap between itself and its rivals to four points. It must be said that Kasımpaşa has narrowly avoided a major crisis this season.
In the match between two teams fighting to stay in the league, neither side emerged victorious. Although Eyüpspor scored early in the match, Kayserispor managed to equalize. Kayserispor had the home-field advantage but failed to capitalize on it. Kayserispor should have won this match.

Sapling: 83.1% AI
Originality: 85% AI

The match, which ended goalless in the first half, saw a total of five goals in the second half, with Bayern Munich emerging victorious. Freiburg were the ones to open the scoring and had made a strong start to the first half. Despite taking a 2-0 lead by the 71st minute, they were unable to secure the win. Bayern Munich, who scored three goals in the final 10 minutes, managed to secure a victory away from home. Bayern Munich were on the verge of losing the match, but Freiburg were unable to hold on to their lead in added time.
Hamburg drew 1-1 at home against Augsburg. Augsburg, who went into the break ahead, conceded a goal in the second half and left the match with one point. Both teams had plenty of attempts during the match, but it was somewhat lacking in goals. With a total of 36 shots taken and only two goals scored, this is likely down to the low conversion rate.

Sapling: 93.8% AI
Originality: 94% Likely AI

Although the Czech Republic took the lead in the 3rd minute, the match ended in a draw. In extra time, both teams scored again, bringing the score to 2-2, and the match went to a penalty shootout. In the shootout, the Czech Republic defeated their opponent and earned a spot in the World Cup. Looking at the match as a whole, Denmark was the better team, but they just couldn’t find the winning goal. Despite Denmark’s dominant performance, their failure to qualify for the World Cup must be disappointing for them. Frankly, Denmark was the more determined team here, but sometimes you just need a little luck on your side.

Sapling: 75.6% AI
Originality: 92% Likely AI

It doesn't matter if you are using AI or not (although you almost certainly are -- and if you aren't, the publication from which you are borrowing these articles is). These are low quality posts. Nobody is reading this stuff, and nobody cares about it. You rarely respond to anybody and people rarely respond to you. The forum does not need more posts like this.

[execijutiere]

You’re still talking about my English posts, and I wrote all of them with the help of a translation tool. When we translate all of them into Turkish, you’ll see that they’re 100% human-written.

The problem is I no longer trust that the detectors can analyze the Turkish language. I shouldn't have tried to analyze them not knowing if they were any good at it. At least with English language posts I have some idea.

Here's the real problem. For posts like these, which is the majority of your English language posts:

Kasımpaşa drew 1-1 at home against Kocaelispor. Kasımpaşa looks set to avoid relegation. By securing a draw against Kocaelispor, Kasımpaşa earned a crucial point, raising its total to 32 and widening the gap between itself and its rivals to four points. It must be said that Kasımpaşa has narrowly avoided a major crisis this season.
In the match between two teams fighting to stay in the league, neither side emerged victorious. Although Eyüpspor scored early in the match, Kayserispor managed to equalize. Kayserispor had the home-field advantage but failed to capitalize on it. Kayserispor should have won this match.

Sapling: 83.1% AI
Originality: 85% AI

The match, which ended goalless in the first half, saw a total of five goals in the second half, with Bayern Munich emerging victorious. Freiburg were the ones to open the scoring and had made a strong start to the first half. Despite taking a 2-0 lead by the 71st minute, they were unable to secure the win. Bayern Munich, who scored three goals in the final 10 minutes, managed to secure a victory away from home. Bayern Munich were on the verge of losing the match, but Freiburg were unable to hold on to their lead in added time.
Hamburg drew 1-1 at home against Augsburg. Augsburg, who went into the break ahead, conceded a goal in the second half and left the match with one point. Both teams had plenty of attempts during the match, but it was somewhat lacking in goals. With a total of 36 shots taken and only two goals scored, this is likely down to the low conversion rate.

Sapling: 93.8% AI
Originality: 94% Likely AI

Although the Czech Republic took the lead in the 3rd minute, the match ended in a draw. In extra time, both teams scored again, bringing the score to 2-2, and the match went to a penalty shootout. In the shootout, the Czech Republic defeated their opponent and earned a spot in the World Cup. Looking at the match as a whole, Denmark was the better team, but they just couldn’t find the winning goal. Despite Denmark’s dominant performance, their failure to qualify for the World Cup must be disappointing for them. Frankly, Denmark was the more determined team here, but sometimes you just need a little luck on your side.

Sapling: 75.6% AI
Originality: 92% Likely AI

It doesn't matter if you are using AI or not (although you almost certainly are -- and if you aren't, the publication from which you are borrowing these articles is). These are low quality posts. Nobody is reading this stuff, and nobody cares about it. You rarely respond to anybody and people rarely respond to you. The forum does not need more posts like this.

You're talking about posts from about 6–7 months ago. I don't think anything like that has happened recently, and these are things that can be fixed. I'm constantly monitoring this through your app, PostHealthScore. I don't see a problem here; after all, I know a ban was issued based on this.




Now, getting back to the topic at hand, you're accusing me of using AI spam. Let's translate these back into Turkish and run them through the AI again.

You can translate the three posts you added into Turkish and try them out using Pangram, ZeroGPT, or GPTZero.

Yes, I'm aware that when I copy and paste the English text into these programs, it appears to be AI-generated. I think this is because of the DeepL program I'm using. I saw that the program translates using AI support.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Yes, I'm aware that when I copy and paste the English text into these programs, it appears to be AI-generated. I think this is because of the DeepL program I'm using. I saw that the program translates using AI support.

If you know this, why are you using this translator? Perhaps it's time to consider changing it.
Why prove something that is hard to believe, especially if the translator himself claims that he uses AI? Change the translation model without AI. Write a post by translating it elsewhere, then check it with detectors, which are used here for evidence. If something goes wrong again, it means your translator is building obstacles for you. Do you need it?

[execijutiere]

Yes, I'm aware that when I copy and paste the English text into these programs, it appears to be AI-generated. I think this is because of the DeepL program I'm using. I saw that the program translates using AI support.

If you know this, why are you using this translator? Perhaps it's time to consider changing it.
Why prove something that is hard to believe, especially if the translator himself claims that he uses AI? Change the translation model without AI. Write a post by translating it elsewhere, then check it with detectors, which are used here for evidence. If something goes wrong again, it means your translator is building obstacles for you. Do you need it?

You’re absolutely right, but here’s the thing: I only found out later that this translator uses artificial intelligence. I currently have it downloaded as an app on my desktop computer, and that’s where I’m getting support from. I won’t be using this translator anymore anyway, because it leaves room for misunderstandings.
But as Theymos mentioned earlier, I just want the AI to translate the text I write word for word—after all, I don’t have the option to “improve” the text here.

[nutildah]

You're talking about posts from about 6–7 months ago. I don't think anything like that has happened recently, and these are things that can be fixed.

I just pulled posts from pages at random to demonstrate that you have been doing this for a very long time. I could find posts from just about any page that are AI generated. For example, this is from Page 50:

The transfer season is proving to be quite eventful.
Our representative Aurora has parted ways with jottAAA and brought soulfly into the squad. It was unfortunate for jottAAA, as he wasn't playing in his natural role, but I believe he performed well given the role he was assigned. I think the issue remains tactical, but we'll see how soulfly impacts the team in the first tournament.
Departures have also begun at Astralis. With Device and magisk leaving, it's highly likely that this duo will move to 100Thieves, where it seems an older but experienced squad is being formed.

Sapling: 93.5% AI
Pangram: 100% AI

From Page 10:

The Turkish team Bushido Wildcats qualified for the Season 52 European Final of the ESCL Challenger League by defeating the former MANA team in the Season 52 European Cup final. In the final match, we saw that both teams struggled to win the maps they had selected. The match went to a decider map, and Bushido Wildcats deservedly won the match with a strong CT-side performance. To be honest, no one on the team played particularly poorly, and Vej and cadynx stood out as the players who made the difference in the final match.

Sapling: 92.5% AI
Originality: 85% Likely AI

Also from Page 10:

MOUZ emerged victorious in the BLAST Bounty final. Spirit’s loss on Dust2—a map they had chosen themselves—may have derailed all their plans. Spirit is a team that generally picks Dust2 first in Bo3 matches, and we can say they’ve been trying to make it their main map; however, it’s also worth noting that they’ve never lost a match on the Ancient map. If they had won Dust2 in this match, they would have already secured the victory on Ancient, and the series would most likely have gone to a decider map—but it didn’t happen. Spinx deserves congratulations. He put on a truly legendary performance and was the top fragger even on the map they lost.

Sapling: 99.6% AI
Originality: 55% Likely AI
Pangram: 93% AI

From Page 25:

Union Berlin failed to secure a win at home against Wolfsburg. Having gone into halftime trailing and conceding another goal early in the second half, it became difficult for Union Berlin to earn any points from the match. Although they played far better than their opponents and created more scoring opportunities, they were unable to score enough goals to secure a point. This was a crucial three points for Wolfsburg.
In the relegation battle, Werder Bremen managed to defeat Hamburg at home. Werder defeated their opponent 3-1 to secure a crucial three points and tie their opponent in points. We know both teams are fighting to stay in the league, and Werder Bremen managed to win without making any mistakes at home. The home team, who played a great match, increased their point lead over ST Pauli to five.

Sapling: 81.1% AI
Originality: 90% Likely AI
Pangram: 93% AI

You haven't been contributing much in the way of conversation. You mainly exist to write one sports match summary after another, and nobody appears to be reading any of them. I'm going to be honest with you: I now think you should be banned from the forum completely.

I'm constantly monitoring this through your app, PostHealthScore. I don't see a problem here; after all, I know a ban was issued based on this.

Unless the ban is for AI posting.

Yes, I'm aware that when I copy and paste the English text into these programs, it appears to be AI-generated. I think this is because of the DeepL program I'm using. I saw that the program translates using AI support.

I think there's more to it than that.

[execijutiere]

You haven't been contributing much in the way of conversation. You mainly exist to write one sports match summary after another, and nobody appears to be reading any of them. I'm going to be honest with you: I now think you should be banned from the forum completely.

I'm constantly monitoring this through your app, PostHealthScore. I don't see a problem here; after all, I know a ban was issued based on this.

Unless the ban is for AI posting.

Yes, I'm aware that when I copy and paste the English text into these programs, it appears to be AI-generated. I think this is because of the DeepL program I'm using. I saw that the program translates using AI support.

I think there's more to it than that.

I’m telling you, I’m translating my messages using a translator—I have nothing to do with AI. You’re approaching this with a biased mindset. Even though I’ve provided evidence for everything, you’re still trying to interpret my English posts as if they were entirely generated by AI. As I said before, you can translate all of these into Turkish and test them in the program—they’ll still come out as 100% human.
As I’ve said again, I only used a translator.

[nutildah]

I’m telling you, I’m translating my messages using a translator—I have nothing to do with AI.

You're not the first person to use this as an excuse, and you won't be last. As I've mentioned to you a couple of times, the content of your posts (whether AI or human written) isn't very compelling. Just because a post has flawless grammar and spelling, it doesn't mean its a good post.

Even though I’ve provided evidence for everything, you’re still trying to interpret my English posts as if they were entirely generated by AI.

A lot of your posts appear to be either entirely or mostly generated by AI. This is my conclusion after running hundreds of posts through the detectors over the years.

As I said before, you can translate all of these into Turkish and test them in the program—they’ll still come out as 100% human.

As I've said before, the detectors are too unreliable when it comes to Turkish language text, and I don't know enough about Turkish to make any kind of assumptions in that regard.

You will have to make your appeal to an admin or global moderator as they have the power to reverse the ban, and I will not be reversing it.

[execijutiere]

I’m telling you, I’m translating my messages using a translator—I have nothing to do with AI.

You're not the first person to use this as an excuse, and you won't be last. As I've mentioned to you a couple of times, the content of your posts (whether AI or human written) isn't very compelling. Just because a post has flawless grammar and spelling, it doesn't mean its a good post.

Even though I’ve provided evidence for everything, you’re still trying to interpret my English posts as if they were entirely generated by AI.

A lot of your posts appear to be either entirely or mostly generated by AI. This is my conclusion after running hundreds of posts through the detectors over the years.

As I said before, you can translate all of these into Turkish and test them in the program—they’ll still come out as 100% human.

As I've said before, the detectors are too unreliable when it comes to Turkish language text, and I don't know enough about Turkish to make any kind of assumptions in that regard.

You will have to make your appeal to an admin or global moderator as they have the power to reverse the ban, and I will not be reversing it.

I’m not saying my posts are perfect, but based on what you’ve developed, it’s clear they’re not bad. After all, PostHealthScore shows the result as “good,” doesn’t it?
You're contradicting yourself right now. You say the app you developed is “good,” but then you say it isn't.

My posts are still created not with AI, but by translating English posts using a translation tool. After translating them into Turkish with the translation tool, you can run the same posts through Pangram and other AI tools to test them. If you’d like, I can send them to you one by one.

[Cointikka]

~I'm sorry but I'm not downloading hundreds of megabytes to my computer to run your tool. I do appreciate the transparency in what you're doing, as in you made a choice to let the user know that's what the tool was doing. Since the overall goal of this thread is to remove AI posts from the forum, please feel free to use your tool to report AI posts in this thread, by adding it as one of the detectors you use. If you feel your detector's results are good enough on their own, I encourage you to report AI posts using your detector only, and then we can see if the moderators agree. Thanks.

I will start reposting using my own AI and add a few others if I detect a bot. I will also work on your feedback and now give the user the option to use my server for an AI check [which significantly decreases privacy], with an option if they want to use the AI locally [temporarily] to detect by downloading it to their browser cache to detect whether the content is AI-generated or not.