Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?

[sotelorene]

So your trying to say investment aggressively those not really depend on the amount you invest or the number of times but what matters is the person is willing collect for his/her discretionary funds.
I'm starting to understand that different people have there own perspective about investing aggressively, my perspective is the number of times a person invests at a short period of time e.g like buying twice every week throughout the month, that I see as investing aggressively.

With what I understood from your post I would say you are wrong because being aggressive is not the number of times someone purchased Bitcoin but rather it is the amount been used to purchased for instance now, Mr A has $1000 and Mr B has $1000 also but Mr A purchased $800 worth of Bitcoin at a time while Mr B purchased $150 twice which is a sum of $300 worth of Bitcoin. Clearly, you would tell that Mr A was more aggressive than Mr B so being aggressive is not about the number of time someone purchased rather it is the quantity or volume of purchased that will determined.

[Abbatty]

So your trying to say investment aggressively those not really depend on the amount you invest or the number of times but what matters is the person is willing collect for his/her discretionary funds.
I'm starting to understand that different people have there own perspective about investing aggressively, my perspective is the number of times a person invests at a short period of time e.g like buying twice every week throughout the month, that I see as investing aggressively.

With what I understood from your post I would say you are wrong because being aggressive is not the number of times someone purchased Bitcoin but rather it is the amount been used to purchased for instance now, Mr A has $1000 and Mr B has $1000 also but Mr A purchased $800 worth of Bitcoin at a time while Mr B purchased $150 twice which is a sum of $300 worth of Bitcoin. Clearly, you would tell that Mr A was more aggressive than Mr B so being aggressive is not about the number of time someone purchased rather it is the quantity or volume of purchased that will determined.

I think bring aggressively is both how many times you buy and how much you to buy also. Let assume you do buy bitcoin every month end after being paid at work with your discretionary income, then after buying for that month, you were gifted money or maybe you win a gamble or lotto, definitely you see that you will have to buy bitcoin from that money in that same month. So buying aggressively can be both how many times you and how much you put in to buy.

And I don’t see both as a problem, so long your are not overdoing it, then the times of purchase and how much you used in buying aggressively don’t really matter.

[Homemade-IQ]

With what I understood from your post I would say you are wrong because being aggressive is not the number of times someone purchased Bitcoin but rather it is the amount been used to purchased for instance now, Mr A has $1000 and Mr B has $1000 also but Mr A purchased $800 worth of Bitcoin at a time while Mr B purchased $150 twice which is a sum of $300 worth of Bitcoin. Clearly, you would tell that Mr A was more aggressive than Mr B so being aggressive is not about the number of time someone purchased rather it is the quantity or volume of purchased that will determined.

When talking about aggressive purchasing of Bitcoin, I personally think that it is the percentage of your discretionary income that is being used, not the amount or the number of times you bought in a week or month, because if you use like 60% if your discretionary income to buy and accumulate, you are being over aggressive, and it becomes even worse if you invest with more than 60% of your discretionary income because it is not sustainable, if you have not put your emergency funds in place before being over aggressive.

[Nheer]

With what I understood from your post I would say you are wrong because being aggressive is not the number of times someone purchased Bitcoin but rather it is the amount been used to purchased for instance now, Mr A has $1000 and Mr B has $1000 also but Mr A purchased $800 worth of Bitcoin at a time while Mr B purchased $150 twice which is a sum of $300 worth of Bitcoin. Clearly, you would tell that Mr A was more aggressive than Mr B so being aggressive is not about the number of time someone purchased rather it is the quantity or volume of purchased that will determined.

When talking about aggressive purchasing of Bitcoin, I personally think that it is the percentage of your discretionary income that is being used, not the amount or the number of times you bought in a week or month, because if you use like 60% if your discretionary income to buy and accumulate, you are being over aggressive, and it becomes even worse if you invest with more than 60% of your discretionary income because it is not sustainable, if you have not put your emergency funds in place before being over aggressive.

Yes aggressive accumulation is not by the number of times you buy Bitcoin or the amount you use to buy but by the percentage of your discretionary income that you are able to put into buying that is why sometimes a person might earn more but not as aggressive as someone who earns lesser because of the percentage they are able to put into buying Bitcoin.

Putting more into buying Bitcoin in some instances is good but shouldn't be done when you're barely starting investing. Putting 60% at an early stage like that will give almost no room for reserve funds and will in turn have a negative effect on your investment. Discretionary income is meant to be divided into 3 and only when you have had enough emergency fund before getting aggressive and putting more of your discretionary income into buying Bitcoin.