In fact... has he sent you that PM? I believe it's roughly about him and his attempt to get a support and/or to twist yet another story?
OP, I challenged you, do you dare enough to give permission to BitcoinGirl.Club to publish what you wrote to him publicly?
Yes, I received a PM from him and it's just a short one where he asked how to find those No Win No Fees law farms. I left him a response with my suggestions a few minutes ago before I discover your reply.
Thank you for adding more context and actually adds the growing list of OP's inconsistencies.
OP, I take that you actually don't have any contact with a law firm, and Roeloef Bijkerk is another bluff, an attempt to threaten BC and keep them from performing the video verification, because you know you'll fail if you do, as well as to buy more time to get in touch with the unfortunate woman whose identity you use? Because if you have... I wonder why else you need a lawyer with no-win-no-pay basis when you already have one?
If Bijkerk is just a bluff, it ironically goes consistent with all of those slips you made, though. The "advise" that their PM [a written statement] has no weight, the sarcasm that can be used as a statement against yourself, the epic fail to record the damning evidence.
I wonder what will a lawyer think and say if they know someone uses their name without their permission, to cover your muddy traces... and to threaten "someone else", to say the least.
I don't think swaga is their alt. The cluster and him have some differences; swaga is a script seller, while simpleghostingjoana is a pure gambler with a condition. I can't see this two background works together. Also, they don't seems to share a quirk.
[Side note: you might want to read
this other quirk shared between simple-ghosting-joana that I found, amongst other, it kinda seal the connection between them three, IMO]
