SpeedDemon13 (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2014, 07:29:19 PM |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system.
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
seljak
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:01:27 PM |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system. Can you also compare the performance/watt usage results of +nofee option and v3.0.
|
|
|
|
kpematop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:03:27 PM |
|
Hello, 3x7950+1x7970 with claymore v3.0 it consumed 780W, with v4.0 it is 820W on the wall. Scrypt with this configuration is 1000W
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13 (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:07:25 PM Last edit: April 27, 2014, 08:41:04 PM by SpeedDemon13 |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system. Can you also compare the performance/watt usage results of +nofee option and v3.0. I'm just comparing with the fee on. Here's my findings with a single 7970: Idle: 125 watts Claymore v4.0: 344 watts (1080core/1500mem)/360 watts (1150core/1500mem) Primegpu v2.00: 342 watts (1080core/1500mem)/354 watts (1150core/1500mem) Scrypt: 436 watts (1080core/1500mem) @ 750 kh/s
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
gilad215
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:54:19 PM |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system. Can you also compare the performance/watt usage results of +nofee option and v3.0. I'm just comparing with the fee on. Here's my findings with a single 7970: Idle: 125 watts Claymore v4.0: 344 watts (1080core/1500mem)/360 watts (1150core/1500mem) Primegpu v2.00: 342 watts (1080core/1500mem)/354 watts (1150core/1500mem) Scrypt: 436 watts (1080core/1500mem) @ 750 kh/s + They generate much less heat for me, and the summer is starting here
|
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13 (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:58:38 PM |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system. Can you also compare the performance/watt usage results of +nofee option and v3.0. I'm just comparing with the fee on. Here's my findings with a single 7970: Idle: 125 watts Claymore v4.0: 344 watts (1080core/1500mem)/360 watts (1150core/1500mem) Primegpu v2.00: 342 watts (1080core/1500mem)/354 watts (1150core/1500mem) Scrypt: 436 watts (1080core/1500mem) @ 750 kh/s + They generate much less heat for me, and the summer is starting here I haven't passed 62C during times when it was 85F to 90F with either XPM miner.
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
Strannik-74
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:13:25 AM Last edit: April 28, 2014, 07:51:53 AM by Strannik-74 |
|
48 hours solo I dug 8+7 = 15block * 7,67xpm = 115XPM / 2day = 57XPM/day 24 hours on the Ypool I found 8 blocks received only 43XPM -- This is 42% less than it should be
|
|
|
|
Atma-n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
April 28, 2014, 07:21:37 AM |
|
48 hours solo I dug 8+7 = 15block * 7,67xpm = 115XPM / 2day = 57XPM/day 24 hours on the Ypool I found 8 blocks received only 43XPM
I mined solo for about 36hours, found nothing (6 cards 280x). As soon as I mine with ypool I see in the statistics that I find multiple blocks a day. I hade over 11 connections with the wallet. Anyone else having solo issues?
|
|
|
|
Strannik-74
|
|
April 28, 2014, 07:28:08 AM Last edit: April 28, 2014, 07:46:48 AM by Strannik-74 |
|
When I Mine solo 29 card ( 2x280X 16x7950 4x270X 7x7850) and I had 10 connections, I lost 6 block, while it was 8 Connects everything was normal. Most likely you have not synchronized wallet.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
April 28, 2014, 04:32:57 PM |
|
is it true that the v4.0 consume similar power as scrypt mining?
Which would only mean it is optimized to full potential, right? Not necessary, right? Speed increase vs power consumption increase might not be worth it? I'll hook up my Kill-A-Watt meter later on in the day and show what one 7970 does in my AMD system. Can you also compare the performance/watt usage results of +nofee option and v3.0. I'm just comparing with the fee on. Here's my findings with a single 7970: Idle: 125 watts Claymore v4.0: 344 watts (1080core/1500mem)/360 watts (1150core/1500mem) Primegpu v2.00: 342 watts (1080core/1500mem)/354 watts (1150core/1500mem) Scrypt: 436 watts (1080core/1500mem) @ 750 kh/s + They generate much less heat for me, and the summer is starting here It's dramatic on multiGPU setups. For me, 3x 7970 on scrypt is 825 W, while Claymore was 545 W.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
mafostedu
|
|
April 28, 2014, 05:18:26 PM |
|
Claymore, can you modify this miner to work it for RIC GPU mining somehow ?
I was mining it with my 8x i5 CPUs while mining scrypts on the same systems with GPUs But since your miner needs some resources from Processors also (30-35% from my i5 CPUs with 3x 290 cards on each of them) I stopped mining RIC.
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
April 28, 2014, 05:24:15 PM Last edit: April 28, 2014, 06:13:09 PM by Claymore |
|
Version 5.0 is available:
- Improved speed by 10% for 290/290X, for other cards less. Up to 3.0 CPD on 290X. - Added "-ss 0" option. - Added "-nofee" option for solo miner.
|
|
|
|
gilad215
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:19:07 PM |
|
Version 5.0 is available:
- Improved speed by 10% for 290/290X, for other cards less. Up to 3.0 CPD on 290X. - Added "-ss 0" option. - Added "-nofee" option for solo miner.
indeed improvement for my 290s. we're all looking for 280x improvements aswell! gj
|
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1
|
|
|
triton0550
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:35:45 PM |
|
At 280x remains the same
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:43:43 PM |
|
Version 5.0 is available:
- Improved speed by 10% for 290/290X, for other cards less. Up to 3.0 CPD on 290X. - Added "-ss 0" option. - Added "-nofee" option for solo miner.
indeed improvement for my 290s. we're all looking for 280x improvements aswell! gj Ok, just wait for next update
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:44:49 PM |
|
Claymore, can you modify this miner to work it for RIC GPU mining somehow ?
I was mining it with my 8x i5 CPUs while mining scrypts on the same systems with GPUs But since your miner needs some resources from Processors also (30-35% from my i5 CPUs with 3x 290 cards on each of them) I stopped mining RIC.
No, RIC uses much larger numbers so it won't work there with decent speed.
|
|
|
|
Strannik-74
|
|
April 28, 2014, 07:14:35 PM |
|
v 4.0 v 5.0 v 5.0 -nofee 280X 156k 4ch & TRT 308 -> 156k 4ch & TRT 303 +0% 122k 4ch & TRT 382 -22% 7950 120k 4ch & TRT 396 -> 122k 4ch & TRT 385 +2% 95k 4ch & TRT 495 -13% 270X 97k 4ch & TRT 490 -> 97k 4ch & TRT 490 +0% 62k 4ch & TRT 620 -37% 7850 70k 4ch & TRT 670 -> 74k 4ch & TRT 634 +5% 47k 4ch & TRT 807 -37%
|
|
|
|
tristartek
|
|
April 28, 2014, 07:37:50 PM |
|
290x increase. Love it. Just wish solo would be easier to find blocks. Can take hours sometimes, almost not worth it.
|
BTC: 1KTg6RkiHjovXqVfVB1a74NPPXLnoL1HNf
|
|
|
mainman1009
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
April 28, 2014, 08:03:46 PM |
|
What does TRT mean? The reason I ask is I tried using Primecoin GPU miner with my 7950 and received a value of 200 vs 400 from claymore, but I get the same amount of CPD for both miners around 1.3 CPD. For now I am sticking with claymore since I can use multiple machines and point them to one wallet for mining. Any insight is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
April 28, 2014, 08:24:27 PM |
|
What does TRT mean? The reason I ask is I tried using Primecoin GPU miner with my 7950 and received a value of 200 vs 400 from claymore, but I get the same amount of CPD for both miners around 1.3 CPD. For now I am sticking with claymore since I can use multiple machines and point them to one wallet for mining. Any insight is appreciated.
Check "readme" file: ... Press "m" to see a performance counter, total round time (TRT). Don't compare this value to other miners, this value is not related to any other numbers of different miners. ... and so on. Btw, "Readme" has a lot of useful information
|
|
|
|
|