[ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool

[foxkyu]

I think all orders of scrypt on Nicehash mine coin LTC and all orders of SHA256 on Nicehash mine coin BTC but why can Nicehash pay high profit than real profit from mining ?
           Because SHA ORDER has " Price  0.0160 BTC/TH/Day" , if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.0130 BTC/TH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS .     With SCRIPT ORDER has " Price  0.3 BTC/GH/Day" ,if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.3 BTC/GH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.25 BTC/GH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.3 BTC/GH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS . SAME to X11, X13....
           MEMBERS can't calculate exactly profit from miners because reject hash,stale shares ... ,they only get fewer profit .BUT renters can't rent with high price (NO profit) ,they get cheat from ADMIN of NICEHASH and BOT

that was very sensitive issue for renter like me

do you have any proof of that?

[1714903842]

1714903842

[1714903842]

1714903842

[1714903842]

1714903842

[nicehash]

anyone used higher hash rate miners on nicehash or westhash? how does it do with the hash rate and wasted hash?

I notice my s2 almost always have some rejected speed. is this because not as many people rent at least 1th? or does it not matter, does the actual machine have to be mining in full from a single renter?

I fi buy a sp35 will it be always using the entire 6th??

A few particular ASIC miners have higher reject ratio, but not because of their high speed, but because of either bad software implementation (most of the time issues with handling flushwork or issues with bugs in older cgminer versions) or because weak controller board CPU is used. All these issues arise due to the fact that Orders on NiceHash are usually mining altcoins with low diff, fast blocks and quick diff change ... and some miners simply can't handle this properly (poor implementation from the ASIC miner manufacturers).

Unfortunately AntMiner S2 is know to have such issues. You can try to use stratum-proxy (https://www.nicehash.com/software/#asic) and see if you get better results. btw: other Antminers (S1, S3, S4, etc.) are known to work good. We have no experiences with Spondoolies SP35, but as far as we know these are high-quality miners and should work fine ... if any user is currently using SP35 please leave feedback here.

[ljm81]

How I create a new ticket?

[hashie]

We've experienced attacks from this joker too. His primary attack is using Wordpress pingbacks, just set up iptables DROPs for any incoming request with a '*WordPress*' useragent to mitigate.

If anyone is targeted by DD4BC and need help mitigating, contact us (support [a t] hashie.co), we'll be happy to give you a hand.

-Sahra

[ljm81]

Can anyone answer me? I do not see ticket options for support.

[Dophoeve]

Can anyone answer me? I do not see ticket options for support.

Just mail their general mail adress with your question: info@nicehash.com

That would work..

[ljm81]

Can anyone answer me? I do not see ticket options for support.

Just mail their general mail adress with your question: info@nicehash.com

That would work..

I have already sent. Long does it take for a response?

[nicehash]

NeoScrypt algo added. Sellers, make sure to use latest Sgminer 5.0 develop version, since cgminer-neoscrypt 3.7.8 has extranonce bug (you will only receive "Share above target" with cgminer-neoscrypt 3.7.8 on our stratum servers)!

Sgminer 5.0 develop source: https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/develop

Sgminer 5.0 develop windows binaries: http://cryptomining-blog.com/3735-new-sgminer-5-development-version-with-neoscrypt-support/

BTW: it took as a bit longer to implement proper validator because we were testing on cgminer-neoscrypt 3.7.8 and only today figured out that the issue is with the extranonce bug in cgminer-neoscrypt 3.7.8 ... we really don't understand why they even used such an old buggy version of cgminer for neoscrypt implementation ... bwah!

MultiAlgo users : either update to Sgminer 5.0 develop or disable NeoScrypt factor until you update to this miner. You can disable a particular algorithm by setting f8=0 .... for example f0=1;f2=0.5;f3=4;f4=3;f5=500;f6=3.5;f7=16;f8=0 ... more info on https://www.nicehash.com/multialgo/#finetuning (of course, since NeoScrypt is very profitable, we suggest you to upgrade to latest Sgminer 5.0 develop as soon as possible).

Here are some key settings for Sgminer (of course, your mileage may vary):

Code:

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize" : "32",
"kernel" : "neoscrypt",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",

[gambadamba]

neoscript
share reject !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[suchmoon]

neoscript
share reject !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not enough information in your post. Are you using cgminer 3.7.8?

[Vilchaco]

SGminer 5.0 shows dead pool with Neoscrypt port (both 3341 and 4341)

[nicehash]

Looking for cgminer beta testers with extranonce.subscribe support on SHA256 miners (for optimal mining performance - no disconnects)

extranonce.subscribe support made it into sgminer quite some time ago, but not yet into latest cgminer version. We prepared an implementation which would hopefully made it into the official version, but we need some testers first.

If you are still using some older miners, connected via USB, we are looking for users to test with these devices:

--enable-avalon
--enable-avalon2
--enable-bflsc
--enable-bitforce
--enable-bitfury
--enable-blockerupter
--enable-cointerra
--enable-drillbit
--enable-hashfast
--enable-hashratio
--enable-icarus
--enable-klondike

If you own one of these devices we welcome you to test this cgminer binary: https://www.nicehash.com/software/cgminer-4.7.0-extranonce.subscribe.zip

make sure you add #xnsub at the end of the stratum connection string to enable extranonce subscription:

cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3334#xnsub -u enterYourBTCaddress -p d=128

When your miner successfully connects, take a look a miner stats page:

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=1&addr=enterYourBTCaddress

and make sure you see extranonce subscription confirmation:



Please report if you have any success and if all is fine we will propose to push this feature in official cgminer and from there it will hopefully made its way into various ASICs firmwares...

Thanks!

[Nicehashischeater]

I think all orders of scrypt on Nicehash mine coin LTC and all orders of SHA256 on Nicehash mine coin BTC but why can Nicehash pay high profit than real profit from mining ?
           Because SHA ORDER has " Price  0.0160 BTC/TH/Day" , if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.0130 BTC/TH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS .     With SCRIPT ORDER has " Price  0.3 BTC/GH/Day" ,if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.3 BTC/GH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.25 BTC/GH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.3 BTC/GH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS . SAME to X11, X13....
           MEMBERS can't calculate exactly profit from miners because reject hash,stale shares ... ,they only get fewer profit .BUT renters can't rent with high price (NO profit) ,they get cheat from ADMIN of NICEHASH and BOT

that was very sensitive issue for renter like me

do you have any proof of that?

Nicehash use BOT eat all hash from scrypt and SHA256 , X11 ... ,but no coin profit than LTC (scrypt ),BTC (SHA256),DRK (X11) ... and they can't pay high profit than real profit from mining .I sure they pay less then setup high profit to attract new miners .

[Ntrain2k]

I think all orders of scrypt on Nicehash mine coin LTC and all orders of SHA256 on Nicehash mine coin BTC but why can Nicehash pay high profit than real profit from mining ?
           Because SHA ORDER has " Price  0.0160 BTC/TH/Day" , if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.0130 BTC/TH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.0160 BTC/TH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS .     With SCRIPT ORDER has " Price  0.3 BTC/GH/Day" ,if you are real renter, you will pay exactly 0.3 BTC/GH/Day ; if you were admin of NICEHASH , you could pay 0.25 BTC/GH/Day and setup order (order from admin ) to 0.3 BTC/GH/Day AND run BOT control price to eat all hash not share to other RENTERS . SAME to X11, X13....
           MEMBERS can't calculate exactly profit from miners because reject hash,stale shares ... ,they only get fewer profit .BUT renters can't rent with high price (NO profit) ,they get cheat from ADMIN of NICEHASH and BOT

that was very sensitive issue for renter like me

do you have any proof of that?

Nicehash use BOT eat all hash from scrypt and SHA256 , X11 ... ,but no coin profit than LTC (scrypt ),BTC (SHA256),DRK (X11) ... and they can't pay high profit than real profit from mining .I sure they pay less then setup high profit to attract new miners .

Either post proof or shut up about your BS.

[nicehashdev]

We have plenty of customers that do use bots for automatic order management. There is no secret to that. For that reason, we even made API, so managing orders automatically is simpler. Take a look here: https://nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=api

Just like all exchanges have API and permit bots, we permit them too. What would be the reason not to permit them?

But it is true - there is no publicly available bot to work with NiceHash (yet). Maybe we will create own one, one day in the future...

As for your claims about payments to miners not being real; there are proofs, that these payments are real, verified by third persons (suchmoon and poolpicker) - check here: http://poolpicker.eu/vs?algo=scrypt

Bottom line: miners do actually get paid what you see on site, there is only slight variance (few percents up or down).

[yslyung]

i have many miners SHA256 (+/- 50) connected to NH or WH (both yielded same results) via stratum proxy but i am always seeing a much lower reporting hashrates approx. 10% or lower most of the time. let's say i have 50 ths all pointed to NH but in stats page i see 45 ths or less. i do see close to 50ths sometimes but rarely. 10% lower is pretty often. sometimes there are some rejected hashrates and sometimes none but still lesser that 50 ths.

before i wasn't using proxy i did ask a similar question  before but was told using proxy would improve. still the same.

[Herbalconfusion]

My account is being hacked. Dev can you please help. They have enabled 2fa on my account and i cant do anything

[nicehash]

Bump.

Source is available here: https://github.com/nicehash/cgminer, so maybe someone could make binaries for some other ASIC devices as well.

Looking for cgminer beta testers with extranonce.subscribe support on SHA256 miners (for optimal mining performance - no disconnects)

extranonce.subscribe support made it into sgminer quite some time ago, but not yet into latest cgminer version. We prepared an implementation which would hopefully made it into the official version, but we need some testers first.

If you are still using some older miners, connected via USB, we are looking for users to test with these devices:

--enable-avalon
--enable-avalon2
--enable-bflsc
--enable-bitforce
--enable-bitfury
--enable-blockerupter
--enable-cointerra
--enable-drillbit
--enable-hashfast
--enable-hashratio
--enable-icarus
--enable-klondike

If you own one of these devices we welcome you to test this cgminer binary: https://www.nicehash.com/software/cgminer-4.7.0-extranonce.subscribe.zip

make sure you add #xnsub at the end of the stratum connection string to enable extranonce subscription:

cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3334#xnsub -u enterYourBTCaddress -p d=128

When your miner successfully connects, take a look a miner stats page:

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=1&addr=enterYourBTCaddress

and make sure you see extranonce subscription confirmation:



Please report if you have any success and if all is fine we will propose to push this feature in official cgminer and from there it will hopefully made its way into various ASICs firmwares...

Thanks!

[chococat211]

for last 5 days until now, its very hard to connect to multi algo port (4xxx), my rigs keep move to another backup pool (most of time) or 3xxx port backup pool (sometime), check it out plz, thanks.

[nicehash]

for last 5 days until now, its very hard to connect to multi algo port (4xxx), my rigs keep move to another backup pool (most of time) or 3xxx port backup pool (sometime), check it out plz, thanks.

Make sure you have NeoScrypt support: either update to Sgminer 5.0 develop (https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer) or disable NeoScrypt factor until you update to this miner. You can disable NeoScrypt multi-algo algorithm by setting f8=0 on ALL your algos .... for example f0=1;f2=0.5;f3=4;f4=3;f5=500;f6=3.5;f7=16;f8=0 ... more info on https://www.nicehash.com/multialgo/#finetuning (of course, since NeoScrypt is quite profitable, we suggest you to upgrade to latest Sgminer 5.0 develop as soon as possible).