btchigh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2014, 03:29:26 PM |
|
Are the miner/seller ports down (3334/sha)..?
|
|
|
|
Ntrain2k
|
|
November 10, 2014, 03:37:22 PM |
|
Are the miner/seller ports down (3334/sha)..?
Up for me on westhash.
|
|
|
|
TracerX
|
|
November 10, 2014, 04:00:29 PM |
|
Are the miner/seller ports down (3334/sha)..?
Up for me on westhash. Up for me, too.
|
|
|
|
btchigh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2014, 04:02:02 PM |
|
OKay now. I was going through a VPN (that is working for all other traffic), and now going direct and both west & nice working. Thx.
|
|
|
|
jtostenr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2014, 06:01:52 AM |
|
All pools have been down for me the last couple of days. Currently running on my backup pool, but would really like to get back on Nicehash.
|
|
|
|
nicehash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
|
|
November 11, 2014, 07:35:48 AM |
|
Wolf0's optimized NeoScrypt OpenCL kernel ( double hash rate): https://www.nicehash.com/software/neoscrypt.cl.zipInstructions: download, unzip, copy to your sgminer folder (overwrite existing neoscrypt.cl), delete neoscrypt*.bin files in your sgminer run directory and restart sgminer. Say thanks to Wolf0
|
|
|
|
bigtop1967
|
|
November 11, 2014, 10:21:39 AM Last edit: November 11, 2014, 11:46:50 AM by bigtop1967 |
|
All pools have been down for me the last couple of days. Currently running on my backup pool, but would really like to get back on Nicehash.
Me too.....can't connect to any 43xx pools.... Edit: Have managed occasionally to connect to X13 and X11, but neoscrypt is not working for me......even when it is hashing, nothing registers on nicehash for neo.
|
|
|
|
nicehash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
|
|
November 11, 2014, 12:08:47 PM |
|
All pools have been down for me the last couple of days. Currently running on my backup pool, but would really like to get back on Nicehash.
Me too.....can't connect to any 43xx pools.... Edit: Have managed occasionally to connect to X13 and X11, but neoscrypt is not working for me......even when it is hashing, nothing registers on nicehash for neo. Are you able to connect directly to 33xx pools? If yes, then make sure you have NeoScrypt support: either update to Sgminer 5.0 develop ( https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer) or disable NeoScrypt factor until you update to this miner. You can disable NeoScrypt multi-algo algorithm by setting f8=0 .... for example f0=1;f2=0.5;f3=4;f4=3;f5=500;f6=3.5;f7=16;f8=0 on all your NiceHash algorithms/pool profiles ... more info on https://www.nicehash.com/multialgo/#finetuning (of course, since NeoScrypt is quite profitable, we suggest you to upgrade to latest Sgminer 5.0 develop as soon as possible). For NeoScrypt try latest sgminer https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer with intensity: 13, gpu-threads: 2 and worksize: 64 ... AMD drivers 14.9 are reported as problematic, use 14.6 instead.
|
|
|
|
bigtop1967
|
|
November 11, 2014, 12:15:26 PM |
|
This is my current output......even with I=9 I still get HW errors
I'm using 14.9 which was fine with everything else - will go back to 14.6 and see what happens.
sgminer 5.1.0-dev - Started: [2014-11-11 12:05:21] - [0 days 00:07:44]
(5s):51.46K (avg):50.70Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:4 WU:0.000/m ST: 0 SS: 0 NB: 22 LW: 753 GF: 1 RF: 0 Connected to NiceHash_Neo (stratum) diff 64 as user 15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8 Block: e6dfda56... Diff:686K Started: [12:11:42] Best share: 0
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit GPU 0: 62.0C 1788RPM | 51.48K/50.98Kh/s | R: 0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I: 9
[12:05:19] Started sgminer 5.1.0-dev [12:05:19] * using Jansson 2.6 [12:05:19] Loaded configuration file sgminer.conf [12:05:19] Probing for an alive pool [12:05:20] Switching to NiceHash_Neo - first alive pool [12:05:20] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool NiceHash_Neo. [12:05:20] Startup Pool No = 3 [12:05:20] Initialising kernel neoscrypt.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024 [12:05:20] Initialising kernel neoscrypt.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024 [12:07:53] NiceHash_Neo extranonce change requested [12:08:19] NiceHash_Neo difficulty changed to 32 [12:10:19] Stratum connection to NiceHash_Neo interrupted [12:10:20] NiceHash_Neo difficulty changed to 32 [12:11:42] NiceHash_Neo difficulty changed to 64
|
|
|
|
bigtop1967
|
|
November 11, 2014, 02:02:41 PM Last edit: November 11, 2014, 02:13:15 PM by bigtop1967 |
|
Nope....same problem.... driver version 14.6.2rc running on Saphire 280X Toxic - lots of HW errors sgminer 5.1.0-dev - Started: [2014-11-11 13:54:27] - [0 days 00:05:44] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):240.5K (avg):229.6Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:27 WU:0.000/m ST: 0 SS: 0 NB: 4 LW: 542 GF: 1 RF: 0 Connected to NiceHash_Neo (stratum) diff 64 as user 15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8 Block: d66c2583... Diff:999K Started: [13:58:46] Best share: 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit GPU 0: 72.0C 2277RPM | 231.7K/231.3Kh/s | R: 0.0% HW:28 WU:0.000/m I:13 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [13:54:25] Started sgminer 5.1.0-dev [13:54:25] * using Jansson 2.6 [13:54:25] Loaded configuration file sgminer.conf [13:54:25] Probing for an alive pool [13:54:25] Switching to NiceHash_Neo - first alive pool [13:54:25] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool NiceHash_Neo. [13:54:25] Startup Pool No = 3 [13:54:25] Initialising kernel neoscrypt.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024 [13:54:25] Initialising kernel neoscrypt.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024 [13:56:46] NiceHash_Neo extranonce change requested [13:57:25] NiceHash_Neo difficulty changed to 32 [13:58:47] NiceHash_Neo extranonce change requested [13:59:25] Stratum connection to NiceHash_Neo interrupted [13:59:25] NiceHash_Neo difficulty changed to 64
Config:
{ "pools" : [ { "name" : "NiceHash_X11_auto-switch", "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336", "user" : "15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8", "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=5.5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0;f8=0.15", "nfactor" : "10", "algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod" }, { "name" : "NiceHash_X13_auto-switch", "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337", "user" : "15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8", "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=5.5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0;f8=0.15", "nfactor" : "10", "algorithm" : "marucoin-mod" }, { "name" : "NiceHash_X15_multi", "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339", "user" : "15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8", "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=5.5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0;f8=0.15", "nfactor" : "10", "algorithm" : "bitblock" }, { "name" : "NiceHash_Neo", "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4341", "user" : "15UTX7CQFW3X2A6g6rVYrPNiis2got5hQ8", "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=5.5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0;f8=0.15", "intensity" : "11", "worksize" : "64", "algorithm" : "neoscrypt" } ], "intensity" : "17", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "expiry" : "1", "failover-only" : true, "auto-fan" : true, "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "device" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "2", "vectors" : "1", "shaders" : "2048", "temp-cutoff" : "90", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "gpu-fan" : "40-100", "gpu-vddc" : "1.150", "gpu-engine" : "1120", "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7" }
|
|
|
|
JHDarkLeg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2014, 10:59:08 PM |
|
All pools have been down for me the last couple of days. Currently running on my backup pool, but would really like to get back on Nicehash.
Me too.....can't connect to any 43xx pools.... Edit: Have managed occasionally to connect to X13 and X11, but neoscrypt is not working for me......even when it is hashing, nothing registers on nicehash for neo. Are you able to connect directly to 33xx pools? If yes, then make sure you have NeoScrypt support: either update to Sgminer 5.0 develop ( https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer) or disable NeoScrypt factor until you update to this miner. You can disable NeoScrypt multi-algo algorithm by setting f8=0 .... for example f0=1;f2=0.5;f3=4;f4=3;f5=500;f6=3.5;f7=16;f8=0 on all your NiceHash algorithms/pool profiles ... more info on https://www.nicehash.com/multialgo/#finetuning (of course, since NeoScrypt is quite profitable, we suggest you to upgrade to latest Sgminer 5.0 develop as soon as possible). For NeoScrypt try latest sgminer https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer with intensity: 13, gpu-threads: 2 and worksize: 64 ... AMD drivers 14.9 are reported as problematic, use 14.6 instead. Created an account just because of this issue. I've been running since June with the same config and no issues. In the last week however I've been unable to connect to the Nicehash stratums. Sgminer reports all Nicehash 3xxx pools as dead, so I tried to manually connect to the 4xxx pools, but they're showing dead as well. This seemed weird so I tried to ping stratum.nicehash.com but I get no reply either at home or work, so maybe that's the issue? I've tried upgrading to Sgminer 5.1 and adding f8=0, but all Nicehash pools are still showing dead. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
ReturnZero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2014, 03:52:39 PM |
|
Is the most profitable algorithm list on the main website delayed? There are quite a few times that the Autoswitcher isn't lining up with what the main page says is the most profitable, often connecting to Scrypt-N when it's around 250% instead of Neo when it's around 400%. All my f values are at the defaults listed, f2=0.5 and f8=0.15 so I would think it should match, right?
Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
November 13, 2014, 05:07:43 PM |
|
We just changed default factor of NeoScrypt from 0.15 to 0.3. If you use your own factor, then you may of course get connection to different algorithms.
|
|
|
|
jaitor
|
|
November 13, 2014, 07:40:16 PM |
|
What's happening to nicehash profitability much lower than betarigs, is there any other alternative to nicehash?
|
|
|
|
Joe9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2014, 09:53:12 PM |
|
What's happening to nicehash profitability much lower than betarigs, is there any other alternative to nicehash?
http://cryp.today/it is what it is
|
|
|
|
Automatic Monkey
|
|
November 14, 2014, 08:21:41 AM |
|
Hey Nicehash guys... I've still got a problem with my Antminers not being fully released when the paying price goes below my threshold. They never make it to the backup pool, or sometimes they do make it but with an extremely low hashrate, and the Miner Status screen shows the pool is still "Alive" for Nice/West. Any idea how to fix this?
|
Try ShadowCash, the first coin with instant and decentralized private transactions! SDC address: SUPERMAN8eDvcPL6RWYMVwtPzUtqWi2zCr Wallet Private Key: 7S6fJBEzXqJuuGCvEPcgBSbd5wmjVTvDj7591gNKcTmS7X47e98
|
|
|
TR8888
|
|
November 14, 2014, 11:51:40 AM |
|
Please help I cant get sgminer 5.1 to work with neoscrypt. I'm using AMD drivers 14.6 My config is: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 sgminer.exe -neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://XXX -u XXX -p x 2>logfile.txt my logfile error: [11:43:56] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [11:43:56] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [11:43:56] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1526.3) [11:43:56] Platform devices: 4 [11:43:56] 0 Tahiti [11:43:56] 1 Tahiti [11:43:56] 2 Tahiti [11:43:56] 3 Tahiti [11:43:56] Number of ADL devices: 4 [11:43:56] ATI ADL Overdrive5 API found. [11:43:56] ATI ADL Overdrive6 API found. [11:43:56] Found 24 logical ADL adapters [11:43:56] ADL index 0, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] GPU 0 assigned: iAdapterIndex:0 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6798&SUBSYS_27751462&REV_00_4&2AF7FC6&0&00E3A iBusNumber:5 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [11:43:56] ADL index 1, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 2, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 3, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 4, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 5, id 35644736 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 6, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] GPU 1 assigned: iAdapterIndex:6 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6798&SUBSYS_27751462&REV_00_4&36135B44&0&00E2A iBusNumber:4 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [11:43:56] ADL index 7, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 8, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 9, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 10, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 11, id 33503296 - BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] ADL index 12, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] GPU 2 assigned: iAdapterIndex:12 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6798&SUBSYS_30061043&REV_00_4&25A57E32&0&00E0A iBusNumber:2 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [11:43:56] ADL index 13, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 14, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 15, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 16, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 17, id 25098560 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 18, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] GPU 3 assigned: iAdapterIndex:18 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_6798&SUBSYS_30061043&REV_00_4&63638AD&0&0008A iBusNumber:1 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [11:43:56] ADL index 19, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 20, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 21, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 22, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] ADL index 23, id 4252608 - BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] GPU 0 AMD Radeon R9 200 Series hardware monitoring enabled [11:43:56] ADL GPU 0 is Adapter index 0 and maps to adapter id 35644736 [11:43:56] GPU 0 BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] GPU 1 AMD Radeon R9 200 Series hardware monitoring enabled [11:43:56] ADL GPU 1 is Adapter index 6 and maps to adapter id 33503296 [11:43:56] GPU 1 BIOS partno.: 113-C3865000-O77, version: 015.042.000.000, date: 2013/12/04 05:04 [11:43:56] GPU 2 AMD Radeon R9 200 Series hardware monitoring enabled [11:43:56] ADL GPU 2 is Adapter index 12 and maps to adapter id 25098560 [11:43:56] GPU 2 BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] GPU 3 AMD Radeon R9 200 Series hardware monitoring enabled [11:43:56] ADL GPU 3 is Adapter index 18 and maps to adapter id 4252608 [11:43:56] GPU 3 BIOS partno.: 113-AD47800-100, version: 015.039.000.000, date: 2013/08/28 05:07 [11:43:56] 4 GPU devices max detected
At this point SGminer just closes. Any idea's please? Thanks
|
|
|
|
ReturnZero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
November 14, 2014, 05:28:57 PM |
|
We just changed default factor of NeoScrypt from 0.15 to 0.3. If you use your own factor, then you may of course get connection to different algorithms.
Thanks for the update. Do you think you can update what it says on the website here? https://nicehash.com/multialgo/That's a good reference when setting everything up. What I seem to notice is that several of the pools (all autoswitch nicehash) say alive at one time, and it just uses the highest priority alive pool which may not be the most profitable anymore. When I first restart sgminer only one is alive, then after a while when another also is more profitable then that one switches to alive but the previous one doesn't switch to dead. After a while if a higher priority pool gets switched to, it will never switch back to another. Is this an issue with sgminer? Or something else I can fix, maybe in my config file?
|
|
|
|
manfred87
|
|
November 16, 2014, 10:57:54 PM |
|
what's going on on buyer's side? ( scrypt, last two days, mainly on nicehash, not westhash )
there is one bot which places one order for every amount ( 0.23 , 0.24 , 0.25 . 0.26 etc .. ). he always uses a limit of ca 10-13 ghash.. then he sets the limit for high prices to 0.1 ghash.. so he always gets the cheapest hashrate.. if a place an order, i am always overbidden automatially within seconds.. he always invests a maximum of 0.05 btc or so.. and refills it once a minute or so.. as these orders stay for 15 days, he is always the top bidder for every amount... come on nicehash, this can not be allowed! pleace introduce higher fees for bids / introduce fees for refilling / set an order down in the queue if refilled!
addionally: during the day often 75% of the scrypt bids get dead simultaneously.. so the price drops to 0.07 or so ( much under value, ltc = 0.22 ) all my pools still work on westhash, but the very same pools on nicehash are shown as "dead" BUT: the orders of this creepy bot stay active that can't be a coincidence! he gets hashrate for 0.07 and i am dead!
so it would be nice, if nicehash would comment on this..
( proof: please check order #122027, #122151 , #122024 , #122149 , #122148, #122022, #122767 , #122020 , #122766 , #122019 , #122010 , #122009 , #112716 , #121358 , #122008 , #121357 )
|
|
|
|
7queue
|
|
November 17, 2014, 02:10:07 AM |
|
Just discovered these sites after pointing two S1's with extranonce.subscribe support added.
8 )
|
8 )
|
|
|
|