smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 19, 2014, 01:31:31 PM |
|
No there is one signature for each input and the key images are not included in the outputs
In this case (key images are not included in the outputs), how do you want to prevent DOUBLE spend ? whitepaper LNK LNK: The verifer checks if "keyImage" has been used in past signatures (these values are stored in the set ). Multiple uses imply that two signatures were produced under the same secret key.
I will sign again and again same input. Because I made an error (omission). The key images are indeed not included with the outputs, they are included with the inputs. Corrected: { prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(1 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) } Different version with two inputs: tx{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) input(a2(4 XMR),f4(4 XMR),f5(4 XMR),f6(4 XMR),keyimage(priv(a2))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(5 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) sign(tx_prefix,pub(a2),pub(f4),pub(f5),pub(f6),keyimage(priv(a2))) }
|
|
|
|
fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
|
|
September 19, 2014, 01:55:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:16:39 PM |
|
{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(1 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) }
Different version with two inputs:
tx{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) input(a2(4 XMR),f4(4 XMR),f5(4 XMR),f6(4 XMR),keyimage(priv(a2))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(5 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) sign(tx_prefix,pub(a2),pub(f4),pub(f5),pub(f6),keyimage(priv(a2))) }
Can I use foreign unspent output or this public keys are not known ?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:18:31 PM |
|
{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(1 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) }
Different version with two inputs:
tx{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) input(a2(4 XMR),f4(4 XMR),f5(4 XMR),f6(4 XMR),keyimage(priv(a2))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(5 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) sign(tx_prefix,pub(a2),pub(f4),pub(f5),pub(f6),keyimage(priv(a2))) }
Can I use foreign unspent output or this public keys are not known ? Yes you can use unspent outputs. There is no unspent hash format in the blockchain the way there is for bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:28:32 PM |
|
I found the inclusion of CZ to be bizarre
I don't see why the Czech Republic shouldn't get a voice.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:34:31 PM |
|
its already fairy accepted.
not that there's anything wrong with that.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:43:33 PM |
|
@fluffy, awesome intro on the openalias project. Can you please check if I've configured an XMR alias correctly at the following DNS location: myagui.monujo.comIt's not a secured domain or anything at this time, I just wanted to check if I got the implementation basics right. Thanks! ~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:53:29 PM |
|
Might be good for someone to compare XMR price development over the two days to other altcoins. Might well be that the effect of FUD is not even existent...
Quick scan: Over that period the range of LTC was 2.5%, XMR 13.6%, BBR 27.4%, XCN 34.5%, and all are within 10% of the range closest to their lows over the period. What I see is that PoW non-app coins (pure currencies) generally, whether CN or BTC based, have declined in degree best indicated by their market cap. My intuition: There is no FUD effect. It is pure imagination. The price is down because bitcoin. My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:56:01 PM |
|
{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(1 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) }
Different version with two inputs:
tx{ prefix= { input(a1(5 XMR),f1(5 XMR),f2(5 XMR),f3(5 XMR),keyimage(priv(a1))) input(a2(4 XMR),f4(4 XMR),f5(4 XMR),f6(4 XMR),keyimage(priv(a2))) output(r1(3 XMR),c1(5 XMR)) ; fee 1 XMR } sign(tx_prefix,pub(a1),pub(f1),pub(f2),pub(f3),keyimage(priv(a1))) sign(tx_prefix,pub(a2),pub(f4),pub(f5),pub(f6),keyimage(priv(a2))) }
Can I use foreign unspent output or this public keys are not known ? Yes you can use unspent outputs. There is no unspent hash format in the blockchain the way there is for bitcoin. Looks, it is good. :-) Thank you for your time. I must absorb new information.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 19, 2014, 02:57:20 PM |
|
My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that.
There is also a conjecture I've heard that Ethereum is dumping a lot. Why they would be in such a hurry to sell I have no idea. Maybe they got a bill from their lawyer.
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:05:14 PM |
|
My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that.
There is also a conjecture I've heard that Ethereum is dumping a lot. Why they would be in such a hurry to sell I have no idea. Maybe they got a bill from their lawyer. I think Ethereum story is more credible. The money which can flow out of BTC is too small compared to the one in stock market/foreign exchanges.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:07:22 PM |
|
My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that.
There is also a conjecture I've heard that Ethereum is dumping a lot. Why they would be in such a hurry to sell I have no idea. Maybe they got a bill from their lawyer. I think Ethereum story is more credible. The money which can flow out of BTC is too small compared to the one in stock market/foreign exchanges. Another one is China money (and I suppose some non-China money) flowing out to speculate on the Alibaba IPO. EDIT: Oops, didn't see that was already mentioned a few quoted levels back.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:12:05 PM |
|
The money which can flow out of BTC is too small compared to the one in stock market/foreign exchanges.
You are using opposite logic. It leads to bizarro results. GBP and BABA are enormous. They are sucking the air out of every room, no matter how tiny it is. Yes, the money flowing from crypto into legacy is tiny compared to the size of the BABA IPO. That fact is not in any way relevant to the conclusion you are drawing. An example of a reasonable inference: BTC is tiny. Therefore the money flowing out of BTC into BABA will not significantly impact the price of BABA. An example of an unreasonable inference: BTC is tiny. Therefore the money flowing out of BTC into BABA will not significantly impact the price of BTC. A drop in the ocean may not mean anything to the ocean, but it does mean a big lifestyle change for the drop.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:24:49 PM |
|
Might be good for someone to compare XMR price development over the two days to other altcoins. Might well be that the effect of FUD is not even existent...
Quick scan: Over that period the range of LTC was 2.5%, XMR 13.6%, BBR 27.4%, XCN 34.5%, and all are within 10% of the range closest to their lows over the period. What I see is that PoW non-app coins (pure currencies) generally, whether CN or BTC based, have declined in degree best indicated by their market cap. My intuition: There is no FUD effect. It is pure imagination. The price is down because bitcoin. My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that. I'm not above trading BTC comparably aggressive (after all, some of those profits then go into anon coins like XMR), but agreed on what you write here: Unless you trade rather small amounts (and can get in and out without slippage, and are nimble enough to jump back in on short notice), it makes little sense to trade the current swings that are largely secondary effects to XMR's older brother Bitcoin. Small correction maybe: It does make sense if you aren't attached to your XMR position, as in: if you're skimming off profits in USD only. If your goal is increasing an already non-trivial XMR stash, I find it hard to believe this can be achieved by swing trading, given the current market conditions.
|
Not sure which Bitcoin wallet you should use? Get Electrum!Electrum is an open-source lightweight client: fast, user friendly, and 100% secure. Download the source or executables for Windows/OSX/Linux/Android from, and only from, the official Electrum homepage.
|
|
|
fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:27:56 PM |
|
@fluffy, awesome intro on the openalias project.
Can you please check if I've configured an XMR alias correctly at the following DNS location: myagui.monujo.com
It's not a secured domain or anything at this time, I just wanted to check if I got the implementation basics right. Thanks! ~ Myagui
100% - [ ric->bitmonero ]$ host -t TXT myagui.monujo.com myagui.monujo.com descriptive text "oa1:xmr recipient_address=41goTv5ma7GZeiRKfdNisLGHPbYTPxtMs3mjH8NExEneNB2s9fasBrehsoMRESpJApXqcvqn7PMU3W1SpjNokA1a9d7ujyr\; recipient_name=Myagui\;"
Looks good, and - [wallet 48NGTd]: transfer 0 myagui.monujo.com 10 For URL: myagui.monujo.com,DNSSEC validation FAILED! Monero Address = 41goTv5ma7GZeiRKfdNisLGHPbYTPxtMs3mjH8NExEneNB2s9fasBrehsoMRESpJApXqcvqn7PMU3W1 SpjNokA1a9d7ujyr Is this OK? (Y/n)
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:51:02 PM |
|
You better have damn pressed [Y] there! ~ Myagui Edit: Thank you for checking fluffy, much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
September 19, 2014, 05:11:51 PM |
|
Party rock is in the house tonight "Every payday I'm monering"
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 05:22:59 PM |
|
I'm glad the dev team is still so dedicated. Hope you have better donating system before scum starts to attack Monero again (which I hope won't hapen or won't succeed).
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
September 19, 2014, 05:49:35 PM |
|
My conjecture is that hot money is flowing out of bitcoin into US stocks (BABA) and GBP bets. This is ADHD money we're talking about. I give it a week or so, before btc bottoms. Unless there is an exogenous jump it would be reasonable to expect continuing XMR\BTC decay. Yet I am unwilling to sell for a turn-around, simply because the scale and likelihood of a positive shock is too large. The market cap is too small. One buyer can double the price forever in 20 seconds or less. I can't risk that. There is also a conjecture I've heard that Ethereum is dumping a lot. Why they would be in such a hurry to sell I have no idea. Maybe they got a bill from their lawyer. I think Ethereum story is more credible. The money which can flow out of BTC is too small compared to the one in stock market/foreign exchanges. Ethereum is cashing out. They announce it in advance and the last round of cashing out is now.
|
|
|
|
Hatch
|
|
September 19, 2014, 06:12:51 PM |
|
A miner here.
Currently I use Claymore's miner with AMD cards. I pay a 5% dev fee, which I think is a bit too high, but I acknowledge that the dev deserves something for his/her efforts.
If XMR devs were to create an equivalent or better Windows64 AMD miner with a 4% fee going to the XMR devs I reckon that would be a win/win.
Something to think about.
Big +1 Claymore's is the best available, but comparitively speaking, 5% is highway robbery and he knows it. But when you have no other suitable alternatives, you pay. I would MUCH rather that percentage went to the devs...
|
|
|
|
|