|
TaunSew
|
 |
September 23, 2014, 01:47:37 AM |
|
bittrex was interested with this coin, when they will add NODE?
 I'm not sure what Bittrex said. I know BTC38 said they'll put on NODE but that's buried some pages back. |
There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution. The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
|
|
|
|
visual111
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:48:52 AM |
|
bittrex was interested with this coin, when they will add NODE?
bittrex has everything..they'll get it up soon enough i'm sure |
|
|
|
RoyBtc
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2014, 02:22:00 AM |
|
where is the code ?
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoTV
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 03:14:54 AM |
|
where is the code ?
Yes Give us the Code! plz  |
got hacked all my coins gone from the blackjack sites. Thanks jerk.
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
|
September 23, 2014, 04:19:42 AM |
|
NODE wallet balance has no impact on forging correct? Just activity and run time?
yes it is called Proof of Activity! The primordial 2 factors are: time & spent volume! Very interesting. I think this is much better than NXT PoS where the more you have the more you forge. |
|
|
|
anon74
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Deep Onion = soon to be the #1 ANON COIN!
|
|
September 23, 2014, 04:52:00 AM |
|
So Bittrex, BTC38 and Poloniex, all in the works.  NODE is moving forward, excellent job on your constant business development guys. |
|
|
|
threedream
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Stand up , Stand up , Stand up !
|
|
September 23, 2014, 05:38:24 AM |
|
So Bittrex, BTC38 and Poloniex, all in the works. NODE is moving forward, excellent job on your constant business development guys. It was a great start |
I have to get back all the lost .
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:03:28 AM |
|
How many coins I need to have in my wallet for forging?
|
|
|
|
|
megashira1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:07:43 AM |
|
How many coins I need to have in my wallet for forging?
The beauty is you don't need any! Forging is to be based on wallet up time and wallet activity(sent transactions). |
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:13:17 AM |
|
How many coins I need to have in my wallet for forging?
The beauty is you don't need any! Forging is to be based on wallet up time and wallet activity(sent transactions). This is not good. Why I should by this if I can forge it without any coins? |
|
|
|
|
megashira1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:18:00 AM |
|
How many coins I need to have in my wallet for forging?
The beauty is you don't need any! Forging is to be based on wallet up time and wallet activity(sent transactions). This is not good. Why I should by this if I can forge it without any coins? The forging is based on POA (proof of activity) .. The more active your node the more likely you are to generate the next block. It is actually much more fair than traditional POS forging. read about it in the white paper here > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit |
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:21:21 AM |
|
How many coins I need to have in my wallet for forging?
The beauty is you don't need any! Forging is to be based on wallet up time and wallet activity(sent transactions). This is not good. Why I should by this if I can forge it without any coins? The forging is based on POA (proof of activity) .. The more active your node the more likely you are to generate the next block. It is actually much more fair than traditional POS forging. It is fair, but I think there should be some minimum amount of NODE in wallet for forging. If it is free so it is cheaper to make attack to network maybe. |
|
|
|
|
myself111
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 06:27:49 AM
Last edit: September 23, 2014, 03:38:04 PM by myself111 |
|
There are some misspellings in the client.
Blockchain verified complaite, wait synced blocks. -> Blockchain verification complete, wait for blocks synced.
Blockchain verified blocks. Verified 1338 of 2705 -> Blocks are being verified. Verified 1338 of 2705
Verified 1338 of 2705 -> Verified 1338 of 2705. (point was missing)
I am no native english speaker. Maybe somebody else can take a look.
And please rename c:\nxtl to c:\node or c:\nodemoney. Nxtl is history.
|
|
|
|
|
threedream
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Stand up , Stand up , Stand up !
|
|
September 23, 2014, 07:35:12 AM |
|
Wallet a little humanity, hoping to improve, the block loading slow
|
I have to get back all the lost .
|
|
|
boestin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2014, 09:58:01 AM |
|
Koop or Silk,
When are you planning to lower the transaction fees?
thanks,
boestin
|
|
|
|
|
|
sava0123
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:43:05 AM |
|
Koop or Silk,
When are you planning to lower the transaction fees?
thanks,
boestin
Try to read whitepaper |
|
|
|
|
|
sava0123
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:49:14 AM |
|
Like any other system - Rules need to be set, in order to avoid vicious intent!
We specified an example of those rules in the white-paper and i don't know if you guys perceived my intention of making the rule setting a community quest!
In my opinion: one head is ok, a dozen of heads is ok*10!
A rule example is: Singles (blocks with only 1 transaction) will not be forged by the sender. This rule will make sure not to let senders of a single transaction block receive the fee.
I would like the community to understand the forging mechanism and help us find vulnerabilities and solutions to them!
Making this an open debate will cover our needs and engage individuals into constructive discussions!
*The link on the WhitePaper & Announcements will be made after the page is set!
There are no possible rules that will help against someone who will be using dozen of clients until there is no rule about zero balances. To get protected from multiaccounting we need to add rule about non zero balances that can forge. I say leave the rule about time spend and transactions but add some coefficient that depends on account balance. And if balance is 0 then then this coefficient is zero and all probability is 0 as well. |
|
|
|
|
NorrisK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1007
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:52:40 AM |
|
Like any other system - Rules need to be set, in order to avoid vicious intent!
We specified an example of those rules in the white-paper and i don't know if you guys perceived my intention of making the rule setting a community quest!
In my opinion: one head is ok, a dozen of heads is ok*10!
A rule example is: Singles (blocks with only 1 transaction) will not be forged by the sender. This rule will make sure not to let senders of a single transaction block receive the fee.
I would like the community to understand the forging mechanism and help us find vulnerabilities and solutions to them!
Making this an open debate will cover our needs and engage individuals into constructive discussions!
*The link on the WhitePaper & Announcements will be made after the page is set!
There are no possible rules that will help against someone who will be using dozen of clients until there is no rule about zero balances. To get protected from multiaccounting we need to add rule about non zero balances that can forge. I say leave the rule about time spend and transactions but add some coefficient that depends on account balance. And if balance is 0 then then this coefficient is zero and all probability is 0 as well. This is very important, I bet there are already people setting up thousands of wallets for forging. A minimum balance would make this more difficult and could stimulate normal users to set up extra nodes, improving security. |
|
|
|
|
|
sava0123
|
|
September 23, 2014, 11:07:05 AM |
|
This is very important, I bet there are already people setting up thousands of wallets for forging. A minimum balance would make this more difficult and could stimulate normal users to set up extra nodes, improving security.
And we will be back to nxt forging system but with insta transactions and liteweight blockchain. Why reinvent the wheel if we can improve it? |
|
|
|
|
manfromaus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2014, 11:34:54 AM |
|
This is very important, I bet there are already people setting up thousands of wallets for forging. A minimum balance would make this more difficult and could stimulate normal users to set up extra nodes, improving security.
And we will be back to nxt forging system but with insta transactions and liteweight blockchain. Why reinvent the wheel if we can improve it? Except that's not at all where it'll be at. It'll still be PoA but with a requirement for having a minimum buy in in order to forge. Prevents "spam" of forging accounts, the same reason why transaction fees exist at particular levels of cost (preventing spam of transactions bloating the blockchain, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
