Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 03:16:09 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 [382] 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 ... 532 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Closed Thread  (Read 677670 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
LeFiste
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 07:14:17 AM
 #7621

I have a question, who decided on the 500,000 nodes threshold for forging? Shouldn't it be a tiered system where more % is earned based on the amount of connectivity the user is donating + amount of node within their tier? Tiers being similar to the tax brackets.

If 500k is the starting point, doesn't this just parallel our current shitty money system where the rich get richer and there is a gaping hole of a middle class? I would think a tiered system would be more fair, or useful to all. Correct me if I'm wrong or missing the big picture all together.

I thought about this too...and I think you are right

Nodeclub
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2014, 07:16:29 AM
 #7622

I have a question, who decided on the 500,000 nodes threshold for forging? Shouldn't it be a tiered system where more % is earned based on the amount of connectivity the user is donating + amount of node within their tier? Tiers being similar to the tax brackets.

If 500k is the starting point, doesn't this just parallel our current shitty money system where the rich get richer and there is a gaping hole of a middle class? I would think a tiered system would be more fair, or useful to all. Correct me if I'm wrong or missing the big picture all together.

We have already announced that in the future this amount will be reduced in proportion to the growth of NodeNet.

We fundamentally don't do multi-level network, 'cause in this case NodeNet loses its flexibility - only the peer network has a future.

Even in real life to earn you need to make at least a minimal effort. Even to win the lottery, you need at least to buy a lottery ticket Grin The middle class - it's the biggest hard workers, they knows the value of effort Smiley

So 500,000 it is not a million bucks yet, today it is less than $ 100 - the sum is more than equal to middle class guys who prefer to earn, rather than to receive Smiley

Node Dev Team
Nodeclub
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2014, 07:41:28 AM
 #7623

I sold And bought and sold and bought.
Now I have 3 times what I started with. Thanks dumpers!
Wink

Enjoy the moment Grin
Nevertheless, I'd recommend to keep 500,000 of earned funds on your online wallet 'cause it will benefit both you and others. You will help support the network and can thus earn without any risk of losing your investment.

Node Dev Team
Paramon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AM
Last edit: December 12, 2014, 10:35:34 AM by Paramon
 #7624

Ok, I'm finally accumulating a decent balance from my bter withdrawals into my wallet.  To forge, all I need to do is login and log out?  Or do I have to stay logged in?

I see guys have already answered you Smiley

If you or anybody else have 500,000 and stable access to the Internet, I'd highly recommend to keep it on your own wallet.

Today Anrdew (Paramon) told me that he forged 100,000 in less than 3 weeks (7981595429821076186).

I've had my wallet open with 500,000 node running 24/7 with minimal downtime and have forged less than 8,000 node.  Not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if he's just exploiting the system.

I do not think so. As far as I know, Andie launched his client on a dedicated server at a good channel. Most likely, his client keeps more stable connection with the others.

Yes I running node 7/24 on windows azure. My uptime 17 days + every day I have small transaction from bter (1.5k-2k).

Yes, I said to NodeClub that I find almost every 3 block per day and that my account has been increased by more than 100K NODE.

But not all the money extracted forging.

I did not think that it will be published on the forum. I would like to clarify.

Real statistics for forge in my account 7981595429821076186:

Found:                          89 blocks
Total fee forged:            25879.15682 NODE
Forged fee:
MIN                                   0.00001
MAX                             2501.86645
AVG                               290.77704

BTW I will give access to the api from my node where anyone will be able check forging block for any account number (login will be not required) soon.
GreenDude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 12:18:26 PM
 #7625



Nice nice.. Keep the good work.
vytasz7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 561
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 12:41:29 PM
 #7626

cant open new windows client ,when i try to open it flashes and disapiers .Didnt have any problems with older clients
Paramon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 12:54:42 PM
 #7627

cant open new windows client ,when i try to open it flashes and disapiers .Didnt have any problems with older clients

You can tray remove(move) db files from "C:\nxtl\db" folder.
gosuturtle2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 02:03:06 PM
 #7628

I have a question, who decided on the 500,000 nodes threshold for forging? Shouldn't it be a tiered system where more % is earned based on the amount of connectivity the user is donating + amount of node within their tier? Tiers being similar to the tax brackets.

If 500k is the starting point, doesn't this just parallel our current shitty money system where the rich get richer and there is a gaping hole of a middle class? I would think a tiered system would be more fair, or useful to all. Correct me if I'm wrong or missing the big picture all together.

We have already announced that in the future this amount will be reduced in proportion to the growth of NodeNet.

We fundamentally don't do multi-level network, 'cause in this case NodeNet loses its flexibility - only the peer network has a future.

Even in real life to earn you need to make at least a minimal effort. Even to win the lottery, you need at least to buy a lottery ticket Grin The middle class - it's the biggest hard workers, they knows the value of effort Smiley

So 500,000 it is not a million bucks yet, today it is less than $ 100 - the sum is more than equal to middle class guys who prefer to earn, rather than to receive Smiley

Oh okay, that makes sense thanks for clearing it up.
vytasz7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 561
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 02:46:45 PM
 #7629

cant open new windows client ,when i try to open it flashes and disapiers .Didnt have any problems with older clients

You can tray remove(move) db files from "C:\nxtl\db" folder.

i cant even open the client ,it keeps dissapiering
Paramon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 03:09:23 PM
 #7630

cant open new windows client ,when i try to open it flashes and disapiers .Didnt have any problems with older clients

You can tray remove(move) db files from "C:\nxtl\db" folder.

i cant even open the client ,it keeps dissapiering

Do you delete "C:\nxtl" folder?


If Yes, please give more info.(Windows version etc...)
Nexxie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 03:36:02 PM
 #7631


Can you give a little more information about the mac client?
Will users be able to use real coins? etc.

Best regards
NOjust
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 318
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 03:47:01 PM
 #7632


Can you give a little more information about the mac client?
Will users be able to use real coins? etc.

Best regards
anyone has tested this version?
stable is need.

BEATNIK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 05:02:56 PM
 #7633


Can you give a little more information about the mac client?
Will users be able to use real coins? etc.

Best regards
anyone has tested this version?
stable is need.

Mac Os 10.9 / 10.10 everything works perfectly Roll Eyes
Paramon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 05:37:30 PM
 #7634


Can you give a little more information about the mac client?
Will users be able to use real coins? etc.

Best regards
anyone has tested this version?
stable is need.

Mac Os 10.9 / 10.10 everything works perfectly Roll Eyes

I have only 10.10 I test (and build) client only on it when develop.
It didn't work on mac below 10.7

Quote

Can you give a little more information about the mac client?
Will users be able to use real coins? etc.
It will be (must be) same functionality as Windows and Linux
l8orre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 07:12:44 PM
 #7635


so what if I run two nodes and have them forge on the same account?

will that give collisions, or will that account simply gather more blocks?
TheRealSilk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 07:44:33 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2014, 08:00:29 PM by TheRealSilk
 #7636


so what if I run two nodes and have them forge on the same account?

will that give collisions, or will that account simply gather more blocks?

Your time will be considered for only one running client

However, you can run two different wallets, provided that it will be located on different servers

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
 
Instant Transactions
 
Non Bloating BlockChain
 

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
    ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
whitecloud
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 09:54:16 PM
 #7637

http://cointelegraph.com/news/113073/stellar-switches-to-centralized-system-after-node-issue-causes-accidental-fork
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 5453


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 05:40:17 AM
 #7638

Quote
Both the experts I talked to and members of the stellartalk.org forum mentioned one section of the code as the key change to the code:

    +    // move on asap if we are behind
    +    // If 80% of the nodes on your UNL have moved on, you should declare consensus
    +    if (((currentFinished * 100) / (currentProposers + 1)) > 80)
    +    {
    +        CondLog (forReal, lsWARNING, LedgerTiming) <<
    +            "We see no consensus, but 80% of nodes have moved on";
    +        failed = true;
    +        return true;
    +    }
    +
    +    if (currentAgreeTime <= LEDGER_MIN_CONSENSUS_TIME)

It cannot be confirmed that this was the cause of Stellar's problems, but it does confirm that the code was changed since Stellars' fork from Ripple, and does seem to match up with the issue. The Ripple explanation on why this issue doesn't affect them included node behavior, behavior that appears to have been modified.

“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
l8orre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:41:45 AM
Last edit: December 13, 2014, 07:52:19 AM by l8orre
 #7639

Your time will be considered for only one running client

However, you can run two different wallets, provided that it will be located on different servers

Thanks, that is reasonable! Just important to know that there won't be any conflicts.

I have another Question, sorry for not asking, it occurred to me only later.

When I am not comfortable to put my passphrase in a plaintext file ( clientConfig.js ), can I just put the real password in there, start node, and then take the password out again to not keep it there?

Depends on whether node accesses it repeatedly or only at boot, I guess... I'll just give it a try!
TheRealSilk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 10:02:38 AM
 #7640

Your time will be considered for only one running client

However, you can run two different wallets, provided that it will be located on different servers

Thanks, that is reasonable! Just important to know that there won't be any conflicts.

I have another Question, sorry for not asking, it occurred to me only later.

When I am not comfortable to put my passphrase in a plaintext file ( clientConfig.js ), can I just put the real password in there, start node, and then take the password out again to not keep it there?

Depends on whether node accesses it repeatedly or only at boot, I guess... I'll just give it a try!

You can enter the password via the web interface

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
 
Instant Transactions
 
Non Bloating BlockChain
 

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
    ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Pages: « 1 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 [382] 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 ... 532 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!