Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 03:27:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 402 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [NAUT] Nautiluscoin - First Coin w/Stabilization Fund - Digishield  (Read 901796 times)
drakoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000

see my profile


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 03:36:26 PM
 #3221

If I could give exact date/time I would, but if we miss that date/time then trust is lost.  I want this change to happen as much as anyone else as it has consumed WAY more of my TIME than I can afford to give!
-BK

I fully understand that. And I don't like deadlines myself, it's a horrible way to work.


What then about, for the "July- and August-action"

* Letting other people write it up, perhaps even here in the thread.
* Offering a bounty, if someone emerges who does this well, just share a few NAUT with him.
* Hiring someone who can do all the simpler things, under your supervision.


and most of all:

* Giving just a structured list, perhaps ordered by planned sequence of events, but without any dates?


no sign of a signature
PilotofBTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 03:36:54 PM
 #3222

When can we expect the PoS transition? It's been over 10 days since the code was finished, does it need more testing?

The dev said they were shooting for Thursday. How much of the thread did you read before asking this?
Pyramusx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250

Following on Twitter @pyramusx


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 03:38:14 PM
 #3223

When can we expect the PoS transition? It's been over 10 days since the code was finished, does it need more testing?

The dev said they were shooting for Thursday. How much of the thread did you read before asking this?

Lol the worst that can happen would be a botched PoS transition so it is great for NAUT that BK and whoever is helping him are being cautious.

BK_PHI (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 03:38:45 PM
 #3224


If I could give exact date/time I would, but if we miss that date/time then trust is lost.  I want this change to happen as much as anyone else as it has consumed WAY more of my TIME than I can afford to give!
-BK

I fully understand that. And I don't like deadlines myself, it's a horrible way to work.


What then about:

* Letting other people write it up, perhaps even here in the thread.
* Hiring someone who can do all the simpler things, under your supervision.


and most of all:

* Giving just a structured list, perhaps ordered by planned sequence of events, but without any dates?



I meant dates just for PoS - that is all I am focused on right now...then I will finish the business plan for NAUT

If members of the community have projects they think will help the value, by all means go for it!



IncreaseMyT
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 04:56:47 PM
 #3225

no botches gonna fly high fo sho  Shocked
drakoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000

see my profile


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 09:13:24 PM
 #3226


-->

Quote
Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, [no address given] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Server at explorer.nautiluscoin.com Port 80

?

no sign of a signature
PilotofBTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 09:25:40 PM
 #3227


-->

Quote
Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, [no address given] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Server at explorer.nautiluscoin.com Port 80

?

Yes, I don't think that one ever works. Check out this one: http://nautinsight.buddylabsapps.com/
whatdidshedo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 09:48:28 PM
 #3228

remember those 40btc sell off, must be fitch panic selling newb lol

nwfella
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1000

Well hello there!


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:23:28 PM
 #3229

Went ahead and picked up a few of these puppies.  Interested in seeing how this coin develops.

¯¯̿̿¯̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿̿)͇̿̿)̿̿̿̿ '̿̿̿̿̿̿\̵͇̿̿\=(•̪̀●́)=o/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿

Gimme the crypto!!
Xtal__
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:37:09 PM
 #3230

Went ahead and picked up a few of these puppies.  Interested in seeing how this coin develops.

Me too.
hokus_pokus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:56:50 PM
 #3231

Can we get a vote on whether to go PoS?

hokus_pokus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:59:01 PM
 #3232


Support is very low for most coins though. I think the recent VRC hack caused a ton of big holders to withdraw their coins and wait things out. We might very well see a very quiet market for a little while until things clear out.

I also pulled nearly everything out, don't like that pull-back at all. I also think that VRC shouldn't let Mintpal influence their coin or the whole crypto scene.

Its not Mintpal alone. VRC is near-dead without rollback beacuse who invests in a POS coin with 30% of the money supply in the hands of a criminal? No wonder vrc community praises their dev, becasue he save their investment. Still bad and should have never happended imo.

And regarding the price:

Cryptos have a hard time (vrc, nav, other stuff), the price is being surpressed since days, some potential buyers call themselves sidelined (me too) because the uncertainty about pos and our all time dumping miners, it might get cheaper (or not). We just have to make sure that once this coin is POS, that there is a good roadmap (important points in drakoin's last page) and this coin will flourish.
We really need to think long and hard about this POS transition.
IncreaseMyT
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 11:00:15 PM
 #3233

Vote?

Why wouldn't we want POS? of course I'm all for it

Lets not blame this on POS and try to create some FUD, the truth is its the exchanges fault for not putting enough in cold storage, if those precautions would have been followed this would not have happened.
hokus_pokus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:03:28 PM
 #3234

Vote?

Why wouldn't we want POS? of course I'm all for it
You don't represent "we" you represent "you"
FlyingMongoose
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:05:13 PM
 #3235

Vote?

Why wouldn't we want POS? of course I'm all for it
You don't represent "we" you represent "you"

In this statement I agree with him, and therefor, he represents my opinion (as well as many other members of the Nautiluscoin community, but I will not claim to know who)

qoinpro.com/951c974b34f66cc68e805832df0c9d8c
IncreaseMyT
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 11:05:48 PM
 #3236

Vote?

Why wouldn't we want POS? of course I'm all for it
You don't represent "we" you represent "you"

what did that even mean?

Its a question not a statement.  as I said I am all for it.

So please explain why this POS could be so bad, I love FUD, means good things are coming.

did you just start posting in here all of the sudden?  seems like some hokus pokus  Grin
HKBvM
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 398
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:10:32 PM
 #3237

Can we get a vote on whether to go PoS?



I dont think so. For once the active community here is clearly in favour of POS, there was no one to raise any concerns. I believe BK wants NAUT as an investment, with investors getting rewarded for holding the coins. If that is the intention of NAUT, POS is clearly the way to go. POW is not exactly a benefit for early buyers, as new coins are constantly generated and devalueing investments. The community is dicsussing changing to POS since weeks now, most of the work is done, we wont go back.

POS has some disadvantages, no question. What happened to VRC would have been pretty severe for any coin, POW or POS, and what happened to NAV and C2 was bad, but could have been prevented if people were staking their coins.
hokus_pokus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:12:36 PM
 #3238

Vote?

Why wouldn't we want POS? of course I'm all for it
You don't represent "we" you represent "you"

what did that even mean?

Its a question not a statement.  as I said I am all for it.

So please explain why this POS could be so bad, I love FUD, means good things are coming.

did you just start posting in here all of the sudden?  seems like some hokus pokus  Grin
No, it's not FUD or whatever they call asking a question nowadays. I brought up an issue and was trying to get some input into the current "state of crypto" and the problems we have been seeing with PoS coins. I noticed some posts from members that are on the fence about PoS and thought it would be a important topic. I want see good things for NAUT so that is why I am asking for a vote.
IncreaseMyT
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 11:15:01 PM
 #3239

just checkin.  but i doubt we will go back, as pointed out a lot of work has been done.  Many of us are waiting patiently for this to be implemented.
hokus_pokus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:18:39 PM
 #3240

Can we get a vote on whether to go PoS?



I dont think so. For once the active community here is clearly in favour of POS, there was no one to raise any concerns. I believe BK wants NAUT as an investment, with investors getting rewarded for holding the coins. If that is the intention of NAUT, POS is clearly the way to go. POW is not exactly a benefit for early buyers, as new coins are constantly generated and devalueing investments. The community is dicsussing changing to POS since weeks now, most of the work is done, we wont go back.

POS has some disadvantages, no question. What happened to VRC would have been pretty severe for any coin, POW or POS, and what happened to NAV and C2 was bad, but could have been prevented if people were staking their coins.
So what's to stop some "big" investor buying a ton of NAUT...Not very decentralized..is it? We know Bryce has over 100,000 of them. When it comes time to stake with PoS, does he control the network?  Really guys...come on'  
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 402 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!