Are they talking about how Bryce says one thing one week, and a complete opposite 3 weeks later? Bryce has found another puppet, as even on his own show..he (Bryce) has shown to be an absolute liar, again.
What has he lied about? Just to be clear, if he *implies* something at one point then *says* something different later, that's not lying.
Oh, im glad you asked.. watch a few minutes minutes of each of the following links.
Exhibit A) Stating A public P&D & buy back, of his coin with naut, on an adderess that no longer has the funds:
http://youtu.be/UMjrjpCPjpo?t=48m22s Claimed Fund Address NasWubPMuMaExrP94u6F2jFoeKM154r9up
Exhibit B) Stating he does NOT do P&D's ever, and they are evil and destructive:
http://youtu.be/fmb0xQvBGss?t=6m18sFurthermore, Mr Seaman is not a Journalist, if he was, he would be asking the tough questions, such as " Why are you clearly stating on my video-casts, 2 completely different things "
URL Proof of the statement of the buyback:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=616288.0Photo of the statement (for the ones that dont want to go to the link)
URL of proof that these coins (Naut) are gone:
http://nautinsight.buddylabsapps.com/address/NasWubPMuMaExrP94u6F2jFoeKM154r9upPhoto ( for the ones that dont want to go to the link )
I would like to believe that David Seaman is smart enough, to see threw the smoke & mirrors, however it's becoming more and more apparent, that there may be some compensation involved, as there is no way this is any sort of neutral Journalism, in any shape fashion or form.
"Journalism has developed a variety of ethics and standards. While objectivity and a lack of bias are of primary concern and importance, more liberal types of journalism, such as advocacy journalism and activism, intentionally adopt a non-objective viewpoint. This has become more prevalent with the advent of social media and blogs, as well as other platforms that are used to manipulate or sway social and political opinions and policies. These platforms often project extreme bias, as "sources" are not always held accountable or considered necessary in order to produce a written, televised or otherwise "published" end product."
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalist I truly hope, that in no way , Bryce Weiner is involved with Nautilus coin in any sort of official capacity , aside from being a holder, investor, speculator, trader, or promoter.
