HashInvest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:02:31 PM |
|
>>> Join QuazarCoin Pool http://qcn.hashinvest.net / EU <<<minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://qcn.hashinvest.net:13333 -u YOUR_ADDRESS -p xQCN Getting Started for Linux, Windows and Mac users. Now with instant support! / UTC+6
|
|
|
|
polecrab
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:02:18 PM |
|
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet:
I think it is risky to change the payment id while payments are still to be processed, are you sure Poloniex can handle that? They may only store one payment id per account/coin. Also, I wouldn't use an exchange transfer to cleanup dust, those transfers take longer and it just makes everything harder to track. Such a large transaction for such a small amount could sit around for a while before being included in a block, and may eventually be rejected and returned to your wallet. I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:36:25 PM |
|
I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem.
Are we able to send coins from 1 wallet to same wallet ?!
|
|
|
|
trogdorjw73
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:46:08 PM |
|
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet:
I think it is risky to change the payment id while payments are still to be processed, are you sure Poloniex can handle that? They may only store one payment id per account/coin. Also, I wouldn't use an exchange transfer to cleanup dust, those transfers take longer and it just makes everything harder to track. Such a large transaction for such a small amount could sit around for a while before being included in a block, and may eventually be rejected and returned to your wallet. I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem. Mining for pools where you are more than 1% can be rather difficult, and despite all the talk of decentralization it's actually provably less profitable to mine at a small pool than at a large pool. If it's not, then why doesn't everyone just stick with solo mining forever? Because you'll likely never find a single block that way, just like a small pool will only find blocks infrequently. A pool with 3% of the hash rate for example is likely to find about 2.7% of blocks in my experience, while a pool with 1% might only find 0.5% of the blocks. And a pool with 35% of the hash rate might find 37% of blocks. But that's a topic for discussion elsewhere. I'm mining a decent amount of coins right now, which is of course generating tons of small payouts over time. What's the best way to consolidate those so I can do one or two larger transfers to an exchange? Do I just run: transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount] And do that multiple times until I can send larger transactions of 10 to 100 coins without having the wallet balk about having too many inputs? I guess I'd have to wait for confirmation on the transfers as well, but better than than ending up with vaporized coins. LOL
|
|
|
|
polecrab
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:53:10 PM Last edit: June 20, 2014, 09:29:06 AM by polecrab |
|
Mining for pools where you are more than 1% can be rather difficult, and despite all the talk of decentralization it's actually provably less profitable to mine at a small pool than at a large pool. If it's not, then why doesn't everyone just stick with solo mining forever? Because you'll likely never find a single block that way, just like a small pool will only find blocks infrequently. A pool with 3% of the hash rate for example is likely to find about 2.7% of blocks in my experience, while a pool with 1% might only find 0.5% of the blocks. And a pool with 35% of the hash rate might find 37% of blocks. But that's a topic for discussion elsewhere.
I'm mining a decent amount of coins right now, which is of course generating tons of small payouts over time. What's the best way to consolidate those so I can do one or two larger transfers to an exchange? Do I just run:
transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount] [My Address]
And do that multiple times until I can send larger transactions of 10 to 100 coins without having the wallet balk about having too many inputs? I guess I'd have to wait for confirmation on the transfers as well, but better than than ending up with vaporized coins. LOL
Yes that will work. I send as much as will fit (approximately) in a single payment, and keep sending that payment again and again until there is little left. Then wait for it to return as consolidated inputs. N.B. you only need to do: transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount]
The repeated address in your command is payment id, but does no harm: transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount] [My Address=Payment Id]
|
|
|
|
polecrab
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:59:40 PM |
|
Mining for pools where you are more than 1% can be rather difficult, and despite all the talk of decentralization it's actually provably less profitable to mine at a small pool than at a large pool. If it's not, then why doesn't everyone just stick with solo mining forever? Because you'll likely never find a single block that way, just like a small pool will only find blocks infrequently. A pool with 3% of the hash rate for example is likely to find about 2.7% of blocks in my experience, while a pool with 1% might only find 0.5% of the blocks. And a pool with 35% of the hash rate might find 37% of blocks. But that's a topic for discussion elsewhere.
I don't doubt that is correct. I also have found that the pools not generating dust for my hashrate are not at all reliable. It seems to be a problem with all the Bytecoin code derived coins. Other coins I have mined in pools (litecoin and vertcoin) do not seem to have these problems.
|
|
|
|
zjz_lgd
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
zjz_lgd
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:47:38 AM |
|
QuazarCoin is great, and what's the difference from the XMR. They look like the same thing. We like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot! when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait! good luck!
|
ShareCoin Free and Fair Distribution, Share to moon! SbuXjdoiErjmAoGd3s4jcyEWiRifuorVv3
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:09:07 AM |
|
QuazarCoin is great, and what's the difference from the XMR. They look like the same thing. We like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot! when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait! good luck! 1.XMR has a bit more hype 2.XMR has several developers, and this has been seen as a positive. 3.XMR has a different emission curve. That said, the developer of this coin has said he hopes to announce a development team too at some point, so that should be positive. This developer has done many things right but it's a lot to do without help. It's good to see him coming up with his own ideas to improve things in the XMR code too.
|
|
|
|
|
argentinx
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:49:49 AM |
|
2014-Jun-20 07:48:32.268542 [P2P7]Selected peer: 18041371098255128933 114.228.69 .152:23080[white=1] last_seen: d1.h20.m54.s17 2014-Jun-20 07:48:32.268542 [P2P7]Connecting to 114.228.69.152:23080(white=1, la st_seen: d1.h20.m54.s17)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.285054 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 114.228.69.15 2:23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.290511 [P2P7]Selected peer: 13263566046364305543 77.255.110 .213:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h14.m20.s15 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.297790 [P2P7]Connecting to 77.255.110.213:23080(white=0, la st_seen: d1.h14.m20.s15)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.308686 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 77.255.110.21 3:23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.312319 [P2P7]Selected peer: 13679926584330439148 115.77.15. 113:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h14.m56.s33 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.318686 [P2P7]Connecting to 115.77.15.113:23080(white=0, las t_seen: d1.h14.m56.s33)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.323749 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 115.77.15.113 :23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.328294 [P2P7]Selected peer: 11462659978619655692 222.50.3.2 50:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h16.m49.s58 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.332310 [P2P7]Connecting to 222.50.3.250:23080(white=0, last _seen: d1.h16.m49.s58)... and 1 hour dont download the block What should I do?
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
June 20, 2014, 06:09:36 AM |
|
2014-Jun-20 07:48:32.268542 [P2P7]Selected peer: 18041371098255128933 114.228.69 .152:23080[white=1] last_seen: d1.h20.m54.s17 2014-Jun-20 07:48:32.268542 [P2P7]Connecting to 114.228.69.152:23080(white=1, la st_seen: d1.h20.m54.s17)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.285054 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 114.228.69.15 2:23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.290511 [P2P7]Selected peer: 13263566046364305543 77.255.110 .213:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h14.m20.s15 2014-Jun-20 07:48:37.297790 [P2P7]Connecting to 77.255.110.213:23080(white=0, la st_seen: d1.h14.m20.s15)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.308686 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 77.255.110.21 3:23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.312319 [P2P7]Selected peer: 13679926584330439148 115.77.15. 113:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h14.m56.s33 2014-Jun-20 07:48:42.318686 [P2P7]Connecting to 115.77.15.113:23080(white=0, las t_seen: d1.h14.m56.s33)... 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.323749 [P2P7][0.0.0.0:0 OUT]Connect failed to 115.77.15.113 :23080 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.328294 [P2P7]Selected peer: 11462659978619655692 222.50.3.2 50:23080[white=0] last_seen: d1.h16.m49.s58 2014-Jun-20 07:48:47.332310 [P2P7]Connecting to 222.50.3.250:23080(white=0, last _seen: d1.h16.m49.s58)... and 1 hour dont download the block What should I do? What operating system?
|
|
|
|
argentinx
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 06:11:44 AM |
|
windows i'have download the last binary in homepage but is the seems i'have set the log to 2 to see those written without standing still so long 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.188227 Blockchain initialized. last block: 28712, d1.h14.m3 2.s13 time ago, current difficulty: 63361990 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.188227 Core initialized OK 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.188227 Starting core rpc server... 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.188227 Run net_service loop( 2 threads)... 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.219477 [SRV_MAIN]Core rpc server started ok 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.219477 [SRV_MAIN]Starting p2p net loop... 2014-Jun-20 07:51:50.219477 [SRV_MAIN]Run net_service loop( 10 threads)... 2014-Jun-20 07:51:51.219519 [P2P7] ********************************************************************** The daemon will start synchronizing with the network. It may take up to several hours.
You can set the level of process detailization* through "set_log <level>" comman d*, where <level> is between 0 (no details) and 4 (very verbose).
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
Note: in case you need to interrupt the process, use "exit" command. Otherwise, the current progress won't be saved. **********************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
ParkExcite
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:12:29 AM |
|
I stop mining QCN :/ Too much bug in the Wallet, everything i send in the exchange never arrive. Before there was no problem.... What's going on ?
Edit: Here are my transaction who never arrived:
1) transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP 5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.84 c046ad7272438caf683833d2f0a6fde7b7bdb1eac8b8ef7d53456618cd1c70d1 2014-Jun-17 17:09:19.882917 Money successfully sent, transaction <c6b4282ce6a2b77d50e5551ce92ce80a6b79c7f0c710e615514b4525d4bca3b7>
2) transfer 0 1SEtGDSVATrNhXQdSa3Burcigx126HyMuczFQJby3NsQf5xTuzQwUuvGvnfqDHNDXkSVG7DmHeJJMb3 Tj3Vi2NXb6ecfLeR 0.54 06946aa78d0a4cffa9c7c163a2ea257af0db8b242b64474881aa90ce48374fef 2014-Jun-17 18:01:33.557647 Money successfully sent, transaction <1721ebe7931686feb5cc644d935d5b2857f317084ef92104089d20946db9e2f2>
Try to send at poloniex and bittrex....
More than 24H and my coins are still lost....
|
|
|
|
ciocgun
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:13:35 AM |
|
Bittrex ferund my coin but i'm waiting from poloniex.. dev any news of transaction issues?
|
|
|
|
OracionSeis (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:06:40 PM |
|
Now the transactions are accumulated in tx pool and assigned to blocks under new criteria, for example commission and median size. If your transaction doesn't fit the conditions (e.g. exceeds block median) it waits for another block and that's why the time for the transaction can increase to infinity. If your transaction isn't transferred within 24h it's returned to your wallet. What to do if passed 24 hours and QCN wasn't transferred and didn't return in your wallet?You must delete the 'wallet.bin' file. Pay attention! Don't delete the '.keys' file!After this resynchronize your wallet. You must type the command in the simplewallet window: simplewallet --wallet-file=wallet.bin --pass=your_password After sync you must type & commands.
|
Time off to sleep ... ( ̄︶ ̄)~
|
|
|
OracionSeis (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:12:40 PM |
|
Edit: PS, I also notice that when I type balance in my wallet now, I get the following: balance: 0.793321787690, unlocked balance: 0.652022415308 There's a difference of 0.14 QCN, give or take, and it has been like that since I sent the seven transactions. Again, confusing would be an appropriate term for what's going on. It seems like each transaction included some "dust" coins, and when the transaction is processed by the receiver I got that dust back. I can see that prior to the above my "unlocked balance" was 0.647195415308, and if I add the four "receieved" lines to that I end up with the current 0.652022415308.
When you send a transaction a random amount is charged. It depends on the quantity of inputs and it's always bigger then the amount you've specified. After the transaction is completed you recieve the overcharged amount back.
|
Time off to sleep ... ( ̄︶ ̄)~
|
|
|
ciocgun
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:45:37 PM |
|
Now the transactions are accumulated in tx pool and assigned to blocks under new criteria, for example commission and median size. If your transaction doesn't fit the conditions (e.g. exceeds block median) it waits for another block and that's why the time for the transaction can increase to infinity. If your transaction isn't transferred within 24h it's returned to your wallet. What to do if passed 24 hours and QCN wasn't transferred and didn't return in your wallet?You must delete the 'wallet.bin' file. Pay attention! Don't delete the '.keys' file!After this resynchronize your wallet. You must type the command in the simplewallet window: simplewallet --wallet-file=wallet.bin --pass=your_password After sync you must type & commands. thank you dev..my qcn are back! Support QCN!
|
|
|
|
OracionSeis (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2014, 02:57:23 PM |
|
Thank you! I updated the top posts.
|
Time off to sleep ... ( ̄︶ ̄)~
|
|
|
OracionSeis (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2014, 03:03:42 PM |
|
Now the transactions are accumulated in tx pool and assigned to blocks under new criteria, for example commission and median size. If your transaction doesn't fit the conditions (e.g. exceeds block median) it waits for another block and that's why the time for the transaction can increase to infinity. If your transaction isn't transferred within 24h it's returned to your wallet. What to do if passed 24 hours and QCN wasn't transferred and didn't return in your wallet?You must delete the 'wallet.bin' file. Pay attention! Don't delete the '.keys' file!After this resynchronize your wallet. You must type the command in the simplewallet window: simplewallet --wallet-file=wallet.bin --pass=your_password After sync you must type & commands. thank you dev..my qcn are back! Support QCN! Welcome
|
Time off to sleep ... ( ̄︶ ̄)~
|
|
|
|