Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 07:21:47 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 [144] 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 ... 215 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Slimcoin : Proof of Burn NEW BLOCK GEN, Mineable by low power computer!  (Read 284894 times)
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 01:47:12 PM
 #2861

Can someone post a PoB block height or hash ?
Example heights:
531,539,550,554,560
...
12987,12989,12994,12996,12999

You can find them yourself (other than by messing with the code) using getblock(), check if the hash == 0.

Or if you have the debug.log, the checkIndex output:
Code:
12994 ------------------------------- 0 1 0 1 4401 2 1
|     |                               | | | | |    | `- burnCTxOut
|     |                               | | | | |    `- burnCTx
|     |                               | | | | `- burnBlkHeight
|     |                               | | | `- fProofOfBurn
|     |                               | | `- PoS
|     |                               | `- PoB
|     |                               `- PoW
|     `- dashes galore.
`- height

sandor111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 01:51:39 PM
 #2862

People, don't forget that the "blocks" figure you are seeing in getinfo/getmininginfo includes PoB/PoS blocks.
Actually there are a lot of PoB/PoS blocks mined ATM, so it's not accurate to look at the figure and compare it to the PoW blocks the pool has mined.
Everything is fine. Smiley

Your other IP is down : 92.222.27.45 / 3333

Thank you for letting me know.

Wirel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 02:29:12 PM
 #2863

I have got strange wallet behaviour, had found a PoB block with value of 8 SLM but if i click on transaction's details the amount is +0.11 SLM. I have other PoB blocks with different values between transaction list and details ( and i think balance) import.
yang5034
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 04:53:11 PM
 #2864

i felt after reluanch pob blocks  is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of  the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
ynyjl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 04:59:43 PM
 #2865

Why most of the mining block for pos?
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 05:04:14 PM
 #2866

i felt after reluanch pob blocks  is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of  the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .


    After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins )
sp00lin9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 05:48:00 PM
 #2867

I'm staking! Woo-hoo! Cheesy
TaijiBagua
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 05:52:26 PM
 #2868

i felt after reluanch pob blocks  is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of  the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .


    After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins )


It's hard to get PoB block now.   117231 slm have been burned.
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 06:09:17 PM
 #2869

i felt after reluanch pob blocks  is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of  the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .


    After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins )


It's hard to get PoB block now.   117231 slm have been burned.


     No, it is simple, I have got env 1.2% so I should receive in mean 1.2% of all POB block. After 24h I think more than 100 blocks have been found. So I should at least have seen 1 mint block in my wallet.................

    The question is: how many POB blocks have been found in 24h HuhHuh
mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 06:17:44 PM
 #2870

DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.

Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 06:29:27 PM
 #2871

DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.


Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks.

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
TaijiBagua
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 06:30:10 PM
 #2872

i felt after reluanch pob blocks  is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of  the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .


    After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins )


It's hard to get PoB block now.   117231 slm have been burned.


     No, it is simple, I have got env 1.2% so I should receive in mean 1.2% of all POB block. After 24h I think more than 100 blocks have been found. So I should at least have seen 1 mint block in my wallet.................

    The question is: how many POB blocks have been found in 24h HuhHuh


sounds reasonable...
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 07:22:26 PM
 #2873

DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.


Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks.


TheRealSteve  uses to provide us table of stats. It could be interesting now to see if we have a diff.  


IE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.msg7097546#msg7097546
mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 07:35:46 PM
 #2874

DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.


Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks.

I guess it's the number of POW blocks - 30 out of 200. Could POS blocks distort the algorithm? They pop up very often. A lot more often then POB blocks for similar share of coins. At the same time POW difficulty is pretty high for a coin without exchange. Could the algorithm try to adjust difficulty for POW+POS blocks together?

Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 07:44:52 PM
 #2875

Steve  uses to provide us table of stats. It could be interesting now to see if we have a diff. 
I plan to - starting at the latest hard fork - just have to free up some time to do so (and shut down the wallet, restart with zero connections, as right now it's completely pegged with network and disk I/O).  I can't help but think the current block generation rate appears to be higher, at least.  But that might be psychology after the days of nothing happening Smiley

mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2014, 07:54:33 PM
 #2876

DEV, you should check the POS algorithm - it overloads the CPU as primer said before (I was forced to transfer all coins to other wallet to fix it) and distorts a sensible POW/POB algorithm. At the same time it's half cents per block doesn't make any sense for miners - I just closed the wallet with all my coins.

Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 08:30:00 PM
 #2877

DEV, you should check the POS algorithm - it overloads the CPU as primer said before (I was forced to transfer all coins to other wallet to fix it) and distorts a sensible POW/POB algorithm. At the same time it's half cents per block doesn't make any sense for miners - I just closed the wallet with all my coins.


    Many POS coin use the algo:

    Takes a transaction if eligible, then calculates the interest then add the interest and split the transaction in two news transaction, and so on.

    The problem is that algo is creating many transactions until the transaction are too small to split resulting in multitude of transaction you never made.  Notes that the wallet when the amount of transaction is important takes more CPU, that's your problem.

    And this is a real problem seen in majority of POS coins actually.


primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2014, 09:15:20 PM
 #2878

Someone email bter or the member who first posted about bter adding SLM to re-enable deposits!!
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 23, 2014, 09:54:06 PM
 #2879

   DEV  FYI:

    

  

  


    Two pictures are same transaction received, I suppose this transaction came from POOL

primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2014, 10:01:55 PM
 #2880

  DEV  FYI:

    

  

  


    Two pictures are same transaction received, I suppose this transaction came from POOL



Yeah , known bug..
Pages: « 1 ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 [144] 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 ... 215 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!