TheRealSteve
|
|
June 23, 2014, 01:47:12 PM |
|
Can someone post a PoB block height or hash ?
Example heights: 531,539,550,554,560 ... 12987,12989,12994,12996,12999 You can find them yourself (other than by messing with the code) using getblock(), check if the hash == 0. Or if you have the debug.log, the checkIndex output: 12994 ------------------------------- 0 1 0 1 4401 2 1 | | | | | | | | `- burnCTxOut | | | | | | | `- burnCTx | | | | | | `- burnBlkHeight | | | | | `- fProofOfBurn | | | | `- PoS | | | `- PoB | | `- PoW | `- dashes galore. `- height
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 23, 2014, 01:51:39 PM |
|
People, don't forget that the "blocks" figure you are seeing in getinfo/getmininginfo includes PoB/PoS blocks. Actually there are a lot of PoB/PoS blocks mined ATM, so it's not accurate to look at the figure and compare it to the PoW blocks the pool has mined. Everything is fine. Your other IP is down : 92.222.27.45 / 3333 Thank you for letting me know.
|
|
|
|
Wirel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
June 23, 2014, 02:29:12 PM |
|
I have got strange wallet behaviour, had found a PoB block with value of 8 SLM but if i click on transaction's details the amount is +0.11 SLM. I have other PoB blocks with different values between transaction list and details ( and i think balance) import.
|
|
|
|
yang5034
|
|
June 23, 2014, 04:53:11 PM |
|
i felt after reluanch pob blocks is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
|
|
|
|
ynyjl
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
June 23, 2014, 04:59:43 PM |
|
Why most of the mining block for pos?
|
|
|
|
glop
|
|
June 23, 2014, 05:04:14 PM |
|
i felt after reluanch pob blocks is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins )
|
|
|
|
sp00lin9
|
|
June 23, 2014, 05:48:00 PM |
|
I'm staking! Woo-hoo!
|
|
|
|
TaijiBagua
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 23, 2014, 05:52:26 PM |
|
i felt after reluanch pob blocks is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins ) It's hard to get PoB block now. 117231 slm have been burned.
|
|
|
|
glop
|
|
June 23, 2014, 06:09:17 PM |
|
i felt after reluanch pob blocks is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins ) It's hard to get PoB block now. 117231 slm have been burned. No, it is simple, I have got env 1.2% so I should receive in mean 1.2% of all POB block. After 24h I think more than 100 blocks have been found. So I should at least have seen 1 mint block in my wallet................. The question is: how many POB blocks have been found in 24h
|
|
|
|
mbk
|
|
June 23, 2014, 06:17:44 PM |
|
DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.
|
|
|
|
slimcoin (OP)
|
|
June 23, 2014, 06:29:27 PM |
|
DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.
Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks.
|
-Much Donate BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
|
|
|
TaijiBagua
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 23, 2014, 06:30:10 PM |
|
i felt after reluanch pob blocks is much hard to find now,as i kept the pecentage of the burn coins. maybe half or 30% .
After 1 day continue, 0 POB block found ( with 1400 burnt coins ) It's hard to get PoB block now. 117231 slm have been burned. No, it is simple, I have got env 1.2% so I should receive in mean 1.2% of all POB block. After 24h I think more than 100 blocks have been found. So I should at least have seen 1 mint block in my wallet................. The question is: how many POB blocks have been found in 24h sounds reasonable...
|
|
|
|
glop
|
|
June 23, 2014, 07:22:26 PM |
|
DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.
Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks. TheRealSteve uses to provide us table of stats. It could be interesting now to see if we have a diff. IE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.msg7097546#msg7097546
|
|
|
|
mbk
|
|
June 23, 2014, 07:35:46 PM |
|
DEV, please, look at POB blocks algorithm. Something's definitely wrong. I could post some numbers later if you need. Looks like SlimCoinAfterBurner() is called a lot rarely lately. Just 30 calls out of 200 blocks. About 6 calls an hour. It's a lot less it was before. POS blocks could distort it somehow. It was different before them. Everything else looks fine.
Out of those 200 blocks, how many were PoW. The SlimCoinAfterBurner() is only called every time a new PoW block is found, thus PoB blocks can only be found after PoW blocks, not PoS blocks. I guess it's the number of POW blocks - 30 out of 200. Could POS blocks distort the algorithm? They pop up very often. A lot more often then POB blocks for similar share of coins. At the same time POW difficulty is pretty high for a coin without exchange. Could the algorithm try to adjust difficulty for POW+POS blocks together?
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
June 23, 2014, 07:44:52 PM |
|
Steve uses to provide us table of stats. It could be interesting now to see if we have a diff.
I plan to - starting at the latest hard fork - just have to free up some time to do so (and shut down the wallet, restart with zero connections, as right now it's completely pegged with network and disk I/O). I can't help but think the current block generation rate appears to be higher, at least. But that might be psychology after the days of nothing happening
|
|
|
|
mbk
|
|
June 23, 2014, 07:54:33 PM |
|
DEV, you should check the POS algorithm - it overloads the CPU as primer said before (I was forced to transfer all coins to other wallet to fix it) and distorts a sensible POW/POB algorithm. At the same time it's half cents per block doesn't make any sense for miners - I just closed the wallet with all my coins.
|
|
|
|
glop
|
|
June 23, 2014, 08:30:00 PM |
|
DEV, you should check the POS algorithm - it overloads the CPU as primer said before (I was forced to transfer all coins to other wallet to fix it) and distorts a sensible POW/POB algorithm. At the same time it's half cents per block doesn't make any sense for miners - I just closed the wallet with all my coins.
Many POS coin use the algo: Takes a transaction if eligible, then calculates the interest then add the interest and split the transaction in two news transaction, and so on. The problem is that algo is creating many transactions until the transaction are too small to split resulting in multitude of transaction you never made. Notes that the wallet when the amount of transaction is important takes more CPU, that's your problem. And this is a real problem seen in majority of POS coins actually.
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 09:15:20 PM |
|
Someone email bter or the member who first posted about bter adding SLM to re-enable deposits!!
|
|
|
|
glop
|
|
June 23, 2014, 09:54:06 PM |
|
DEV FYI: Two pictures are same transaction received, I suppose this transaction came from POOL
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2014, 10:01:55 PM |
|
DEV FYI: Two pictures are same transaction received, I suppose this transaction came from POOL Yeah , known bug..
|
|
|
|
|