Steve uses to provide us table of stats. It could be interesting now to see if we have a diff.
I plan to - starting at the latest hard fork [...] I can't help but think the current block generation rate appears to be higher, at least. But that might be psychology after the days of nothing happening
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
Block generation was definitely lots faster - I guess the network took a while to balance out all the hashing power thrown at it that was ready to go as soon as the update was posted.
Here's some basic graphs from the re-launch:
Yep, those who got in early on the relaunch made a mint
![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
Keen observers might see a single dot in the otherwise 'down' period. That's block #15936, minted 2014-06-20 06:58:03 . (15937 and 15938 were also minted before the relaunch, but only by about an hour).
There's also a metric somethingsomething of PoS blocks now, so that's got its own bits and pieces in some of the graphs.
Perhaps also of interest - the massive block generation just after relaunch.
In the first 4 hours, ~420 blocks. Counting just the PoW blocks, ~331. That gives an interval time between PoW blocks of ~43.5s.
Compare that to the last 4 hours, ~194 blocks. PoW blocks, ~26. Interval: ~553.8s.
The vast majority of the later blocks appear to be PoS. I think the last 12 hours or so in the dataset were relatively stable, so breaking down blocks in that period:
PoW: 98
PoB: 28
PoS: 445
Like this post? Donate Slimcoin: STDpqwvEC6banMNzfNYDTuZy8xspHpGuNj