[OLD][CSC]CasinoCoin ♠ A Digital Currency For The Regulated Online Gaming Sector

[Bitcoinguru99]

Malta loves blockchain an csc gaming solution is just what they are waiting for...

[barbeq]

Malta loves blockchain an csc gaming solution is just what they are waiting for...

Sure, Malta is waiting for some incompetent one man band who cannot even launch one product within 2 years.

Any future blockchain gaming payment solution is likely to be based on ETH.  It has all the necessary features, including a sub-minute block time, and it can easily incorporate all the features of the Prypto closed loop system, which never took off.

Face it, CSC is dead.  

I sold my coins to the poster who offered 5 BTC for them a few posts above. The trade went through on Alcurex.  I was subsequently able to sell a further 100k on Cryptopia to some hopeful but misguided bidders.

Already made 20% gains after reinvesting them in Factom and ETH.

You can waste your time waiting for anything to happen in CSC (hint: never) or make money in the ongoing race for which coin will become the next BTC.  

[LongAndShort]

Malta loves blockchain an csc gaming solution is just what they are waiting for...

Sure, Malta is waiting for some incompetent one man band who cannot even launch one product within 2 years.

Any future blockchain gaming payment solution is likely to be based on ETH.  It has all the necessary features, including a sub-minute block time, and it can easily incorporate all the features of the Prypto closed loop system, which never took off.

Face it, CSC is dead.  

I sold my coins to the poster who offered 5 BTC for them a few posts above. The trade went through on Alcurex.  I was subsequently able to sell a further 100k on Cryptopia to some hopeful but misguided bidders.

Already made 20% gains after reinvesting them in Factom and ETH.

You can waste your time waiting for anything to happen in CSC (hint: never) or make money in the ongoing race for which coin will become the next BTC.  

And now you are here bagging the project and its developers out, in the hope that it never gets anywhere. Thats so you can feel safe in your reckless decision to sell 1mill coins. Am i correct, if you are to be truly honest with yourself? Or am i way off in my assumption?

I don't want to start a fight, i just want you to be respectful and exit the project properly like you seem to be wanting to. But sure, bag them out, not like its going to change anything. You sold your coins but someone bought them too. I encourage you to move on properly and respectfully, thanks. You have been heard.

[ajochems]

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

[casinocoin]

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

Where do you stand on Segwit/UASF ?

I understand we don't have a block size problem etc but it may be good to think about this now instead of in hindsight.

[ajochems]

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

Where do you stand on Segwit/UASF ?

I understand we don't have a block size problem etc but it may be good to think about this now instead of in hindsight.

I am currently also working on some examples on pushing gambling results onto the blockchain, .... kind of adding a 'Proof of Gambling Result' feature. That could potentially increase  the need for an increase in block size in the future so yes i guess we need to consider the possibilities. I guess that Litecoin is a good proof of concept for that and we can look on adding that in the future. On the other hand looking at the diff and getting the blocktime closer to its projected 30 seconds would already give CSC the possibility to process 20x more transactions as BTC.

There is also an other thing that has been on my mind lately, .... the Qt license conditions keep changing and move towards commercial applications more and more. Professionally i already switched to Code::Blocks and wxWidgets because of that and i really started to appreciate that IDE.

So i might consider migrating from Qt to Code::Blocks when i separate the source code into Core, CLI and GUI projects. Currently nobody else does development on the C++ source code but would there be any objections against that?

I guess i then would also create a 'Lite' and 'Pro' version of the GUI Wallet where the lite version would only support basic send/receive/addressbook options and the pro version would include all current features but also more mining and blockchain info, .... kind of adding the insight like search features into the wallet pro version. Because of legal issues we will never add gambling directly into the wallet but if all the above is achieved we could also create a desktop casino application that connects directly to the blockchain quite easily and creating some white label applications might give CSC a real push!

[Marec4]

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

What do You guys think about adding anonymity (privacy of transactions) to CSC? For example to the Pro version. Is it even possible?

[ajochems]

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

What do You guys think about adding anonymity (privacy of transactions) to CSC? For example to the Pro version. Is it even possible?

I think that would push CSC into an 'illegal usage only' direction ..... i think the legal casino business is actually struggling with KYC and AML requirements. That is also the reason of my 'Proof of Gambling Result' comments. If we can show the business that CSC can actually help them solving KYC and AML we have a business case.

[Marec4]

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

What do You guys think about adding anonymity (privacy of transactions) to CSC? For example to the Pro version. Is it even possible?

I think that would push CSC into an 'illegal usage only' direction ..... i think the legal casino business is actually struggling with KYC and AML requirements. That is also the reason of my 'Proof of Gambling Result' comments. If we can show the business that CSC can actually help them solving KYC and AML we have a business case.

Looking it from this perspective then Yes, no anonymity is needed. Thanks for the explanation.

[four3200]

Malta loves blockchain an csc gaming solution is just what they are waiting for...

Sure, Malta is waiting for some incompetent one man band who cannot even launch one product within 2 years.

Any future blockchain gaming payment solution is likely to be based on ETH.  It has all the necessary features, including a sub-minute block time, and it can easily incorporate all the features of the Prypto closed loop system, which never took off.

Face it, CSC is dead.  

I sold my coins to the poster who offered 5 BTC for them a few posts above. The trade went through on Alcurex.  I was subsequently able to sell a further 100k on Cryptopia to some hopeful but misguided bidders.

Already made 20% gains after reinvesting them in Factom and ETH.

You can waste your time waiting for anything to happen in CSC (hint: never) or make money in the ongoing race for which coin will become the next BTC.  

Man you moved onto bigger bubbles, I see massive pain for ETH holders, FCT is not even a block chain.

So that's why I am chiming in CSC is the casino coin, but not in the way you suspect.

CSC needs to become a general promoter of casino projects that have ROI.

It primary function is just being a surviving block chain, that's the main value.

It can build value by being a social or public platform for finding casino projects.

Specifically spinning out tokens.

[ugabuga]

Fantastic !!! There were already CSC moves in the blockchain, in 1969 ... 


Timestamp                                                                   Hash                                                            Amount (CSC)
31st Dec 1969 18:00:00   2fd3b2c314bec0069acc9e5cff32d3357c5b39392497b3e407efc1f77dfe0f1b   + 1000.00000000

[casinocoin]

So i might consider migrating from Qt to Code::Blocks when i separate the source code into Core, CLI and GUI projects. Currently nobody else does development on the C++ source code but would there be any objections against that?

No objections from me, I trust in your development skills and wish I had a better grasp of c++ so I could help you.

Some good news in the altcoin world - https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/03/coinbase-adds-support-for-litecoin/

On a side note as of yesterday I have finished re-integrating roulette (thoroughly upgraded) and poker into the cscgaming platform, next ill be creating the blackjack/baccarat and then the slot machines.

[barbeq]

Man you moved onto bigger bubbles, I see massive pain for ETH holders, FCT is not even a block chain.

One can have divided opinion about ETH, but it is the prime candidate for replacing BTC as the #1 cryptocurrency.  BTC has scaling problems and the BTC community seems unable to overcome them. ETH offers all the necessary features for a future proof blockchain.  ETH can also do everything CSC does.

FCT is of course a blockchain. Perhaps you are confusing blockchain with payment network. Of course nobody knows if FCT will be the global records system of the future, but it has a shot and serious backers. 

So that's why I am chiming in CSC is the casino coin, but not in the way you suspect.

CSC needs to become a general promoter of casino projects that have ROI.

It primary function is just being a surviving block chain, that's the main value.

It can build value by being a social or public platform for finding casino projects.

Specifically spinning out tokens.

Fair points, but I just don't see it happening with CSC. At one point, 2 years ago, CSC would have had a differentiating factor. Now other blockchains provide the same advantages, except perhaps for the brand value.   

[LongAndShort]

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

I think it would be a really good idea to consider moving to POS after updating the codebase to as close to litecoin as possible. Then breaking up the things you wish to put into other projects.

Logically, overall, i believe this to be less of a headache then what you propose. I'm more then willing to be incorrect though.

[ajochems]

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

I think it would be a really good idea to consider moving to POS after updating the codebase to as close to litecoin as possible. Then breaking up the things you wish to put into other projects.

Logically, overall, i believe this to be less of a headache then what you propose. I'm more then willing to be incorrect though.

Yes, changing the diff algorithm is a real headache, ... thats why we haven't touched it yet. It might even not be necessary if hashrate increases but currently its soo hard to determine if the diff is good enough to create a stable blocktime. Anyway, .... PoS is not going to happen, ... we discussed that before and the consensus was that it would dilute too much the current market capital. A stable blockreward of 1 CSC for the next 30 years was preferred .....

[Tarz]

if you think this coin is not going to be any higher in price than it is now, or will never be higher than 1$ , you shouldn't even hold this coin long term.   this coin is for long term holding only.

That's not what I am thinking. You are making a straw man argument and then shoot it down.  What I said is that your stated scenario is not aligned with the document put out by Prypto.

dear things can not be decide whether they are for long time or for short time but only our thinking and work over it makes it so.

We all know what is Prypto and who is behind, don't we? The percentage of chief executives of multitrillion dollar companies on this forum is well over 0.5% and this tells you a lot. You can spot them rapidly if you look at their manner of typing and their posting habits, many if not most of them are lurkers and operate silently but everyone knows they all are part of Prypto.

[edmundduke]

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

I think it would be a really good idea to consider moving to POS after updating the codebase to as close to litecoin as possible. Then breaking up the things you wish to put into other projects.

Logically, overall, i believe this to be less of a headache then what you propose. I'm more then willing to be incorrect though.

Yes, changing the diff algorithm is a real headache, ... thats why we haven't touched it yet. It might even not be necessary if hashrate increases but currently its soo hard to determine if the diff is good enough to create a stable blocktime. Anyway, .... PoS is not going to happen, ... we discussed that before and the consensus was that it would dilute too much the current market capital. A stable blockreward of 1 CSC for the next 30 years was preferred .....

While i do agree that staying on POW might be better. But, wouldnt it also be possible to make the coin POS and still keep the block reward 1 ?

[KickAzzDude]

Does bittrex still do the bribe thing to get coins listed? If so, anyone wanna pitch in to get it listed?

[barbeq]

We all know what is Prypto and who is behind, don't we? The percentage of chief executives of multitrillion dollar companies on this forum is well over 0.5% and this tells you a lot. You can spot them rapidly if you look at their manner of typing and their posting habits, many if not most of them are lurkers and operate silently but everyone knows they all are part of Prypto.

Since you are quoting on a conversation I was part of, please allow me to respond, even though some posters here believe I am not entitled to say anything any more, as I have sold my CSC.

Sadly, you have disqualified yourself slightly from a serious and factual discussion with your comment about "chief executives of multitrillion dollar companies on this forum".  There is currently no company with a $1 trillion value in the entire world, let alone multi-trillion, unless you count SASAC, the entity controlling Chinese state owned assets. The only public company to ever achieve a >1$tr market capitalisation in the past was Petro China in 2007.  Looking at below the $1 trillion mark, we have frontrunners Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft and Saudi Aramco. I doubt that the CEO of any of the aforementioned companies are active on this forum.

I am not sure whether your question "We all know what is Prypto and who is behind, don't we?" is rhetorical, so just in case you really want to know, let me help you out:

• Prypto Holdings Limited (http://prypto.com/) is a company incorporated in the Isle of Man in March 2016 (although the trade name "Prypto" was used before that date). The company has made multiple announcements of forthcoming product and customer launches, none of which came to pass.  The company's website recently went offline for several weeks and was subsequently replaced with a holding page, making yet more "launching soon" announcements
• You can find the main individual behind Prypto easily by looking at this article on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/csc-closed-loop-voucher-system-duncan-cameron.  That individual's LinkedIn page describes them as "Consultant/Self Employed, Available for Contracts that require a Project Manager."

 
From the above, it must be clear to anyone not suffering from self-delusion that Prypto as a company is inactive and the individual behind it is looking for other work.  That is not to say that there may be others who might do something with the CSC blockchain. Nothing is impossible, but it seems very unlikely.

[ajochems]

Does bittrex still do the bribe thing to get coins listed? If so, anyone wanna pitch in to get it listed?

They state that they might add a coin for free but can charge up to 3BTC for investigation of the coin: https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202583854-Submitting-a-Coin-to-Bittrex
If necessary i am willing to be the Enhanced Verified Account member needed to register and i am willing to donate 0.1 BTC towards the good cause ....