bitbd83
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Crypto Enthusiast, BD
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:16:26 PM |
|
Haha, fool yourself bastard. Sole reason for the fork was coin reduction, and they forget to change it? Haha, you believe too much or have to much faith while your bag lost all his value. You FUCKING MORON, @Cryptocobain Silkcoin Maximum POW supply: ~45 million Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 2000000000 * COIN; QUICK - BETTER DELIST IT @ Bryce Weiner @BryceWeiner @CryptoCobain #supercoin is fine. @Poloniex is retarded. #SUPER refuse a bribe or something?
|
|
|
|
Mrjitter
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:18:30 PM |
|
ei dev, i apologize for my incompetence: the total amount of the coins will be around 50 millions... ok, but when? Within a few of days? one month? one year? thanks
After 2 years. Because we have 2 years long PoS plan. that's great, then we will have a low inflation and the price will goes up then more people will join us. until now, not many people realized supercoin has a testnet Anon wallet now. when everybody realize this, the price will sky rocket. total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs... it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) true "total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs...
it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) "read the words of Supercointeam .... not lie , inicially was 150 millions . Poloniex are not a serious business Its still 150 million Unless you want worthless coins because the dev grabs another 100m and dumps them, just keep buying and holding.. And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ?
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:18:38 PM |
|
Abinito is a fucking moron!
|
|
|
|
Vlizzjeffrey
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:18:48 PM |
|
i must say i think i judged to soon, i didnt thought the owner of poloniex would spread fud, but now i think he does....
|
|
|
|
bitrap
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:19:08 PM |
|
Any chance Abinito and fellow FUDsters eat crow? probably not.
|
|
|
|
doch
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:21:53 PM |
|
ei dev, i apologize for my incompetence: the total amount of the coins will be around 50 millions... ok, but when? Within a few of days? one month? one year? thanks
After 2 years. Because we have 2 years long PoS plan. that's great, then we will have a low inflation and the price will goes up then more people will join us. until now, not many people realized supercoin has a testnet Anon wallet now. when everybody realize this, the price will sky rocket. total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs... it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) true "total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs...
it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) "read the words of Supercointeam .... not lie , inicially was 150 millions . Poloniex are not a serious business Its still 150 million Unless you want worthless coins because the dev grabs another 100m and dumps them, just keep buying and holding.. And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ? Sorry if my initial post was unclear, I was just pointing out that a lot of coins have the MAX_MONEY variable set much higher than what the actual maximum number of coins is. That alone is not proof that SUPER (or SC or Cinni or any other coins that works that way) is a scam.
|
|
|
|
MinerBay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:22:30 PM |
|
And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ?
They could sneak in the coins later if they wanted to with a new wallet from what me reading. No reason to have the max higher than it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
Vlizzjeffrey
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:23:18 PM |
|
Abinito, look at the code of other coins, we judged to quik, poloniex was just spreading fud.
guys me and abinito were just trying to prevent people from being scammed, but we misjudged, seems there is nothing wrong at all, poloniex should've looked at other coins's codes first before tweeting fud.
|
|
|
|
doch
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:24:12 PM |
|
And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ?
They could sneak in the coins later if they wanted to with a new wallet from what me reading. No reason to have the max higher than it should be. If the devs were going to do a hard fork that changed the total number of coins to scam people, why would they leave a "hint" that they were going to do it in an earlier version? That's like calling the police and telling them you're going to rob a bank before you do it.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:24:20 PM |
|
Sorry if my initial post was unclear, I was just pointing out that a lot of coins have the MAX_MONEY variable set much higher than what the actual maximum number of coins is. That alone is not proof that SUPER (or SC or Cinni or any other coins that works that way) is a scam.
It also shows that Busoni may not be as methodical in his code checking as he should be.
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:25:26 PM |
|
i must say i think i judged to soon, i didnt thought the owner of poloniex would spread fud, but now i think he does....
moron!
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:26:10 PM |
|
100% agreed. Polo should list supercoin with no transaction fees for a week
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:26:42 PM |
|
100% agreed. Polo should list supercoin with no transaction fees for a week
where the hell have you been maan
|
|
|
|
fireinyourhole
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:27:28 PM |
|
100% agreed. Polo should list supercoin with no transaction fees for a week
You are #1 community member. Weak bagholders are now out. Supercoin dev will come tonight and tear shit up, price going to 10k
|
|
|
|
MinerBay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:27:57 PM |
|
Now all devs know they can sneak in more coins if their max is higher than it should be with a new fork. Besides, why would devs put in max higher than their coin supply? Makes no sense. Please explain
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:28:35 PM |
|
i think we may still see a fall until a official response from super coin dev
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:28:54 PM |
|
100% agreed. Polo should list supercoin with no transaction fees for a week
There is the dumper. They made no mistake at all. Simple code change could unlock the coins. Fool yourself. SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU TROLL
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:30:23 PM |
|
If you want Poloniex add Supercoin again, you can say some kindly here for Support Supercoin.they may make their decision again. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0thank you very much for your Support.
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:30:43 PM |
|
They could sneak in the coins later if they wanted to with a new wallet from what me reading. No reason to have the max higher than it should be.
What you just said is the case with any coin.
|
|
|
|
|