[ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon

[provenceday]

1 ask mintpal add supercoin directly on mintpal

send email to support@mintpal.com

such as


hi

mintpal


Please add Another Anon coin- supercoin directly on mintpal, they have some big volume on bittrex.

if you add it on mintpal, i do believe that's will bring big volume on mintpal.

Because so far only Dark XC and Supercoin has worked mixer and Anon features.

Please add it directly, thanks


Supercoin Ann post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.0

Anon features:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.msg7244842#msg7244842

Big volume on bittrex:  https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-SUPER

Add it Please!

2 Ask biggest Chinese altcoin exchange platform add supercoin on Bter!

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

still works. let's do something good for community.

Send Emails guys, more exchanges can prevent multipool's big dump.

[1713305128]

1713305128

[1713305128]

1713305128

[1713305128]

1713305128

[chedigital]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:

if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:

static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

[doch]

if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin

I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea:

My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.

[jakiman]

we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out

dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online.

he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet.

If the dev is in Asia, it's still early morning there. (6:40am)
He released the anon wallet before going to sleep AFAICS.

He'll soon wake up to this exciting thread I assume.

[provenceday]

Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release

Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features

Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node
XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later.
Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan
Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet.

Dark coin Current total supply   is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$
XC   coin  Current total supply  is 5.5 Million, the Price is  130K Satoshi/0.84$
Vericoin Current total supply    is  26 Million, the Price is   15K Satoshi/0.1$
Supercoin Current total supply is  10 Million, the Price is   3K?/0.018$???

personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin

so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi
if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.

now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi.

so what are we waiting for???.

+1

thank you for your support!

[neilh]

MAX_MONEY in main.h is normal and allows for pos minting?

Okay they maybe forgot to change in the main.h file but the
code below in the bitcoinrpc.cpp busoni posted


Line 99

Super:

Code:

99    if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp#L99

Honor:

Code:

99 if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)

Why change MAX_MONEY and hardcode when it's set
in the main.h file?

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

[Mrjitter]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

   
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 08:20:32 PM
Reply with quote  #1
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote
- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

POLONIEX are retarded , its obvious and clear.

should have waited several confirmations of expert developers before to launch the FUD News

[cyberhacker]

if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin

I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea:

My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.

sense of humor. lol

now POLO are frustrated with all complaints.

they are totally in a big mess.

[Abinito]

Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release

Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features

Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node
XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later.
Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan
Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet.

Dark coin Current total supply   is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$
XC   coin  Current total supply  is 5.5 Million, the Price is  130K Satoshi/0.84$
Vericoin Current total supply    is  26 Million, the Price is   15K Satoshi/0.1$
Supercoin Current total supply is  10 Million, the Price is   3K?/0.018$???

personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin


now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi.

so what are we waiting for???.

+1

thank you for your support!

   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM

diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry

[sussex]

MAX_MONEY in main.h is normal and allows for pos minting?

Okay they maybe forgot to change in the main.h file but the
code below in the bitcoinrpc.cpp busoni posted


Line 99

Super:

Code:

99    if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp#L99

Honor:

Code:

99 if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)

Why change MAX_MONEY and hardcode when it's set
in the main.h file?

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38

Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

This gets better and better. 

[supercoindev]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus

[Abinito]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

   
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 08:20:32 PM
Reply with quote  #1
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote
- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

[Abinito]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus

   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM
diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry

[maryvale]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus

Yes, and also you can set the upper limit to be 10000000000000000000 trillion, but only generate 15 millions, is there a problem there? someone is completely idiot.

If you want to know how many coins will be generated, look at the functions generating them, not the limit. Idiot!

[bitrap]

Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.

[chedigital]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus

+1

Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code.

[cyberhacker]

Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.

JUST IGNORE this moron

[originalchilli]

already bounced back up to 4000 on bittrex, grabbed me some cheap super, thanks!

[provenceday]

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old?

The max coin limits the maximum coin,
but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all.
The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:

- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

[Abinito]

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus

+1

Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code.

   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM
diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry