|
ozzy1926
|
 |
May 28, 2014, 08:51:47 AM |
|
BTW, miner is open sourced an you can inspect code and compile your own version ) Sure everyone can inspect the code and can compile his own version... Because everyone know C++ and linux You are completely wrong, if you think I'm c++ and linux guru. any plan to use upgrade this miner for boostcoin? |
|
|
|
|
lasybear (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 14
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:59:04 AM |
|
BTW, miner is open sourced an you can inspect code and compile your own version ) Sure everyone can inspect the code and can compile his own version... Because everyone know C++ and linux You are completely wrong, if you think I'm c++ and linux guru. any plan to use upgrade this miner for boostcoin? Testing now. Raw preresults: 280x 2.4MH/s, 270x 1.6MH/s |
|
|
|
|
|
saykor
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:24:03 AM |
|
BTW, miner is open sourced an you can inspect code and compile your own version ) Sure everyone can inspect the code and can compile his own version... Because everyone know C++ and linux You are completely wrong, if you think I'm c++ and linux guru. If you understand the source code to know that there not have a virus then you have more knowledge from most users. But you talk as everyone know what you know. |
|
|
|
|
SomeRelax
|
|
May 28, 2014, 10:25:44 AM |
|
it would be great if you share setting for 280x and 7950 on X13 algorithm (boostcoin)
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexillus
|
|
May 28, 2014, 10:29:49 AM |
|
Also for those scanning this miner on virustotal. Go scan the original SGMINER or the original CGMINER and see if it also gets flagged. Your scanning the same program that has been used on several crypto bot nets of course its going to flag on virus scanners.
All I can say is wow. People these days.
As for looking at the source, its pretty obvious most of the time if there is something malicious within the code if you have access to the source not including with all the teach savy people here if it was true to have all the "viruses" that virustotal is saying it is malicious you think something would say something? Yup, generally people are pretty quick with it just like how the 2% one was reversed within a week. Have some common sense now people, please.
|
|
|
|
|
lasybear (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 14
|
|
May 28, 2014, 10:50:24 AM |
|
Sources was updated.
Added x13mod support.
Ask Remember remember the 5th of November or Elun for windows build.
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 28, 2014, 10:51:04 AM
Last edit: May 28, 2014, 11:06:44 AM by Amph |
|
BTW, miner is open sourced an you can inspect code and compile your own version ) Sure everyone can inspect the code and can compile his own version... Because everyone know C++ and linux You are completely wrong, if you think I'm c++ and linux guru. If you understand the source code to know that there not have a virus then you have more knowledge from most users. But you talk as everyone know what you know. actually is very to spot a malicious code, just search for a bitcoin address in it lol or something that search in your roaming to copy your wallet Sources was updated.
Added x13mod support.
Ask Remember remember the 5th of November or Elun for windows build.
not uploaded yet? the one in the op seems the old one ok nevermind, only the source is available btw what you guys use to compile? |
|
|
|
|
Elun
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:14:24 AM |
|
Sources was updated.
Added x13mod support.
Ask Remember remember the 5th of November or Elun for windows build.
Ok. I will try to build it, and say about result as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
|
t00tie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:18:56 AM |
|
Seems that this version is not optimised for HD58** and HD59** series.
I have 4 gpu rig that has 5300Mh/s with regular miner
but with this version instead to get more Mh/s i got just half of that, about 2000 Mh/s.
Changed everything in config file, tried with just a bat file, but no success.
Anyone has a clue ?
drivers v13.2
haven't tried with 14.4 yet, it will make a difference ?
I have this exact same problem. My 5970 runs at 2*1.687Mh/s on the last version in this thread which is locked at I 15. With it my 290 only gets 2.7Mh. When I tried the newer version with unlocked I my 290 increased to 3.4 but the 5970 drops to 2*200Kh, losing me almost 3Mh total. I would really appreciate it if someone could fix this? cards: 7970 flashed to 280X 7950 290 5970 (two gpus) "kernel" : "x11mod",
"expiry" : "30",
"failover-switch-delay" : "10",
"scan-time" : "30",
"queue" : "2",
"intensity" : "15,15,15,15,15",
"worksize" : "128,128,128,128,128",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"thread-concurrency" : "30592,8192,30592,8192,8192",
"gpu-engine" : "1050,1100,1000,830,830",
"gpu-fan" : "85,85,85,85,85",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1400,1500,1200,1200",
"gpu-powertune" : "0,0,0,0,0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000,0.000,1.100,1.040,1.040",
"temp-cutoff" : "96,96,96,96,96",
"temp-overheat" : "95,95,95,95,95",
"temp-target" : "80,80,80,80,80"
|
|
|
|
|
lasybear (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 14
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:27:20 AM |
|
Seems that this version is not optimised for HD58** and HD59** series.
I have 4 gpu rig that has 5300Mh/s with regular miner
but with this version instead to get more Mh/s i got just half of that, about 2000 Mh/s.
Changed everything in config file, tried with just a bat file, but no success.
Anyone has a clue ?
drivers v13.2
haven't tried with 14.4 yet, it will make a difference ?
I have this exact same problem. My 5970 runs at 2*1.687Mh/s on the last version in this thread which is locked at I 15. With it my 290 only gets 2.7Mh. When I tried the newer version with unlocked I my 290 increased to 3.4 but the 5970 drops to 2*200Kh, losing me almost 3Mh total. I would really appreciate it if someone could fix this? cards: 7970 flashed to 280X 7950 290 5970 (two gpus) "kernel" : "x11mod",
"expiry" : "30",
"failover-switch-delay" : "10",
"scan-time" : "30",
"queue" : "2",
"intensity" : "15,15,15,15,15",
"worksize" : "128,128,128,128,128",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"thread-concurrency" : "30592,8192,30592,8192,8192",
"gpu-engine" : "1050,1100,1000,830,830",
"gpu-fan" : "85,85,85,85,85",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1400,1500,1200,1200",
"gpu-powertune" : "0,0,0,0,0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000,0.000,1.100,1.040,1.040",
"temp-cutoff" : "96,96,96,96,96",
"temp-overheat" : "95,95,95,95,95",
"temp-target" : "80,80,80,80,80"
Please try last updated sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
unlock.mk
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:27:41 AM |
|
Seems that this version is not optimised for HD58** and HD59** series.
I have 4 gpu rig that has 5300Mh/s with regular miner
but with this version instead to get more Mh/s i got just half of that, about 2000 Mh/s.
Changed everything in config file, tried with just a bat file, but no success.
Anyone has a clue ?
drivers v13.2
haven't tried with 14.4 yet, it will make a difference ?
Yes, you need to use -k x11mod, not darkcoin as the kernel. i am already using -k x11mod. Is there a solution ? |
|
|
|
|
lasybear (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 14
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:29:19 AM |
|
Seems that this version is not optimised for HD58** and HD59** series.
I have 4 gpu rig that has 5300Mh/s with regular miner
but with this version instead to get more Mh/s i got just half of that, about 2000 Mh/s.
Changed everything in config file, tried with just a bat file, but no success.
Anyone has a clue ?
drivers v13.2
haven't tried with 14.4 yet, it will make a difference ?
Yes, you need to use -k x11mod, not darkcoin as the kernel. i am already using -k x11mod. Is there a solution ? Please try last updated sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
unlock.mk
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:32:44 AM |
|
Please try last updated sources.
Link to latest ? |
|
|
|
|
|
bonosurgut
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:34:49 AM |
|
- Added x13mod (Marucoin, Boostcoin etc) support
where we can download miner with x13 support ? |
|
|
|
|
Elun
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:35:04 AM |
|
Ok. Compiled. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/umdtns7vfvpnca4/X13mod.zipSomeone please test it, and confirm that it works not only on my pc. my conf for R9280X-DC2T-3GD5: "intensity" : "18",
"vector" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "x13mod",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2"
 |
|
|
|
|
tr0ubles0me
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:42:08 AM |
|
Is this new windows binary only for x13, or you compiled the whole master branch and that's now the complete and latest x11mod with added x13 support? Just to make it clear...
|
|
|
|
|
Elun
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:42:39 AM |
|
Is this new windows binary only for x13, or you compiled the whole master branch and that's now the complete and latest x11mod with added x13 support? Just to make it clear...
whole. But i tested it for x13 only. |
|
|
|
|
|
bonosurgut
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:44:55 AM |
|
zlib1.dll missed in x13mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:44:59 AM |
|
Is this new windows binary only for x13, or you compiled the whole master branch and that's now the complete and latest x11mod with added x13 support? Just to make it clear...
whole. But i tested it for x13 only. any .conf for 290? i am only getting 2.7mh/s |
|
|
|
|
Elun
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 11:45:35 AM |
|
zlib1.dll missed in x13mod
Yeah. Sorry for that mistake again. Now it's fixed. Is this new windows binary only for x13, or you compiled the whole master branch and that's now the complete and latest x11mod with added x13 support? Just to make it clear...
whole. But i tested it for x13 only. any .conf for 290? i am only getting 2.7mh/s Sorry, i don't have 290. 5770+R9 280X only. Small farm |
|
|
|
|
|
