nwoolls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 02:19:51 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data?
|
MultiMiner: Any Miner, Any Where, on Any Device | Xgminer: Mine with popular miners on Mac OS X
|
|
|
ScriptProdigy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 02:33:06 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150.
|
|
|
|
nwoolls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 06:47:22 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150. I'm not sure where you get 150 Mh/s from the output of BFGMiner? Your BFGMiner screenshot shows you doing 7 Mh/s. That is also what the API is reporting.
|
MultiMiner: Any Miner, Any Where, on Any Device | Xgminer: Mine with popular miners on Mac OS X
|
|
|
ScriptProdigy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 07:10:52 PM Last edit: September 24, 2014, 07:39:48 PM by ScriptProdigy |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150. I'm not sure where you get 150 Mh/s from the output of BFGMiner? Your BFGMiner screenshot shows you doing 7 Mh/s. That is also what the API is reporting. Figured it out, if I didnt set the chip count it reports the wrong MHS. Was still getting the correct MHS on the pools side. --set zus:chips=128
|
|
|
|
nwoolls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 07:27:06 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150. I'm not sure where you get 150 Mh/s from the output of BFGMiner? Your BFGMiner screenshot shows you doing 7 Mh/s. That is also what the API is reporting. The 0.15GH/s ? That part looks like a bug - your 7 Mh/s of ASICs isn't doing 150 Mh/s unfortunately ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
MultiMiner: Any Miner, Any Where, on Any Device | Xgminer: Mine with popular miners on Mac OS X
|
|
|
ScriptProdigy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 07:41:12 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150. I'm not sure where you get 150 Mh/s from the output of BFGMiner? Your BFGMiner screenshot shows you doing 7 Mh/s. That is also what the API is reporting. The 0.15GH/s ? That part looks like a bug - your 7 Mh/s of ASICs isn't doing 150 Mh/s unfortunately ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Nah ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Figured it out, if I didnt set the chip count it reports the wrong MHS. Was still getting the correct MHS on the pools side. --set zus:chips=128
|
|
|
|
nwoolls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2014, 07:53:14 PM |
|
What specifically do you see is wrong in the API data? The MHS says 7,000. When it should say 150. I'm not sure where you get 150 Mh/s from the output of BFGMiner? Your BFGMiner screenshot shows you doing 7 Mh/s. That is also what the API is reporting. The 0.15GH/s ? That part looks like a bug - your 7 Mh/s of ASICs isn't doing 150 Mh/s unfortunately ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Nah ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Figured it out, if I didnt set the chip count it reports the wrong MHS. Was still getting the correct MHS on the pools side. --set zus:chips=128 Hoo-ha - nice! I only ever had the 6-chip devices, forgot about needing to set the chip count to get accurate estimates.
|
MultiMiner: Any Miner, Any Where, on Any Device | Xgminer: Mine with popular miners on Mac OS X
|
|
|
Racer8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 25, 2014, 01:06:25 PM |
|
Does anyone have an old win32 install zip that supports CPU mining? Everything in the archive has been built without it I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
Racer8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 25, 2014, 01:19:29 PM |
|
Thanks. The last time I built an executable it was 20 years ago :-). I've never built a windows binary before and it looks quite involved! If anyone does have a link or zip I would appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 12:32:39 AM |
|
SO as their been any updates in regards to antminer integration with firrmware or is this now on hold and no longer in coming soon? Would be nice to see a newer version of antminer firmware with bfg integration
|
|
|
|
Ntrain2k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 12:35:08 AM |
|
I have 10 of the original r-boxes and 2 of the new ones. Is there a way to get BFGMiner to run them all together, but set one frequency for the original ones and another for the new ones?
Thanks.
The --set parameter can be used to target specific devices by path or serial number: --set rkm@/some/path:clock=XYZ --set rkm@serial123:clock=ABC If I understand correctly, the R-boxes generally have the same serial number, so this line would only have to be used signally? --set rkm@serial123:clock=ABC Hopefully the new R-boxes will have a different serial. Sorry, kind of new at digging this deep into them. If the devices have the same serial number (IOW manufacturer did not set proper information), you would either need to use the device path instead or use a tool to program a serial number on the device(s). For CP210x-based devices the following tool is relatively painless: http://cp210x-program.sourceforge.netCould I leave my current setup for the frequency on the older r-boxes and then use the serial frequency command on just the 2 new r-boxes? Sure it should work. Sweet. Thank you Sir. How do I find the serial numbers for them?
|
|
|
|
nwoolls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 12:46:10 AM |
|
How do I find the serial numbers for them [ASICs]?
If you run BFGMiner with the -d? parameter it will list mining devices with their driver, path, and serial number. e.g. bfgminer -S all --scrypt -d? [2014-09-26 00:45:11] Started bfgminer 4.8.0-34-g9c71295 [2014-09-26 00:45:14] Devices detected: [2014-09-26 00:45:14] CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller by Silicon Labs (driver=zeusminer; procs=48; serial=0001; path=/dev/ttyUSB3) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller by Silicon Labs (driver=zeusminer; procs=48; serial=0001; path=/dev/ttyUSB1) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] STM32 Virtual COM Port by STMicroelectronics (driver=gridseed; procs=5; serial=8D8513655551; path=/dev/ttyACM1) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] STM32 Virtual COM Port by STMicroelectronics (driver=gridseed; procs=5; serial=8D801F885551; path=/dev/ttyACM0) 4 devices listed
|
MultiMiner: Any Miner, Any Where, on Any Device | Xgminer: Mine with popular miners on Mac OS X
|
|
|
Ntrain2k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 09:41:15 AM |
|
How do I find the serial numbers for them [ASICs]?
If you run BFGMiner with the -d? parameter it will list mining devices with their driver, path, and serial number. e.g. bfgminer -S all --scrypt -d? [2014-09-26 00:45:11] Started bfgminer 4.8.0-34-g9c71295 [2014-09-26 00:45:14] Devices detected: [2014-09-26 00:45:14] CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller by Silicon Labs (driver=zeusminer; procs=48; serial=0001; path=/dev/ttyUSB3) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller by Silicon Labs (driver=zeusminer; procs=48; serial=0001; path=/dev/ttyUSB1) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] STM32 Virtual COM Port by STMicroelectronics (driver=gridseed; procs=5; serial=8D8513655551; path=/dev/ttyACM1) [2014-09-26 00:45:14] STM32 Virtual COM Port by STMicroelectronics (driver=gridseed; procs=5; serial=8D801F885551; path=/dev/ttyACM0) 4 devices listed Thanks!
|
|
|
|
ScriptProdigy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 02:54:32 PM |
|
Any news on implementation of the Antminer S3's? Have quite a few of these that are pretty much useless as of right now for my purposes.
|
|
|
|
Burning
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 07:55:19 PM |
|
Trying to run New R-Box 100 GH/s on BFG Miner 4.8.0 win 32.........it will detect device with .... rockminer:all but I get message RKM0 chip id:11 out of range. any guesses?
The original Rboxes do that too. Does it happen every 5 minutes or so? Is the Chip ID number always the same or does it change to different numbers? They do? I've never seen it... Here is that screenshot I promised. It finally happened while I was sitting in front of it. This is running on Win8/64. http://s30.postimg.org/qk8rv6nyp/BFGsnap_Copy.jpgB
|
|
|
|
Ntrain2k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 08:12:52 PM |
|
Trying to run New R-Box 100 GH/s on BFG Miner 4.8.0 win 32.........it will detect device with .... rockminer:all but I get message RKM0 chip id:11 out of range. any guesses?
The original Rboxes do that too. Does it happen every 5 minutes or so? Is the Chip ID number always the same or does it change to different numbers? They do? I've never seen it... Here is that screenshot I promised. It finally happened while I was sitting in front of it. This is running on Win8/64. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fqk8rv6nyp%2FBFGsnap_Copy.jpg&t=665&c=XlWPQ3eK7JooGw) B I just started using 4.8 yesterday and I've been seeing a ton of those messages. Running 10 of the 32 GH R-Boxes and 2 of the 110 gh ones.
|
|
|
|
Burning
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2014, 08:36:48 PM |
|
Additionally, I came across this message: http://s28.postimg.org/9le3s52ml/BFGtemp_Copy.jpgThere was no way it hit any temp above 42c, yet BFG thought it hit 139. This is the same RBox that gave the "Chip id out of range" messages from the previous post. Any ideas? B
|
|
|
|
zyberguy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 27, 2014, 08:13:09 AM |
|
@nwoolls Could you please update the WR703n firmware to BFGminer4.8. I cannot do it myself, got stuck on the size of the firmware. Thanks
|
|
|
|
pekatete
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 27, 2014, 11:43:42 AM Last edit: September 27, 2014, 12:20:13 PM by pekatete |
|
Thanks. The last time I built an executable it was 20 years ago :-). I've never built a windows binary before and it looks quite involved! If anyone does have a link or zip I would appreciate it. I don't blame you for not wanting to build one as it is one heck of a task. Having spent the better part of Saturday's first half of the evening trying to compile BFGMiner for windows (and having a complete MinGW environment), I made a fresh git download and all goes well until ... make[2]: Entering directory `/home/User/bfgminer' CC bfgminer-miner.o In file included from ./miner.h:43:0, from ./sha2.h:39, from miner.c:68: miner.c: In function 'have_block_height': miner.c:2928:48: error: expected ')' before 'PRIx32' applog(LOG_DEBUG, "Learned that block id %08" PRIx32 " is height %" PRIu32, (u int32_t)be32toh(block_id), blkheight); ^ miner.c: In function 'work_decode': miner.c:3150:82: error: expected ')' before 'PRId64' applog(LOG_WARNING, "Cannot append template-nonce to coinbase on pool %u ( %"PRId64") - you might be wasting hashing!", work->pool->pool_no, (int64_t)ae);
^ miner.c:3161:107: error: expected ')' before 'PRId64' applog((appenderr ? LOG_DEBUG : LOG_WARNING), "Cannot append coinbase sign ature at all on pool %u (%"PRId64")", pool->pool_no, (int64_t)ae);
^ miner.c:3200:66: error: expected ')' before 'PRId64' "Pool %u truncating appended coinbase signature at %"PRId64" bytes: %s(%s)", ^ miner.c:3208:91: error: expected ')' before 'PRId64' applog((appenderr ? LOG_DEBUG : LOG_WARNING), "Error appending coinbase si gnature (%"PRId64")", (int64_t)ae);
^ miner.c: In function 'hashmeter': miner.c:8337:36: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' applog(LOG_DEBUG, "[thread %d: %"PRIu64" hashes, %.1f khash/sec]", ^ make[2]: *** [bfgminer-miner.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/User/bfgminer' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/User/bfgminer' make: *** [all] Error 2 I could go into the code and add the odd bracket et all as the error suggests, but then that could spawn another error .... Now that was from last nite .... and the repository was also downloaded last nite! I am not sure whether the *nix builds are OK, but .... Any insights? EDIT: Like I suspected, after posting I decided to go ahead and edit the errors out, did that, and now .... though some progress, more errors still! make[2]: Entering directory `/home/User/bfgminer' CC bfgminer-miner.o CC bfgminer-deviceapi.o CC bfgminer-util.o In file included from winhacks.h:4:0, from config.h:719, from util.c:16: c:\mingw\include\mstcpip.h:17:5: error: expected identifier or '(' before numeri c constant _WSAIOW(IOC_VENDOR, 4) ^ In file included from deviceapi.h:10:0, from lowl-vcom.h:9, from util.c:60: util.c: In function 'keep_sockalive': util.c:327:46: error: expected expression before ',' token if (unlikely(WSAIoctl(fd, SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS, &vals, sizeof(vals), NULL, 0, &o utputBytes, NULL, NULL))) ^ miner.h:173:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' #define unlikely(expr) (__builtin_expect(!!(expr), 0)) ^ util.c: In function 'json_rpc_call_async': util.c:505:44: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' sprintf(ghashrate, "X-Mining-Hashrate: %"PRIu64, (uint64_t)global_hashrate); ^ In file included from miner.h:43:0, from deviceapi.h:10, from lowl-vcom.h:9, from util.c:60: util.c: In function 'check_coinbase': util.c:2485:44: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' applog(LOG_DEBUG, "Coinbase output: %10"PRIu64" -- %s%s", amount, s, ah ? "* " : ""); ^ logging.h:60:35: note: in definition of macro 'applog' snprintf(tmp42, sizeof(tmp42), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ ^ util.c:2491:77: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' applogr(false, LOG_ERR, "Coinbase check: lopsided total output amount = %"PRI u64", expecting >=%"PRIu64, total, cb_param->total); ^ logging.h:60:35: note: in definition of macro 'applog' snprintf(tmp42, sizeof(tmp42), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ ^ util.c:2491:3: note: in expansion of macro 'applogr' applogr(false, LOG_ERR, "Coinbase check: lopsided total output amount = %"PRI u64", expecting >=%"PRIu64, total, cb_param->total); ^ util.c:2495:74: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' applogr(false, LOG_ERR, "Coinbase check: lopsided target/total = %g(%"PRIu64 "/%"PRIu64"), expecting >=%g", (total ? (double)target / total : (double)0), tar get, total, cb_param->perc); ^ logging.h:60:35: note: in definition of macro 'applog' snprintf(tmp42, sizeof(tmp42), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ ^ util.c:2495:4: note: in expansion of macro 'applogr' applogr(false, LOG_ERR, "Coinbase check: lopsided target/total = %g(%"PRIu64 "/%"PRIu64"), expecting >=%g", (total ? (double)target / total : (double)0), tar get, total, cb_param->perc); ^ util.c:2506:90: error: expected ')' before 'PRIu64' applog(LOG_DEBUG, "Coinbase: (size, pos, addr_count, target, total) = (%lu, % lu, %d, %"PRIu64", %"PRIu64")", (unsigned long)cbsize, (unsigned long)pos, (int) (HASH_COUNT(cb_param->scripts)), target, total);
^ logging.h:60:35: note: in definition of macro 'applog' snprintf(tmp42, sizeof(tmp42), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ ^ make[2]: *** [bfgminer-util.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/User/bfgminer' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/User/bfgminer' make: *** [all] Error 2
|
|
|
|
|