[ANN][PURE][X11] PURECOIN - new Visa card sample

[MineP.it]

PureCoin? What The Fork!?



MineP.it PureCoin Pool

Register now, if you haven't already done so, and prepare your workers start mining!

Stratum connection example:
stratum+tcp://pure.minep.it:3345 -u MinepitUsername.anything -p anything

MinePit Pools

• 0.75% fees across the board
• Rock solid security and stability
• One registration to access all our pools
• Auto payouts every minute (manual payouts too)
• 24/7 on-site chatbox
• Super fast, powerful, scale-able servers
• Unbeatable DDOS protection
• Unique, custom interface and back-end infrastructure
• Super fast compile times - we aim to be one of the first pools running at every launch

Join Now!

[Revelation]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

[Real_Unhooked]

Today i send bounty for all user.
Cryptoaltex stole 70k PureCoin for bounty.

Cryptoaltex - We hand over the coins

I think everyone here missed that the dev is now accusing the exchange of stealing coins that was supposed to be for bounties.  So am I to believe that the dev was going to dump the coins and hand BTC out for bounty?

How can an exchange steal coins? Don't coins have to be sent to them?

[scorpio18]

Coinminers NOMP Pool Hosted in US

Purecoin NOMP Pool

http://coinminers.freemoneyonlines.info:8080/getting_started

Spread the hashes!!


Choose one of the 3 ports and start mining

URL (difficulty 0.001): stratum+tcp://coinminers.freemoneyonlines.info:3109

URL (difficulty vardiff): stratum+tcp://coinminers.freemoneyonlines.info:3103

URL (difficulty 0.01): stratum+tcp://coinminers.freemoneyonlines.info:3158

Username: your Purecoin wallet address
Password: anything


sgminer --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://coinminers.freemoneyonlines.info:3109 -u your Purecoin wallet address -p anything

Payments:
1% fee for the server cost.
Note: Round Earnings are not credited until 60 confirms.Payments every 60 sec after the coins get confirmed.Minimum payment 0.001 PURE

Hi i have been mining for 12 hour now, but i didnt get a payout? Can you check?

In order to get paid we need to find blocks , until now we find just 1 block because we do not have enough miners to find more blocks. Tell me your wallet address by pm to check it.

[Specialkey]

PureCoin? What The Fork!?



MineP.it PureCoin Pool

Register now, if you haven't already done so, and prepare your workers start mining!

Stratum connection example:
stratum+tcp://pure.minep.it:3345 -u MinepitUsername.anything -p anything

MinePit Pools

• 0.75% fees across the board
• Rock solid security and stability
• One registration to access all our pools
• Auto payouts every minute (manual payouts too)
• 24/7 on-site chatbox
• Super fast, powerful, scale-able servers
• Unbeatable DDOS protection
• Unique, custom interface and back-end infrastructure
• Super fast compile times - we aim to be one of the first pools running at every launch

Join Now!

Good Pool. I mined there last night.
Even a very cool dashboard- and design.
Thx.

[chisefu]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

Do it, start your .15% pool, prove us all wrong.

If my pool with 1% fees can't break even with 300mh/s sustained, I really want to see you do it with .15%

Go live the dream, be as transparent as you want, when you're dealing with $25.00 per month.  No matter what you do and how see-through your operation is people will call you a scammer - just like you're doing, and you'll see how just silly you look when you try and live your chinese/indian super accountable pool awesome lifestyle.

[onebtcplace]

We have turned the coin back on using the last config posted. As of this posted we are at block 1452.

If you like to continue to mine at http://www.onebtcplace.com we have also removed the fee from this pool.

URL: stratum+tcp://stratum.onebtcplace.com:3858
URL (Variable difficulty): stratum+tcp://stratum.onebtcplace.com:6858
URL: stratum+tcp://stratum.onebtcplace.com:9858

no need to signup just point your wallet address to any of the above ports and start mining

stratum+tcp://stratum.onebtcplace.com:3858

Doesnt work?

our test miner connected to it. I am not sure why but on these x11 coins you may get a timeout warning once or twice during the connection at the start but then it connects.

We have forked our own branch of NOMP and have made some pretty big improvements that we are putting the final testing on now. This is one of this issues the new code will fix.  

[Revelation]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

Do it, start your .15% pool, prove us all wrong.

Why do you keep arguing with me? What is wrong with having public scrutiny over big pools - are you against it and if yes why?
You are running a small pool, so you should be interested in what I am saying, i.e. make bigger pools to contribute to the coin development and be scrutinized. In that way running a big pool would bear more responsibilities and it would be less lucrative, thus making pool mining more decentralized.

[chisefu]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

Do it, start your .15% pool, prove us all wrong.

Why do you keep arguing with me? What is wrong with having public scrutiny over big pools - are you against it and if yes why?
You are running a small pool, so you should be interested in what I am saying, i.e. make bigger pools to contribute to the coin development and be scrutinized. In that way running a big pool would bear more responsibilities and it would be less lucrative, thus making pool mining more decentralized.

You said you could show us all that a .15% pool could break even or make a profit and that we should all lower our fees.  You're dead wrong on that point.  You would also see that Dedicated is not making a killing at 2%, and the reason they have such a large amount of hash is because they can handle the DDoS attacks most of the time, and the pool operator works hard to keep it that way.  There's nothing malicious going on at Dedicated, he didn't jack and dump the premine, that has been confirmed by this coin's dev and the exchange operator.  They did nothing wrong, they didn't start the fork, there were multiple forks going on because the main node was being DDoS'd.  None of these issues have anything to do with pools or their fees, you don't understand anything about crypto you're just a troll.

You said you could break even or profit with a .15% pool, do it or get out.

[Revelation]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

Do it, start your .15% pool, prove us all wrong.

Why do you keep arguing with me? What is wrong with having public scrutiny over big pools - are you against it and if yes why?
You are running a small pool, so you should be interested in what I am saying, i.e. make bigger pools to contribute to the coin development and be scrutinized. In that way running a big pool would bear more responsibilities and it would be less lucrative, thus making pool mining more decentralized.

You said you could show us all that a .15% pool could break even or make a profit and that we should all lower our fees.  You're dead wrong on that point.  You would also see that Dedicated is not making a killing at 2%, and the reason they have such a large amount of hash is because they can handle the DDoS attacks most of the time, and the pool operator works hard to keep it that way.  There's nothing malicious going on at Dedicated, he didn't jack and dump the premine, that has been confirmed by this coin's dev and the exchange operator.  They did nothing wrong, they didn't start the fork, there were multiple forks going on because the main node was being DDoS'd.  None of these issues have anything to do with pools or their fees, you don't understand anything about crypto you're just a troll.

You said you could break even or profit with a .15% pool, do it or get out.

So you are a pool operator that is barely running a profit and you are arguing about something that doesn't even relate to your pool? That makes you incompetent and there is no reason to argue with you about this anymore.

I am talking with community about making big pools be responsible for further coin development and transparent regarding their fees. What do you guys think?

[chisefu]

I am just saying that if pools are taking 1-2% fees than be transparent what are you doing with your coins and public scrutiny should be the same as is for the dev.
If you don't want public scrutiny lower the fees.

We can't lower the fees, I think you're starting to see why now.  We're already losing money at 1%, it needs to be 1.5% to break even, and 2% for profit.  That's if you're good enough to make it work, which is hard, considering the competition.  Go look at the OP, see all those other pools?

Anyways, go do it, prove us all wrong.  I really want to see your chinese/indian morality raise above and show us all how to stop the ddos and scamming by losing money.

Maybe your pool can't break even, but the pool that is 50% of the network certainly is scooping all the cream and it was the culprit of the problem yesterday. We should require public scrutiny at least from the top pools as they have too much power over the network, make extra profits and don't contribute to coin development. Why should the dev spent his coins on coin development and not the top pool?

Do it, start your .15% pool, prove us all wrong.

Why do you keep arguing with me? What is wrong with having public scrutiny over big pools - are you against it and if yes why?
You are running a small pool, so you should be interested in what I am saying, i.e. make bigger pools to contribute to the coin development and be scrutinized. In that way running a big pool would bear more responsibilities and it would be less lucrative, thus making pool mining more decentralized.

You said you could show us all that a .15% pool could break even or make a profit and that we should all lower our fees.  You're dead wrong on that point.  You would also see that Dedicated is not making a killing at 2%, and the reason they have such a large amount of hash is because they can handle the DDoS attacks most of the time, and the pool operator works hard to keep it that way.  There's nothing malicious going on at Dedicated, he didn't jack and dump the premine, that has been confirmed by this coin's dev and the exchange operator.  They did nothing wrong, they didn't start the fork, there were multiple forks going on because the main node was being DDoS'd.  None of these issues have anything to do with pools or their fees, you don't understand anything about crypto you're just a troll.

You said you could break even or profit with a .15% pool, do it or get out.

So you are a pool operator that is barely running a profit and you are arguing about something that doesn't even relate to your pool? That makes you incompetent and there is no reason to argue with you about this anymore.

I am talking with community about making big pools be responsible for further coin development and transparent regarding their fees. What do you guys think?

You're also saying you could break even with a pool running at .15% fees and you should be accountable for your claims, so prove it.

I don't see how you are attacking Dedicated here, they didn't do anything wrong whatsoever on this coin launch.  They even ate about 15 blocks of forked coins and any profits that came out of this are worth nothing now because it was the dev who tried to dump, not the pools.  You're ranting on and on about something so irrelevant, trying to cling on in a debate you can't win.

[Soul_eater_123]

Any exchange?

I may turn it back on tomorrow depending on what the community wants.  It's currently disabled due to the dev dumping the premine and the different forks.

Arrghhhh- Another premine scam- F+ck.

Thx for information.

Good idea.  You said the dev dumped the entire 250k premine.  So in this case, the premine is no longer a factor.  Purecoin can live on without the fear of anymore dev dump.

Maybe the community wants to take over the development of purecoin?   Any takers?

Follow my logic?


http://dedicatedpool.com
Ryan, dedicatedpool.com support/admin
admin@dedicatedpool.com / IRC on freenode ##dedicatedpool

You are disappointing for someone with such high reputation. You keep pushing for your own interests and in this case your interest (keeping the coin alive) is not what is best for the community - relaunch. With relaunch your pool's current hashrate will be worthless and this is only that matters to you, whatever you say its all about $$$ that you make from fees. I don't even understand what is the reason that your pool (or any other pool) are collecting these fees - you don't do any good for community (in this case you destroyed the coin by your fork), its only about greed and $$$ and you don't give a shit about the coin - you will dump the coins you collect from the fess as soon as they become listed on the bigger exchange.

We have to collect fees because we lose money every month on server fees.  We lose sleep constantly for little to no pay, and get reamed out on forums as 'scammers' when it's most often fly-by-night coin launches that end up hurting people.  

How can you say pool operators do no good for the community when we're usually the folks finding issues and fixing them.  We're the front lines of the crypto scene, dealing with the non-stop DoS attacks and trolling.

The real question here should be: "Why would you shit all over your life just to take shit from pubbies" and that's something I ask myself constantly.

Dedicatedpool with his fees and 50% network hashrate gets 1%+ coins which is sometimes more than what the dev team has and yet they don't support/promote the coin in any way. People talk about dumpers, I think pool operators are the biggest dumpers of any coin. Maybe smaller pools are barely breaking even but dedicatepool certainly is not and yet they behave in a reckless way.
DDoS attacks are because pool operators are fighting for $$$ in fees, no pools - no DDoS.
Do you really think that we will believe that you lose sleep constantly for little to no pay? Yeah right, tell that to someone outside crypto world. People living in the US where outside option for job opportunity is one of the highest in the world are choosing to become pool operators as their day job - it has to be very profitable to run the pool. I would buy your story if pool operators were from developing countries were it is very hard to earn any $$$ and maybe they would work for pennies but this is not true - US/Canadian pools dominate crypto by ripping off the miners and dumping coins in the market.

We all want transparency from dev's premine but why don't we require transparency from pool operators? They can easily dump their coins and everybody is fine with it.

Put your money where your mouth is - go run a pool.  You probably can't, because the technical knowledge required to do it properly instantly makes you eligible to make 40-80k USD / year working a day job, so you wouldn't be running your mouth over 1.6btc a shit coin dev dumped on today's coin.  If you do pull it off, you'll learn very fast that the only money to be made in this niche is when you go through the shit Dedicated did for months and build up a following.  All of which can come crashing down to a DoS attack while you're sleeping, so you need partners.  

Why don't you ask why Multipool was begging for venture capital on some crypto-stock exchange so he could quit his dayjob?  That pool has 26gh/s, so do you really think us guys with 500mh/s are rolling in it?  All you are doing here is showing off your hater skills, on the internet.

All I wanted to say is that running a pool is just a commodity - using open source code, installing it and renting a server is certainty something that doesn't create anything new in the crypto world. Developing a coin is completely different game and yet these pools get the same % as coin developers. If pool operators should earn 40-80k/year as you say than how much should coin developers earn? Multiples of that I guess, and yet whenever there is a premine people scream scam but when pool operators are dumping no one even cares.
To me - scam is when pool operators cause forks, force people to be on their fork, dump the coin etc. Why should these people earn 40-80k/year is beyond my understanding - in developing economies (China/India etc) there are enough knowledgeable people who could do the same job for 10% of that reward and everybody would be better off (less dumping, DDoS etc) apart from current pool operators.

If running a pool takes nothing but some open source code and a rented server, go ahead and do it.  Once you magically show us all how it's done, enjoy making no money.

If I do it, and I am thinking about it, the fees will not be 1 or 2%, but 10% of that, i.e. 0.1 or 0.2% - this should be more than enough to pay for the servers. The problem is that community will not trust my pool, I will have to think how to go around this.

Let me ask you, if a pool doesn't sell their coins how are we supposed to pay our server fees?  It's such a simple question.  You go on about how you want pool operators to be transparent, well that's what the block chain is for.  You've got the exchange owner that outright said it wasn't Dedicated that dumped the premine, but you keep going on about pools.  

1-2% is way more than what is required to pay for the servers. As you said, pool operators who are running pools as their dayjob are making 40-80k/year and we are paying for this. There is no reason to pay for it as setting up a pool is rather simple task (I did setup a couple of private pools for my own rigs). Instead of having N pools being up at launch for every single coin we could have 10N pools randomly being up at launch

You're a total hypocrite yelling for transparency when you create some alt account on this forum and instantly start attacking people with your massive 18 post count.  Who are you to ask for transparency when you somehow come out of nowhere and start discussing how shibecoin was an instamine and dedicated is creating forks, how could an 18 post newbie know this kind of stuff.  You say pool operators bring nothing to the table, look at your past posts and ask what you're doing other than try to be the internet hall pass monitor.

I am not trolling, I am discussing the issues that I currently see with new coins. Transparency is required from the ones that are running the show - devs and pools, however for some reason community is only questioning the dev teams.

I really don't know where you're coming up with this China/India crap like they're somehow morally superior to everyone else at 10% the price.  They're people, just like everyone else, the amount of dumping and ddos'ing would most likely be the same.  I don't know where you come up with this fantasy stuff about pool operators being in on some kind of anti-industry conspiracy.  

China/India offers cheaper labor, the labor for which we (the community) are paying for when we use the pools. The problem is that there is little trust in new pools and pool mining has been centralized in the hands of very few. However, these pools are only providing human labor and nothing more and we are paying for it. Why are we hiring white clerk workers to work at McDonalds?

Regardless, you're a troll, your post history shows that.  You have never said anything positive once in any thread, and you talk about bringing solutions to the table.  The only thing I can see remotely close to a solution is you proposing that we all stop and let people in China/India enlighten us about your dreams of convenient morality.

You are accusing me of trolling without actually trying to understand the problem that pool mining is facing. Multipools are bad, somehow people agree on this, but regular pools are not better.

Revelation give it up.  You were wrong.  The dev is now trying to get back his dumped coins from Cryptoaltex - is this now somehow Dedicated Pool's fault too?  You come across like an obsessed stalker.  You failed with your disinformation now move on.

[Grifftech]

Why are people still mining this? I thought this coin was dead?

[PureDev]

Cryptoaltex stole 70k PURE us, write to them for bounty.

Sorry users

[huynhthuan99]

add bittex?

[Revelation]

Any exchange?

I may turn it back on tomorrow depending on what the community wants.  It's currently disabled due to the dev dumping the premine and the different forks.

Arrghhhh- Another premine scam- F+ck.

Thx for information.

Good idea.  You said the dev dumped the entire 250k premine.  So in this case, the premine is no longer a factor.  Purecoin can live on without the fear of anymore dev dump.

Maybe the community wants to take over the development of purecoin?   Any takers?

Follow my logic?


http://dedicatedpool.com
Ryan, dedicatedpool.com support/admin
admin@dedicatedpool.com / IRC on freenode ##dedicatedpool

You are disappointing for someone with such high reputation. You keep pushing for your own interests and in this case your interest (keeping the coin alive) is not what is best for the community - relaunch. With relaunch your pool's current hashrate will be worthless and this is only that matters to you, whatever you say its all about $$$ that you make from fees. I don't even understand what is the reason that your pool (or any other pool) are collecting these fees - you don't do any good for community (in this case you destroyed the coin by your fork), its only about greed and $$$ and you don't give a shit about the coin - you will dump the coins you collect from the fess as soon as they become listed on the bigger exchange.

We have to collect fees because we lose money every month on server fees.  We lose sleep constantly for little to no pay, and get reamed out on forums as 'scammers' when it's most often fly-by-night coin launches that end up hurting people.  

How can you say pool operators do no good for the community when we're usually the folks finding issues and fixing them.  We're the front lines of the crypto scene, dealing with the non-stop DoS attacks and trolling.

The real question here should be: "Why would you shit all over your life just to take shit from pubbies" and that's something I ask myself constantly.

Dedicatedpool with his fees and 50% network hashrate gets 1%+ coins which is sometimes more than what the dev team has and yet they don't support/promote the coin in any way. People talk about dumpers, I think pool operators are the biggest dumpers of any coin. Maybe smaller pools are barely breaking even but dedicatepool certainly is not and yet they behave in a reckless way.
DDoS attacks are because pool operators are fighting for $$$ in fees, no pools - no DDoS.
Do you really think that we will believe that you lose sleep constantly for little to no pay? Yeah right, tell that to someone outside crypto world. People living in the US where outside option for job opportunity is one of the highest in the world are choosing to become pool operators as their day job - it has to be very profitable to run the pool. I would buy your story if pool operators were from developing countries were it is very hard to earn any $$$ and maybe they would work for pennies but this is not true - US/Canadian pools dominate crypto by ripping off the miners and dumping coins in the market.

We all want transparency from dev's premine but why don't we require transparency from pool operators? They can easily dump their coins and everybody is fine with it.

Put your money where your mouth is - go run a pool.  You probably can't, because the technical knowledge required to do it properly instantly makes you eligible to make 40-80k USD / year working a day job, so you wouldn't be running your mouth over 1.6btc a shit coin dev dumped on today's coin.  If you do pull it off, you'll learn very fast that the only money to be made in this niche is when you go through the shit Dedicated did for months and build up a following.  All of which can come crashing down to a DoS attack while you're sleeping, so you need partners.  

Why don't you ask why Multipool was begging for venture capital on some crypto-stock exchange so he could quit his dayjob?  That pool has 26gh/s, so do you really think us guys with 500mh/s are rolling in it?  All you are doing here is showing off your hater skills, on the internet.

All I wanted to say is that running a pool is just a commodity - using open source code, installing it and renting a server is certainty something that doesn't create anything new in the crypto world. Developing a coin is completely different game and yet these pools get the same % as coin developers. If pool operators should earn 40-80k/year as you say than how much should coin developers earn? Multiples of that I guess, and yet whenever there is a premine people scream scam but when pool operators are dumping no one even cares.
To me - scam is when pool operators cause forks, force people to be on their fork, dump the coin etc. Why should these people earn 40-80k/year is beyond my understanding - in developing economies (China/India etc) there are enough knowledgeable people who could do the same job for 10% of that reward and everybody would be better off (less dumping, DDoS etc) apart from current pool operators.

If running a pool takes nothing but some open source code and a rented server, go ahead and do it.  Once you magically show us all how it's done, enjoy making no money.

If I do it, and I am thinking about it, the fees will not be 1 or 2%, but 10% of that, i.e. 0.1 or 0.2% - this should be more than enough to pay for the servers. The problem is that community will not trust my pool, I will have to think how to go around this.

Let me ask you, if a pool doesn't sell their coins how are we supposed to pay our server fees?  It's such a simple question.  You go on about how you want pool operators to be transparent, well that's what the block chain is for.  You've got the exchange owner that outright said it wasn't Dedicated that dumped the premine, but you keep going on about pools.  

1-2% is way more than what is required to pay for the servers. As you said, pool operators who are running pools as their dayjob are making 40-80k/year and we are paying for this. There is no reason to pay for it as setting up a pool is rather simple task (I did setup a couple of private pools for my own rigs). Instead of having N pools being up at launch for every single coin we could have 10N pools randomly being up at launch

You're a total hypocrite yelling for transparency when you create some alt account on this forum and instantly start attacking people with your massive 18 post count.  Who are you to ask for transparency when you somehow come out of nowhere and start discussing how shibecoin was an instamine and dedicated is creating forks, how could an 18 post newbie know this kind of stuff.  You say pool operators bring nothing to the table, look at your past posts and ask what you're doing other than try to be the internet hall pass monitor.

I am not trolling, I am discussing the issues that I currently see with new coins. Transparency is required from the ones that are running the show - devs and pools, however for some reason community is only questioning the dev teams.

I really don't know where you're coming up with this China/India crap like they're somehow morally superior to everyone else at 10% the price.  They're people, just like everyone else, the amount of dumping and ddos'ing would most likely be the same.  I don't know where you come up with this fantasy stuff about pool operators being in on some kind of anti-industry conspiracy.  

China/India offers cheaper labor, the labor for which we (the community) are paying for when we use the pools. The problem is that there is little trust in new pools and pool mining has been centralized in the hands of very few. However, these pools are only providing human labor and nothing more and we are paying for it. Why are we hiring white clerk workers to work at McDonalds?

Regardless, you're a troll, your post history shows that.  You have never said anything positive once in any thread, and you talk about bringing solutions to the table.  The only thing I can see remotely close to a solution is you proposing that we all stop and let people in China/India enlighten us about your dreams of convenient morality.

You are accusing me of trolling without actually trying to understand the problem that pool mining is facing. Multipools are bad, somehow people agree on this, but regular pools are not better.

Revelation give it up.  You were wrong.  The dev is now trying to get back his dumped coins from Cryptoaltex - is this now somehow Dedicated Pool's fault too?  You come across like an obsessed stalker.  You failed with your disinformation now move on.

I admit, I was apparently wrong that 250k block was mined by dedicatedpool (still I don't understand why does dedicatepool's blocks statistics show that 250k block if it was deleted from the database). I am not defending PureCoin dev, he is shady and apparently a scammer.
However, I am saying that dedicatepool was somewhat responsible for the fork and this was due to greed and pool's business being too lucrative without any responsibility for the coin development. We should require more from the biggest pools!

[w8]

Cryptoaltex stole 70k PURE us, write to them for bounty.

Sorry users

How did anyone steal from you? If it ended up at the exchange, wouldn't that mean your were trying to dump everything?

[PureDev]

Cryptoaltex is scam!

[chisefu]

Any exchange?

I may turn it back on tomorrow depending on what the community wants.  It's currently disabled due to the dev dumping the premine and the different forks.

Arrghhhh- Another premine scam- F+ck.

Thx for information.

Good idea.  You said the dev dumped the entire 250k premine.  So in this case, the premine is no longer a factor.  Purecoin can live on without the fear of anymore dev dump.

Maybe the community wants to take over the development of purecoin?   Any takers?

Follow my logic?


http://dedicatedpool.com
Ryan, dedicatedpool.com support/admin
admin@dedicatedpool.com / IRC on freenode ##dedicatedpool

You are disappointing for someone with such high reputation. You keep pushing for your own interests and in this case your interest (keeping the coin alive) is not what is best for the community - relaunch. With relaunch your pool's current hashrate will be worthless and this is only that matters to you, whatever you say its all about $$$ that you make from fees. I don't even understand what is the reason that your pool (or any other pool) are collecting these fees - you don't do any good for community (in this case you destroyed the coin by your fork), its only about greed and $$$ and you don't give a shit about the coin - you will dump the coins you collect from the fess as soon as they become listed on the bigger exchange.

We have to collect fees because we lose money every month on server fees.  We lose sleep constantly for little to no pay, and get reamed out on forums as 'scammers' when it's most often fly-by-night coin launches that end up hurting people.  

How can you say pool operators do no good for the community when we're usually the folks finding issues and fixing them.  We're the front lines of the crypto scene, dealing with the non-stop DoS attacks and trolling.

The real question here should be: "Why would you shit all over your life just to take shit from pubbies" and that's something I ask myself constantly.

Dedicatedpool with his fees and 50% network hashrate gets 1%+ coins which is sometimes more than what the dev team has and yet they don't support/promote the coin in any way. People talk about dumpers, I think pool operators are the biggest dumpers of any coin. Maybe smaller pools are barely breaking even but dedicatepool certainly is not and yet they behave in a reckless way.
DDoS attacks are because pool operators are fighting for $$$ in fees, no pools - no DDoS.
Do you really think that we will believe that you lose sleep constantly for little to no pay? Yeah right, tell that to someone outside crypto world. People living in the US where outside option for job opportunity is one of the highest in the world are choosing to become pool operators as their day job - it has to be very profitable to run the pool. I would buy your story if pool operators were from developing countries were it is very hard to earn any $$$ and maybe they would work for pennies but this is not true - US/Canadian pools dominate crypto by ripping off the miners and dumping coins in the market.

We all want transparency from dev's premine but why don't we require transparency from pool operators? They can easily dump their coins and everybody is fine with it.

Put your money where your mouth is - go run a pool.  You probably can't, because the technical knowledge required to do it properly instantly makes you eligible to make 40-80k USD / year working a day job, so you wouldn't be running your mouth over 1.6btc a shit coin dev dumped on today's coin.  If you do pull it off, you'll learn very fast that the only money to be made in this niche is when you go through the shit Dedicated did for months and build up a following.  All of which can come crashing down to a DoS attack while you're sleeping, so you need partners.  

Why don't you ask why Multipool was begging for venture capital on some crypto-stock exchange so he could quit his dayjob?  That pool has 26gh/s, so do you really think us guys with 500mh/s are rolling in it?  All you are doing here is showing off your hater skills, on the internet.

All I wanted to say is that running a pool is just a commodity - using open source code, installing it and renting a server is certainty something that doesn't create anything new in the crypto world. Developing a coin is completely different game and yet these pools get the same % as coin developers. If pool operators should earn 40-80k/year as you say than how much should coin developers earn? Multiples of that I guess, and yet whenever there is a premine people scream scam but when pool operators are dumping no one even cares.
To me - scam is when pool operators cause forks, force people to be on their fork, dump the coin etc. Why should these people earn 40-80k/year is beyond my understanding - in developing economies (China/India etc) there are enough knowledgeable people who could do the same job for 10% of that reward and everybody would be better off (less dumping, DDoS etc) apart from current pool operators.

If running a pool takes nothing but some open source code and a rented server, go ahead and do it.  Once you magically show us all how it's done, enjoy making no money.

If I do it, and I am thinking about it, the fees will not be 1 or 2%, but 10% of that, i.e. 0.1 or 0.2% - this should be more than enough to pay for the servers. The problem is that community will not trust my pool, I will have to think how to go around this.

Let me ask you, if a pool doesn't sell their coins how are we supposed to pay our server fees?  It's such a simple question.  You go on about how you want pool operators to be transparent, well that's what the block chain is for.  You've got the exchange owner that outright said it wasn't Dedicated that dumped the premine, but you keep going on about pools.  

1-2% is way more than what is required to pay for the servers. As you said, pool operators who are running pools as their dayjob are making 40-80k/year and we are paying for this. There is no reason to pay for it as setting up a pool is rather simple task (I did setup a couple of private pools for my own rigs). Instead of having N pools being up at launch for every single coin we could have 10N pools randomly being up at launch

You're a total hypocrite yelling for transparency when you create some alt account on this forum and instantly start attacking people with your massive 18 post count.  Who are you to ask for transparency when you somehow come out of nowhere and start discussing how shibecoin was an instamine and dedicated is creating forks, how could an 18 post newbie know this kind of stuff.  You say pool operators bring nothing to the table, look at your past posts and ask what you're doing other than try to be the internet hall pass monitor.

I am not trolling, I am discussing the issues that I currently see with new coins. Transparency is required from the ones that are running the show - devs and pools, however for some reason community is only questioning the dev teams.

I really don't know where you're coming up with this China/India crap like they're somehow morally superior to everyone else at 10% the price.  They're people, just like everyone else, the amount of dumping and ddos'ing would most likely be the same.  I don't know where you come up with this fantasy stuff about pool operators being in on some kind of anti-industry conspiracy.  

China/India offers cheaper labor, the labor for which we (the community) are paying for when we use the pools. The problem is that there is little trust in new pools and pool mining has been centralized in the hands of very few. However, these pools are only providing human labor and nothing more and we are paying for it. Why are we hiring white clerk workers to work at McDonalds?

Regardless, you're a troll, your post history shows that.  You have never said anything positive once in any thread, and you talk about bringing solutions to the table.  The only thing I can see remotely close to a solution is you proposing that we all stop and let people in China/India enlighten us about your dreams of convenient morality.

You are accusing me of trolling without actually trying to understand the problem that pool mining is facing. Multipools are bad, somehow people agree on this, but regular pools are not better.

Revelation give it up.  You were wrong.  The dev is now trying to get back his dumped coins from Cryptoaltex - is this now somehow Dedicated Pool's fault too?  You come across like an obsessed stalker.  You failed with your disinformation now move on.

I admit, I was apparently wrong that 250k block was mined by dedicatedpool (still I don't understand why does dedicatepool's blocks statistics show that 250k block if it was deleted from the database). I am not defending PureCoin dev, he is shady and apparently a scammer.
However, I am saying that dedicatepool was somewhat responsible for the fork and this was due to greed and pool's business being too lucrative without any responsibility for the coin development. We should require more from the biggest pools!

Well you get to be wrong about pretty much everything.  The fork wasn't caused by Dedicated, it was the coin's single node died and multiple forks were created.  There was another fork for hashhot as well, probably 4 forks in total.

So in sum, Dedicated didn't steal the premine, nor did they cause a fork.  All they did was eat about 15 blocks of forked coins and end up with something worth nothing.  Did you see how long Dedicated worked to make nothing off this coin today?  Probably 6-8 hours.  Got DDoS'd for their time as well, but he should probably lower his fees and be more accountable, just to please one alt account on this forum.

[Stenull]

Cryptoaltex is scam!

wow, i'm off this coin.... Time to mine something else!