Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 03:31:32 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 1628 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1483649 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:22:23 PM
 #4481

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.



The Return of the Troll
The Troll Strike Back
The Troll Menace
The Revenge of Troll
...
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:23:03 PM
 #4482

jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:23:29 PM
 #4483

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.



That does appear to be trollbait, please use technical analysis instead of pure ignorance to bring up your points. Then people will likely discuss them instead of calling you out.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:25:27 PM
 #4484

Teka please can you correct the First picture for the official website in page 1, you have forgot a I on OFFICIAL

Thanks
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:25:49 PM
 #4485

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.



Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:28:49 PM
 #4486

Teka please can you correct the First picture for the official website in page 1, you have forgot a I on OFFICIAL

Thanks

Long day, sorry Sad
greyskies
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:31:39 PM
 #4487

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

You are a sad, sad man.
zetent
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:33:37 PM
 #4488

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.



Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

The thing that makes me wary with this statement is that one could potentially abuse this to get good rep, before deciding to steal. How is this avoided?
stealth923
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:35:03 PM
 #4489

So ATCSecure puts out another test for what 1-2 hours, then when no-one responds he proclaims "Yes its secure and anonymous". Get real....

As others have said put out a real reward to the community 5-10btc and leave it for 1 week and see what happens when you attract the attention of people that do real block-chain analysis. Are you confident enough to risk the death of the coin on it at this point? If not then you obviously have more work to do this this space.

ATC you seem like you are rushing through things saying you are wrapping up Rev1 as "there's not much time" - anonymity is NOT A JOKE, it takes time to get right as the number of attack vectors is HUGE - take the time to listen to the community, have in depth technical discussions....people are screaming around you with red flags and you keep pushing forward with business plans, ATMs and VISA cards etc.

jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:39:09 PM
 #4490

That is not what he said, and you are misconstruing what is being said. Try reading the previous pages.

What was pointed out is that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs. That is the most important step, and has been accomplished already before the rest of the project is done. Thus, it is a success. If you feel this is incorrect, there is a bounty to find a string of tx or even 1 that ties to the original.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:42:09 PM
 #4491

tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:43:36 PM
 #4492

So ATCSecure puts out another test for what 1-2 hours, then when no-one responds he proclaims "Yes its secure and anonymous". Get real....

As others have said put out a real reward to the community 5-10btc and leave it for 1 week and see what happens when you attract the attention of people that do real block-chain analysis. Are you confident enough to risk the death of the coin on it at this point? If not then you obviously have more work to do this this space.

ATC you seem like you are rushing through things saying you are wrapping up Rev1 as "there's not much time" - anonymity is NOT A JOKE, it takes time to get right as the number of attack vectors is HUGE - take the time to listen to the community, have in depth technical discussions....people are screaming around you with red flags and you keep pushing forward with business plans, ATMs and VISA cards etc.



Go help your dev he need you for pay hirocoin dev fork your masternode.
Have a nice day !
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:43:43 PM
 #4493

That is not what he said, and you are misconstruing what is being said. Try reading the previous pages.

What was pointed out is that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs. That is the most important step, and has been accomplished already before the rest of the project is done. Thus, it is a success. If you feel this is incorrect, there is a bounty to find a string of tx or even 1 that ties to the original.

Seriously, it is the same 2-3 DRK trolls always posting FUD.  Just go look at how often / positively they comment on the DRK thread.  And then read their XC posts.  Agenda much?  They take everything out of context and jump on any chance they get to display the harshest criticism towards atcsecure.  It's getting old.
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
June 04, 2014, 10:44:52 PM
 #4494

So ATCSecure puts out another test for what 1-2 hours, then when no-one responds he proclaims "Yes its secure and anonymous". Get real....

As others have said put out a real reward to the community 5-10btc and leave it for 1 week and see what happens when you attract the attention of people that do real block-chain analysis. Are you confident enough to risk the death of the coin on it at this point? If not then you obviously have more work to do this this space.

ATC you seem like you are rushing through things saying you are wrapping up Rev1 as "there's not much time" - anonymity is NOT A JOKE, it takes time to get right as the number of attack vectors is HUGE - take the time to listen to the community, have in depth technical discussions....people are screaming around you with red flags and you keep pushing forward with business plans, ATMs and VISA cards etc.



Unless I'm mistaken the idea of a 5-10BTC bounty will probably be implemented in the near future. It's not a matter of ATCSecure rushing through this aspect of development; it's a matter of implementing the coin as specified and then testing it, presumably with brutal thoroughness.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
stealth923
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:45:09 PM
 #4495

That is not what he said, and you are misconstruing what is being said. Try reading the previous pages.

What was pointed out is that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs. That is the most important step, and has been accomplished already before the rest of the project is done. Thus, it is a success. If you feel this is incorrect, there is a bounty to find a string of tx or even 1 that ties to the original.

Are you sure that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs? Thats the dev's opinion based on his code. Has this been THOROUGHLY tested by people who are skilled enough and would have even have heard of XC? - NO it hasnt. They wouldnt waste their time.

Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:46:22 PM
 #4496

That is not what he said, and you are misconstruing what is being said. Try reading the previous pages.

What was pointed out is that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs. That is the most important step, and has been accomplished already before the rest of the project is done. Thus, it is a success. If you feel this is incorrect, there is a bounty to find a string of tx or even 1 that ties to the original.

Are you sure that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs? Thats the dev's opinion based on his code. Has this been THOROUGHLY tested by people who are skilled enough and would have even have heard of XC? - NO it hasnt. They wouldnt waste their time.



Thanks for the feedback, it has been noted.
studio1one
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 500


BintexFutures


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:50:34 PM
 #4497

So ATCSecure puts out another test for what 1-2 hours, then when no-one responds he proclaims "Yes its secure and anonymous". Get real....

As others have said put out a real reward to the community 5-10btc and leave it for 1 week and see what happens when you attract the attention of people that do real block-chain analysis. Are you confident enough to risk the death of the coin on it at this point? If not then you obviously have more work to do this this space.

ATC you seem like you are rushing through things saying you are wrapping up Rev1 as "there's not much time" - anonymity is NOT A JOKE, it takes time to get right as the number of attack vectors is HUGE - take the time to listen to the community, have in depth technical discussions....people are screaming around you with red flags and you keep pushing forward with business plans, ATMs and VISA cards etc.



You have no idea what you are talking about.

You have never been involved in a development project in your life. When you work on a project you have milestones, when a milestone is achieved you move onto the next stage.

Milestone 1 -- obfuscate inputs and outputs. This is done, it doesn't mean the the anno transaction code is finished, it means the first stage is done and finished and the second stage can be moved onto.

No one is suggesting it is not still possible to link transactions. They are suggesting that a direct link between input and output is not possible. This has been queried for days now and no one has been able to.

Sure Chaeplin either recognised the mixer code on the blockchain

or

was able to trace the transactions back through amount and time due to lack of activity on each block

No one denies that. At this stage, for a reason, tx can be traced back to the sender

That reason is not a direct link on the block chain between transactions.

The developer has clearly stated that the current milestone was not uncrackable anonymity but to remove any direct blockchain link between input and output

This has been done.

Now he is moving on to the second stage of further obfuscating the way the mix works, by using multiple paths and varied splits of mix amounts.


You need to quit the trolling and grow a brain. You'll feel better for it.

BINTEX


















Powered by,
policymaker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:51:24 PM
 #4498

To post something that matters, im trying to get some xc to bittrex its painfully slow, been witing more than 30 min. 2/6 conf... is it normal ?

XCurrency Price Speculation Topic
Coin Control Basic guide                                                                XChat address/private/instant/absolute: XSKu1fpwvRcAekfK91qVHi51Tgz4ckoA91
XChat public key: zcfx74j4fFK9hW7rQniTvLyDyXd9SyRCrncP9vdukbVT
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
June 04, 2014, 10:53:32 PM
 #4499


Milestone 1 -- obfuscate inputs and outputs. This is done, it doesn't mean the the anno transaction code is finished, it means the first stage is done and finished and the second stage can be moved onto.

No one is suggesting it is not still possible to link transactions. They are suggesting that a direct link between input and output is not possible. This has been queried for days now and no one has been able to.

Sure Chaeplin either recognised the mixer code on the blockchain

or

was able to trace the transactions back through amount and time due to lack of activity on each block

No one denies that. At this stage, for a reason, tx can be traced back to the sender

That reason is not a direct link on the block chain between transactions.

The developer has clearly stated that the current milestone was not uncrackable anonymity but to remove any direct blockchain link between input and output

This has been done.

Now he is moving on to the second stage of further obfuscating the way the mix works, by using multiple paths and varied splits of mix amounts.



+1. Solid summary. Trolls please make an attempt to avoid misrepresenting it.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 10:55:03 PM
 #4500

That would defeat the purpose of "the troll." Their sole objective is to present a misrepresentation.
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 1628 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!