btcsql
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:48:41 PM |
|
anyone have any success staking in a virtual machine?
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:50:38 PM |
|
anyone have any success staking in a virtual machine?
Why don't you ask Chaeplin. I think he probably has some wallets staking and Xnoding (what do we call multiple Xnodes running?)
|
|
|
|
jibble
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:51:37 PM |
|
anyone have any success staking in a virtual machine?
Why don't you ask Chaeplin. I think he probably has some wallets staking and Xnoding (what do we call multiple Xnodes running?) i vote for a murder of xnodes or a gaggle of xnodes
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:04:36 PM |
|
anyone have any success staking in a virtual machine?
Why don't you ask Chaeplin. I think he probably has some wallets staking and Xnoding (what do we call multiple Xnodes running?) i vote for a murder of xnodes or a gaggle of xnodes An Xnot /'eks/'nɒt/ " aks not" = "ask not" -> "Do not ask what I am doing" pertaining to the elusive and anonymous transfers going through an xnode.
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:09:25 PM |
|
An Xnot /'eks/'nɒt/ "aks not" = "ask not" -> "Do not ask what I am doing" pertaining to the elusive and anonymous transfers going through an xnode.
So if I ran 5 XNodes on 1 device and have 6 devices running I would have 6 XNot running.. Man I really like this "name game" Keep them cumming
|
|
|
|
zetent
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:14:12 PM |
|
I've probably missed it, but I can't seem to find any information on how to:
1. Get xnodes up and running on rev 2. What are the requirements, if any?
2. Requirements for utilising the anonymous transfer. I've tried sending 10XC having ticked the anon transfer checkbox, but all 5 times nothing's happened, and the coins lie still in my original address.
hey did you read the manual ?? : private_transactions_readme_.txt Decentralized Trustless Mixer testing
- Test Release
- Stable for mainnet
- Enable via "Enable Private Transactions" Checkbox (available under coin-control)
- Use a test wallet, You need at least 50 XC's in the testwallet to use this feature [ no more than 100 XC's, don't use your primary wallet]
- if transaction does not go through, no coins are sent and no risk of mixer stealing coins
- transactions are processed over 30 minute windows
- Requires UNPNP or Port Forwarding of TCP:32348 to host running wallet to use this feature until XNodes support DTM codem, then XNodes will receive payments for supporting these transations
- XCurrency.conf requires seed nodes and nothing else [unless you have a special configuration] addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com
- Transactions process within 30minutes
- Transactions can fail, however it is a zero-risk system, you can NOT loose coins, coins either go to destination you specified or stay in the local wallet
- Next UI update will have transaction progress indicator
- use 10 XC"s for sending with release only
grts Yeah okay I read it and I missed a few lines before. But regarding X-nodes, do you still need a 550 reserve balance set up? If so, is it possible to do so in the mac wallet?
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:22:33 PM |
|
Hi folks The how-to for the XC App has been updated (including coin control and private transactions). http://xc-official.com/wallet/P. S. Forget about needing 550XC for now. You don't need it to make private transactions, and for the time being it's still being decided how tx fees will be charged for nodes that forward transactions.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Thrash
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:31:11 PM |
|
anyone have any success staking in a virtual machine?
Yes, I have a virtual machine that is staking just like a normal wallet. Nothing different from what I have seen.
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:13:59 AM |
|
Someone posted a link here to a site that analyses crypto coins and gives them a buy hold or sell rating.It had XC as a buy. Does anyone know that website? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:29:00 AM |
|
Nice to see they adjusted some info!
|
|
|
|
Driv3n
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:39:24 AM |
|
Nice to see they adjusted some info! I think it's pretty damn impressive that they have the value of XC predicted to within 20 cents 8 months from now
|
|
|
|
Tree Fiddy
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:39:40 AM |
|
No one takes that site seriously.
|
ceo 10 μbtc/day
|
|
|
Abrupto
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:45:26 AM |
|
Any serious xcers in the Atlanta area?
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 15, 2014, 12:53:47 AM |
|
I think it's pretty damn impressive that they have the value of XC predicted to within 20 cents 8 months from now I screenshot it with the date (Like I do with most "things"). That is going to be a laugh when I show people my screenshot book
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
July 15, 2014, 01:21:07 AM |
|
I think it's pretty damn impressive that they have the value of XC predicted to within 20 cents 8 months from now I screenshot it with the date (Like I do with most "things"). That is going to be a laugh when I show people my screenshot book that site is wee todd id ... what does it do.. randomly generate a buy and sell rating ? ..what info to they base the buy and sell on? so dumb. .. better sell all your litecoins everyone
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
July 15, 2014, 01:41:09 AM |
|
your first one "supercoin" uses coinjoin to provide anon - coinjoin has been prooven to never truly be able to be anonymous - basically supercoin is built ontop of an already flawed system. your second one "darkcoin" uses masternodes. these are centralized mixers essentially. XC uses Everyone as a mixer, not just centralized nodes. it does this without coinjoin. XC does this using distributed multipath architecture. This means that no single node or masternode is responsible for mixing, and all nodes participate in a trustless way to ensure anonymity. TL:DR - XC is better because it offers technology that is unheard of within any other block chain and provides complete decentralization
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 15, 2014, 01:44:24 AM |
|
your first one "supercoin" uses coinjoin to provide anon - coinjoin has been prooven to never truly be able to be anonymous - basically supercoin is built ontop of an already flawed system. your second one "darkcoin" uses masternodes. these are centralized mixers essentially. XC uses Everyone as a mixer, not just centralized nodes. it does this without coinjoin. XC does this using distributed multipath architecture. This means that no single node or masternode is responsible for mixing, and all nodes participate in a trustless way to ensure anonymity. TL:DR - XC is better because it offers technology that is unheard of within any other block chain and provides complete decentralization Lol that was quick hihi (he already removed all his posts.. n00b)
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
July 15, 2014, 01:55:02 AM |
|
your first one "supercoin" uses coinjoin to provide anon - coinjoin has been prooven to never truly be able to be anonymous - basically supercoin is built ontop of an already flawed system. your second one "darkcoin" uses masternodes. these are centralized mixers essentially. XC uses every wallet automatically as a node, making it completely decentralized. it does this without coinjoin. XC does this using distributed multipath architecture. This means that no single node or masternode is responsible for mixing, and all nodes participate in a trustless way to ensure anonymity. TL:DR - XC is better because it offers technology that is unheard of within any other block chain and provides complete decentralization (edited quote above in bold) And this is precisely why I will be donating a considerable amount of BTC towards XC marketing -- to help ensure that the world knows exactly why they should care about XC & why privacy matters.
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
July 15, 2014, 02:01:52 AM |
|
your first one "supercoin" uses coinjoin to provide anon - coinjoin has been prooven to never truly be able to be anonymous - basically supercoin is built ontop of an already flawed system. your second one "darkcoin" uses masternodes. these are centralized mixers essentially. XC uses every wallet automatically as a node, making it completely decentralized. it does this without coinjoin. XC does this using distributed multipath architecture. This means that no single node or masternode is responsible for mixing, and all nodes participate in a trustless way to ensure anonymity. TL:DR - XC is better because it offers technology that is unheard of within any other block chain and provides complete decentralization (edited quote above in bold) And this is precisely why I will be donating a considerable amount of BTC towards XC marketing -- to help ensure that the world knows exactly why they should care about XC & why privacy matters. Thanks!!! It's good to have you with us from the beginning !!
|
|
|
|
|